Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning added to OP 10/1/26

17947957977998001582

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭Rosahane




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,048 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    It's an attempt at pure damage control for himself rather than anything to do with the bill. Start to try and separate himself from Trump a bit to slow down the negative impact his association with Trump has had on his companies, and change the media narrative about him regarding his drug use and being punched.

    If he was still part of DOGE and in Trump's inner circle, he'd be praising it at least as a first step towards future cuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,170 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,094 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    While it's been known for decades not that a lot of Senators and Congresspersons never read the finance bills through from start to finish, due to the size of the document, and it's additions, it's good to hear that one voter, Marjorie Taylor Greene admit [full transparency] that after voting for the bill she realised there is a section in it on pages 278/279 that strips rights from the individual states from enacting bills to regulate AI for 10 years and if she'd known, she'd have voted against the bill. More likely that she'd have argues for the deletion of the section in return for her vote.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,048 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I think there was another House GOP member who admitted in a Town Hall that he hadn't read the bill either.

    Edit: Found it

    If anything, I wouldn't be surprised if more of them come out to say the same thing, considering it's going to be deeply unpopular and it's now in the hands of Senators to vote through. "Don't blame me, I only voted it through the House. It was the Senators who had final responsibility for it!"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭bog master


    Hurricanes!

    Picked this up from a comments section,

    Donald wants a hurricane named after him.

    "If Jimmy Carter had Hurricane Carter named after him,
    it's only fair that I get one too!"
    , he whined.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    Musk and Trump falling out was bound to happen. I wish I could have bet money on it. Two strange deluded narcissists who massively over-estimate their own competence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,114 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    I guess it'll be interesting to see where any fallout goes. In the UK there was a somewhat similar dynamic between Dominic Cummings and de Pfeffel 'Boris' Johnson. And when they fell out it got nasty with DC devoting a lot of time to leaking the dirt on Johnson. Which in truth was relatively meagre dirt, - but DC played it quite cleverly by unsourced leaks, getting Johnson to deny on the record, then releasing the actual evidence, then rinsing and repeating.
    For those of us who hated both, it became a 'the enemy of my enemy' situation.

    If the rumours about Trump are true, then there are major stories out there. If anyone has access to them it's Elon Musk.

    Some key differences at the moment though.
    Musk and Trump may not have had a full falling out, Musk's issues may be more with the people around Trump as both still seemed cordial up to last week.
    When DC was sidelined he had nothing to do but wallow in self-pity and dedicate himself to bringing down Johnson. Musk has a business empire to run.
    DC had absolutely nothing to lose and also it appears had no skeletons of his own that he wished to keep secret. Musk won't want to risk the business, and may not want the full force of MAGA, the DOJ and the IRS to descend upon him if he is not squeaky clean himself.

    So potential for lots of fun if they have seriously fallen out, but also might be stalemate situation.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,737 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Mod note:

    I deleted app. 10 off topic posts.

    Back on topic please and thank you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,302 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Uhh… a comments section? I'd like to believe even CFTrump isn't this stupid, but this is America we're talking about so…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,829 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I came here to comment to this effect. The main people I've seen in the media speaking out against this Bill in clips like those referenced here, are all Conservatives. Greene, Mike Flood, Rand Paul, Thomas Massie, Elon Musk.

    It's quite a line up and their comments are not easily dismissed. Can't recall seeing this before where members of the party proposing a bill are the more vocally visible opponents to the bill.

    The likes of Flood, Greene and Musk are putting a not insignificant amount of pressure on Republican Senators.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Marjorie Taylor Greene is now also back-tracking saying that she didn't know that there was a provision in the Bill that blocks State level legislation on AI for 10 years.

    It's almost like they just voted for it because Daddy told them to and not because they thought it was a good thing.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    It's like his recently announced 50% tariff on Steel , it's only on "raw" steel and not on end-products containing steel so it just screws the downstream industries.

    Saw an article today that said for every 1 job in "Steel making" there are 80 jobs in companies that use steel as a raw material and they are now all screwed.

    US Produced steel is way more expensive than imported and now imported Steel is going to cost stupid money.

    The US doesn't have the capacity to make all the steel they need and won't do anytime soon , so all those companies costs have just spiked and it will be significantly cheaper for them to shift production overseas and pay the lower tariff rates on importing the finished Products. Failing that , all their customers will just buy the overseas manufactured end-product because it will be significantly cheaper..

