Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

1173174176178179190

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    "on here" meaning the entirety of boards.ie, then sure, you'll have heard that.

    "on here", the roads forum, hardly. A road project has to be pretty bad for us to take against it. N6 really is that bad, but not much else is.

    What's maddening about N6 is that Galway City Council's insistence on submitting it again in the hope that'll get a different answer is just delaying the inevitable. They'll have to go back to the drawing board and come up with a proper road transport plan for Galway that won't just create more traffic jams. That plan will still involve building more roads, but not this thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,395 ✭✭✭markpb


    There’s a huge difference between a TD saying that they support road building and it becoming government policy. And even if the current government were as pro-road as you think, they still have to do it in a way that is compliant with the Irish and EU environmental laws and compatible with our commitment to a reduction in emissions. The Greens not being part of the current government is not the road-building panacea that you think it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,472 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    There is a strong possibility that the GCRR will not have actionable planning approval within the lifetime of the current government (or ever for that matter). That has nothing to do with posters here. Rather than wasting further years on something which has a low probability of processing, don't you think it makes sense to change tact to something which has a higher probability of processing (which may not involve changes to the proposed road at all)?

    Your comment that "recently we see the usual lot complaining about the cabinet funding the ringaskiddy motorway" is probably an indication of the issue here. There was no complaining whatsoever about cabinet funding the M28. There was discussion about the effects the M28 will likely have an the Bloomfield interchange but no suggestion at all that the M28 should not proceed. The construction of a major new road is going to have consequences, some intended, some not. If you think that simply building the GCRR or M28 is going to resolve all traffic issues and alleviate all congestion for the foreseeable future, then you are living in a fantasy world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,790 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Time to move on. Too late too many objections just re-purpose and re-route the existing system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,300 ✭✭✭Wompa1




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,300 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    Utrecht is in a position to remove road capacity. Galway currently is not. Getting to where Utrecht is, should be the goal and reportedly was a goal just a few years ago. The current roads around Galway are not fit for purpose. Its not fit for current capacity, wasn't fit for the capacity 20 years ago. Making sweeping changes and reducing capacity further to accommodate cycle infrastructure and public transport will cripple the city. Building new roads smartly laid out with connection points for public transport would be best, imo.

    The passing loop itself is also pretty short sighted, imo. If they want to have frequent commuter trains, it will still cause big delays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Changing the configuration of the roads inside the ring road to have continuous lanes, bus gates for public transport wouldn't reduce capacity as long as there are buses to make use of them.

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭Unrealistic


    Indeed, we've seen this in Dublin. The number of private cars moving through the city centre has dropped but the number of people moving through the city centre has grown significantly. It's only a drop in capacity if you're looking at it from a point of view of prioritising people travelling in private cars rather than prioritising moving the greatest number of people most efficiently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,790 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    Dublin has the M50 and other link roads. It’s crappy for public transport as a capital city goes but it is streets ahead of Galway in roads and public transport infrastructure. I’ve just been to a few European cities over Easter. Some of the rubbish posted on here belongs in the nearest dustbin re no need for the road protect. The cities I was in have so many roads, ring roads, inner ring roads, spaghetti junctions, and tons of public transport and cycling options. As a result the city centres were very car free and a joy to be in. It’s not an either or argument, I would argue we need far more than just the ring road at this stage roads wise, not to mention years of cycle lanes and public transport infrastructure to catch up on, it shouldn't be that hard to manage in a city the size of Galway but it is, and it’s a disgrace. At some point the government and public need to push this through along with many other options. There’ll always be a NIMBY objection to either the road or a public transport option that involved construction,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I'll bet every one of those cities with their motorway ring roads has 10x the population of Galway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,472 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    You realise that the road can't be "pushed through" if it has been deemed illegal (as was the case with the previous bypass proposal), right? That will be decided by the courts (yes courts plural as it will go through several of them before the decision is final, probably all the way to Europe, as was the case previously.

