Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1572573575577578723

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,654 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN




  • Subscribers Posts: 42,914 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    As ALL these tariff monies goes to the US government, and are paid for by the American people, it's very difficult to see this as anything but an extortion by the trump administration on the USs own people.

    Reap what you sowed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,416 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    As I said, the literal point is for there to be retaliation then negotiation. Any other action is dumb and taking the US trade secretary, of this administration, at their word is ridiculously naive of you. It looks like Europe is preparing a more targeted response as we speak.

    Protecting French farmers (again, hyperbole and wrong from an EU perspective) also protects Irish farmers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,051 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Jaguar Land Rover sells about 20-25% of their global output in the US (>100k cars in 2024), and it’s the market with their biggest profit margin. People there are really worried. I’m sure it’s the same in other UK car manufacturers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭forzacalcio


    Thank you for this. What's the max price for small value exemption?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,946 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Well true in the sense they used some form of maths to get to them, they arent true if you try to call them tariffs when all they are is trade deficits



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    $800. I certainly wouldn't call it small value!

    Assuming what ever you sell isn't actually Chinese origin, there should be no issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,547 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    The value figures are correct - how they have used them to create "tariff" figures is complete nonsense.

    They have also ignored how small poor countries like Cambodia - which US companies make stuff in/buy stuff from to provide the US customers the cheap stuff they crave are never going to have trade deficit with the US as they cant afford American products.

    He also ignores that the US is the biggest consumer on the planet - of virtually everything and there is a reason why a lot of the manufacturing moved out of the US in the first place.

    Trump really is the bottom of the gene pool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭forzacalcio


    Thanks for this. Nope all Irish made. Appreciate your help on this. Just very hard to find info on this today for the small businesses. Thanks again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,636 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Ahh, Mr. "Art of the Deal" himself…went and applied tariffs to essentially the entire planet and thus used up all of his potential negotiation leverage all at once. Sure he can threaten "more" tariffs, but the impact is essentially the same.

    He's gone and essentially Brexit'd the US from the global supply chain, and although it will of course have an impact on everyone, it will also galvanise the rest of the world into the practice of bypassing trading with the US at all. By far, the thickest President in US history, although we already knew that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,766 ✭✭✭threeball


    He didn't bother factoring in sales tax in the US I see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,314 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Listening to an American economist on with Pat Kenny and she is quietly optimistic for Ireland. Says Trump hasn't got a clue what he is doing basically and doesn't remotely understand global trade - she feels most US multinationals (Intel for example) will remain in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭Genghis


    The figures are true, I think the point is the formula is a blunt measure of trade deficit, it's not as Trump presented, the tariff each country charges.

    It would be like you looking at all of your income last month, then all your expenditure and only using those two things to compute the tax you paid. Completely erroneous calculation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The real risk for rest of world is if the tariffs cause US inflation to rocket and devalue their currency. Then it might well be cheaper for companies to onshore manufacturing if US labour prices decrease from inflation.

    I can't see the FED allowing it to happen but with the way US politics is right now nothing would surprise me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭Large bottle small glass


    From the Financial Times

    "The formula the US used, although the White House explanation was dressed up in formal language of economics modelling, is in fact incredibly simple and will be regarded as bizarre by economists. It assumes that deficits entirely reflect trade policy — something no serious economist accepts — and divides the 2024 US goods deficit for each country by that country’s exports. Dividing that number by two generates the so-called “reciprocal tariff”, except that even countries with which the US runs a surplus get a 10 per cent “baseline tariff”.The White House also said that the “reciprocal” US tariff could be reduced by the country taking trade or security actions to align itself with the US, meaning the number is to be used to coerce foreign governments into doing whatever Trump feels like."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    Many Americans seem to say "what does this truck/SUV/sports/luxury vehicle cost? Ah nevermind, I'll take two, one for me, one for the wife".
    And then they'll pay 70, 100, 150, ah who cares $$$ for it without blinking or thinking, or they'll just finance it. When one sees the massive, idiotic, bloated tanks they drive over there, cost is not an issue for many Americans. As long as it gets 5 kids per mile. Just can't seem to see those dang things with that 6 foot high bonnet. They'll just work more hours, go into more debt and worry about it later. And the ones who can't afford it, screw them anyway. They'll just finance it, default and try to avoid the repo man as best as they can.
    They may grumble a bit when prices go up AGAIN, but hey, that's capitalism. No-one knows how it works and there's no point complaining, since the government can't do anything anyway, right? You don't want to look like a pauper in front of the neighbours and the HOA has been giving you the stink eye about that 5 year old eyesore bringing down property prices in your neighbourhood and your golf buddies are laughing at you behind your back, so you better make it happen! You want that promotion, don't you? And don't forget to vote republican, they'll look after you, don't worry.