    So massive job losses coming in all those downstream industries..

    Just performative nonsense for the clapping seals..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,701 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    Trump next week: "Elon Musk? Never heard of him".



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Far more likely to try desperately to ignore him and any questions about him..

    Trump is terrified of his money - Musk could just as easily spend a few hundred million destroying the GOP before the mid-terms as he did spending it to get Trump elected..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,356 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    You'd think but he was attacking Bezos a few weeks back and he's equally capable of harming him. Plus Trump can harm Musk too IMHO, Tesla is a meme stock and if Trump turns on Musk that could harm that value.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Perhaps , but Bezos hasn't shown any real interest in doing that one way or the other whereas they have 1st hand experience of the kind of things that Musk can and will do to get someone Elected or otherwise..

    You are right , there's an element of mutually assured destruction there.. but you are dealing with arch narcissists, one of whom is off his face of drugs most of the time if reports are to be believed and the other is a moron..

    So who knows..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,173 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Indeed but Trump has the MAGA cult behind him and could gut Tesla, SpaceX and Musk with the stroke of a pen by putting Tariffs on raw materials that Musk's firms import or just by gutting subsidies. Bezos by contrast is probably smart enough to keep his head down.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,825 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Is this the same Musk who threatened GOP members with funding challengers to their relection campaign if they didn't follow Trump's agenda?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,689 ✭✭✭threeball


    If Trump pulls the governemnt contracts in any of Musks businesses they're screwed, especially Tesla. All of his businesses are only viable once the government contracts keep rolling.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    No doubt Bezos is far "cuter" than Musk..He'll go about getting his way quietly and without fanfair..

    Musk loves the attention though..

    Like you say - They could both do massive damage to each other if they really went for it and if they were logical they'd put down the weapons and agree to disagree , but both of them are massive arseholes with paper thin skins and easily bruised egos , so who knows how it might play out..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,170 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Reuters: US HOUSE REPUBLICAN TAX-CUT AND BUDGET BILL WOULD ADD $2.4 TRILLION TO NATIONAL DEBT, CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ESTIMATES

    I remember reading one guy polled said he voted for Trump because of his "business acumen".

    Well, Trump did bankrupt companies, so I guess if that's what you voted for, mission accomplished!

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Ah yes , but if you listen to Mike Johnson , the CBO was absolutely 100% trustworthy 4 years ago when they said that Bidens various plans would add to the deficit , but they are clueless and full of crap now when they say that Trumps plan will spike the National Debt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,727 ✭✭✭Cody montana




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    No idea - I do know that despite all the carnage of DOGE , the Trump administrations spending is already ~$200B ahead of Biden at the same point in time, so in a full year they are on target to spend an additional ~$750/$800B after they have gutted half the Federal Government..

    Which is quite impressive really , in a weird twisted way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,094 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    AFAIK, Trump posted something to the effect that the senate had until July 4th to debate and decide on how to vote on the bill. He's in talks with John Thune, the GOP senate leader, on the [contents of] bill so they can get it passed by the senate and sent to him for signature. There's some more horse trading to do between Trump and the senate which will [possibly] irritate Musk and d his dislike for pork-barrel deals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,094 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Greene voted for the bill first and then, when she allegedly became aware of the AI clause, regretted her vote. The GOP Senators, like Rand Paul, have until 04 July to read up and find the hidden in plain sight clauses in the bill which cut the legs from under their constituents and states rights before casting their vote [aye or nay] on it. No one will really take seriously any tears and crying of "I didn't know the clause was there" they might make as MTG and Mike Flood have got their regrets in first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,094 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Is Trump stupid enough to vent the anger he has at other untouchables, like the Fed Chairman, on Musk's employees and sink Musk's Co's and all the jobs and revenue because of a passing blip in politics? We know Trump's tantrum-prone but he has to know the employees and the boards and shareholders are canny enough to know who pushed the button and target him in return. Some-one, like Bessent, would have to get to him and advise him to back off from stupidity or face a Wall Street revolt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,170 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    1000010786.jpg

    Soooooo, still haven't fixed the Russia Ukraine war then huh?

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,620 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    More ignominy brought on the US Presidency too (if it can take any more) - now reduced to a kind of gopher role, Trump's mouth delivering Putin's threats against Ukraine second hand.



Advertisement
Advertisement