    It must give you some sort of comfort pretending that the hold up is some NIMBY who just has to be faced down but that isn't the case. I imagine you and a couple of other posters here as the villain in an episode of Scooby Doo; "and I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for those pesky kids NIMBYs". In this case however it's not just the NIMBYs, you are also relying on official Ireland (and EU) forgetting huge amounts of recently enacted legislation and targets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Ballymena has had a motorway bypass for 55 years, time Galway got one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    The usual nonsense in the replies, ranging from population claims (false, Galway's population is increasing rapidly and is protected to increase further while relying on a road built in the 1980’s for a much smaller population) to actually trying to pretend building a much needed ring road is “illegal”. Honestly if the electorate hear that one, they’ll turf everyone elected out and put in some radical who will change all the laws as that’s just a completely ridiculous assertion and no developed country should tolerate such crap. Europe certainly doesn’t based on what I’ve seen. The electorate want the road and more roads, and far more development re cycle tracks and improved public transport, a minority cannot and should not hold them to ransom any longer. The tragic accident on the Headford road is the final straw for me, families trying to squash onto a narrow road to cycle where trucks have to drive as there’s no where else to go. Disgrace. We should be planning forward instead of this ridiculous situation Galway is now in where they’re 40 years behind on their infrastructure development.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Building a road is not illegal and nobody is claiming it is.

    Building the previous iteration of this road, and the current plan to build (modifications yet to be decided) were rejected, the latest for not adequately addressing climate legislation. Whether that is a basic redrafting exercise or a fundamental flaw is unclear, but if its a fundamental flaw with the proposal then the blame falls squarely at the councils feet, nobody else's. In the 20 odd years this has been rumbling on they have had ample opportunity to develop and implement a robust plan for shifting city bound traffic from cars to public transport and bikes and have done sweet FA other than say they will look at it once the road is done (I.e. never) its that bull headed approach to things that is now tripping them up, it might have flown pre-crash but the legislative landscape has changed.

    Also it's great that Galway is growing, that doesn't change the fact that places people are comparing it to and saying, "why do they get a bypass!" Are European cities with populations 10x above Galways and on key transit corridors.

    As has been stated time and again, 5% of all traffic travels end to end per the councils own modelling. That is the share of people this bypass is targeting. Everyone else is going into the city and they have no plan for dealing with that.

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'm not sure whether you are deliberately constructing strawmen, or are completely misunderstanding why this road has not been built yet. Do you realise that it wasn't actually NIMBY's or objectors that stopped this road's latest iteration: ABP made a mistake in approving it and the team withdrew it. It hasn't actually made it to a court yet. You do realise that, right? And that the courts could potentially add years of further delay, just like they did the N28 in Cork.

    We're not "all just anti roads": we're on the roads forum FFS! I'm confident most of us (if not all of us) are not NIMBYS either. We're all just saying the same thing over and over:

    1. It's not about population or need, or who's in the Dáil
    2. The traffic analyses have been published
    3. ABP made a mistake in approving the design (I'm being generous)
    4. It's currently back for "redesign"

    I do apologise if you're not just deliberately creating strawmen, but I really don't see how you could think that some maverick could be elected and just "push the road through", like Monsignor Horan did with Knock. The question at this point is whether the "redesign" will clearly satisfy regulations, or if it will get bogged down in court because of another attempted stroke.

    Meanwhile M20 seems to move forward nicely…because they covered their a$$ by doing the design properly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It’s not “nonsense”. You’re saying that there are “cities” that have bigger road infrastructure around them than Galway, but as you don’t identify these cities, we’re not able to make any kind of judgement about whether they’re in any way similar to Galway’s situation. If you had started your argument with: “I’ve just been to Aachen/Bilbao/Catania…“ we could have talked (and I’d have been wrong too: those three are only 6~8x the size of Galway), but if you let the reader chose what “cities in Europe” is supposed to mean, you’re not helping your argument.

