Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1107108110112113144

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Likely go back to the UK where 80 percent come from .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Job discrimination is not a stand alone reason to claim asylum one must demonstrate a broader reason . A search on Google shows articles on job discrimination in Ireland for asylum seekers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,577 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Agree it's a collasal waste of money, due to complacency, poor processes and not wanting to be seen as mean.

    We should be publishing weekly figures on arrivals, staff and processing times.

    At least we get a children's hospital at the end of that drawn out process, we get very little at the end of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,577 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    I don't think it is fair to assume that at all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Yeah but the problem is that the vast majority of these people are NOT fleeing war or persecution or are children at risk by remaining at home.

    It’s a lovely appeal to emotion on your part but you’re not engaging with what the practical issue is here.

    We are spending billions accommodating people that shouldn’t be here in the first place. The system as it stands is too open to abuse and it is putting a lot of additional unnecessary strain on our services.
    There is plenty we can do, while still working within the 1951 convention, to curb excessive applications here.

    What would you say if next year 100,000 people turned up claiming asylum? Or 250,000 people? Or more? No doubt you’d just shrug and say oh well we’re signatories to the 1951 convention so…?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,650 ✭✭✭riddles


    the only way to handle it is to consider people who come through the official process ie refugee camps. Anything else is like showing up at a hotel without a booking and expecting everything just to happen. All the people returning to vacation in the home country should have their Irish status revoked as it was gained under false pretences.

    Post edited by riddles on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,970 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Ministers plan ‘significant’ step-up in number of charter deportation flights leaving Ireland | Irish Independent

    Obviously people who should not be here should be deported, no one can argue otherwise. But isn't it a pity the Government just goes with the way the wind is blowing and didn't start making such efforts at a much earlier stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,145 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Then please point to any article where South African nationals have claimed asylum owing to job discrimination in SA. Or any where SA nationals in Ireland have stated that as the reason why they're here. Should be easy to find. I've been waiting 15 hours for evidence following a spurious claim, happy to wait longer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,145 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Have you read the Convention? Seemingly not as you fail to understand our obligations under it.

    Anyone can claim asylum. It's up to us to then investigate the veracity of this. If rejected the applicant leaves the country having not had a fun time in Direct Provision or elsewhere. If 80% of applicants are being rejected then you must surely be applauding the state doing its work, no?

    €2.5 billion over 6 years. At that rate we could use the €13 billion Apple taxation and take care of refugees for 31.2 years. Mooney well spent to provide a haven for people fleeing war and persecution. We have enough cash to take care of traumatised children and adults.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,060 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I want actions over words. Every few weeks these pieces are rolled out to make it look like the government have a handle on the situation. Ring up their mates, send down a camera crew and reporter,, get a few shots of immigration officers checking id, rinse and repeat so the population feel like the government are doing their job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,207 ✭✭✭dmakc


    Amazing how the government again have lagged years behind what anyone with a rational mind has been saying all along



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    If 80% are being rejected on the lacking veracity in their claim then it’s largely NOT being spent on “traumatised” adults and children, compelling as you think your transparent appeal to emotion might be.

    Weird that you try to lump in the earlier years before this was a crisis into the spend. Let’s take the most recent figures that are representative of our current reality shall we? Over a billion in 2024 alone, putting people up for no reason because as we’ve established 80% are not genuine. Let’s call it for what it is at this stage, it’s viewed as a soft underbelly to circumvent visa restrictions to gain access to the country. If it wasn’t we wouldn’t be seeing tens of thousands of people chancing their arm when they don’t have a genuine claim.

    So go on anyway, if 500,000 turn up to Irish shores next year - you’ll just sit there happily “Oh well we’re obliged so this is fine” 🤷‍♂️

    As I said, plenty we can do while while working within the confines of the 1951 convention to disincentivise non genuine applications



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,259 ✭✭✭CollyFlower


    "The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has determined that Ireland cannot cite housing shortages as a justification for failing to provide adequate accommodation to asylum seekers. In a legal opinion published on April 10, 2025, the ECJ emphasized that Ireland, as an EU member state, is obligated to ensure that international protection applicants receive appropriate reception conditions, regardless of challenges such as increased arrivals or housing shortage."

    If they can't fulfill this" obligation" then they need to ramp up deportations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭tom23


    Or just keeping buying and renting hotels. Shure we have 14 billion as one person has pointed out… let's try and save as many as we can. Along with the 14 billion, we have the Irish taxpayer, an ATM that never runs out of money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,145 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Have you read the 1951 Convention, and do you understand our obligations?

    Did you read the government figures, and the reference to the 6 years of expenditure?

    Do you believe that 500k people will turn up next year, or ever? Hyperbole signifies an inability to argue your corner. And therein lies the reason that the anti-immigration parties in this country got wiped out in the general election. They've no case and the public is too smart for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,025 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,145 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Nope. They need to fulfil the obligation. Take a crash course in legalese.

