Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 06/06/25

1814815817819820

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,093 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    They didn't start by declaring them sub human. It was a staggered descent.

    Is a Muslim ban not along the same lines? What about calling all immigrants rapists and murderers? Do you think that is aimed at increasing people's perceptions of them?

    It is undeniable that the signs are there. You seem to be of the view that nothing should be done until it is already done, and by then it's too late.

    human



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Where I feel your argument falls down is the supposition that oppression by the state would require them to act unlawfully. Even disregarding SCOTUS giving Trump carte blanche immunity, there are many broadly worded laws that would allow them to act, while also violating individuals rights. We have seen this multiple times already. Agents carrying out orders to round up and deport people, without serving warrants or filing charges, and without affording them due process. The law would say that's illegal, Trump says otherwise. Who has the final say? You can claim that the courts can sort it out afterwards, but that does little to help someone trafficked to a torture facility in El Salvador. You're also presuming that the courts will adhere to the law, when we've seen numerous rulings from MAGA aligned judges that upend precedent to facilitate Trump. The Republican Congress has abrogated their duties as a co-equal branch and check on the executive. Robert's court has reached the final stages of his decades long destruction of American democracy, and his only concern seems to be the court's survival, rather than upholding the Constitution.

    You continue to afford the government the benefit of the doubt, when all evidence shows a clear intent to create conditions for an authoritarian state. These events in LA are shaping operations to create the pretext for enacting emergency powers. Project 2025 laid the gameplan out in detail. There are little to no restrictions on the Presidents emergency authorities. He can rule by dictate, which has always been Trump's desire. Where that intersects with the military is what we're seeing now. To begin with, using them as a shield for the illegal actions of ICE and other agencies. We can see that the administration is keen to weaponise Palantir to create the sort of intel fusion used in counter-terrorism operations overseas against US citizens. An emergency is declared, the military are put on the streets. Martial law is enacted, masked goons round up dissidents. This is a well worn path.

    Post edited by AbusesToilets at


  • Subscribers Posts: 43,276 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    third world country



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,013 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    What of the Trump statement that USMC Pers will be put on the ground in LA, they being regular standing military and not Nat Gd Unit pers? One of the numerical figures given for the deployed Nat Gd Pers was that of several [3] hundred only, not two thousand. If the two thousand figure is an actual reality and not just a Trumpism it would allow for rotation, rest and the cooks, Tpt & POL etc needed for a large Nat Gd commitment and no MC commitment, another display of Trumpism to scare the local Pols and state law enforcement agencies.

    One major visible point yesterday was the armaments the Nat Gd were carrying while on the skirmish line, not batons and shields but actual fire-power. There seems to have been a decision [good in my opinion] made to have them used to protect the federal buildings at the centre while LAPD & some other agency [CHP] are deployed in front-line crowd control.

    One thing I would not like to see is the military being used as a political tool by Trump for the promotion of Trumpism. If it came to that, I'd hope to see the new top generals make it clear, via congress, that they were not going to stand by and let Trump use them for political gain within the US, that they would use the US media to officially order the troops to stay in Bks if Trump tried to abuse the national authority power by ordering regular military onto the streets to forcefully coerce the US civilian population into being Trump puppets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,894 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Yes, we'd better. Because you're just unable to understand the point that's being made.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,970 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I agree with you that there seems no need to commit USMC personnel and that the statement of "high alert" is more to political grandstanding than a likelihood of use.

    The "firepower" thing may also simply be a matter of what the troops have. They are not going to issue sidearms to guardsmen without a current pistol qualification. I recognize my old battalion as one of the ones which is on the streets (Washington Guard brigade patch, California has a unit), it's a Stryker unit. The lads are qualified mainly with rifles and it's what's in the vaults, so that's what they will carry.

    Not just a federal thing either. Last time I looked at the CalGuard civil response a SOP (granted a few years ago now, but no reason to think it has changed), it stated that the standard call-out equipment was rifles with bayonets and that any other arming required direct instruction from higher.

    The use of the Guardsmen to protect federal facilities was one of the logical options and is in line with past precedent of federalised Guard support of civilian police operations. I would not be surprised if they also do something like they did at Border Patrol in taking over administrative tasks being done by law enforcement agents which do not actually require law enforcement powers, thus freeing up the agents for work outside the facility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,175 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    In a gameshow type voice... "Here's what you could have won..."