    I’m also not going to believe that the electorate wants “more roads”. They don’t. There’s very little support for more roads within cities (or rather there is until you tell people these new roads would be behind their neighbourhoods). What people do want is an end to the horrible traffic jams in Galway, and they don’t really care how it happens as long as it does. Building this road won’t do that; it will make things worse. It offers nothing for better transportation: not one centimetre of cycleway or bus provision, just a vague promise that maybe, sometime, they could consider doing an old cycle lane in town. This is nothing more than a big collector-distributor road for cars around the edge of Galway City - it has no purpose except to allow private cars to get to and from various points around the edge of the city core. After that, where do you think those cars will go? Home? Nope. They’ll leave the ring road, and go onto the Headford Road, the Lough Atalia road, and all the other places that everyone in the country knows about from A.A. Roadwatch.

    This is a horrible plan. It’s not even a plan, it’s just a big ****-off road and a ball of hope, and by persisting with trying to get it approved when it is fundamentally unapprovable, Galway is again showing how they are the worst local authority in the country for land-use and transport planning. While this project is delayed, they could at least be working on a cycle and bus plan for the city, with traffic reduction measures included, but no: it’s like they’re sitting in a big **** sulk because they didn’t get their big highway that Cork and Limerick have, so in the meantime, there’s no improvement at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 706 ✭✭✭GBXI


    What do you mean it hasn't made it to court? There were three judicial reviews taken against this to the High Court in 2023. Maybe you mean ABP did not challenge it in court. ABP didn't take into account the very recent climate action plan, which was the foundation of Friend's of the Environment's (aka An Taisce) legal challenge. I think it is safe to say that it was absolutely objectors that stopped the project given that ABP had approved the plans.

    image.png

    Also, isn't it the case that it is not back for redesign but it has been resubmitted to ABP for approval, this time taking into account the Climate Action Plan.

    https://connachttribune.ie/ring-road-moves-slowly-through-planning-gears/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Did someone defend it in court?

    Edit, so it's not back for redesign? I assume it's not back for approval so either, because the reason nobody challenged it in court was….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 706 ✭✭✭GBXI


    While I agree that the plans for public and cycle transport are incredibly poor in the city - though bus connects I guess is one positive thing they are planning - I don't get the passionate negativity towards this project itself. As I have said before, surely this capital transport investment in Galway is to be welcomed given how rarely it happens and that it makes the case for better cycle and public transport even stronger. One example would be that one lane on each side of the road on the N6 starting at the bus lane at the Browne roundabout and following the N6 route all the way to Ballybrit/Parkmore is changed to a bus lane is so obvious it cannot be ignored. Also, it's clearly very approvable given it was approved 4 years ago. There's no reason why, given the political will and taken into account the action plan this time, that it won't be approved again.

    Regarding cycling infrastructure in the city centre. That will take real political courage because the roads are so small it can only be cars or bikes/pedestrians, not both. My take is that everything within the old city core should be pedestrianized and include cycle lanes. I drive but the way cars dominate Galway city centre is both ugly and frustrating.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    This thing of "ABP didn't take into account such a very recent Climate Action Plan" is smoke and mirrors too. Before ABP approved the last revision there were posts on here - not from me because I didn't know one way or the other - saying that it couldn't be approved by ABP because the published calculated traffic numbers show increased car traffic in the city following completion.

    When I write "redesign" over and over it's because we all know those numbers must change in order for it to not be successfully challenged in court. We'll all call it a "redesign" together because we all know that a real redesign would be expensive and slow but that they need to do something that changes those numbers. They will either call it a "redesign" or look for an exemption. But either way, the submitted documentation needs to change.

    We can argue semantics together about whether it's been to court and whether there will be a redesign, but the fact that they submitted something and didn't even attempt to defend it tells you enough: they literally submitted something that they thought was indefensible.

    This is like people complaining about that guy Peter Sweetnam for lodging objections: as he says himself, he'd have no successes if things were just done right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    You’ve got the answer right there in your comment: More of Galway needs to be pedestrianised, more bus lanes provided, and access by private cars curtailed. Now, how likely is it that Galway City Council will do this?

    What’s worse is that these policies could be pursued without any ring road. Set up Park and Ride at the city edges, and provide an improved bus service within; reduce through-routes for cars, use the space for cycle and pedestrian ways. Traffic evaporation is a real thing: if you give people a safe and reliable alternative to sitting in a traffic jam, they take it. I think that they’re afraid that any transport plan would reduce traffic volumes to the point where the justification for a “motorway-style” ring road no longer stands up. This ring-road is an ego project: Galway wants one because Cork and Limerick have them, nothing else.

