Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1574575577579580723

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,710 ✭✭✭yagan


    Speaking of USD it's down to 90 cent to the Euro and falling.

    We're entering the USD panic zone.

    I think what's spooked the markets most is how Trump arrived at his tariff rates which illustrated perfectly the blunt ignorance of the manchild in charge. International trade can not work within parametres set by addled angry convicted sex offenders.

    Trump and power base aren't even interested in the lessons of history, they're determined to become a history lesson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,589 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    In a way, it's America's own fault for electing a gambler who bankrupted his own casinos, and it's a lesson they need to learn. On the other hand though, it won't be the likes of Trump who suffer the consequences, and the economic hammer will be smashed on people who did and didn't vote for Trump alike, and the harm it will do to those people will be catastrophic. And worst of all, the lesson still won't have been learned and after a term or two of a Dem president trying to get America back on track, some other populist using Trump's playbook will swoop in, blame the Dem president for the state of the country, and get elected.

    The greatest damage Trump has done or will do isn't economics, it is ultimately the destruction of political discourse, norms, and checks & balances, and that goes all the way back to his first term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What a bad minded post. Seriously fella, go out and get some sun and lighten up.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,392 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    Jesus, these American pharma companies are not just based in Ireland.

    They have manufacturing facilities in France, Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Italy and more. That's just in Europe.

    They have manufacturing facilities all over Asia.

    These companies are not going to shut down their global operations and bring everything back to the US to export out with ridiculous tariffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Noticeable that his biggest supporters seem to mysteriously disappear during these **** storms.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,800 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    Local representatives refused to comment, then lay on their bellies and slid off the ice into the sea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,234 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Its so dumb, they've added the highest tariffs to the countries that they import the most from. He chose the best way to maximize the increase in inflation for US consumers

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    It's a completely unrealistic scenario. No company is going to sell a product like that with zero profit margin.

    You're assuming that the landed price for the import is more expensive than the locally produced one. Companies don't tend to import a car that would cost more than a locally produced one.

    Assuming BMW likes to make a profit and sells both SUV's for €80k on the forecourt:

    VAT on the US model would be €18,400 and VAT on the EU model would be….. €18,400, the very same amount and %

    The end consumer ultimately pays the VAT.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,946 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Prove China charges 67% tariffs without using trumps bogus surplus/deficit maths.

    Also the 34% he is putting on China is on top of the prior 20% he already added so China is now being hit with 54% tariffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Suckler


    The US and their entire administration can get fucked for the next 4 years, should be as isolated as possible from the rest of the world.

    Aside from the 3rd term discussion; I think we (the royal we) need to take a solid lessen from this situation. The USA has shown itself to be a completely unreliable and untrustworthy ally & trading partner. It could well end up being a trade war but irrespective of how this pans out; I don't think the next US administration should be allowed to simply put it down to Trump and his cohort.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    No idea why you've chosen to include that photo of Michael D, Trump's tariffs will make everyday goods including things like clothing more expensive. Let's see if the US public are feeling wealthier if they let this run for a year. My guess is the poor and working class will have less spending power while the billionaires etc will just get to engage in some disaster capitalism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Suckler


    the billionaires etc will just get to engage in some disaster capitalism.

    Definitely where I would put my money on what the current US administration is doing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,313 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The isolationists / protectionists in the US want to put a halt to all that. But the US has been one of the main beneficiaries of the global economy - countries that are protectionist tend to struggle economically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,705 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Does this make any sense? So who should it be put down to then? Would you expect us to credit Trump if somehow miraculously it turned out all this stuff worked? For how long has the USA been 'completely unreliable and untrustworthy', did this time suddenly turn out to start this last January (or maybe 2016)? There's a coincidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭Aurelian


    The crazy thing is the system was clearly working in favour of the US, their economy having grown to double that of the EU in the last few years. I can afford to buy tons from the supermarket ergo the supermarket is ripping me off.

    A bit of internal wealth distribution to make it work for more individuals in the US is clearly what was needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    I do agree that Trump is the issue but I partially agree with Suckler in the sense that the US can't be viewed as trustworthy going forward. Their electorate is far too willing to elect insane candidates and I can't see that changing. Their checks and balances are not functional if they're unwilling to ever oust a president etc.

    Plus I'm also not entirely sure if they're gonna exit from the path they're following ATM.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Going all the way back to WW2 the US have always been very insular. The leader of the free world bollix is more from a position of King than big brother.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Mod: FrancisMcM given a week off for trolling, no need to quote them going forward. Thanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    They will be shocked - but you won't be able to tell. 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,820 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    At best it’s coming from a place of ignorance and ineptitude, or at worst it’s to destroy all small, and medium, enterprises, in the US, for the massive corporations to hoover up the business.

    EmmetSpiceland: Oft imitated but never bettered.

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,342 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    In other news other then tarrifs I see the Wiscounsin supreme court election was a loss for Musk



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,613 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Or its both, hes too stupid to realise that the billionaires in his ear arent his friends and he's ruining a world leader.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    They are (trying to think of an egg pun) … shell shocked



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,866 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Trumps friend Musk motor co seems to have run into further problems in Europe. After it's decision not to allow collective bargaining between the workforce and it, unions in Norway and Denmark said they would block movement of it's car exports to Sweden. The trouble between Tesla and its workforce over the issue has been brewing up for the past four months. A Swedish Insurance Co, Folksam, has decided to divest itself of the shares it has invested in in Tesla shares to the sum of US$160 Million. A Danish Co, PFA, in December was discussing whether to do the same with its Tesla shares.

