Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1122123125127128137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 432 ✭✭briangriffin


    In 2019 the cso made a population projection that by 2036 the population of Ireland would reach three different totals given high, medium and low migration M1 = high net migration of 30k per annum M2 = medium net migration of 20k per annum and M3 low net migration of 10k per annum. By the cso figures of 2024 the year to April we have surpassed the low M3 figure of total population of 5.33 million predicted for the year 2032. the M2 figure of 5.57 million for 2032 will be surpassed very soon. Bearing in mind net natural population growth which is much easier to predict given data on age and predicted birthrate is not suppose to reach the minus levels until around 2047 and then it is the single figure thousands it seems unlikely unless there is a massive recession and net migration turns to net emigration (there was not one year of predicted net outward immigration). In fact the predictions in 2016 have overestimated our fertility rate. Net population increase is driven more by migration. If there is a recession though none of us will have to worry however given we have increased government spending by 50 billion in the past 6 years when/if a recession hits us we are all well and truly goosed. That will be a test of integration and social cohesion. Our social welfare supports for the rental market our social welfare payments and our public services for an aging population not to mention the pension crisis. We wont be spending 8 billion on housing or 2 billion on refugees.

    https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-rpp/regionalpopulationprojections2017-2036/regionalpopulationprojectionsresultsoverview/

    "The wildly racist Great Replacement Theory seems to have taken hold with people who seem unwilling to fact-check and possibly have a higher than usual quantity of gullibility genes (not you obviously) and have led to a large number of racist murders and mass shootings of non-natives. The USA circa 1900 held the widespread belief that the white population were soon to be replaced by immigrant Chinese & Japanese. How did that work out?

    Historical fact shows that the only replacing we've actually been witness to have been the white colonising of the USA, Brazil, Australia, Argentina, Colombia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Cuba, Peru, Bolivia and others where they've taken over from the native population. Do you approve of that 19th century resource-grab and widespread genocide.

    The current theory is a long-debunked one, but hey, enough of me, have a read of what the WP has to say."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/great-replacement-theory-is-ignorant-both-broadly-narrowly/

    Had to argue with that logic. I will resist the baiting there. Yes we get it diversity is our strength. Native Irish live with unearned privilege. The Irish emigrated to the 4 corners of the world - The Native Americans saved us from the Famine with their go fund me. Immigration officials at the airport are "Trumpian" etc. etc.

    I think you hit all talking points there though.

    1. All White people are racist colonizers who get what they deserve.
    2. They are low IQ with gullibility genes for questioning immigration and demographic change. If they do that they are conspiracy theorists and obviously racist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,222 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Well the begging alone is a crime and should earn you a ban never mind deportation. It's quite sickening to see good honest caring Irish people duped into giving spare change to these beggars who are well looked after socially by the government. From my experience it's usually the elderly. Some of whom would be worse off then the beggars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Your guesswork or the very detailed and clear empirical research by the CSO? Hmnnn, which shall I rely upon?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Nope. Plenty of ex-Asylum Seekers working in our services.

    And what are your stats for Asylum Seekers having minimal or no English?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Replacement Theory is dumb, not happening now nor ever will and the most basic of educations helps recognise that. Please read this.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/great-replacement-theory-is-ignorant-both-broadly-narrowly/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Plenty of non-nationals are retired here or at school/college here. We've had immigration for the entire history of our state, and beyond.

    A plain fact that proportionately more non-Irish than native-Irish are in employment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Quoted above already, 8% and 9% (for Irish and non-Irish). You then have student, children and retiree numbers.

    More non-Irish that Irish in work and contributing. Are you going to thank them for their contributions to our state and any receipt of cash you get from the state?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    1. There is no replacement going on here or elsewhere. The only places it happened were due to European colonisation. Do you deny this? And why say ALL whites when it was very few in positions of power in the UK, Belgium, France, Spain, Germany, etc? Many European peoples, including us, did not participate.
    2. To not fact-check and question Replacement Theory to me shows an inability to conduct research. You can apply your own adjectives to describe anyone in this category but there's no need to be rude to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 895 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Pihlip Bump's opinion pieces are just that, opinion pieces.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 6,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Mod note:

    Good afternoon everyone.

    I deleted a few off topic posts.

    I will advise you all to calm down, because many of yous are very close to getting banned for trolling/baiting/being uncivil.

    2025 gigs: Selofan, Alison Moyet, Wardruna, Gavin Friday, Orla Gartland, The Courettes, Nine Inch Nails, Rhiannon Giddens, New Purple Celebration, Nova Twins



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,056 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Replacement of ethnic populations is happening, whether a conspiracy or a theory, only time will tell. Towns in other EU countries and the UK have all experienced it, to claim it isn't happening, is a denial of reality.

