Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Pope Francis has died (updated 21st April 2025)

191012141522

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭Man Vs ManUre


    The Italian police better be on the lookout for Holly and Phil as no doubt they will try to skip the queue again to see the Pope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭Bogey Lowenstein
    That must be Nigel with the brie...


    I hadn't realised he became a priest so late in life, in his 30s. The priests here in those days used to almost go straight from school to the seminary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,580 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    When I heard him first talking about homosexuals and him saying “who am I to judge” it felt like a breath of fresh air.

    Since that statement, which was very early in his papacy, there has been some positive progress but certainly not enough- I do respect what Francis tried to do but for much of his reign as pope, he was thwarted by a very conservative Curia within the Vatican.
    He wasn’t afraid to root out corruption - decades of money laundering for example - but even I appreciate he couldn’t do it all .

    In terms of the abuses of children- I do believe he was genuine in his sorrow and his ask for forgiveness on behalf of the church -but again I don’t see this issue being “resolved” - it’s a cross the church just has to bear and carry it always.

    He moved away from contentious issues such as divorce abortion etc and focused on poverty and migrants - in other words, relatively safe ground (albeit with backlash from right wing governments)

    So you could say, he used some avoidance tactics - rather than address issues and try and resolve them, he just didn’t mention them or played them down- but he did try and put through reforms that would have made the Catholic Church more inclusive - unfortunately the conservative Vatican appears fixated on bringing us back to the past



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,061 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The church never had a problem rooting out money laundering. They are are always quick off the mark when it comes to getting money off people.

    He wasn't as keen when the courts wanted money from the church.

    And when it comes to child abuse

    The most stand out part is his decree to report child abuse to the church not the police.

    Reformer my bollix. He was about protecting the church same as always. He might have thrown crumbs to the gays because he knew it would play well in the media but that's about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,580 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    He was a Jesuit - it takes approx 13 yeas to become a Jesuit priest - they don’t call them Gods stormtroopers for nothing 😀



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,124 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Must say I found the LGBTQ statement rather patronising. As for being appalled at child abuse and helping the poor,well that's just having basic human empathy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭csirl


    You"ve given a good assessment of the situation.

    I think approaching child abuse as being a cross to bear is not the right approach to take - hence why I think history will be harsh. A better starting point would be:

    1. Full compliance with Child Protection rules/laws. There's still a selective compliance approach.
    2. Zero tolerance re: abusers including full cooperation and dusclosure to the authorities - church is still in cover up mode.
    3. Pay the redress owed.

    Apologies are very hollow without the above.

    The church should also re-evaluate its involvement in the delivery of childrens services e.g. education. Given that they dont seem to be able to stop abuse, maybe its better from a child safety perspective to withdraw.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,580 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    “The most stand out part is his decree to report child abuse to the church not the police”

    It’s explained in the article why it wasn’t possible to do this - not all police forces across the world are as law abiding as ours and Western Europe in general - it could place many lives of innocent people in jeopardy - this announcement was completely different to past actions of the church which only wanted to cover up the abuses and protect the church - this new rule was about rooting out abusers not protecting the church - it was progress in my eyes - local laws still applied such as we have in Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,061 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It quotes why the church said they couldn't. That's not the same as the article explaining why they couldn't.

    It's a convenient cop out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭csirl


    Progress isnt good enough. In Ireland they still only report internally in the first instance, then someone in the church hierarcy decides if they are going to report to the authorities. This in spite of the Law here requiring the first report to go to Tusla. If it doesnt suit them to report at all, they dont.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 935 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith


    Is this actually seriously the case? That's sick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,124 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Not hard to single out countries that they seem not suitable and the rest must report to the police. Doubt there's many ignoring child abuse outside the middle east and some African countries maybe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 935 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith


    And isn't that testament to how serious the organisation fucked up?? Despicable bunch of people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,783 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    Thank you for the unrequested lesson on how TV works, I had no idea that TV stations tried to attract as many viewers as possible.

    As I've said before the issue is not that they cover the story, it is of course a very newsworthy item, but the manner of how they do it. Sending phone notifications when a coffin is moved, bishops on TV promoting religion and saying how great the pope was, grief monkeys at Knock saying how they will miss him and pray for him. That's not reflective of what's going on in Ireland today and Irish people's attitudes towards the religion and church today.

    People are not really talking about this and most are unaffected by it.

    Even on The Irish Times website, their home page is totally dominated by it when in reality nothing is happening but what is telling is that when you look at their most read , only minor papal article about succession makes the most read Top 5 articles and yesterday none of the Pope's death stories made the list at all.

