Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1144145147149150163

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,995 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    People on both sides of this need to be careful.

    They are both vulnerable to ending up defending the indefensible or talking nonsense. Right wingers must not accept the likes of McGregor or fcking Putin, a mass murdering war criminal, as people who are worth listening to.

    Likewise people on the left need to be responsible and not drift into nonsense like saying there's no problem because the population is lower than it was pre-Famine, or that St Patrick was an undocumented male immigrant.

    All of this increases division and makes sensible policy less likely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,199 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Well no, even if you don't view the current rapidly growing population due to migration as an aberration, the fact remains that it is a result of government policy and therefore something that can be changed if it is to our advantage to do so.

    If for example, we need to prioritise the availability of housing, then it still makes sense to control inward migration if we can't build fast enough to house the population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,888 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    It's not controversial at all , just incorrect .

    We had more housing than we could live in up to the crash . Numerous second homes and ghost estates .

    Immigration up to that period was not affecting supply .

    Supply has been squeezed here in the last 10 years . Down to lack of building and particularly social housing . Government relying on private developers to supply social housing gas squeezed out middle earners from the market .

    Migration as shown in your second linked post is on a direct continuum with firstly membership of the EU , enlargement of the EU our growing economy and wars in Europe.

    (Please note it conflates migration with those seeking asylum which is a more recent growing phenomena .)

    Most of this migration has been directly beneficial to our growth as a successful open economy and as a society.

    One only has to look at the years you are pointing out to see the vast improvements in our country over those 50 years.

    I grew up in the 1970s . Ireland was insular and poor . It is a much better country to live in now albeit with issues that need work as every country has.

    Socially as well as economically .

    I generally agree with your posts as you appear to be more towards the centre here than others but not on this .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,634 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    The last national poll was the general election. What did that say?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,457 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


     exacerbated by low levels of construction during the recession. Immigration is the cause, the lack of construction is the exacerbating factor.

    We were overstocked on homes during the recession to the point we were bulldozing housing estates.

    You could actually buy an almost complete 60+ housing estate for less than 700K.

    The lack of building on homes now is a direct result of the lunacy that led to that.

    Even so 10s of 1000s of migrants currently work in our construction sector, we would be even more proper fecked without them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Yep, national discontent over health and housing. No fuss over immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,995 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    This is reductionist again, while elements are just wrong. Property prices did increase very substantially during the Celtic Tiger, partly due to very loose credit post 2000, but in the late 90s prices had shot up also as large scale immigration arrived for the first time in living memory. Housing became far more expensive, renting property in cities was far more difficult than it had been for generations. There is no counterargument to this.

    Also, you have utterly neglected the long term aspect. There are many, many adults living in Ireland now whose parents did not grow up here. Ireland hadn't a wave of immigration like that for centuries and its impact is being felt now.

    You can still argue that the correct immigration policies have been followed, but it's frankly bizarre to claim that Ireland's housing crisis isn't due to immigration. It's very hard to believe that people who won't accept that aren't ideologically motivated.

    Btw I've no disdain for immigrants, I was one myself for years. The housing crisis is in no way the fault of immigrants. IMO it'd be stupid and probably xenophobic to claim it is. It is however the fault of a flawed laissez faire approach of successive Irish governments to the issue of immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,150 ✭✭✭Damien360


    What a ridiculous statement. So you will deny the protest is significant until a percent that you deem matters is to your liking ? So let's wait until 99% of the country turns up.

    I didn't go because I reckoned there might be trouble. I was wrong and am going to the next one when it comes. I wonder how many others thought similarly about trouble.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,659 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    A few thousand people with nothing better to do than fawning over two rapists and the 21st century's best version of Hitler aren't representative of anything. If they were representative, the far right would have more than zero seats in the Dáil. Anti-Brexit marches in London consistently hit over one million people. That's significant.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Not even that. 5k out of a population of 5,308,039 in the Republic is 0.09%. That doesn't take into account any marchers from Northern Ireland or Britain when would thus dilute the percentage further.

    You've been very generous to describe the crowd as 'paltry.'



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,587 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    So the protest isn't worrying any longer then?

    Ultimately people aren't up in arms because they're racists, it's because an increasing number of people are being pitted against new arrivals for dwindling resources.

    It's going to be a hard sell for the left wing parties in Ireland to scream blue murder about the housing crisis whilst at the same time encouraging increasing inward migration of low skilled asylum seekers. Try and explaining that to would be voters, particularly young people who will never own a home or have any sort of quality of life.

    These are the supposed opposition in Irish politics, yet they side with the government on the most divisive issue in the country.

    If Ireland was flush with resources, particularly housing, you wouldn't have had a fraction of that number of people protesting at the weekend. This is becoming existential issue for a growing number of people, it's like a whirlpool slowly growing and pulling more people towards it and it's all caused by the housing crisis.