    1000011064.jpg

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 658 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    Even in likes of Turkey one used to assume the military would uphold the secular democracy that their “founding father” Ataturk created

    In US we can’t make such assumptions, the replies from someone representing armed forces above are just damned depressing

    we reached the “so this is how a democracy dies” stage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,170 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Would have been a far more stable and dutiful president without a doubt, but elections are a hearts and minds thing and Kamala didn't have much of a real message, courted vapid celebrity endorsements and thought it fitting to trot out Liz Cheney, of all people, on the campaign trail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,894 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I've never understood this idea that just because someone is “elected” they have the right to do anything they damn well please. You can elect someone on a particular platform and they'll subsequently go off and do the complete opposite of everything they said they would, as we see far too often.

    AFAIC, that should be grounds for a re-election if a pattern develops into someone's tenure.

    With regards to military situations, "I was only following orders" has been around for a long, long, time. It's associated with the Germans, but every military on the planet use/used it. If a soldier is ordered to do something, whether they agree with it or not, they carry out that order. It's rare, very rare, that you would get any personnel refusing to carry out a direct order from a superior. And senior officers carry out the orders of the day as passed down by the leaders of their nation.

    That's the way a military works and has always worked.

    I'm often reminded of the line in Sam Peckinpah's 'Cross of Iron', where Maximilian Schell's character states "I am a soldier and as a soldier I feel it is my duty to subordinate my own ideas to the principles of my country. Right or wrong." Which is a position that can leave one open to abuse, but also acts as an absolution of sorts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    meanwhile back at the ranch


    IMG_1429.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 364 ✭✭BP_RS3813


    His governent isn't exactly the definition of 'functioning'....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,013 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    There may be one thing which could come out of this and that is the cancellation of Trump's desire to combine the US military parade in Washington with his birthday celebrations. The notion of combined military arms marching through Washington DC may be a step too far for concerned politicians in both parties given Trumps use of foot soldiers [as it were] for his own purpose at the Capitol not far from the White House last time around when he had people at his beck and command.

    The excuse that there are too many troop commitments in the other major US cities for the enforcement of law and order is one I'd use where-as in Washington things are all tickety-boo. I'd certainly not want to risk it for a biscuit tossed from his hand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,170 ✭✭✭✭briany




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,175 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Donald is now calling for people in masks to be arrested

    1000011070.jpg

    (Apparently, ICE agents with masks are absolutely fine)

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭EmergencyExit


    Haven't our government here said something similar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,175 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    I don't know. You tell me.

    And if they did, can you tell me if Gardai are strolling around wearing masks, arresting people and deporting them without due process?

    Because that's the context in which I made my comment.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭EmergencyExit




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,847 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    It's even worse than that - It's a bunch of Gravy Seal types dressed up in cos-play outfits without any insignia or identifying marking with facemasks in unmarked vehicles grabbing people off the streets for committing the offence of being brown.

    They aren't arriving to these locations with a list of names on a warrant - They are simply going to places that brown people of all types of immigration and citizenship status are known to frequent and arresting everyone.

    If you are very lucky and happen to have valid id and proof of status on your person you MIGHT avoid being dragged off , but at the very least you are getting zip tied and manhandled by thugs…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,140 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,463 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I'm surprised an innocent bystander (good citizen) hasn't pull a gun on them. If they are unidentified, zero warrant, zero identification etc... they could well be within their rights.

    No wonder riots are breaking out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,013 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It seems Don Jnr has offered his opinion on the LA situation with a tweet including a photo of what he describes as a Korean-American businessman with a rifle on a rooftop during the LA riots with the intent to use the rifle on people on the street, with the witty catchphrase "everyone rioting until the roof starts speaking Korean". Short memory seems to run in the Trump family when it comes to rooftop shooters.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,645 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Trump cancelled 20,000 Anti drone missiles to Ukraine in the last few weeks. How many lives would those have saved?

    Trump is actually fighting Putins battles for him. The sooner both Trump and Putin are six feet under, the sooner the World will be a better place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,868 ✭✭✭JJayoo


    1000059915.png

    Another journalist was shot with a rubber bullet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭yagan


    We're watching a US president goading for a civil war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,894 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Subscribers Posts: 43,276 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    The intentional targeting of journalists is a war crime, straight out of the IDF play book.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,846 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Of course, it's always different when the rioters are on your side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,645 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    That's the second journalist to be shot in 24 hours. Yesterday a Channel 9 reporter from Australia was also shot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,527 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Sending in the military against the civilian population is classic authoritarian regime stuff. I'm surprised more more people aren't joining the dots (though it appears the MAGA half of the population actively 'want' to live in an oppressive authoritarian state, with a dictator as boss and troops on every corner).



Advertisement