Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

1149014911493149514961519

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,004 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The problem for Israel is that they have nowhere to go any more. The greater Israel project beloved by the right wing over there has been thoroughly exposed (although anyone paying attention to middle eastern affairs was already well aware of it) and simply countering everything with hollow cries of "antisemitism" isn't working for them. That ship has sailed and people can't be silenced by calling them names and smearing them. Too many, publicly, politically and in the media, have woken up to the reality of what Israel is and what it is doing to its neighbours.

    This means that the PR machine (and general supporters of Netanyahu) cannot answer any straightforward questions on Israel's conduct because their lies are easily countered, so they can really only obfuscate and stick to inane mantras and catchphrases. They'll just muddy the waters and deny the obvious evidence that's before everyone's eyes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,004 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Yes, he's been accused of "switching sides" as if there's any more sides to this other than right and wrong. Morgan has just decided not to be on the wrong side any more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I saw Morgan in an interview maybe last year with an IDF spokesman - he touched on the whole numbers game and he clearly still (rightly) pushes it because it a simple fact that exposes lies. It's an easy win.

    I thought the same myself - he did cut her off a lot. But I'm guessing he did that because it was very clear that any of her responses were going to be lies. It may have been a better interview if he allowed her to continue and really show up how to toxic the Hasbara really is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I've not seen any major outlets reporting this, yet. But this could seriously undermine some of the more recent talking points (Hamas stealing aid etc.).

    Haaretz

    • Israel is arming a Jihadist group in Gaza affiliated with ISIS to counter Hamas, Israeli opposition lawmaker and former defense minister Avigdor Lieberman told Israel's public broadcaster. He compared the move to Netanyahu's past support for Hamas as a way to weaken the Palestinian Authority.
    • According to Lieberman, "Israel gave assault rifles and small arms to crime families in Gaza on Netanyahu's orders. I doubt it went through the security cabinet. No one can guarantee these weapons won't eventually be turned against Israel." Responding to Lierbman's claims, PM Netanyahu's office said that "Israel is working to defeat Hamas in various ways, on the recommendation of all heads of the security establishment." Later on Thursday, Netanyahu said Israel mobilized Gazan clans opposing Hamas, and asked "what's wrong with that?"
    • A new armed Palestinian militia has expanded its presence in southern Gaza, operating in an area under direct IDF control, according to recent satellite images and online videos. Sources in Gaza claim the group consists of roughly 100 men who operate with the IDF's tacit approval. The IDF declined to comment.
    • The militia is reportedly led by Yasser Abu Shabab, known locally for his involvement in criminal activity and the looting of humanitarian aid late last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭meepins


    Only morally decrepit ghouls consider the state of Israel and its' genocidal campaign as legitimate. Most of western politics is subject to Jewish rule and has no intention of stopping the campaign since they are the ones supplying the weapons and it's only western countries that make it possible in the first place. Any rhetoric from vassal states like the US or UK is about managing optics to maintain some credibility.

    "Hamas care more for an ideology than the lives of Palestinians"

    Hamas are a nationalist movement for the liberation of Palestine. They are the Palestinians and they are fighting an existential war against an openly genocidal evil empire.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭meepins


    I would reiterate they are not a terrorist organisation. I would have held that view in the past when I was completely ignorant of the history. Everything Hamas done in recent times is absolutely legitimate action against an occupying force that is openly genocidal. Killing IDF soldiers that were having a drug rave on occupied territory is legitimate. Taking prisoners of war on occupied territory is legitimate.

    It is Israel that does terror attacks deliberately targeting civilians, civilian infrastructure like hospitals and schools, refugee camps, aid trucks, aid staff, journalists in multiple countries. I consider every action against them legitimate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,672 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    That's absolutely insane. Do the people of Israelml not see that Netanyahu is insane and out of control for a long time. The damage he is doing to their country is immense.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,672 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    That's insane too. Hamas terrorists killed innocent men, women and children in despicable circumstances. They are not POWs either, they are hostages. It doesn't matter a jot where they were living when they were attacked, killed or taken hostage. It was a disgusting attack and very wrong. It has caused untold death and hardship to thousands and thousands of Gazans. Violence breeds violence.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,368 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    That's probably as balanced a view looking from the Palestinian/Gazan side as looking at it from supporting the Israeli side and supporting what theyre at I suppose. Israel have virtually squeezed Gazans into a legitimate entitlement self defense at least. What happened in October 23 wasn't or couldn't be called a legitimate action though. But in fairness to you I admire your upfront calling what you see as legitimate, even though I don't agree with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 937 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    What Hamas did on Oct 7th are the actions of terrorists, as are many of the actions of the IDF btw.

