Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Last of Us - HBO *Spoilers* See warning in post #1

1484951535457

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno


    Can't speak very highly of the town's defense against the infected.

    Even a moat would be something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,773 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Just watched episode 2 season 2. Great episode. Very hard hitting. Sad to see Joel go. That was hard and very sad more do because Ellie arrived just too late to safe him.

    I liked the song at the end. Anyone know what it is?

    Edit: I found it. Have to love and thank the subtitles for that :) .

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,907 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    Holy moly episode 2 was mad…

    i don't know about the game, so the whole addy Joel thing caught me by surprise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,326 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    I knew what was coming but was still shocking. The fact Kaitlyn's mam died 3 days before this scene adds a lot of weight to it. Then Ashley Johnson's version of Through The Valley playing after it, Jesus, that was a gut punch.

    For reference, the first trailer for the game was Ellie (played by Ashley Johnson) playing and singing this song while promising to kill every last one of them. We didn't know what happened to her and who she was going to kill but Joel was alive and well. Needless to say, we were hoodwinked and plenty people were not too happy. Death threats to Abby's motion/voice actor and game creator followed and the reaction when the game released was divisive and toxic.

    Kaitlyn was a force in this episode. I knew she would be a scene stealer but i think there's a lot of people who won't be able to get past this turn of events.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,461 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    An intense hour or so of television.
    I played the first game only and had no idea that was coming. Right up till the last moment I thought Joel could find a way out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭trashcan


    I saw a spoiler that Joel was killed in the game, so kind of knew it was coming, didn’t expect it so early in the season though. I now want to see Ellie track down Abbey and make her pay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,569 ✭✭✭✭dastardly00


    I've played the games so I knew what was coming...

    Even still... that was very intense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,412 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Absolutely incredible episode. Having played the game, I knew what was coming with Joel but that didn't lessen the impact of it. Dever played a blinder.

    The 'invasion' of the infected was brilliant to watch. The cinematography was top notch and real edge of your seat stuff.

    Shame/strange that people are writing off the series now that Joel is dead. Plenty of cracking TV to come this season (with some crazy scenes and stories) and it'll be worth watching particularly with how well they're developing from the source material. Can't wait.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    That was great. Dever is a terrific addition to the cast. Don't mind that she's not big or ripped enough to be Abby, she can pull it off. The only thing I did think was that her punches looked too "girly", daft as it sounds.

    Am wondering what we're in for now. Vast majority of the reviews point up a significant drop off in quality from the first season, whereas the two episodes to date have been really good, and E2 might have been better than anything in the whole of Season 1. Suggestion appears to be that it all goes a bit Walking Dead-y. Hope that's not true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,502 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    The only reason they didnt have earthwork defences is because they wanted a breach for dramatic effect, a TV reason rather then obvious logic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,835 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I can see why a lot were disappointed with the 2nd game now. If a story has only two main characters I dont think it helps the story if you get rid of one of them- and the best actor. Game of Thrones could do it as they had a number of main characters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,502 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    Theres going to be a lot of questions as to why Joel got tortured to death….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,395 ✭✭✭jj880


    For me when Id completed the 2nd game it was obvious it was better than the 1st in every way. Joel's death, although shocking and early, drove the games story and made it all the more intense and believable. Its where tlou2 story starts really. I'd bet my shorts the same will happen with the TV show.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,273 ✭✭✭✭mrcheez


    I completed both games but thought they were going to take a different course regarding Joel given the big name actor pull, so brave decision to stick with the original plot.

    They will probably keep him on for flashback scenes though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,839 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    The only things that felt a bit off to me were setting fire to a load of infected outside the town when the walls are wooden seemed unwise.

    Also the flamethrower crew. Just seemed a bit nonsensical to have 4 lads on Main Street given everyone else is up on the roofs shooting down into the street. Trying to kill infected with flamethrowers also seemed way more difficult than shooting them so I’ve no idea what these lads were meant to add in terms of practicality to the town’s defence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭MICKEYG


    I'm no expert on fungus controlled zombies but two questions:

    1. Why did the cold not kill them?

    2. Would there not be a risk of spores? After the fight the residents weren't wearing masks as they walked among the dead on main street. They did wear masks in S1E1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,623 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    1. I'd say the cold was probably what led to them lying dormant for so long, but I think the disturbance to the tendrils in the pipework and the mini-avalance in the snow with Abby probably woke them up enough to attack.
    2. Guess it's a case of time and supplies. We only saw the immediate aftermath of the attack, so trying to get that many masks out to people (and bearing in mind they probably don't have a huge supply of working masks either) probably meant they couldn't. I'd say maybe burning so many of the bodies might prevent most of the spores.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,412 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    This is it. Joel's death is necessary for so many reasons, primarily that it drives all of Ellie's actions to come. There was no world where they could have changed course.

    Honestly, the second game didn't need Joel after he was killed. Both Ellie and Abby have huge story arcs to come.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,835 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Obviously no point in pre-judging the rest of the season but I do hate when they knock off a character just to to get a reaction from another character. "Fridging " I think is the colloquial term for it.