    A ring road would still be needed for regional and local traffic, and I’ve always said that Galway needs a Ring Road, but not this one. The problem with this design is that it encourages more private car drivers to circle the city before heading into the core along the existing roads that already cannot accommodate the current traffic volumes. Adding extra road capacity on the approaches to a congested area cannot solve congestion in that area, it can only make it worse.

    If they got their act together about demand, something like Waterford’s Outer Ring Road, a 2+2 with at-grade roundabout junctions, would be sufficient for those needing to circumnavigate Galway city. For regional traffic, extending R381 on a south-western bypass of Claregalway and then north-westward to meet N84 would take a good bit of pressure off N6.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I suspect the passionate negativity for this one stems from Galway people needing better transport, and being told that "this is the solution" and subsequent proposals progressing no further.

    Personally I have no emotional response to this other than exasperation at seeing so much money and effort and wasted time spent on something that has failed (twice I think?). Why can't they just do it right?

    The stuff you're saying like cutting one lane on the N6 is something a bunch of us "negative" brigade (not your comment!) have pointed out would actually help the proposed road to be approved. If they only coupled explicit actions of the GTMS with the road plan (and nothing more!) then they'd likely be sorted. I think most people on here would actually be very happy with that.

    The problem is we're continuously getting "this road first, and then we can talk about fixing Galway's transport problems". If they just resubmit and look for an exemption, it's dead in the water again. If they "redesign" by adding in a bunch of supporting measures as part of the road project, it has a chance of proceeding. But might still get caught in court with NIMBYS anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I agree, I suspect a catch is that they're afraid of undermining the justification for the road. And a second catch is that some councillors have described this road as a development facilitator: they actively want this road to allow the city to sprawl. "Unlocking development land" is the phrase used.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,954 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    From what the council said to their councillors, there's no redesign involved in this, all that they've done with the documents that they resubmitted is include how it is in compliance with the climate action plan, and update all the docs that needed it, i.e. assessments, etc.

    No new design at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    As pointed out previous - this has been the HUGE weakness of this project to date +

    I don't think it needs to be as substantial as what you are proposing here of converting ONE LANE of the CURRENT existing N6 within the City Boundary into a HIGH Capacity people moving lane like a bus lane, just converting Browne Roundabout → Quincentenary Bridge which is the N6 section and then the Sean Mulvoy Road to the Moneenageisha Road to join the OLD Dublin Road would be sufficient in my book a bus lane corridor. So only about 1/6 of the current N6 in the City would need this BUS Lane conversion.

    FYI Galway City Centre ONLY has 50 meters of cycle lane (under the Lough Atalia Railway Bridge)



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,120 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument



    That'd be true if much more than 5% of the cross-city traffic was more than bypass traffic, but it's not. And you're not really suggesting to get to where Utrecht is, you want to see Galway on the path Utrecht was on in the 1970s before they course-corrected. You're clearly focused on moving cars rather than moving people. Car capacity can be removed while increasing people-carrying capacity.

    Making sweeping changes and reducing capacity further to accommodate cycle infrastructure and public transport will free the city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Thanks, I stand corrected. So not even a "redesign". In which case we may see court cases challenging the newly-submitted documentation which will again be rubber-stamped-by-ABP.

    What a waste of everyone's time! It would almost be easier to just do it right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,267 ✭✭✭MBSnr


    Opinion piece in the Independent.


    Máire Treasa Ní Cheallaigh: Galway deserves a chance to breathe, so stop bowing to opposition and build that bypass


    https://archive.ph/nlVxx (non paywall version)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,378 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    If anything the support for this ring road has grown in the last few years years from peoples I've interacted with. The traffic is worse than ever, and is actually worse than than pre covid.

    The lack of a viable alternative is telling too.

    It'll definitely get the go ahead I'd imagine.

    When it'll be built is another thing. By 2035 maybe?

    Save boards.ie by subscribing:



Advertisement