Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1591592594596597721

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    the downward spiralling of stocks in the US is DEFINATELY NOT A CRASH - nor anywhere near it- what is actually happening is the equivalent of a ‘Special Military Operation’ . Another Putin like talking point. Trump is fast picking up all the ways of saying things from his master!!!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    Putin’s generals in the Ukr field do’nt tell him everything either

    Outin’ generals on the Ukr field do’nt tell Putin everything either ,. They only feed him the ‘good news pieces’ and keep him ignorant of disasters



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    if one is driving at 100 mph towards a 2foot thick concrete wall and is just one yard from same - yes , one could say that there has been no crash YET



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    17661

    17661- forgot to say this is in response to post no 17661



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    Am surprised that he did not go for the’ easiest win ‘ first and talk to them. Trump would make a suggestion to them and say “if you agree with me then JUST FLAP” !!!!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    Forgot to say this is is in response to post no 17664



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,365 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    S&P 500 is down 10% in 2 days. The Trump circus will be glad it's Saturday. S&P is also down 2.5% year on year which will really piss long term investors off. I am watching Michael Burry's portfolio and there is a lot of red. I wonder did he short the markets, he has history of doing that. The people that shorted are the only folks making big money now. Monday will be interesting.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    can Trump remove J Powell from his post immediately - once he has dug up ‘ some dirt’ on him - eg driving off from his local store without paying for a lollipop!!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,704 ✭✭✭yagan


    We're definitely near correction territory.

    The tariffs imposition are a political event with economic consequences so market reactions and strategy can take time to materialize. We may see a bigger bolt out of US assets later.

    one thing that will not change is that Trump's tariffs formula signals to the market that there's no actual method being applied. even holding 10 year t bills isn't insurance against the maga madness continuing even if Trump died on the golf course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,583 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I do wonder if the democrats(or anyone, really) are looking at challenging these tariffs in the senate or in court?

    They are causing massive pain for the American people and they clearly go far beyond the reach of what Trump is supposedly allowed to do regarding tariffs so there’s clearly scope for it.

    It’s so strange, and a sign of a democracy with huge problems, that the executive can just do something that damaging unilaterally and there’s no effective way of blocking it.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The EU puts trade restrictions on blood diamonds, products that cause deforestation etc. these are sensible.

    I agree. That is not remotely what Sanders is interested in. He is just a left-wing Amercian protectionist who wanted to nonsensically reshore manufacturing the US every bit as much as Trump. He would be far less stupid about it of course, but his core instincts in this one scenario are the same.

    What the Democrats need (and are clearly desperately lacking) is a free trade advocate who can put out the entirely correct message that it makes everyone richer, in both the US and the markets they are buying from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    Should the Democrats now be putting forward their counter policies now with the aim of winning the mid terms or is it a bit too early ? . Maybe start with broad outlines of it. - giving more details as time marches on. I suppose that’s for political strategists to work out.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    A half comatose badger would be a better leader than Trump right now. That was not remotely my point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,643 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Sanders would be a far better leader than Trump right now, along with your badger. Neither are insane. Sure, Sanders policies might not be great - but he's no idiot and would listen to reason. Plus, who knows, maybe the US would end up with decent health care policy. I can always naievely hope…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,231 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I disagree that the solution to the predicament the US public find themselves in is free trade. There are more than two choices between free trade idealism, and whatever it is that Trump is doing.

    Trade policy is part of international diplomacy. It is a tool to drive reforms and to extend your domestic policy abroad.

    Eg, if you are a liberal country, you should put tariffs on countries that use slavery or revoke civil rights from minorities or women.

    We should put tariffs on countries that have lower costs because they exploit labour and or cause environmental destruction.

    We should also protect essential domestic interests, like the CAP to ensure that Europe has a viable food industry to prepare for the inevitable global trade shocks so we are not left stranded without food.

    Free trade absolutism is a race to the bottom in labour health and environmental standards and political freedoms

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'm not a free trade absolutist. The EU approaches these issues for the most part by incorporating these minimum standards into their free trade deals which is absolutely the way to approach it.

    Also we should just not accept slave goods, not put tariffs on them. We should, as we do, have minimum health requirements for animal products also.

