Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

MEP Kathleen Funchion's ex-partner jailed under Coco’s Law

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 For Petes Sake
    ✭✭✭


    Wouldn't*

    Either way, the point is you haven't a clue as to the background of any of the people in this case, and you used it to have a rant about women's choices.

    These type of characters prey on vulnerabilities. Maybe wonder why men would do something like this instead of pointing the blame (yes, blame) at women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,883 walshb
    ✭✭✭✭


    it easy as to why men, “some” men would fo this. They’re scumbags. Nobody is denying this



  • Posts: 701 [Deleted User]
    ✭✭✭


    There are, but then there are the women who meet men who seem perfectly lovely... and it's a mask.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,883 walshb
    ✭✭✭✭




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,567 Boggles
    ✭✭✭✭


    Sounds to me like she reached out for help at just the right time.

    The behaviour was escalatory.

    Just imagine she consented to a lie detector test, having a third party hook you up to a machine and ask you the most intimate and degrading questions. Absolute bonkers behaviour.

    On the question did he deserve a custodial sentence. The loss of anyone's liberty is an extremely serious thing and should only be used when fully deserved.

    In reality he will probably serve around 10 weeks, whilst not nothing, he will be out to enjoy the summer. I imagine the Judge imposed it more in with the hope of reflection than punishment.

    It seems to be the one court report, picked up from all the papers, which wouldn't be unusual.

    Doesn't say whether he plead guilty?

    Either way it wouldn't be unusual for someone like him to think he is the actual victim in this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,394 randd1
    ✭✭✭


    To be honest, from what I gather from news reports, it seemed like this was going on a while, that she attempted to walk away from him a few times but various threats to hurt her professionally and personally, to alienate her friends and colleagues unless she did what he told her to…

    I don't know what most people think of that, but I'd imagine that if someone was doing that for a long time, and he was, then that someone is a piece of sh!t. I don't see a problem with a fella like this doing time either if it's warranted. He's clearly little more than a nasty bully, and saw someone he could take his paranoia and nastiness out on, and did. Threatening to release material on her if she didn't what he wanted, wanting lie detector tests. He's clearly a psycho.

    Personally though, because it was non-violent, I'd have preferred a 10 year suspended sentence so he very much behaves for the next decade, use the jail cell for a scumbag who physically assaults. Use the threat of jail to make him behave for a long time.

    As for Ms Funchion, well I've never lived my life under the boot of someone threatening to destroy my relationships with my family, work colleagues and friends, who insisted I take a lie detector test to ease their paranoia, and in doing all that threatened my own sanity and ability to care for my children based on their own nastiness.

    I simply don't know what that's like so I can't judge her on not coming forward sooner, but I know damn well I would struggle to handle someone wanting to destroy my life and thinking they actually could, and mostly the fear being what would happen to the people I care about, particularly my children.

    I can imagine for a long time the thinking from her was just to acquiesce to keep the peace so he doesn't hurt her or others she cares about. She was obviously terrified. That's no way to live, or rather no way to live being forced upon you, but fear is a powerful method of control, and quite clearly he did that to her.

    Fair play to her for over-coming her fear and standing up for herself in the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 752 gigantic09
    ✭✭✭


    The media attention this got hopefully encourages more people to report this sort of behaviour and can prevent potential tragedies such as what happened poor Elaine o hara .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 StormForce13
    ✭✭✭


    Something that has got absolutely nothing to do with this thread, but a decision that I still find utterly jaw-dropping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,901 donaghs
    ✭✭✭


    I would say its relevant to this thread. We see so many people avoid jail for violent offenses, and while (with the facts we know so far), this guys behavior seems extremely unpleasant, it does seem surprising he was jailed for it -when so many other more dangerous people go free.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,860 eightieschewbaccy
    ✭✭✭


    I would say he shows all the signs of somebody that could escalate into violence. Regardless, constant psychological harm is incredibly damaging to a person and he's very much so at risk of reoffending so some jail time might put him off doing it again.



  • Advertisement

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Advertisement