Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Rugby Discussion 3

1159161163164165

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,305 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    http://ruckthis.ie/iberias-ambitious-bid-what-a-rugby-world-cup-in-spain-and-portugal-could-mean-for-the-global-game/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,082 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Any opinions of the Georgian rugby union reportedly trying to get the Georgian club side Black Lion, into the URC?

    Not a great source but it has the story as its going around

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-14606947/Georgia-begin-World-Rugby-backed-talks-domestic-Black-Lion-join-United-Rugby-Championship-continue-call-future-Six-Nations-expansion.html

    Is this a serious proposal or is it the kind of thing that's proposed every couple of years and never happens?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,467 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    I would guess that if there's knowledge that one of the Welsh regions is being wound down, it could be a legitimate proposal. I can't see it working with them being a 17th team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭Blut2


    They'll need some pretty serious funding behind them to cover the full travel costs of every other team visiting Georgia for a number of years, theres no way the league will admit them otherwise.

    And the costs of bringing the standard of the club up to URC level on top, and their own travel costs traveling around Europe/SA for games. Its 4000km from Tbilisi to Dublin, not exactly a quick 40min Ryanair flight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Would much rather a Spanish or Portuguese team to replace a Welsh one of that came to pass. Georgia would be a terrible addition, too far away, tiny market, difficult to get to. It sucks for them, but that's just the reality of it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,610 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    But Georgia will never be included on that basis and will never be able to grow which isnt good for the sport. They deserve inclusion in a top tier competition as they are consistently the best European side outisde of the 6 nations. You have to look at what rugby they bring as well as wverything else. And in rugby terms theyre a good bit ahead of spain and portugal



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭Blut2


    None of that matters if the financials don't work out. When almost every European rugby body is already struggling to keep their heads above water they're not in a position to make decisions that could potentially bankrupt themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    They are, and I would include them in an expanded 6Ns, but at the club level it would never work. The costs for teams would be worse than playing in SA, for likely zero gain in terms of money or support. It's a pity that Russia is a fascist hell hole, because their professional league would have been a good spot for some Georgian teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,467 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    No direct flights to Ireland, Wales, Scotland or South Africa from Tblisi should really be the end of the conversation.

    It would be great to see a Georgian team but its massively inconvenient and unfortunate that they're located fairly remotely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,610 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    No dorect flights isnt a reason they cant be added. Have irish teams and others not been flying to SA via dubai on occasions for games and going to heathrow or similar for flight shoulsnt be a reason to not do jt.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    The time zones are also a big hassle



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,610 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    3 hours. Far from a major issue. Not near enough of an issue to dismiss it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,467 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    None of the reasons are enough on their own to make it not viable but together, they present a massive logistical difficulty.

    Away fans will struggle to follow their teams. Flying there is not easy. Then there's the massive carbon footprint. South Africa can at least accommodate tours or play games between themselves but with Georgia, that team would either be living on the road for prolonged periods or flying back and forth pretty much every week.

    That doesn't even consider the costs that would be huge for both the Georgian team and for every other team who would have to fly over for a single game. Will a Georgian team bring money to cover that off for teams that are already on their knees financially? I highly highly doubt it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    3-4 depending on the time of year.

    Edit: it would likely obligate them to playing all their games in the evening, to be viewable back here. That's not great for all sorts of reasons



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,610 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    They are consistently one of the strongest sides not in the top tier. We cant just hope to grow the sport hoping financially atronger countries get better to add them if we want the sport to grow. We need countries with strong rugby backing as much as anything else. Having their games on at a specific time is far from a major issue. And shouldnt be seen as a reason not to allow them play at top level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I agree they should be supported, I'd love to see the 6Ns expanded. I don't think they should be added to the URC. The logistics would be bad, away support even worse than it is already. I'd rather see WR look to set up a REC club league, or perhaps look to have then join the French system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,467 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    "The sport needs to grow" is constantly thrown around without any real consideration or thought. The game is on its arse financially with numerous teams and nations near bankruptcy. If the game was flush with money, I'd say go out there and expand... But it's not. Adding teams that could add significant cost to teams' costs (and/or reduce returns) with minimal financial incentive is not prudent right now simply to 'grow the game'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,610 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    And the game isnt fluah with money because of an inherent refusal to expand properly. It took decades for southern hemisphere sides to look at fiji, tonga samoa for additjon to super rugby. If you were to look at it financiaply theyd never have been added. Tou cant simply look at the balance sheet alone. If you do you will never grow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭PMC83


    Agreed, a Spanish or Portuguese team would make most sense. Looking at Black Lions wiki they have traveled before for Currie Cup first division and challenge cup, obviously URC would be more regular. I've no idea what the economic situation is like over there but as others have said they'd need a massive investment to make it sustainable.