    Hamas targeted thousands of innocent civilians, and killed hundreds, including women and kids. If you are promoting this as somehow justified, you have more in common with the pro IDF crowd in here than anyone else. Just like them I'm sure you have your reasons, and tbh, I'm sure I'll also find them completely illogical and warped as I do many of their points of view.

    If the answer to an argument is legitimising mass killing civilians, that argument is bullsh*t imo. But fire away.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 937 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    And we have finally seen a post supporting Hamas!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,004 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    HAMAS are very much a terrorist organisation and have been recognised as such for decades, even when Israel were propping them up to weaken the Palestinian Authority. What they carried out on October 7th was appalling because they damn well knew what Israel were going to do in the aftermath and they were more than willing to sacrifice ordinary Palestinian lives in the process.

    And HAMAS did not take "prisoners of war", they took civilian hostages.

    Only a twisted individual would try and frame what they did as something legitimate when the reality is that they set in motion a series of events that have made the lives of Gazans demonstrably much worse than they already were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,368 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    2nd time meepins posted it. Same post a few weeks ago I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 937 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Ah really I missed that, I'll take it all back so : )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I can't argue against the principles of this post. The last paragraph is interesting.

    Hamas are designated a terrorist organisation by a number of States. I'm not certain, I'd need to look it up, but there may be a distinction between the "military" wing of Hamas and the "political" wing (e.g. the Hamas -run Gaza Health Authority).

    Certainly, Palestinians need a voice to express their desires, concerns and will. Netanyahu chose to allow funding reach Hamas to divide that voice between the PA and Hamas. If that had been avoided, we'd be in a different place right now.

    But it is true and it has been posted here many times - the IDF and Hamas combatants, in general, are no different. Equally, the Hamas leadership (what's left of it) and current Israeli Govt. are generally no different.

    I try not to get too deep into the politics and focus on the pure inhumanity of the situation. What Hamas did 600 days ago was abhorrent. What Israel has been doing since 1967 is abhorrent but in the last 600 days, they have reached unimaginable levels of destruction and murder not seen for 80 years.

    The Palestinians need a voice - it cannot be Hamas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭meepins


    The Palestinians needs a voice - it cannot be Hamas

    This is an oxymoron. The Palestinians voted and it was for Hamas, who are you or anyone else to prohibit it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭meepins


    Post edited by meepins on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Of course you're entitled to your views but Hamas are a terrorist organisation and what they did on Oct 7th was not legitimate. They killed civilians and took hostages - both are War Crimes and abhorrent.

    I'm not an expert in the laws of war but it might be possible the taking of POWs was legitimate if they were combatants and they were treated as such in accordance with Geneva Conventions. But keeping soldiers as hostages is a War Crime.

    Israel most certainly had (and has) the right to defend itself and maintain its security. As long as that action targets legitimate combatants and their military infrastructure, there can be no argument.

    Of course what Israel has done since is disproportionate retaliation that has resulted in the deaths of many tens of thousands of civilians - a War Crime.

    There is legitimacy for the unavoidable killing of civilians in pursuit of confirmed military targets - but proportionality is key.

    But the latest actions of Israel in withholding aid to Gaza for 11 weeks is totally indiscriminate and affects all inhabitants - by the far the majority being civilians. And a War Crime.

    The sum of all these actions by Israel could constitute Genocide per the UN definition. I believe there are committing genocide, as do many others, but it will be the ICJ that provides the de facto judgement.

    But absolutely not - what Hamas did on Oct 7th was not legitimate. What Israel has done is not legitimate either.

