Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1147148150152153162

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,311 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Patrick Murphy and Martha Kelly were his grandparents involved in the rising. Great stock for an Irish patriot.

    Do I really need to explain what good stock means? Yeah I'm not arsed, everyone knows that term and you probably do too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    Meanwhile, the government that got voted in democratically are risking causing huge protests from the 'vast majority' who won't be happy with these reforms.

    •Three months deadline for processing applications.

    •Use of hearings restricted.

    •Deportations without requiring the permission of the minister.

    The overall effect will be that asylum seekers whose applications are denied will find it much harder to contest the decision.

    A real headscratcher that the recently elected government is going down this path, they are surely going to lose a huge amount of votes given that the 'vast majority' see no issues with immigration, right?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The elected government of the day I guess is best placed to distinguish between genuine concerns and the politics of hate.

    Recent noises from government would suggest that perhaps they do think there are genuine concerns about the ability to sustain the recent high levels of immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Good to see some actual concrete measures from O’Callaghan and some honesty from government.
    They’ve abandoned the facile excuse that these are mostly people fleeing war and persecution - the cynical, false, and emotionally manipulative excuse still trotted out here by the defenders of the system up to now.

    Free admission now that the vast majority (80%) of applicants are not genuine and are chancing their arms, using the Asylum system to circumvent our visa restrictions.

    Glad to see it. This will take pressure off the already strained system and free up resources for those that are genuinely in need of our help.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Asylum claims and Direct Provision have long been criticised by the left, and you'll find that's where the opprobrium emanated from. Much better for asylum seekers to have their cases heard quickly, and this will be applauded on the left who've been requesting it for two decades.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,311 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Surely they'll re-evaluate previous asylum cases if they're questioning 80% of them? It's no joking matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    I think the focus on asylum seekers misses the bigger, more uncomfortable point, which is that there continues to be far too much legal immigration into Ireland. Undoubtedly immigration has many benefits, but much of it is countered by significant problems when a country has so much of it. Thousands are paying part of the price in their rent each month.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Yeah it’s a shame it’s taken this long and billions in tax payer funds spent on mostly non genuine applicants for the last couple of years - but refreshing to see the government being honest with the populace now and taking responsibility that they had things wrong.

    The reforms look to promise a much more reasonable and functional system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,317 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The thing is though that most people in the country are probably fine with these reforms and stricter enforcement of the asylum rules. Not sure there were that many defenders of the system being abused or taken advantage of by people who are not real refugees at all. It seems to be accepted by most that the asylum and direct provision system was a total mess and not functioning properly or efficiently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,883 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    Pickingrandomnumbersoutofmyhole.com

    Sorry A ,got tired of the numbers game bickering.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,547 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    What has changed since the last government - the greens are out and we have a justice minister who at least thus far seems capable of doing the job.

    Just goes to show how absolutely useless McEntee actually was/is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    I think you are having a laugh to suggest that everyone has been on the same page re the state of the asylum system all along.

    There was an enormous thread with thousands of posts on it, dismissing lots of the criticism of the system as far right/racist/dogwhistling/whathaveyou discussion.

    Many people on that (and this) thread were NOT accepting of the idea that most of the applicants were not genuine, and that this was largely a huge waste of taxpayer resources on chancers.

    Fair enough if you’re in agreement with that now, refreshing for people to be able to change their minds about things.

    “But we’ve ALWAYS been at War with East Asia” lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,317 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I think the only major disagreement would have been on the numbers of asylum seekers who were genuine versus the numbers who were bogus. I don't recall many people saying that migrants who are not actual refugees should be granted asylum. Also, the idea of people being left in direct provision for years was and is clearly an utter mess and should not have been happening.

    Should be noted too that most of this has happened fairly recently. In 2021, the country was still under lockdown - asylum claims only started to rise dramatically from 2022 onward. It's not as if Ireland has been grappling with the asylum issue for years or a full decade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 743 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    Economist Dan O’Brien has coined an interesting phrase here “Demand Denialism” from certain quarters in Ireland, who deny the very basic common sense notion that adding hundreds of thousands of people to a population is going to cause a massive strain on an already strained housing situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    You can thank the left for demanding these reforms for two decades. Keeping people in DP interminably and unnecessary delays on cases were long overdue a change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    It's crazy. You can still argue in favour of the current levels of immigration if you want, but claiming it has not led to higher accommodation costs really is just silly. You should be wary of anyone peddling that argument.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 743 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    Yeah, the only difference is “the left” would scrap the DP system and just give them citizenship and a modular home on arrival as an alternative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Yeah it’s great, brilliant to see reform coming at long last.

    I also thank Minister O’Callaghan for showing a bit of backbone and acknowledging the truth that most of the entrants to the system were not genuine and that we can’t keep wasting billions of euro on it.
    The disingenuous obfuscation from some parts in their attempts to disguise this reality has been fairly exhausting for the last three years.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,621 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 743 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    It was more than 5k. Anyone saying it was 5k or less is just as delusional as people saying it was 50k. Probably closer to 10-12k.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,621 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I wrote a big long reply about my own ancestors making me “great stock”, but realised it was an anecdote.

    I’ll say this instead. Not a single leader of the 1916 rising would agree with these idiots.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Yeah absolutely, I think most of the denial was around that authenticity piece and the questions around willing destruction of passports etc.
    I agree I don’t think people were ever really saying that migrants who were not actual refugees should be granted asylum - though I do think many were quite permissive and complacent about the glaring lack of rigour that was evident in our system.

    Agree it’s a recent issue, stemming from about 2022 onwards - unfortunately we’ve seen other countries that went much further down a similar path. We had the awareness and warnings regarding this, so it was quite frustrating to see us make those same mistakes that were clear to see. Particularly when other countries like Denmark copped on much sooner and we could’ve done the same, but instead erroneously ploughed on with the misapprehension that we were somehow going to achieve a different outcome from every other country experiencing this.


    Very frustrating and an opportunity cost of huge amounts of taxpayer funds that could have been spent on other things that would actually benefit the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 743 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    How are you so sure of that?

    If they could see Ireland today, they’d be spinning in their graves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 628 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    Due to this governments immigration policy of allowing unvetted economic migrants into the country they have made housing prices unaffordable for people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Yep, definitely scrap the DP system and give people temporary accommodation whilst awaiting decisions. Not difficult.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,045 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    I don't think that's true, legal migration to fill our skills shortfall is crippling our housing sector



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Have a word with the national broadcaster then. They don't guess their figures but use the authorities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,311 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Demand Denialism is very prevalent in this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,142 ✭✭✭mrslancaster



    ….”Is Steenson an Irish family name. It's not one I would associate with this island historically”….

    FYI. The surname Steenson appears in every census from 1831 to 1911 and also in Griffiths valuation so I’d say that family name has been around for a while. It was more prolific in northern counties but why would that be a problem?


    Never heard the speaker in clip #4449 before, I know nothing about him or his background, or whether he was elected to local or national government. I have seen him mentioned on this thread but never cared to research him or his politics tbh. His speech at a protest march holds as much sway with me as the posts from people who can’t seem to do basic arithmetic, but they are all equally entitled to their viewpoint.

    The facts are the facts, we have spent billions of tax-money on refugees and the huge increase in immigration has put pressure on every service from housing, hospitals, education etc. It is not a fantasy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 743 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    I suppose you wouldn’t have a limit on any numbers coming. House the world is your policy. Unrealistic and dangerous mentality.



Advertisement