    Any of the anti-immigration dudes here willing to give accredited media sources or empirical research to back up their claims? Or will it remain a case of 'I heard this from some lads' or 'I saw this on TV but I can't get a link' or 'them's the numbers.'

    Until you give hard facts no one is voting for your lot. You're shouting loudly but nobody's listening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,060 ✭✭✭prunudo


    This whole thing will contuine until politicians stop gaslighting the public, and that's not related just to immigration either. They are obsessed with power and will do anything to stay there, they don't care for people (either Irish or asylum seeker) and will never comment on anything that they deem will be an impediment to reelection.

    This whole immigration saga has been building for years, but even if just this time last year, prior to the local and European elections, if any one party had of softened the language about 'the far right rhetoric' and grasped immigration nettle, they would have been thanked in the polls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,259 ✭✭✭CollyFlower


    Maybe a crash course in reality would be more helpful than legalese.

    Mod Edit: Warning issued for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,145 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    €13 billion actually. Facts eh, who needs 'em. And that's solely from monies owed from previous years. €28 billion collected in corporation tax alone in 2024. There ain't a financial problem offering refuge to those fleeing war.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,145 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    16 hours since you made your claim about South African nationals (plural) and you offer nothing to back it up bar 'I saw something on TV so please believe me.' I don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,145 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Yep, I'd recommend that for you also. I'm happy to help crowdfund.

    Incidentally what do you think is the REALISTIC response to the government losing a case in the ECJ? They going to ignore it and hope it goes away?

    Off to an appointment now so hopefully some credible sources await me on return. Enjoy the sunshine y'all.

    Mod Edit: Warning issued for uncivil posting



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,230 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Mod: CollyFlower and Seathrun66 are on a timeout for uncivil posting. I suggest other posters also cop themselves on or they'll be joining them fairly shortly, I've deleted a couple of posts that could easily have earned others a few days off. You can disagree on a topic and still discuss it in a civil manner, you know like adults are supposed to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭McBain11


    Ash J Williams is clearly and unambiguously stating that they saw this on a rte news segment. There are no figures. Nobody knows if Ash J Williams actually saw it, thus any poster claiming that Ash J Williams did or did not see that rte news segment is making a false statement. This ain't difficult to understand unless using an agenda to obstructively and obtusely post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭halkar


    1951 Convention Ireland signed is for refugees not for economic migrants that are coming here using illegal human traffickers. A real refugee will go to nearest safest country to their own. They don't open the map to pick and choose countries thousands of miles away and travel with fake documents. If I am persecuted in Ireland I go to UK and claim asylum. I don't go to Thailand and claim asylum because they have good weather and nice beaches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,970 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    I think our politicians know what way the wind is blowing now, and there are going to be fewer comments about the Famine or the health service relying on immigration, which largely sought to shame and misrepresent people with views based on common sense.

    Only an idiot would argue for zero immigration, it'd be absurd and unenforceable. But there does need to be limits, no country should ever be expected to take in a couple of percent of its indigenous population in a year. That's potentially good for owners of multiple properties and business owners who want to minimise wage inflation, but it doesn't work for the vast majority, certainly not for the thousands who can't get homes of their own or for parents who can't get local schools for their kids.

    The mad thing is that people all over the world know this, but for many years western countries didn't move on it. It became very hard to say obvious things about immigration. Even now, when you'd struggle to rent a middling house in the most isolated parts of the country, people still don't want to hear the truth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭JohnJoFitz


    Quite tiresome reading the half-witted view that because people didn't vote for far-right head bangers, that nobody has a problem with the rate of immigration or that immigration is having no impact on the political sphere across Europe.

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/plan-to-double-the-number-of-deportations-this-year/a1179259590.html

    The winds of change continue but it begs the question why weren't they doing this before. Far far more needs to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Yes, have you read my comments where I said twice that I wanted further changes while operating within the confines of the 1951 convention?

    Those figures are irrelevant now as half of the span applies to a time before the crisis took off. Of course you want to dilute them with pre crisis years. I want to talk about how much it is costing us NOW, while the crisis is ongoing. I.e. over a billion a year, every year.

    It doesn’t matter, we would be obliged would we not? The are 7 billion people out there and any one of them can claim asylum here if they so wish. And what are you on about anti immigration parties now for? Who said anything about stopping immigration? Facile attempt to muddy the waters of the discussion because you’ve no ability to actually argue any of the points I’ve raised.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Marcos


    Damn, it seems that the new German government hasn't got the memo from those who say there's nothing to do when any country won't accept it's citizens being deported back there from Germany. They've threatened to cut foreign aid to them if they don't.

    They want to redirect foreign aid to help mothers who have taken time off work and also fund a drop in VAT for restaurants among other schemes.

    They also want to put an end to turbo-naturalisation - allowing certain migrant groups to be given citizenship after three years, as well as suspending family reunification for two years. I wonder what their response to pressure groups who tell them they can't do this, maybe Wir Schaffen Das?

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



Advertisement