    It's as if media and journalists do not reflect modern Ireland and how it has changed and as if they have an agenda to remain devoutly catholic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,580 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    All good points and I’m certainly not here to defend the indefensible - but neither am I saying he did “nothing” - I don’t know how history will treat him - but from my own perspective, he certainly was mire willing to do something than the previous pope who essentially buried his head in the sand and spent his time ruining the Mass by introducing all sorts of new wording nonsense that no one wanted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,580 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I won’t argue on the LBGTQ point as communication is in the interpretation - if it was patronising to you, then it was patronising to you. From my perspective, it was a statement that took a lot of conservative priests bishops and cardinals by surprise no less ordinary lay people- people were not used to hearing a pope say such things - from that aspect it was fresh air to me, because it unsettled a lot of very conservative clergy who essentially preached hell fire and brimestone for much of their lives on these issues



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭Raichų


    in fairness while it’s of course very sad for his family and those who knew him and will miss him dearly; at the end of the day he wasn’t just anybody he was the head of the church.

    To just ignore what they have caused and continue to do on the basis that their leader has died is ridiculous. The discussion is literally surrounding his time as pope and what he did to sort out the underlying and rather serious issues with the church and how they handle certain things— namely child sex abuse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭Raichų


    like in fairness who cares who’s dead when kids are currently, previously and are likely to be fiddled in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭aero2k


    The men in frocks may have been the first á la carte Catholics - celibacy seems to have been optional for some.

    On the subject of the pope's death - I heard Colm O'Gorman giving him credit for being a decent man, while being very critical of his shortcomings in the area of clerical sexual abuse scandals. Probably a fair summary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,186 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    It seems ridiculous to put someone in their late 70s in charge of such a global conglomerate. It’s a job for a much younger man (or woman).

    I’d also agree that the POTUS job should be done by someone a lot younger also



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭Bogey Lowenstein
    That must be Nigel with the brie...


    They won't make the JP2 mistake again. The new pope will be closer to 80 than 70.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,582 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    As someone who has done church child protection training - that's simply not true. It is made clear at every step that anyone is free to report to civil authorities at any time, and that some people are mandated to do do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Been reading the obituaries and most concentrate on his Papacy largely ignoring everything before that which led up to it.

    There will eventually be a wider appraisal of his pre amiable pontiff role in Argentina and Latin America. He was a dogmatic disciplinarian who preferred piety over social activism and had close contacts with the generals who 'disappeared' thousands of Argentinians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,186 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    What parent would leave a priest near their child today?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,159 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    If a person is gay and seeks God and has goodwill, who am I to judge him?

    A statement such as this shouldn't be taken patronisingly. Not judging is what I would expect from any person and his comment is what I would expect from somebody in his position.

    His comments I found to be hollow. That statement was from 2013. 2 years later, May 2015, Ireland voted for marriage equality despite a campaign by the catholic church to try and stop it. He certainly did not practice what he preached

    He also asserted that clergy should act as "spiritual guides rather than political enforcers" in response to efforts by U.S. bishops to bar President Joe Biden from receiving Communion. Yet in 2018 his church did the exact opposite and lead a campaign against repealing the 8th amendment here

    I don't wish to speak ill about the guy now that he is dead but he did not practice what he preached in these circumstances



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,580 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Fair point around words vs actions - in his early days, his words certainly sounded like we’d see a new and different and more open and inclusive Catholic Church - but it never followed through - he had the world congress or whatever it was called where after many months of compiling feedback from all countries on how the Catholic Church should progress, the report lay gathering dust.
    I respected the man but I think he’s shown that even if there is a will to move the Catholic Church into the 21st century, there’s certainly not an easy way forward - again I blame the conservatives in the church but I’m still unclear why as pope, he couldn’t have just done a Picard and said “make it so” .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,124 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Indeed not judging should be a given. The fact he had to say it though means they do judge. Having gay sex is still a mortal sin.

    Catholicism,judaicism and islam have always been down in the gay. They've conditioned people for centuries in their beliefs and created suspicions and judgement against anyone who isn't a straight white mass goer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,159 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Agreed

    To be fair to the man those were the only 2 issues I think he dealt with badly. He made a point of blessing inmates and was opposed to Trumps immigration policy, even going as far as visiting refugee camps. He also lived a much more reserved life than his predecessors, even his coffin is much more basic.

    I also think he'd be unhappy with all the fuss that's being made about him

    https://www.wantedinrome.com/news/italy-mourning-for-pope-francis.html

    There's no mention of it being a mortal sin in the bible. Plenty of people too high up in the church probably got that one wrong



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,124 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    well "who am I to judge" when it remains a mortal sin and they don't allow gay marriage rings a bit hollow. Actions and words.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭csirl


    Not for detailed discussion on this thread, but there are live child protecton issues in my parish and complaining parents were told that the Child First etc Guidelines are not mandatory as "they're only guidines..." to justify a failure to report child abuse occurring in recent years.



Advertisement