    Sanders, much like Trump, wanted to use tariffs in a misguided and ultimately pointless effort to reshore manufacturing to the US. It has/had nothing to do with trade ethics. Tariffs essentially never work for this - all they do is make everyone poorer. Already you can see the response from many Democrats is carefully couched in language about how tariffs can be an important tool to bolster US manufacturing, and that is just 100% wrong and these people are destroying the effective response to this crisis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,407 ✭✭✭thereiver


    I read that Trump will have to come to some agreement with the EU Canada and Japan re tariffs otherwise the stock market will continue to decline. The us is heading for a 2008 type recession unless he is ready to compromise and negotiate. Tariffs increase the cost of goods for All consumers Then voted for trump he promised to crack down on illegal immigrantion. He speaks in a simple way that appeals to working class and Latino voters .Biden was too old to be a viable candidate.

    Democrats can't seem to communicate with working class voters . Hopefully democrats can up with some candidate that appeals to voters in the next 3 years .



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You are again spectacularly missing my point - absolutely nowhere have I suggested Sanders would be worse than Trump. Every single last democrat and 90% of Republicans would be a better leader than Trump. It is completely irrelevant to my point.

    Sanders would be a poor leader of the Democrats right now because his economic trade policies are too similar to Trump's and are well documented (also, cause he's not a Democrat). They need someone who can put forth the sensible economic rationale for why this is all incredibly stupid and just making everyone poorer by choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Now think about the tangible impact it has on any of them. They'll pick that money back up at some other point and they're ultimately unimpacted in day to day life. So if this is your definition of the elite suffering, it's not suffering. Meanwhile working class and middle class people will actually suffer. Equally it doesn't take into account how many of those same billionaires are likely profiting from this situation...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,462 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Who else has lost? It's not just the richest people is it?

    It is anyone with investment, pensions etc connected to those companies.
    Next it will impact demand and jobs as the companies tighten belts.

    It is total misrepresentation to paint this as just hurting the richest people so spare us nonsense about "no wonder the media is in melt down".

    And the same Trump administration has been gutting programmes and staff that helped the poorest Americans.

    So don't even try that angle either.

    The media is in melt down because this economic repercussions for Americans of all income brackets, and not just Americans.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,121 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    The way I look at it rightly or wrongly, is this…. if a country can produce certain goods within its borders then tariffs are ok to shore up domestic production. If they can't produce domestically and place tariffs on imports - not good.

    But I obviously haven't thought it through like an economist either!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,462 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It's not just a question of whether you can produce it. You could produce cars in Ireland but they would be very expensive, we can produce pharma in large quantities. We can produce tomatoes but limited in greenhouses. You can't produce everything efficiently. Better off if Ireland produces butter and gets most of its tomatoes eg from the Mediterranean.

    There is a place for specific tariffs (eg new industries, newly developing countries, to target unfair trade practices) but you won't find any credible competent economist that will justify Trump's across the board tariffs based on a supposed trade deficit.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,913 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ndtv.com/world-news/jp-morgan-predicts-us-recession-by-year-end-amid-donald-trumps-tariffs-8092248/amp/1

    Jp Morgan predicts the US will be in recession by the end of the year, largely due to trump's tariffs.

    Well do the orange utan



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    500 richest people have lost some wealth. No wonder the media is in melt down.

    We have one poster blaming the Dems for Trump being elected, and here we have another claiming that the outrage is caused by the media, and not the people suffering.

    F**king hilarious to see throw blame around without laying it purely and simply where it belongs, at the ample lap of Donny...

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,365 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Getting the tariff formula all wrong made a mockery of the whole thing and probably spooked the markets even more. They know they are dealing with economic clowns now.

    I believe the Trump administration gave the ports a week to implement the new tariffs on their processes and systems so there is a lag there. It will take a while before we see the real impact including delays and bottlenecks at ports.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 94,849 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Is it true that Russia is facing no tariffs ?

    The US military's main adversary and it's main high spend on tech since WWII has been to counter the Russians.

    Trump is also cancelling "The Voice Of America" radio. Using a radio is a lot harder to track than internet usage in locked down countries.

    Is there ANYTHING Donald has done that has impacted Russia more than other countries because I haven't seen it.

    It's getting to the stage where someone will have to take the USA to the WTO under the "Most Favoured Nation" rules to make it clear to the rednecks that this president is like a dog marking his territory over what the US military has stood for for most of living memory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,378 ✭✭✭jj880


    Another assassination attempt in the near future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,710 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I can't believe that this still has to be explained to some people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,462 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Where are all these post numbers you keep referencing?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton


    If rich people keep losing money this one will be successful though.



Advertisement