Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Rugby peaked in 2023 and is now in steady decline. A Very Barron decade ahead

145791013

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I framed my comment by saying I disagree with the premise that NZ is out of step or out of line wrt imports, immigrants, or foreign born players. The responses show just how silly this topic gets because of a natural human impulse to get defensive when criticised. Irish rugby in the pro era (and I mean the provinces as much as Irl) has depended to some degree on imports and it’s been a very good thing both in terms of development and silverware. Similarly the entire history of NZ rugby is a history of immigrant players bolstering the team, whether actual immigrants in the early days or first generation Islanders later on.


    the schools recruitment has big impacts beyond rugby and I’m not against it. In fact while it’s politically toxic it’s an idea to find ballers around the country and give them scholarships to rugby schools as part of a development model in Ireland.

    The only issue for NZ, and I’m not sure it’s actually an issue, is the drain on domestic player resources for the islands which may impede their competitiveness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    How many more times can this drivel get posted here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,944 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    About as many times as your constantly repeating drivel about Prendergast having an amazing 6 Nations 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    He did ok for a 21 year old lad stepping into the 6N stage. But he needs work. Two years (RWC) is loads of time to develop his game. Crowley didn't exactly sparkle in that last game either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Both need time and work. Neither is a clear first choice and nothing wrong with us wusing either for differwnt games.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Surely in the modern game the typical and optimal arrangement is to have a dominant fly half and a damn good back up when needed. As opposed to lets switch & swap two players depending on the game. I'm assuming the coaches settle on the best player as the typical choice for any game.

    What I mean is they want one to eventually emerge as the consistently better contributor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 598 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,676 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Pretty succinct (and accurate) summary. I'm sure they were hoping SP would do a bit better, but Crowley has done very little all season to demand the jersey either. It is what it is - hopefully they both improve.

    Probably the ideal. You don't want to be chopping and changing too much, but I don't think there is any issue coming into a tournament with the position up for grabs somewhat. You just shouldn't be dropping people for one bad game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,944 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Just look up the posting history of that poster. I'm not saying it's a common belief I am saying it was constant from that specific poster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    How about you back up the claim that he had a poor tournament? I think he had a good tournament, both in absolute terms and in the context of being a 21 yr old in his first major action.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 598 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Nope, you made the claim. You must provide evidence to back it up. I'm not going to do your work for you.

    So have you any posts from any member which said Prendergast had an 'amazing' Six Nations?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,944 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Wow well done. You came up with this brand new tactic of "prove it" knowing I'm not gonna waste my time trudging through posts. I know what I read as do others but congratulations being the first ever to come up with this amazing gotcha.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 598 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    So you have no evidence that anybody, anywhere on this forum has said Sam Prendergast had an 'amazing' Six Nations.

    Thanks for clarifying and for wasting everyone's time with nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,576 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I think Prendergast’s performance mirrored that of the whole team, very encouraging start and fizzled out as things went on.

    Still, there’s a lot of rugby yet to be played this season, for Prendergast and the rest of the squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,204 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Fair enough. I do get a bit defensive about it because I've been hearing this "poaching" BS for the near 2 decades I've lived here. And it really is just ignorance of the economic reality of the islands and the fact that thousands of them move to NZ and more recently Australia every year.

    This has actually helped the PI national teams because their domestic comps are crap and selecting players playing in NZ and Australia has made them stronger.

    I think it's a great idea for the big rugby schools to offer scholarships to big, athletic kids playing other sports. They might be good at rugby and even if they don't go pro, they'll get a good education for free. Those schools already give scholarships to rugby players from rural areas don't they?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I’m familiar with one that gives scholarships but needs based and for academics rather than sport, others may sponsor athletes though I’d say it would be politically dangerous as these schools get a chunk of public funding so the optics of sports scholarships aren’t great. It’s a tricky one in Ireland but it is worth thinking about from an IRFU pov, as there are several schools that really do prepare kids to go pro. Not sure how it would need to be structured, maybe private money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 209 ✭✭timothydec77


    A draft would destroy the identities of the Provinces.

    They would be just franchises from then on.

    Would I make as much effort to go to a game with players randomly selected from different pronvinces the answer for me is no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Yup and to continue on this slightly more postive / hopeful tangent … give him a year and he could very well be hitting his full stride. He'll be a year older and a year wiser, and hopefully they'll have coached the **** out of him regarding defence / tackles etc.