    Glazers Out!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,659 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Exactly. The anti-Brexit protests were consistently over a million and given that the UK's population is almost 70 million, it's not far off 2% of the entire population coming from all parts of the country. Like the rabble on the streets of Dublin, those protests changed nothing. The only poll that matters is the one with the ballot box.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Ahem. On one side there are people supporting a rapist (McGregor) and a mass-murdering war criminal (Putin).

    On the other there are people pointing out that St. Patrick misplaced his passport and was an unvetted male when he was stolen from Wales.

    False equivalence perchance?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Well how about more than 0.09% of the population? Try that for starters. Almost filling a small League of Ireland stadium is most unimpressive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    1.5 million people marching against the imminent Iraq War in February 2003. I was at that. It was significant, but had no effect.

    5k people on a sunny shopping day in central Dublin. That ain't significant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,047 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,995 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    No, obviously taking a lead from McGregor or playing a role in legitimising Putin is far worse. There's no doubt about that.

    But it's also true that people shouldn't make silly arguments on the left, that just irritates people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭dublin49


    This is simplistic nonsense,firstly most constituencies such as mine didnt have a candidate,secondly the election is not a one issue vote ,its multi faceted ,many voters horrified by whats happening in their areas voted for the incumbent Government TD on the basis they will have more influence on local issues than a lone wolf independent who probably has no political experience at all.I would love to see a referendum on this issue and would totally respect the result but the manipulation of this issue by the Government in cohoots with mainstream media is disgraceful,that is,label all dissenters as far right racists and cite the election as a thumbs up for the status quo when they all played the anti immigration on the run up to the vote only to revert to business as usual after it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Juanita Broaddrick as I detailed above. Did not proceed in either criminal or civil courts. JB had stated under oath that Clinton did not assault her in 1978. She later changed her mind during his 1999 impeachment process after being approached by Republican supporters. She was seen with Clinton several times in the days and weeks after the alleged rape and at those times consistently expressed support for his campaign. She later altered the dates (both days and month) of the alleged assault. She stated that she had confided in five people but none came forward. She was neither consistent nor credible.

    An accusation is an accusation. Until due process takes place it is nothing else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    The anti-immigration far-right got annihilated in the November 2024 election. No other take on it.

    What would be your wording on a referendum and what constitutional change would you be asking for?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭dublin49


    If you think anti immigration is a far right issue only ,IMO you are out of touch with the reality on the ground.Voters who 5 years ago had little interest in immigration are increasingly becoming aware of the ramifications of this issue.People change their minds when circumstances change,thats life and political life in essence,and this this issue is becoming more intractable by the day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    What type of referendum would you like constitutional or ordinary?

    I'm going to assume constitutional because for an ordinary referendum the president would need a petition from both the dail and the seanad. With the lack of anti-immigration candidates that is highly unlikely (and an ordinary referendum has never been held in the state).

    https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/government-in-ireland/elections-and-referenda/types-of-elections-and-referendums/constitutional-referendum-in-ireland/

    For a constitutional referendum what are we inserting/removing or amending in the constitution?

    What is the constitutional question you would like asked of the citizens of Ireland?

    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭dublin49


    I am not a constitutional lawyer so not going to engage on the intricacies of a referendum.

    I respect you don't agree with me but why the need to throw in an insult at end of your post,Im on here to discuss with respect and I don't engage like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Read the election results and the exit poll please.

    Again I ask for your response regarding a constitutional referendum? What wording and what clause are you requesting to change?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭enricoh


    A commercial unit has recently become available to rent, a case of 'white flight' as they say in the states. Seems a lovely area for rearing the childer! Any odds on Turkish barber or vape shop?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    No insults in my posts. I'd say my posts are in the top 5 most reported in this thread. So I certainly wouldn't get away with an insult.

    You must have some idea of what question you want to ask the people of Ireland.

    You cant want a referendum and have no idea what question you want asked in a referendum. That would make no sense at all to me.

    I'm not asking for a Solicitor or Barristers opinion on it but I am expecting you to be able to at least have some idea what the question should look like.

    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    You brought up the referendum. You must have has some idea of constitutional change in mind?

    I also see no insult from the other poster. Have you mis-read that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭Quags


    "But sure didnt we all emigrate all over the world, sure anyway McGregor is a rapist and all our welcome"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    Do those using the election results as a metric to gauge the public 's concerns with immigration not think that maybe politicians promised voters on the doorsteps that they'd act on the issue if they got back into power.

    Jim O'Callaghan mustn't have got the memo that nobody cares, or maybe he listened to what the public were telling him on the campaign trail.



Advertisement