Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Why do people drive unnecessarily large cars (AKA "SUVS")?

1414244464786

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,866 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i wonder should we summarise this thread? it's got nearly 1,300 posts so it's worth addressing the salient points:

    1: despite them being close to twice as likely to kill a child in a vehicle-on-pedestrian collision, and 44% more likely to kill and adult, SUVs are safe because irish drivers are nice.

    2: consumer choice!

    3: the concept of a private car being too big is simply not conceivable, because of buses. or lorries.

    4: SUVs are good because they give good visibiility (please don't talk about them achieving that by stealing visibility off other road users)

    5: i know someone who has a bad back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,624 ✭✭✭SeanW


    No, I'm asking for specific practical data for Ireland. How often do children die in collision with SUVs where the driver was not to blame but the vehicle size was a secondary factor? Do you have this data as a function of SUV-kilometres driven? Do you even have a definition of SUV? Like I said, the "if" is carrying a lot of weight.

    As for a summary:

    1. The data show that moral panic about road safety is at best overblown.
    2. Data and evidence are irrelevant, especially if they don't suit a moral panic agenda.
    3. Dead children make good props for anti-motorist activists.
    4. Some inanimate objects (e.g. SUVs) are inherently dangerous, but others (like all-purpose single carriageways where there should be safer motorways) are not.
    5. Complaints about the alleged danger of SUVs usually come from anti-motorist activists and are inherently linked to broader anti-motorist positions.

    Did I miss anything?

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭Speedline


    Stop spoofing. Even a quick Google would tell you it's a lightweight sports bike, akin to a Ferrari. It's easily as quick as a Ferrari too. Whatever it is, it's not large and heavy. A cruiser bike would be large and heavy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    How is any of your last paragragh a bad thing? And even if the people wanting both SUV restrictions and the other things are the same, it does not render the SUV are too big for no reason arguement moot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    You can add no.6 to your list: People are just nosy and shouldn't care!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,941 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It's about double the weight of a Yamaha D'elight 125, so that's double the momentum when it is involved in a crash.

    So yes, the size of vehicle chosen has very significant impacts on the damage done in a crash situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,256 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    sometimes when you are in a hole its better to stop digging.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,980 ✭✭✭trout


    deleted post, wrong thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,941 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Thanks for the advice. I'll let you know if that situation arises.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,256 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    With the self awareness you have i expect ill be waiting. i guess we need to compare all car weights to a Citroen Ami or similar as well?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,941 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,149 ✭✭✭creedp


    No it seems the cinquecento is the benchmark us lessor folk are being measured against



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,749 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    If the thread is really spluttering towards the finish line as you both suggest I'd like to add an item to the summary.

    6 (a) IMO it's very unlikely that any poster has been influenced in their choice of vehicle by the discussion.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,866 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i think that's a given. maybe a lurker might come here for some in-depth, level headed reading on the topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,367 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Why do people drive unnecessarily large cars?

    Because they can.

    The data speaks for itself. But unless theres some actual legislation or policy that discourages larger vehicles, and encourages smaller lighter vehicles. They'll grow ever larger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,624 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Except, as we know from Andy's whine about "heavy motorcycles" even getting all cars off the road would not satisfy the activist lobby, because even if nobody drove any car, they could still complain that "this light motorcycle is heavier than some other random light motorcycle."

    And your side still has not presented any practical Irish evidence (only hypothetical, theoretical data) to support these demands for legislation or policy to discourage larger vehicles.

    It's just a different flavour of the same old rubbish from activists who pretend to care about "road safety" but are really just looking for cudgels to club motorists with.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,501 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    This thread has it all. I was particularly bemused by the "Ford Danger" posts - bit like people who refer to Sky TV as $ky or Sly because they think they're too expensive (hint: just don't get it then!)

    The size of the vehicle isn't the issue. It's the competency of the driver. For all the PT fans, look at how many double deck buses roam Dublin's busy streets and suburbs among pedestrians, other vehicles and cyclists without issues. That's driver skill, training and ability.

    Similarly a "big" car or SUV isn't a problem in the hands of a competent driver. It's that latter point that can be the danger, not the former.

    Some people here would want to burn me at the stake reading this thread - big 3L diesel, wide/long (by Irish standards) car (Audi A7) and I have no intention of trading it for an electric hatchback anytime soon. If anything, the next vehicle I buy will probably be one of these:

    image.png

    Audi A8 - another 3L diesel even bigger than my current car!!

    or…

    image.png

    Audi Q7. I'm getting on and SUV's do make more sense when the back starts to give trouble. Still, it also fits the "panzer tank" nonsense I saw earlier in the thread too being a German brand!

    Anyway.. all that and jokes aside, choice is good and it strikes me that most of the arguments against on this thread are based on ideology, good ole Irish envy/begrudgery or just contrarianism. Thankfully people still have the choice to buy whatever (size) car they like - or none at all! - and that's a Very Good Thing.

    The bigger focus should be on driving standards (test times are again getting to ridiculous levels) and councils recognising that cars (even "big cars!") are here to stay for the forseeable and plan accordingly, especially as so many people are being dragged back into offices (unnecessarily in many cases IMO) which is adding to traffic volumes and public transport isn't always a viable alternative for many of these - especially if commuting from a county or two away as many are nowadays!