    But whether by design, as some big sinister plan or just natural migration, will only be known when retrospective studies are carried out in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭Suckler


    It think the "by Design/sinister plan" is simply a by-product. Some people see ways to enrich themselves knowing that the won't have to deal with the ramifications of their actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,056 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I know many don't like links to Gript or to Nick Delehanty X account.

    So here we have the main stream media finally reporting on shady deals within the Ipas system and how a 3 month old buisness with an owner from an apartment in Mallorca and with value of a whopping €120 happens to get a multi million Euro deal to run an ipas centre in Dundrum, Co.Tipperary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,756 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    What are your stats for plenty of ex-asylum seekers working in our services and paying so much tax they’ll be funding their own pensions not to mention local pensions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    This is mental stuff.

    Whatever your thoughts on immigration of any kind, this sort of deal, and the lack of transparency just stinks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭McBain11


    Why are you questioning the veracity of the very report that you have quoted on here countless times in the past week? You have read the actual report, haven't you? I mean, you must have - you surely wouldn't bring it up so many times if you had absolutely no idea what's actually in it. Would you?

    So to be clear, the report states that in 2024, 14.6 percent of migrants aged between 15-24 are unemployed. This is far far far higher than other grouping dealt with in the report.

    The report also states that 5.8 percent of migrants are unemployed. This is far far far higher than the 3.5 percent Irish born that are unemployed. That is a full 60 percent higher than the rate of Irish born unemployed. A huge number - if you've 60 percent more cash in your wages or benefits, you'll be far happier - wouldn't you be?

    Now, it could well be the case that all you did was read 30 seconds worth of an rte or newspaper segment about this report, and picked one statistic

    out of it, and now just repeat it like a broken record. I'd advise you to read the actual report, it will do you the world of good. I'll attach the rte snippet and a bit of that report in screenshot below.

    I really don't understand why you would challenge the very detailed and clear empirical research by the CSO in this report? It's almost like your posting in bad faith.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 895 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Articles like that - which are very much in the public interest are behind a paywall. Colour me shocked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 895 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Absolutely. And to think that there are regular protests all over Mallorca against over-tourism and yet their fellow islander has no issue in stuffing an Irish hotel with 277 IPAs. Brass necks and all that. Wouldn't be surprised if the individual involved was out with her placard:

    Spain holiday protest: First Mallorca protest of the season this Saturday: Tourists told to stay away to help ease housing crisis

    In the letter they stated: “The greed and avarice of hoteliers, politicians, real estate investors, and ‘parasites’ of all kinds” have led to the deterioration of the island territory and ecosystem, infrastructure problems, overcrowded public services, gentrification, and the decline in quality of life. These are all the result of uncontrolled tourism.

    “Mallorca is not the paradise they are selling you. “The local population is angry, and we are no longer hospitable because the land we love is being destroyed, and many residents are having to emigrate.”

    The letter concluded: “It’s time to take a step forward. Our leaders aren’t listening to us; it’s time to ask you NOT TO COME. We don’t need more tourists; in fact, you are the source of our problem.

    The language used by the protestors is very strong and emotive. If similar language was used in Dundrum, swapping tourist for IPA - they'd be labeled far right racists before the protest would even begin even though alot of parallel and similar arguments can be made in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,820 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    But again this is conflating. Asylum seekers with Immigrants .

    What are the percentages of asylum seekers who for obvious reasons may not be paying tax vs immigrants who come here to work , many with qualifications trades and well.paying jobs already organized ?

    Post edited by Goldengirl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 432 ✭✭briangriffin


    You might want to do a little more research on the many nations who were colonisers outside of Europe also. Was ireland a great colonising nation? Why on earth is that relevant to the Irish people? Are you projecting anti white sentiment, guilt onto all Europeans because of the sins of their ancestors? That doesn't seem very progressive. In fact it seems damn racist to accuse modern Irish people by association with white supremacist Europeans.

    Can you find in the thread how many times I brought up "white" or "black".

    You my progressive liberal friend are the one that brought race into it by and guilt by association on all white people by mentioning race twice in one post. You could have just said Europeans.

    I presume you have read the UN report entitled Migration Replacement, it is a economic theory that proposes to solve the low birthrate and pension costs of aging populations through migration. That isn't a far right theory its an economic solution that mentions the word "integration" 3 times in 177 pages of data. Once in English and twice in French and German.

