Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning added to OP 10/1/26

16416426446466471581

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,703 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    I bet that's because she's a women rather than anything relevant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,703 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Would you not want to try and sell more in the EU rather than have the stress of not only all of the trans Atlantic logistics and entirely new distribution setup as well as at least 10% more tarrif costs to account for as well? Never mind the potential for an expensive failure and the prevailing US antiEU attitudes which would make that more likely...

    Quote seems to not have worked properly...

    Yosser:


    i must say to trump re the tariffs at least he seems consistent.

    if i sold a product/service in the EU for a profit and i wanted to access another huge market, i'd be happy to pay a premium.

    i'm very cynical of all these things ever since the EU put tariffs on chinese ev's. like was it about the environment or not?

     Quote 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,982 ✭✭✭yagan


    USD devalued at pace against the euro to $1.13 while main indexes continue to give up their rebound rally gains.

    T bond heading for same territory as before Trump announced his three month pause.

    It might be Friday but it's also just another "flip the table day" in the White House.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,727 ✭✭✭Cody montana




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭pinkfloyd34


    About the American public paying for the tariff. The head of a well known Irish crisp was on the radio during the week saying he could pay a percentage of the tariff to not to pass on the cost to the consumer and stay competitive in that market. So the suppliers do have have a choice to pay the tariff themselves or pass on all or some of it to the consumer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,907 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Some suppliers have a choice. Margins are too tight for others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,982 ✭✭✭yagan


    He could reduce the export price but I doubt his diaspora buyers are what sustains his business and in the current environment that niche demand could diminish further.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,013 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    The grovelling and sycophancy in the US cabinet meeting is absolutely disgusting, and does absolutely nothing for 'confidence'.

    "Mr. President, under your leadership, blah, blah, blah..."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,144 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,354 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    If your logistical and production costs etc don't make that possible, then that's gonna hit the consumer. On top of that, plenty of brands simply have consumers that will pay the increased price so it would make no sense for them to absorb the hit.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭bog master


    Technically the manufacturer does not pay the tariff, it is the import company/business. The manufacturer could lower his price, which would allow the importer to sell at a cheaper price and still maintain their margin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,302 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,118 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    It was Keogh's crisps.

    In his case he likely felt they would become uncompetitive in the US market if the price had to increase a considerable amount beyond it's current rate.

    He said that the increase in the value of the dollar (relative to when they started trading in the US) meant they could keep a similar profit margin to what they had previously, even if the price dropped for their American purchasers.

    The problem he has now, is the value of the dollar is dropping vs the Euro.

    He did also say that in the event the tariffs got too high, they would just work on increasing their sales in other markets and abandon the US. The US is currently responsible for 15% of their sales I believe.

    So where he stands now is hard to tell as things are fluctuating so much. But I imagine they're not prioritising any growth in the US going forward and will look to more stable markets for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    China raises tariffs on US goods to 125%

    BREAKING: China has announced additional tariffs on US goods to 125%, according to Reuters.

    That is up from the previous level of 84%

    China’s finance ministry is reported as saying that If the US insists on continuing to infringe upon China’s interest in a substantive way, China will resolutely take countermeasures and fight to the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    This is going to get really awkward for Trump. At some point, the tariff raises have to stop when it's clear China will just continue to match.

    American consumers will immediately and obviously be affected by these tariffs while Chinese consumers won't. It feels like China is doing this, not to protect itself, but to goad Trump into making what it sees as mistake after mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,109 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    All hail General Pingu

    1000063538.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,825 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    The importer always pays the tariffs.

    The difference is when it's a large multinational like VW, they don't sell direct to the US public. Is the EU branch selling to the US branch, so there's some scope to reduce the base price.

    But for industries who import an item that they use for manufacturing, like fabric and then that enters the supply chain at a higher price (because they have to pay tariffs) then everyone starts adding their profit margins, the end price to the consumer goes up.

    I'd love to hear how that trump supporter who was interviewed about tariffs, who runs a T-shirt printing business and imports from China is getting on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,982 ✭✭✭yagan


    Different dynamic then, the world was being flooded with dollars when rates were low. It's that cheap credit that kept inflating the housing bubbles like ours.

    Demand for t bills increased during that weak dollar era, whereas now demand for both USD and t bills is falling simultaneously, a flight from the US in general.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    Chinese ministers are admonishing the US, calling for reversals from the Trump administration and declaring the Beijing will not back down, according to comments reported by Reuters:

    China’s commerce minister has said that that the country firmly opposes and condemns the US’ wanton unilateral tariff measures, and has taken resolute countermeasures to safeguard its own rights and interest.

    They’ve also said that the US’ repeated imposition of abnormally high tariffs has become a “numbers game” and has no practical economic significance. The ministry has urged the US to take a big step in cancelling the so-called ‘reciprocal tariffs’ and completely correct its wrongful practices.

    If Trump keeps going, we're going to get into comical numbers of thousands of percent, like the 1320% vs 1300%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,907 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    China should just come out and say "If Donald Trump plans to raise tariffs when we respond, both countries should raise it to one million percent today so the economic impact of tariff raises on the world's markets isn't drawn out over months and years."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    On a different note, why does Ireland own $63k of US debt per capita? That seems wildly high.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,982 ✭✭✭yagan


    USD weakening rapidly, gone past $1.14 to the euro.

    Those tariffed imports getting more expensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 839 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    The figure is a misleading and load of bullshit

    It’s not us the Irish at taxpayers that own US treasuries debt, of which about 350bn is in Ireland

    Most of not almost all held by various “funds” down Dublin, usually for clients like Pfizer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,055 ✭✭✭dasdog


    EUR/USD clipped $1.14 and is up 2% today. It was $1.09 two days ago.

    The tarrif numbers no longer matter they are effectively sanctions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭CoffeeImpala


    If that number is true it would be for Irish based companies rather than the government. A lot of the private equity and pension funds in the IFSC would have large holdings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    China actually saying that's their last move on tariffs.

    The statement also suggested it may be Beijing’s last move in the tit-for-tat tariff raises as “at the current tariff level, there is no market acceptance for US goods exported to China”.

    “If the US continues to impose tariffs on Chinese goods exported to the US, China will ignore it,” it said, flagging that there were other countermeasures to come.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,982 ✭✭✭yagan


    Lots more Irish people looking at their portfolios thinking they need to reduce their US exposure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,825 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I'd love to see a reporter ask Trump, with the new tariffs China has placed on the US, who actually pays them? The US companies or China? Of course, he'll probably say China.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,353 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    We have a lot of fund management companies based here for the same reasons as tech companies

    But the tech and pharma multinationals would also own bonds

    US debt has long been seen as very stable, safe and relatively liquid compared to other assets. Per capita is a weird way to calculate it because there's no attribution or correlation of this amount to population size

    Irish holdings of US bonds is whatever your calculation is multiplied by population, $300bn or whatever. Yes that's a lot, but these companies have to hold their cash somewhere

    It's not individual irish people



Advertisement
Advertisement