    Joel's absence leaves a massive hole in the show as the dynamic between him and Ellie was one of the best aspects of the first season. The conflict between Ellie and Abby may be interesting but its not helped by the actresses looking and acting so similar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,412 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    I generally do hate it it too and it's probably much of a muchness but for me Joel's death leads to an evolution of Ellie rather than a lazy way to get a simple reaction from her. It's a necessary plot point as Joel and Ellies story was done. It's brave storytelling to do what they did and as someone who can look back at the completed narrative, it works. So I think in time, viewers of the TV show will appreciate it down the line.

    I'd agree that his absence does leave a hole in the show as it stands but there is so much more to come and so many more characters who are going to take center stage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,835 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Well Ellie and Joel's story is obviously done now but I think alot of viewers wont appreciate it had to happen so soon in second season. Its unusual in TV though for long running shows, anyway, as tends to split the fanbase. It reminds me of Homeland, Waling Dead and House of Cards where losing a main character cost alot of viewers. I think LoU is only supposed to last three seasons anyway so perhaps will make no difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,623 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I don't think this counts as fridging, because Joel didn't die just to get a reaction from another character or to serve their story; he died due to his own actions. If it had been Dinah who died and then Ellie wants to go get revenge and Joel helps/follows her, that would be fridging, because then Dinah would have only died to give Ellie a reason for revenge.

    Joel killed Abby's father as well as killing a dozen or more other Fireflies who were this group's friends, mentors etc. Joel's death was the result of Joel's actions and the culmination of his own story, given how he's admitted to doing some horrible things in the years following the outbreak that even caused Tommy to leave him. Sure, he was becoming a better man, and he killed the Fireflies to save Ellie (whether that was the right or wrong thing is very much a matter of perspective), but he was killed because of his actions, not just to serve as a plot point for Ellie's story.

    It will obviously be the thing which will next drive Ellie's story regardless, but that's just natural cause and effect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,835 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    They have reduced Joel's role this season to be killed early in the season just to drive Ellie's story. I understand there will be flashbacks but I'm not really a fan of them. Joel has been disposed of a mere two episodes after the killing in the hospital, just seems super quick. I would have preferred if they did in later this season. To be honest I would be equally as annoyed if they killed Ellie to motivate Joel for the rest of the season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,623 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Well it is following the game where he dies early in the game, but even then, it's the main story plot point of Season 2. They would had to have done an awful lot of padding to push it out to later in the season. Even if instead of flashbacks later in the season they did an episode showing the five years since season 1, that would probably at most just have pushed Joel's death out by one episode.

    I can see why people would be aggrieved about Joel's death, and especially considering Pedro Pascal was so great in the role, and how Ellie isn't as likeable a character to carry the whole show, but this was going to happen and artifically padding the whole thing out to do something like making Joel's death happen towards the end of this season and then Ellie going for revenge next season, I think would have killed this season and wouldn't have changed the majority of issues people may have with Joel's death.

    He still would have died the same way, he still would have left the show, his death would still lead to Ellie being the main character and going off for revenge. If anything, it may have resulted in Pedro Pascal not taking the role considering how many other projects he has on. Clips of interviews they've done for this episode have been going around where he says he knew going into it that he'd be doing one full season, and then would be killed off early in the second.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,412 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    But his role hasn't been reduced. That was always the source material. They could have extended the first season by two episodes and had the death in the finale but it would be hugely pedantic to fit into a "TV norm" for the sake of it.

    It was a shocking killing that takes the gamer/viewer by surprise. And it worked.

    His death isn't something to give Ellie extra feelings or drive. His death is the base for the entire second (and probably third) series - without it, there simply is no story because what happens next doesn't happen otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,835 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Fair enough regarding the flashbacks. I guess viewers who liked season 1 will get a different show for seasons 2 and 3. Seems odd writing for revenge stories, usually we route for one of the two parties involve, but Abby is no villain for killing Joel. If that is the plot going forward it would seems a stretch to have it last two seasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,326 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    Lads, ye are just going to have to accept that Abby is the hero now. #TeamAbby



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,623 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Well that's the thing; Was Joel justified in killing Abby's father to save Ellie? Was Abby justified in killing Joel to avenge her father? Would Ellie be justified in killing Abby to avenge essentially her adoptive father? It's all a matter of perspective.

    Trust me, you're not wrong in many ways for how you feel about Joel's death, because it was just as much a kick in the gut and fairly inexplicable to people playing the game when it happened (well, there were leaks released before the game came out which spoiled it for a lot of people but that's another story). I'm not going to say it ultimately ended up being the right or wrong decision, or that the story gets so much better or worse, because I can't. It's also all a matter of perspective and opinion. Some people will like the rest of the show/story. Some will look back at Joel's death and think "This is where the show fell apart".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,412 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Without anyone spoiling it for you, you'll have to wait and see. There is so so much more to come. It's not a simple X chases Y and it's resolved in a few episodes. Whilst revenge is the overarching narrative, there are huge siloed storylines that branch away from that narrative involving major new characters, factions as well as the infected.

    You'll only be able to fully judge the narrative when it has all played out. But it's not a conventional lazy revenge story.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,565 ✭✭✭MfMan


    Why was Dina the only character to suffer from frost bite?

    Why not loose the dogs sooner?

    Why did the protagonists return from the lodge with 2 horses instead of 4?



Advertisement