    There's massive potential there. Just have to trust the coaching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭Island Voter


    We have never got past the quarter final of a World Cup. 10 - 12 countries play rugby to an elite level. Its arguable there is even that number. We have never gotten past the last 8. I do not call that doing well on the world stage. The opposite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Not sure if you're trolling but thats total horse manure.

    If you're not able to appreciate Ireland doing well with being ranked no. 1 team in the world until fairly recently and the multipe 6N wins over the last 10 years or so and pretty much being the domanint NH rugby team for at least a few years then your not seeing what everyone else is seeing.

    Goodluck…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,614 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Our world ranking has been number 1 at a time, and we have several wins over all the top rugby playing nations…nations that have a far deeper history than us, as well as greater time and resources for the game. It's not all about the WC. We lost to the likes a NZ and Australia at QF stage. Huge rugby powerhouses. Yes, we lost to Argentina as well, but Argentina for a time were a very good team.

    The 6N. we have more wins in this tournament than all the others. France and England both far bigger rugby playing nations, and Wales' national sport is rugby. We have consistently performed very well against the best teams in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    On the continual discussion of Prendagast. Genuine question here with an intention to keep things realistic with what was expected of him in this 6 nations…

    How many international fly halfs at age 21 were absolutely in full stride? I mean complete almost faultless kicking, supremely athletic & defensively powerful. At age 21 or 22?

    The only person I can think of is possibly Jonny Wilkinson? Who else?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,078 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    If we get a favourable draw for the next world cup we could maybe get Scotland in the quarter-final, a bit less lucky we could get Australia or Argentina, and if we are really unlucky we could get England.
    We would have to drop a lot in the rankings to fall outside the top 4, so hopefully we stay top 4 and get a lucky draw where we would avoid England and win and progress to our first semi-final. After that, anything would be possible.
    Up to now we've had either poor performances or come up against better opposition, or just got pipped on the day. All we need is either a bit of luck with the draw or we get a difficult draw but put in a big performance against one of the top 5 teams, which is what nearly happened last time. The main thing we need to focus on is letting the older players retire before it's too late, and get the new guys up to speed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Dan Carter was 21 when he got his first cap at 12 against a good Welsh team and was pretty good from the off. He was 23 in that Lions test. George Ford was 21, Ntamack was 19. It's not that uncommon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Ok Dan Carter yeah without digging into the stats I'll agree he was phenomenal. The other two? Really they we're at Carter / Wilkinsons level at that age? I'll have to disagree on those.

    Again my question was linked with being that age and pretty much the finished article. I wouldn't say its common at all. Took O'Gara and Sexton until their mid 20's to hit full stride.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Fair enough but Ntamack was pretty good out of the gate and Ford had made his pro debt at 16 or 17 so he was well prepped. Anyway, much of the criticism of SP is because he is so young. I've made the point here already that guys just don't tend to move through the ranks fast in Ireland so a 21 year old playing for Ireland is very uncommon. It's a problem we have honestly, that there is a backlog at Leinster so fellas aren't getting the required experience as quickly as they might. Maybe Stockdale was the last 21 year old we capped? Henshaw before that.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,086 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Big difference between O'Gara, Sexton and Crowley and Prendergast.

    Until Crowley and Prendergast, every Ireland 10 had to earn their way into the team. Humphreys had to surpass Elwood, O'Gara didn't get starts til he had battled past Humphreys, Sexton didn't get starts until he had played well enough to dispossess O'Gara of the jersey (and then some).

    Prendergast and Crowley just got it cause the current guy retired. If Sexton was still playing he'd likely still be starting.

    There's a big Paddy Jackson sized hole in the Irish 10 story. I don't think Sexton plays until 37 if Jackson doesn't get the boot. I don't think Prendergast walks into the team at 22 if Jackson was still around.

    The 10 finding their way in the jersey is not what we are used to, usually by the time they're getting starts they're already proven to be good enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,944 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Paddy Jackson was bang average. Not a hope he replaces Sexton.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Yeah my first thought was why is Paddy Jackson even entering the discussion? tbh. He was decent at best.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 55,086 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Paddy Jackson would have been, in the absolute worst case scenario, nailed on as Ireland's second choice 10, and by a very comfortable distance. He is the only 10 Ireland have produced in the past decade who ever had the potential to threaten Sexton's spot.

    Would he have taken his spot? Maybe, maybe not, we'll never know. Anyone who thinks he was "bang average" genuinely hasn't a notion. Losing him (which was his own fault entirely) was absolutely a blow to Ireland (in terms of player progression).



Advertisement