    Screenshot_20250418_181845_Drive.jpg

    Is the UN far right? Should we not be able to ask the question hang on how does mass immigration affect the locals in everyone of these countries? How does international migration of the kind that has thousands of people from tens of countries all with different beliefs and values emigrating to a small population of 5 million people impact that society? Because there is no putting the genie back in the bottle.

    We have one of the highest rates of migrant immigration in the whole of Europe and one of the smallest populations. Again this isn't far right or racist to question, its prudent because our children and I mean all irish peoples children including recent immigrants who are on the island will deal we whatever we leave behind them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Go ahead and counteract his research and statistics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,634 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Here a video of the background to Dundrum.

    Of course it doesnt include everything like kicking Irish people out of their houses for the Ukrainians but gives you an idea how messed up this is

    This government is so complacent on this, it's just a matter of time this all blows back on them.

    How they can do this to a rural village, it's disgusting. It's destroying a community

    There's going to be a special place in hell for the likes of Jeff, what goes around comes around



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    You claimed that all asylum seekers have little or no English. I'm still awaiting your source on this and must query what you are basing this statement on.

    In terms of asylum seekers contributing taxation the examples are legion and you only have to engage with people within the HSE or

    Here's a dentist in Cork.

    Here's a professional athlete, and Irish record-holder, in Dublin.

    Here's a doctor in Laois.

    Here's a lawyer from Meath.

    The CSO don't do statistics for such a niche part of the population, the subject matter too small for expenditure on such rigorous research. And I'm sure the above individuals, and many more in education and work, would welcome your thanks for their contributions to any benefits or pension you may receive. Who here gives as much as them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    You dislike the report due to its unambiguous statement that more non-Irish are in employment than native-Irish. Ergo you seek to criticise it whilst avoiding its central finding.

    Do you disagree with the CSO findings, and why?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭engineerws


    Not interested in replacement theory but took a look

    ‘Great replacement theory’ is ignorant both broadly and narrowly

    Far more Americans are born each year than are naturalized

    What's the link got to do with Ireland?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    There is no Great Replacement going on in Ireland. It doesn't hold up academically or statistically if you do the minimum of research and is being sold to people who really should know better.

    The only replacement we've seen is 18th/19th century colonialism, perpetrated by a few people with great wealth and power. We were victims of that very same colonialism and it remains unresolved on this island.

    I've also no idea why you, or anyone else, would want to feel guilt over it, unless your great-great-great grandad was a slave-trader and you've a big country pile in Meath bought from the proceeds of that. Have you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭McBain11


    You have stated that I dislike the report. This is an outright lie. I never once stated whether I like or dislike the report. I simply dealt with the actual facts in the report. A report that I've looked at in depth. You should try reading it. Genuinely, give it a go.

    First of all, it is not to true to say that more non Irish born people are in employment than Irish born people. That is a lie. Words are very important - the report is talking about the rate of employment in this regard, not the total numbers which is what you are saying here. The rate of employment. Clearly, the number of Irish born people in employment is actually vastly higher than that of non Irish born people in employment.

    Now, let's get back to the facts from the report that you also dismissed as made up earlier. The reports states that 14.6 percent of migrants aged between 15-24 are unemployed. This is a huge rate of unemployment in comparison to the other groupings in the report. Are you suggesting that the report is making up falsehoods about this rate of unemployment amongst young migrants?

    The report also states that 5.8 percent of migrants are unemployed. This is 60 percent higher that the rate of unemployment amongst Irish born people which is at 3.5 percent. Are you suggesting that report is making up falsehoods regards the rate if unemployment being higher amongst migrants than Irish born people?

    Would you like to actually discuss anything from the report or are you just openly going to lie about my personal feelings about liking/disliking the report?

    Why are you asking me if I disagree with the CSO findings when I am openly discussing them and you clearly refuse to acknowledge those findings?

    Once again, this is the epitome of bad faith posting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,235 ✭✭✭enricoh


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123369811#Comment_123369811Cherry picked good news refugee stories, here as some cold hard figures from a refugee quango inar. Doesn't include those on disability allowance.

    For example, Western Europeans recorded the lowest unemployment rate (French, 7%, Germans, 8%, Italians 9%) followed by Eastern Europeans; Black Africans recorded the highest unemployment rate at over five times that of Western Europeans at 42.3% (Nigerians 43%, Congolese 63%).

    https://inar.ie

    The centrality of race and whiteness in the Irish labour market | INAR



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Do you accept the CSO finding that more immigrants are in employment than Irish?



Advertisement