    Personally though, I can't wait for my next big German Bus to arrive! 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,961 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    You sound like the kind of person I could have pints with 😂 Agree 100% with everything you’ve said above. Yes, we might find a point of disagreement on the third or fourth pint, but you know what, we’d accept that freedom of choice and opinion is ok and we wouldn’t push our ideology on others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,367 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I'm not on a side.

    The data is called physics.

    In a country with major congestion issues it makes no sense to have all that traffic and road space filled with massive one occupant vehicles.

    We should be trying to make things better not worse. Why some people have interest in making things better I have no idea. Only they can explain that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,367 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    There's a different test for a bus. It's also monitored, inspectors, cameras etc.

    You seen to be suggesting introducing the same for larger SUVs.

    There's a lack of enforcement of bad driving regardless of vehicle size.

    Perhaps it's poor driver behaviour that attracts people ire on some vehicles more than others.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,501 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    No, I'm not suggesting a seperate "SUV test" at all! As per my post, we (again!) aren't even testing regular drivers efficiently right now.

    You've hit on my point in your third line though. Bad drivers are bad drivers, regardless of the size of car.

    I was coming around (as in a full 180) a motorway overpass roundabout yesterday and in the left lane beside me was an old woman in a hatchback who went the whole way around in the left lane. That's not just bad driving, that's dangerous for those of us who DO drive in the correct lanes in those scenarios. Nothing to do with the size/type of her car though!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,866 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    The size of the vehicle isn't the issue.

    the data in the report cited multiple times disagrees with you. you are more likely to be killed if an SUV hits you.

    any car will be dangerous with an incompetent driver behind the wheel. but that does not hide the fact that some cars are more dangerous than others.

    re the comment about buses; bus drivers are trained to a higher standard precisely because buses are more dangerous than cars. i just don't understand the logic of saying 'buses and lorries are more dangerous because of their size, but size is irrelevant when it comes to cars'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭mulbot


    But that "some cars are more dangerous than others" argument can't work. Let's pretend it's true, that an X5 is more dangerous than than say a Skoda Octavia, but then same argument can be put, Skoda Octavia is more dangerous than a Golf, a Golf is more dangerous than a VW Up. Where is the line drawn,?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,367 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Statistically older drivers are not a higher % of driving offences. That's whataboutery.

    You implied equivalence with a bus and a SUV. Thus equivalence with licencing.

    You made me wonder is vehicle size a factor in offenses....

    "... frequencies were significantly higher in SUV drivers than in normal passenger car drivers. This “SUV effect” also occurred in women for all violations, although male drivers violated traffic laws more often than female drivers..."

    As for larger cars in general..

    "..When participants believe to be driving a bigger car, this leads to more intense and risky driving behaviour. These results provide initial support for the car cushion hypothesis.."

    Not a lot of data on it. So mostly inconclusive.

    But in general I agree that is down to driver behaviour. Maybe drivers with a history of driving offenses should be restricted in the size and type of vehicle they can drive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,367 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    We have a different license for different vehicles. Maybe that's the way. Also motor Tax etc..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭mulbot




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,149 ✭✭✭creedp


    One of the worst examples of bad driving I've seen recently was from a 'professional' truck diver who overtook a tractor/trailer and 3 cars on a 100kph road as it approached an 80kph speed limit. To make it worse the reduced speed limit related to an upcoming right hand junction for which hatch markings were in place for safety. Very interesting to watch an artic thunder past spewing up dirt and stones from the normally undriven on hatch markings.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,866 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I was coming around (as in a full 180) a motorway overpass roundabout yesterday and in the left lane beside me was an old woman in a hatchback who went the whole way around in the left lane. That's not just bad driving, that's dangerous for those of us who DO drive in the correct lanes in those scenarios. Nothing to do with the size/type of her car though!

    that's a cool story, but it says absolutely nothing about whether SUVs are more dangerous than other cars or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,624 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Again, that "if" is carrying a lot of weight. Three questions come to mind.

    1. Do you have practical Irish data for SUVs? For example, we have all-vehicle fatality statistics, and in this country they're about 3 per billion vehicle-kilometres. Do specific Irish data of this kind for SUVs or just theoretical claims?
    2. Where do you draw the line? If you can't show a line between the vehicles you're waging a holy war against vs the ones you're not (realistically against their drivers) then the question must be considered to be insidious, that the campaign against SUVs is just the thin end of a thickening wedge. Andy proved this point by banging on about one random light motorcycle being heavier than another random light motorcycle.
    3. Does the "inanimate objects are inherently dangerous" argument apply to other things, e.g. main roads that could be upgraded to motorways? The same arguments that could be made about SUVs could more aptly be made about all-purpose single carriageways, indeed much more aptly considering how Ireland's road safety statistics improved dramatically alongside the motorway building programme of the early 2000s.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,928 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Firstly, usage of the term "holy war" is just stupid; really feckin stupid!

    Secondly, a moving vehicle is not an inanimate object no matter how many times you say it!



Advertisement