Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1604605607609610718

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Her and Noem will be hit by tariffs if they apply it to Mayo's Botox supply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    He would like the dollar to devalue but the normal course of events is for the currency to rise after the imposition of sanctions thus nullifying some of hoped-for benefits of the sanctions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    Oil prices are down, interest rates are down (the slow moving Fed should cut rates!), food prices are down, there is NO INFLATION, and the long time abused USA is bringing in Billions of Dollars a week from the abusing countries on Tariffs that are already in place.

    I really don't think he understands tariffs. How could the tariffs be bringing in billions from the abusing countries? Does he think foreign companies are paying the tariff to the US government?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 903 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Yes, but what about their shareholders who are watching their investments tank.

    The economy was one of the main election issues remember. Trump is betting on the tariff plan. If it doesn't work he's toast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭Westernview


    "It's the economy stupid" has never seemed so prescient. Hopefully republican voter anger will kick in fully before too long.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,036 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Yes, but no one will be able to tell if they are upset by that....

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,109 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    It can't really 'work' in his term as president. It takes too long for factories to be built and supply chains upended. I think this is more an obsession for Trump. He's be talking about tariffs since the 80's and seems to have a deep belief that the US has been ripped off in an underhanded way by other countries for decades.

    He's partially right but it's a lot more complicated than that and tariffs are not the solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    EU latest:

    EU chief Ursula von der Leyen says Brussels is ready to negotiate on Trump’s tariffs — but won’t wait forever.

    A new import surveillance task force is being set up, and countermeasures are on the table if talks break down.

    The real headline: Europe is now preparing to pivot away from the U.S. and focus on the 83% of its trade that lies elsewhere.

    Source: Reuters

    https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1909229003065753691



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭poop emoji


    Vietnam offered 0% tarrifs and of course Trump admin are saying “that’s not enough”

    There is no negotiating with these imbeciles, not that Trumps signature is worth anything just ask Canada and Mexico who signed a deal with Trump before



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,358 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Yep I'd have no problem increasing trade with China. They are our largest trading partner as it is. The US empire has been declining for some time and these tariffs could be the sting from a dying wasp. I think Chinese GDP will be larger than US GDP in 10 years. The Chinese are business people and tend not to make rash decisions.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭nachouser


    I think the new approach will be that the U.S. is basically Netflix and each country will have to pay a yearly subscription fee to get access to U.S. markets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    With the annual fee rising every year accordingly no doubt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,848 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    I've just stepped away from the TV after watching Navarro still trying to sell the story that VAT is on a par with tariffs where it comes to US goods being sold abroad and that if the EU stopped applying VAT on US goods, it would be a start in negotiations over tariffs. He was talking to the people who cover the financial and market affairs for the TV stations FFS! Good thing is I had a HR4U "frustration-relief" rubber computer mouse to throw at the screen.

    Presumably he is still trying to tell the US public that VAT is part of the tariffs system and is being used to keep the unequal trade deficits Trump is talking about. He was asked about the differences of opinion on tariffs between him and Musk and sidestepped it by returning to his tariffs waffle and ignoring the questions asked of him.

    We need to educate the US public that VAT is the same as the retail sales tax applied in the US and that VAT applies to most sales and services across and within the EU. One difference is that the different STATES in the US APPLY AND RECEIVE the sales tax revenue and not the Federal Govt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    EU thing started.

    https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/ebs/live/1

    But I don't feel like much would be announced during this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭poop emoji


    Unless you are Russia, they get free access due to peepee tape



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,848 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    I've just watched Navarro on TV telling the people interviewing him that it takes only four [4] months for factories to be built for production of goods in the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    Check out this piece on PETER NAVARRO here, his back story and how Trump "found him". Jesus H Christ!!!!! - by Rachel Maddow ( about 6 mins in )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Field east


    what was American doing what it was being ‘ripped off ‘ by everyone else - I assume that it had its eyes WIDE OPEN while this was going on and decided that it was to their advantage at the time.

    So four points on the above :-

    (1) Americans were enjoying cheap food - and quality food from Ireland - cheap clothes, etc. and mainly products that were cheaper than they could be produced in America. The country knowingly choose to go down this path

    (2) since WW2 the US pumped billions of dollars into building up its army whereas Europe, et al choose to spend its annual budget in other ways ie building up infrastructure, social services m and suchlike.

    (3) So, is Trump kicking himself that the US did not go down , for example, the European path and have a more balanced approach to developing the country?

    (4) what were the Americans doing that could have been making all the nations requirement for clothes, food, cars, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, but did not. Were they all unemployed or making loads of dollars or what? They must have been doing very little as Trump sees a very poor situation in front of him and is going to make America Great/Rich again

    So, in summary, the US has something that most other countries have not got ie an adequate army to defend itself



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,946 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Navarro who is the main advisor pushing the tariffs is saying they need to do something about their Vat rates, whether that is abolish them entirely or just for US goods who knows. The main point is the US is trying to dictate the internal tax policies of other countries, that is **** bonkers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭Sigma101


    I fundamentally disagree with this. This would be the worst possible thing for the EU to do.

    The EU already has a huge trade imbalance with China. We have a high dependence on critical raw materials and components from China, with huge vulnerability in our supply chains. The Chinese have been dumping products in the EU for years, decimating our industries. They've been strategically subsidising particular innovative products to destroy our high-tech industries. They've all but destroyed the fledgling solar manufacturing industry and they're in the process of doing the same to the automotive industry. The Chinese have been buying up strategic assets in the EU, such as ports and airports. And that's before we even start to discuss the human rights issues in Tibet, Hong Kong, the threats to Taiwan, the security concerns relating to their domination of 5G technologies, etc, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    We can just add a 20% minimum tip instead - they should understand that. If they get on time delivery and they want to appear successful to their neighboring (sic) countries they can always up their tip to 30%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭Sigma101




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭poop emoji


    $2.1 trillion wiped out as soon as US markets opened

    Tesla is crashing faster than erm a Tesla on “autopilot”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,109 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Looks like markets are recovering from early losses on hopes negotiations are getting underway. Trump has agreed to negotiations with Japan and the White House says it can do business with Europe if the VAT rate on American goods is removed.

    The VAT argument a bit facile though given the UK does the same and yet gets a 10% tariff compared to the EU's 20%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    It's a bizarre system in America when the president can unilaterally levy tariffs on the entire world but can't change the interest rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,303 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    To my knowledge, they can't remove VAT on US made goods - that would give American businesses and exporters a huge advantage over literally everyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    That's crazy. That would put EU companies subject to VAT at a disadvantage to US companies. There is no way the EU could agree to that with a view to keeping it long term.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,292 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Why did Vietnam have such a large tarriff on the USA in the first place? What was the exact number..



Advertisement