    Neither should be supported in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭meepins


    Hamas targeted thousands of innocent civilians

    I already addressed this claim in the post quoted. Those attending the drug rave were active IDF or reservist IDF and were on occupied land. They were legitimate targets in a war. I wouldn't attribute all their deaths to those brave Hamas soldiers either — I'm sure you are aware of the Hannibal directive and the IDF response of bringing Apache helicopters to the assault which did engage the ground forces.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Directive#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20directive%2C%20once,even%20killing%2C%20the%20abductee%20himself.

    A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used during the 2023 Hamas-led attack



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    They voted for Hamas in 2006. The proportion of the vote in favour of Hamas was about 40% and a majority. Hamas has not held elections since. That is not democratic. The Palestinians have had no choice for 19 years.

    Of course the Palestinians need a voice. Some try and give them a voice but it is futile in the face of a terrorist organisation that refuses to hold elections to give Gazans the opportunity to make a different choice should they wish.

    If there were elections and Gazans voted for Hamas again, so be it. At least it's democratic.

    I wouldn't agree with people voting terrorists into power but it's their choice. Not mine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭meepins


    Israel most certainly had (and has) the right to defend itself and maintain its security.

    You could make that argument if you consider Israel a legitimate country. I don't. That land belongs to the Palestinians and they need to leave.

    Edit: or surrender and accept the jurisdiction of Hamas over the country.

    Post edited by meepins on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    You're going to have to explain that one or retract it.

    None of that is true in my opinion and does not reflect the post or the poster at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Again, you're entitled to your opinions but not your own facts. Israel is a recognised State.

    The issues between Israel and the Palestinians are well known. The solution that allows both of them equality, security and peace is admittedly elusive. But that solution should not require either to give up their land that was given to them (again, that is noted in controversy but the clock cannot turn back).

    I do take offence at your statement that "the Jews need to leave". Not all Israelis are Jews so that could be construed as antisemitism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 937 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Those attending the drug rave were active IDF or reservist IDF and were on occupied land. 

    Any proof for this?

    I found this on, admittedly, Wikipedia.

     It was the Israeli edition (pre-festival event) of Universo Paralello, a psychedelic trance festival started 23 years earlier in BahiaBrazil.

    Doesnt sound like a drug rave for IDF reservists to me, unless Brazil has enough IDF people over there to fund a festival? Sounds like a regular festival to me.

    They were legitimate targets in a war

    Who were? They also killed loads of kids, do you think them legitimate targets? Or are you saying the Hannibal directive only killed kids? Find that v hard to believe, and v convenient for your argument.

    Lastly, the festival was within Israel's borders right - not occupied land. I even think Hamas does not dispute Israel's 1967 borders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,303 ✭✭✭✭mrcheez


    It wouldn't be "temp accommodation" it would be a permanent relocation the same as the permanent refugees in other surrounding countries like Jordan, Syria, Lebanon

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_refugee_camps

    There would be 0 chance of them being allowed to return



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭meepins


    They also killed loads of kids

    I don't know that and neither do you.

    The rest of your post is drivel and I have nothing to add.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭meepins


    Well you're entitled to your opinion yada yada.. but Israel is a terror state and needs to be destroyed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,368 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Israel need to be stopped for sure and made to live within their own borders. But Destroyed? That's pretty much what they feel about Gaza is it not? Given that most accept Hamas as terrorists, All of Israel certainly does, does that mean Israel should be allowed destroy gaza?

    That mindset I'm afraid will only lead to the total destruction of Gaza, more or less what is happening. If the world accepted your stance Gaza and palestine have no chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 937 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Yes, lots of kids were killed that day. Some were kidnapped were they not? Was that legitimate?

    Another cheek of the same arse as the pro IDF crowd on here.

    Your stated aim would lead to a genocide of Israelis (if Hamas has the means), and all you have is a nonsense narrative to back it up - where have we seen that before? At least you are more upfront about it I suppose.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    But I thought that no one on here supports hamas? Here it is for all to see and many more posts besides this. Boards has become a place where people can openly support terrorist groups like hamas, across multiple threads. Its really not a good look



Advertisement