    This is all kicking up on the possibility of a Welsh region dropping though? It should happen but has been resisted until this point, I reckon they will keep stumbling along with 4 putting the idea of a Georgian team to bed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,467 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Except you do have to look at the balance sheet, that's how it works when a game is not in good financial health. Taking significant risks for potentially no return is simply reckless.

    Teams have to be able to survive and ensure stability in the short term before they can think about investing to build the game because the reality is they won't be around if they take a bad gamble.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,042 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's broke exactly because it is trying to expand beyond it's means.

    Pretending clubs from Georgia or Spain or wherever are way stronger than they actually are just because of some dogmatic quest to expand is pie in the sky stuff.

    You can only grow if there are actually realistic viable places and conditions to grow. "If you build it they will come" is the greatest lie in sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,610 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Except georgia are far stronger than many here think and havent been given any real opportunity to grow. They are best non 6 nations side in europe by a distance and need the supports to be able to get closer. Through games at 18s and 20s international level as well as senjor jnternational and at club/provincial level.

    Look At results of second tier. A georgian side in a top tier comp would get many of their players home from france if supported right

    How else do we grow the sport of rugby then. How do we expand. As expansion has to happen.

    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,042 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    You keep going on about the national team and it's clear nobody here disagrees with you about the national team. I don't think anyone would be against expansion of the national game.

    This is not a conversation about the national team. We are talking about clubs who have far less resources in a tournament that is way longer than the 6N.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,467 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    You keep saying that 'we have to grow the game' and 'expansion has to happen'.

    It doesn't if it would be detrimental to the game. And in this regard, it's not financially prudent for many club teams (and the unions that support them) who are on the edge of extinction. Yet you seem to ignore that again and again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,610 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Well If you just keep looking inward. How do you expect to do better in future times of trouble. The sport needs to expand to more countries. And going to actual properly competive sides has to happen first. Rather than simply look at the money. If you were to just look at the money side of things fijian drua would never have been added to super rugby. But new zealand and world rugby support them as its better for the game.

    On money you get world rugby involved. As thats a key part of their existence.

    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,042 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Every small sport thinks it desperately needs to expand and that the world is only waiting for it to come. But the truth is the world doesn't give a fuk.

    Rugby is just one of a whole bunch of others trying to break into markets already full of established sports and often countries that already can't afford to fund their established sports never mind some niche game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,305 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Black Lion Rugby is owned by the Georgia Rugby Federation which is back by a billionaire.

    They previously competed in Currie Cup Rugby in SA and competed in European Challenge Cup this season.

    So in their case, neither distance, travel or expense detered them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,467 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Yeah and if you don't look at the money , you get another London Irish, Wasps, Worcester Warriors etc. Seven Premiership clubs are balance sheet insolvent. The Welsh RFU is on its knees losing 7.5m last year. The Scottish Rugby Union made an 11m loss last year.

    You're just not living in reality if you think teams and unions need to ignore the money side of it. The money isn't in the game. If you wandered into any of those unions or clubs to try to sell how spending more money to bring up the Georgian game, you'd be taken out in a strait jacket.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭Blut2


    World rugby just fired 10% of their staff due to funding issues, and are under huge pressure from the national unions to pay out more from their meager funding for World Cup participation - their financials are awful currently, and only getting worse.

    If the URC expanded to Georgia and it drove one Scottish club, one Italian and one Welsh into bankruptcy how would that benefit the game exactly?

    Because costs when running a business are a zero sum game - if you introduce a new franchise/club thats a net drain on the overall business, then the money has to be cut from elsewhere. Theres no magic money tree.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,610 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Im noy saying to ignore it but if you primarily look at it then of course you will never really expand or grow. Rugby needs to develop more and get more countries to top level and have more competition. It cannot just wait and hope for america, spain, germany to be that next country. It has to look at the countries that are properly competitve on the field. You can then support them through the governing bodies off the field where possible

    Many of the english clubs were mismanaged. Thought they had something they ultimately didnt. that the welsh and scottish unions and english clubs are struggling becuase of their own ineptitude doesnt mean you cant look to new/orher areas to grow. The sport needs to expand and get more countries to top level. For financial and sporting reasons. To do so you need to take on risks with some countries like Georgia



Advertisement