    Musk, last Friday, posted on X that he had sold his shares in X to his AI Co, xAI. “xAI and X’s futures are intertwined. Today, we officially take the step to combine the data, models, compute, distribution and talent,” Musk wrote in a post on X. The deal value, according to AP News, is US$33 Billion in an all shares deal while thehill put it at US$45 Billion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,017 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    I see Nutlick was spewing nonsense again about the EU being unfair because we won't allow their chlorinated chicken in (no amount of tariffs will ever create a market for that filth in the EU) and then claimed the US has better beef than anywhere else 🤣 These people are completely disconnected from reality, hopefully they get a very harsh lesson soon to bring things back in perspective for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Hopefully this can be put down to Trump style bluster/posturing and negotiated out so that we/The EU/The US aren't further adversely affected. Trade wars like this never end well for anyone but the proverbial '1%'.

    If all this stuff "works"; the apparent end game shows it won't be a two way street and we won't be in any way eventual benefactors (who will remains to be seen), so I doubt we'll be crediting Trump. The fact that you've used the word "miraculously" leads me to think that you'd also agree this is not a well thought out plan to say the least.

    However, if the trade war deepens & continues; I don't think we should accept that it be quietly put down to a simple "it was just Trumps 4 years, we'll be friends again" thought process.

    If an Asian/African nation came up with this rhetoric and line of thought; we'd collectively steer well clear. The whole administration has gone along with this; they're 100 days old and have embarked on this nonsensical tariff war; checks & balances don't even factor. The announcement and signing fronted by a table with basic arithmetic/economic assessment completely wrong.

    When did they become untrustworthy, in my opinion - It's nearly ten years in the making. Trump & the Republican lies/rhetoric were seen in the run up to his 2016 election, he's further those lies and they've now become Government lines. Independent & robust journalism has been completely eroded. The White House press briefings were a running joke under his first term - Sean Spicer & Kayleigh McEnany were allowed to spew lie after lie after lie from the podium. The tone and statements of JD Vance in Europe about Europe shouldn't be permitted to be wiped away too easily. The attitude to Ukraine has the potential to endanger all of Europe but the US administration and people have shown themselves to be completely on board with this thought process. Trump & Co. bemoan European defence spending; the EU then focussed more on production of armaments in the EU and not reliant on US firms; what happened, the same USA crying that we wouldn't be buying from them. It's basket case management that's leadership inspired.

    Edit 2: Just listen to Howard Lutnick on Fox news today. If it was a hack journalist you'd could chalk his nonsense down to stupidity but, he's the Commerce Secretary. His outright lies and misrepresentations are intentional and taken from the President. For an administration to fall in collectively like this, it shouldn't be permitted to simplistically blame one man's term in office. They are all complicit and it shouldn't be forgotten.

    If it was in a business scenario (as Trump fans love to equate the running of a government to the same as business) and I was dealing with another company for years with a good relationship; a change of management triggering turmoil and open disdain for my company, would leave me under no illusion that they were not to be further trusted to the same degree. That's a very simplistic summary/analogy I'd definitely contend.

    The country has allowed this and, at times, willed it down it's current path. I don't think we should reward such a place, a stronger Europe is what we should now focus on.

    American rhetoric is invasive, stupid and dangerous in equal measure and it's crept in here. It's been boiled down to be sold to the lowest common denominator; look at this thread; even though there's been widespread highlighting that his percentages were nonsense, we have people still defending the US policy.

    Would you expect us to credit Trump if somehow miraculously it turned out all this stuff worked?

    Edit: You know what, book mark this post and in the event of the Tariff escapade working out for us all, I'll happily say I was wrong. Because if that happens, it means Ireland/EU doesn't end up in another financial mess. The last recession doesn't feel like that long ago, I've no wish for us to go through it again.

    Post edited by Suckler on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭Genghis


    Didn't you notice I said "hypothetical", and then later in my post said that for multiple reasons my illustration was not realistic?

    I am trying to isolate the impact of VAT on tariff for discussion purposes, that is all.

    We can go with your scenario too.

    How much lower does the US car maker need to be able to supply the same car to a European importer to be able to compete with a non US supplier. The answer is 'at a minimum, the US supplier has to be lower by the value of import tariff, plus any VAT arising from the tariff component'.

    If they can't do that or get close enough so that a the supply chain absorbs any difference, then they are blocked from competing.

    Yes I know there are many other factors at play not only landed cost, like stock availability, brand appeal, currency and hedging, variability in shipping, standing contracts, sustainability, supply chain constraints, cost factors, maybe the EU supplier uses US components, etc, etc, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,540 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    I see trump is " artificially altering the value of his currency"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    How much lower.... 9.1% lower to match the exact same price as the EU price. The 9.1% reduction is basically to offset the 10% tariff.

    If the EU had 10%/50%/1000% VAT, that 9.1% above would still be 9.1%

    VAT has zero impact because the importer (assuming they are VAT registered) claim the VAT back and the same % VAT is applied to both domestic goods and imported goods to the end consumer. VAT is a level playing field as it's applied to everyone.

    Just because Trump or his admin say something doesn't make it true.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,022 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I'd say that if chlorinated chicken was cheap enough, people over this side of the Atlantic would buy it. Whether the EU would create a loophole in its food standards to allow the importation of it is another matter…



Advertisement