Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1522523525527528728

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Must have assumed it was one of Putin's assets. (this too will pass )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 797 ✭✭✭reclose


    I wish my team were as proactive in managing their projects 😃



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,031 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It's an administration in a hurry. It will be wanting to get past the point where their power cannot be challenged by the time the 2026 midterms roll around.

    And when you look at how much progress has been made in just over two months and realise that there are another 19 months until those midterms and also see how ineffective the Democrats have been at opposing Trump's agenda, you can't say that total power by that point is an unrealistic aim.

    The last thing really in his way is the courts, and he's already taking aim at them. Trump vs the US Supreme Courts and specifically its chief justice John Roberts could be the epic final battle that decides which direction the US goes in. Personally, my money's on Trump because even if the US Supreme court maintains its integrity in deciding against Trump on various cases, Trump will just remove the mechanisms by which their rulings are actually enforced, cutting the legs out from under them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Just to add one thing that was kinda lost in the main thrust of the story but it's abundantly clear that the current US Administration absolutely hate us. And see us not as Allies and friends but as free loading idiots that need to be properly shaken down for cash.

    @Pete Hegseth: “if you think we should do it let’s go. I just hate bailing Europe out again.”

    Vance: I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC.

    Stephen Miller: “As I heard it, the president was clear: green light, but we soon make clear to Egypt and Europe what we expect in return. We also need to figure out how to enforce such a requirement. EG, if Europe doesn’t remunerate, then what?

    Europe as a whole needs to urgently extract itself from any and all dependence on US military equipment and intelligence.

    And urgently review what intelligence is shared with the US as they can no longer be trusted.

    We can't have our security be subject to the whims of whomever the slack jawed yokels(and the non idiots who still somehow think Trump is fine?) vote in next when they get angry about egg prices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,117 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭tarvis


    Heavens knows how those who lost young soldier relatives in Iraq and Afghanistan will react to these Neanderthal attitudes from an ‘ally’.

    How are Blair and Bush feeling now ?? Will they say a word??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,031 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Yeah, but the time to do this was really ten years ago in the sense of doing it without creating pain and uncertainty domestically. Obama and Biden might have been more amenable to the idea of Europe decoupling if only because Obama and Biden would have known how crazy the US could possibly get.

    But that never happened. So now, Europe is caught in the room with a killer and our leaders feel the best option is to tiptoe around, being all nicey nice with him until the cops show up, i.e. hoping the Democrats get re-elected, but maybe not considering that the killer has cut the phone line.

    Just on the subject of intelligence alone, we probably don't even know the full amount of US intelligence assets around Europe with access to every level of information and communication channels. I doubt even our national governments know the scope of it. Things like this would be the reaping of 80 years of chronic underinvestment in our own defence. If Europe becomes hostile to the US right now, those assets will be used against us all much more whether we like it or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,672 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    If Europe had any hope left for this US administration to be on friendly terms, I hope that leak from that message app firmly puts an end to this.

    It doesn't surprise me with JD Vance, this man is much worse than Trump in my eyes, a very dangerous individual.

    Europe needs to distance itself from America, the days of close friends are dead.

    No more sending out the welcoming party for these lot, no more pandering to them. Europe as a whole needs to start diverting investments away from US and that starts with our arms industry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,687 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    There's about 40 US military bases in Europe. Do they pay rent? If so is it mates rates? How about Brussels issues a rent review notification, if the US thinks they are bailing us out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,117 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Considering Hegseth is apparently an heroic alcoholic does that qualify him as a DEI hire?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,947 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,936 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,911 ✭✭✭eire4


    Or since the US hate us so much and we are such spongers then the US should be told go ahead so and pack up your bases and leave.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,911 ✭✭✭eire4


    I think you just nailed it for post of the day with that zinger. Outstanding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    So the POTUS is either lying about nor knowing (which he 100% is) or he as POTUS hasn't a clue about one of the biggest security breachs in US military history.

    As was posted already, can you imagine the uproar, nay the absolute screams of thus had happened under Biden. And if Biden had come out and said he simply hadn't a clue about it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,687 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    If Biden said he didn't know about a particular social media, it at least would be plausible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,871 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Greenland is bracing itself for an official state visit by the US 2nd lady this week accompanied by Waltz, as of today. It'll be interesting to see if the visitors guest list is changed by request of either party before the day or if a diplomatic flu will postpone it. The locals could always ask Waltz if he knew the date for its annexation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,911 ✭✭✭eire4




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 916 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    That Atlantic story shows the level of amateurs we are dealing with in this administration. Absolute insane carry on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,936 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    They just have to tell Greenland officials that they aren’t serious and only joking, that’s according to a few posters here anyway



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,032 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    A big part of the US strategy post WW2 was fir the de-militarization of Europe, including its allies who had won WW2 with them.

    Eisenhower felt European countries were prone to conflict and so wanted to clip their claws so to speak. Hence the US actually seeking to dominate the security space.

    America has done very very little since it's foundation "for the good of others", they are always acting in their own beat interests. As evidenced by Stephen Miller wondering what to extract from Europe and Egypt as payment for the US attacking the Houthis.

    This administration is bringing the world closer to WW3 with all this anti-diplomacy and aggression. Remember when the MAGAts told us Trump was a peacemaker, he's the most outwardly aggressive President since the Bushes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,723 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Agreed.

    Western Europe, as a whole, needs to be extremely careful about what they share with America now. A nation that is now on the side of another nation, Russia, who actively wants to see harm come to western part of the continent. There can be no wavering on this matter. The US has been turned into an absolute shitshow under Trump and his billionaire coup, who'll not balk on destroying anything they deem to be a threat to themselves, even if they're a national ally.

    These people and the useful idiots that support them are extremely dangerous to the stability of the world…and this is only the beginning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    Seems Charles de Gaulle was right about not quite trusting the Americans …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,050 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Pete telling it like it is ...

    IMG_20250325_000441_339.jpg

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    Surely now the Magamaniacs can see how messed up their vote has made America, right?.........…right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,395 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    RE that security breach - the Trumpers here should really just sit down and have a little think to themselves (I'm sure it's possible, or at least I hope they can think) of what would've happened to Biden or Harris if this had happened on their watch. Trump basically made his political career on the "lock her up" thing and now his own administration is making war plans on Signal with a journalist in the group. I know it won't make a blind bit of difference because in a week, something else just as dumb will have replaced this in the news cycle, but people really need to start waking up to the sh*t these people are shovelling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    So Dump claims he knows nothing about it and Pete the Pisshead is trying to trash the reporter and say he’s spreading misinformation…and of course the MAGAlomaniacs are lapping it up and saying there’s nothing to see…Fox news saying that the conversation shows the leadership in the admin. **** laughable.
    And these other clowns off to Greenland. Why don’t Greenland just refuse them entry and tell them they’re not wanted, with the rhetoric being peddled by Dump and Vance?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 528 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    I'll tell you what, people keep talking about JD Vance being the future of MAGA.

    I think Pete Hegseth could well be putting down his own marker for that title.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,117 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,007 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    It would be the end of the Western world and the Western civilization if a Trump lead US would invade Greenland by military force.

    If Greenland should ever join the US, it would have to be a referendum, - one which isn't influenced by social media or tools like this. It would be only the choice of Greenlanders to chose their future, and the US to accpect if they did so, as a 2nd step.

    But a military invasion or other kind of threats of tariffs would be unacceptable.

    The thing is, under Trump 2.0 the damage will be permanent. Also the issue is, how do you trust somebody, sign a treaty, with somebody who isn't to be trusted at any stage. It wouldn't be worth the paper it's written on.



Advertisement