Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mocks

  • 10-03-2025 01:27PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭


    I know a lot of schools correct their own but how many are forced to correct during mid term or have unrealistic deadlines?

    If a school decided to correct mocks and you disagreed - can be forced?



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭Joe286


    I'm getting the impression that boards.ie is in decline



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭Treppen


    No you can't be forced, your holidays are your holidays, if you don't have them back on an appointed date then it's unlikely you'll be reprimanded or fired.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭Darth Melkor


    Change to work practices should be agreed upon by a majority consensus according to an ASTI directive. So hopefully the issue of correcting your own mocks was discussed and agreed upon before you were instructed to correct your own mocks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭Treppen


    The thing is it's always normal for teachers to correct their own tests. No need for collective bargaining there. But having to enter results online or by an unreasonable date without agreement is a no



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭joebloggs32


    As Treppen said, correcting tests and exams is really part of the job.

    As with all house exams, having a reasonable deadline is what is important. We had 3 weeks from the last mock exam to have everything done, which is generally what we have for all our house exams.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭Darth Melkor


    I wonder. I understand what you mean by correcting your own tests as always part of the job, but if traditionally the school has always sent mocks away to be marked externally, introducing self correction adds a significant extra workload. You could have more than 150 scripts to correct. That could be 70 hours extra work added to your regular hours.

    No doubt Christmas exams, Summer exams and normal regular assessment is being carried out. I would have thought that there would have to be some sort of agreement before such an amount of extra work could be piled upon staff?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭2011abc


    Hard to believe more than one poster would willingly correct mocks but baulk at inputting results online subsequently ( 1-5% more time ?!) Thankfully my school is one of the majority where this is a hill we are prepared to die on ( i.e. giving up most every spare waking moment for a month or so to correct mocks )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 409 ✭✭Madd002


    Can I ask seeing as ye are teachers, I was charged €110 to have my sons junior cert mock exams marked ( told externally ) yet my son said in one of his exams he input an English word in an Irish sentence and his teacher commented on it the next day. Did this money go to the existing teachers?

    If so that's one hell of a bonus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 851 ✭✭✭French Toast


    Students in our school pay €80 for their mocks. This covers the cost of the papers as far as I know. They’re corrected by us, their teachers. We don’t receive extra pay for this.

    If you’re told exams are corrected externally then they probably are. Most likely your son’s teacher flicked through the papers upon their return to be able to provide some sort of feedback.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 409 ✭✭Madd002


    Ok thanks, I don't mind paying if thats what it was for,as I said if it was teacher marking during class then I'd be miffed. Ps he got 39% in history hates the subject could they not of rounded it to 40% a D doesn't look as bad on results 🤣



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭derb12


    you’re making 2 assumptions there - 1) that the teacher was correcting and getting paid for it and 2) that they were correcting in class.
    As to the 39% it would be malpractice to round it up, especially in the mocks. You’d risk the student approaching the June exam with the attitude that sure they did f all for the mocks and passed it!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,370 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    In the real exam that would have been given an 'achieved'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭Treppen


    Definitely not, 40% gives hope and security, 39% gives the hint



Advertisement