    So, people will still buy those shiny, expensive German cars, because price is not the top consideration when buying one of those. BMW, Mercedes, etc… are gonna be fine. And the repo business will experience a Renaissance like never before.

    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    External Revenue Service… they have to make up the shortfall from all of those billionaire tax cuts!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,547 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Align with the US on security is comical considering the games they are playing with Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,654 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    At least the price of eggs is down for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,705 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Can we assume that there will now be a log-jam of goods trying to get into the US but held up by the lack of bodies to process the paperwork to calculate the tariffs on goods going into the country?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Make Americans Poor Again *

    *worked out great next door with similar Brexit nonsense and flatlined their economy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,705 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    The $800 minimum loophole has been closed for China but whether it has been closed for everyone else is not clear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 446 ✭✭Will_I_Amnt


    What's irritating me is the condescending, even passive aggressive way they bat questions away as if they were only joking.

    They're absolutely not. Trump was already "Joking" about a 3rd term when he was in his first term.

    To my mind, the only way they can do it, short of an outright coup, is if they find a way to suspend the constitution by declaring martial law during an extreme national emergency like war/rebellion, or widespread chaos - Meaning Trump will have to create the environment where such chaos would occur. They might argue that the president's inherent powers as Commander-in-Chief or their duty to "preserve, protect, and defend" the Constitution allow them to suspend it temporarily to "save" the nation.

    If that's the plan - they cant exactly tell people about it now without negating their ability to achieve it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,017 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    Hopefully the "reciprocal" tariffs the US starts getting hit with today are brutal. The American idea of having any right to bully the world needs a serious reality check starting today. No fake outs, no "we'll delay it to x date" - hit them as hard as possible in the nose and let this **** head come crawling on his hands and knees for reprieves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    I thought he rolled back on that fairly promptly? Hard to keep track of all the uncertainty

    hopefully they are razor sharp targeted at companies and industries with majority presence in red districts and anyone even remote connected to Trump and his Admin

    Eg: +1000% on Tesla only and so on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,705 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    I think this is the second attempt, he did it previously then undid it as customs could not keep up with the paperwork. Temu and Shein trade increased massively so he is trying again (has he employed more customs officers?) effective May 2nd. It may only apply to China though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭spakman


    I stand corrected!

    I knew jaguar Land rover would be hit, but didn't think it would be close to their main export to US!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,589 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    There is another reason why Trump needs to make it seem like he's going to somehow go for a third term, and it comes back to the current tariffs issue; Trump's tariff plan is his way of trying to make manufacturers invest in and come to the US, but there are huge investment costs, regulatory issues infrastructure issues with that. The simple fact is that for most countries and companies, they may decide it's best to take the economic hardship caused by Trump for the next 4 years in the hopes that a Dem (or somehow more reasonable GOP) President comes in 2029 and rights the ship.

    Trump threatening to find a way to stay in office for another term could be enough to force some companies and even countries to kowtow to Trump's demands, and find some way to start giving Trump his big win.

    Right now countries and companies are probably just considering that it may be in their best interest to just take a hit for a few years, because all they have to do is outlast Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,148 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    They were asking European countries for eggs but then they'd be tariffed and made more expensive for them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,032 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Saw a social media post last night from a reputable US political blogger who said that the Trump Administration was becoming concerned at EU movements to not purchase defence equipment from America.

    Apparently even Marco Rubio was warning Europe about it. I couldn't believe it, I mean, this is the same administration that made such a song and dance about Europe needing to take care of its own defence, what, just weeks ago.

    I had a quick look and found this from Reuters.

    image.png

    You can add the name Marco Rubio to the list of people who debased themselves at the feet of Trump only to end up looking like a F'ing idiot.

    They are an embarrassment to the offices they hold.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us-officials-object-european-push-buy-weapons-locally-2025-04-02/



Advertisement