Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning added to OP 10/1/26

14924934954974981581

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,978 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Well he's got to play with every other aspect of government and expansionism, all he needs now is to control and organise the troops and he will have a Royal Flush. Because, of course, he has all the cards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,560 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Absolutely nothing to do with the party empowering him and those who voted for him though, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,705 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    I had no idea the Houti's are still causing problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,752 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I read in BBC site a lot of shipping taking longer route to avoid Red Sea.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,705 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Gotcha. I had assumed as Yemen was not much in the news these days that things were back to normal.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,260 ✭✭✭roosterman71




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,850 ✭✭✭✭astrofool




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Doge has cut workers at the national weather service at a time when there's more frequent floods and extreme weather events .Doge has cut highly experienced staff these people are essential to maintain the complex systems that keep large Dams working properly and keep the water supply clean in parks and other parts of America

    Doge is a very blunt instrument they cut 20 per cent of workers Doge staff are arrogant tech bros. They don't understand that some workers are highly trained to run complex technical systems like Dams . It's like you do,nt go to a hospital and sack surgeons and specialist medical staff that have trained for years in a specific area of expertise.

    I read experts in wall Street are afraid to criticize trump even though they see he is tanking the stock market and pushing the economy into recession .

    Doge is talking about fraud in social security they can save 500 million. What they mean they ,ll cut snap payments that provide food to low income families and cut all social security payments by over 500 million

    Even before doge many media and gaming company's were laying off workers

    Is



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Yes they can avoid the red sea but that route is longer and makes shipping goods more expensive .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,014 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    I wouldn't mind if the US made a move for Greenland. I can see the geostrategic benefit for not just the US but the west in general.

    Obviously it would be better if it was handed over maybe in return for some money to Denmark and for the population themselves but if they don't want to engage and the US just went ahead and annexed it no one is going to do anything about it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,560 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    What does any of this even mean?

    Greenland is not interested in anything America or Trump has to offer, they have made that clear. The threats to annex clearly haven’t landed well with them.

    How would it benefit the west?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,014 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Greenland has a population of 57,000 people and thus really have no agency one way or another. All i'm saying is the US could annex it within a matter of hours (if even) if it wanted too. I'd prefer they paid Denmark off though. It would be the best outcome.

    Look at a map and it's patently obvious why the west's only power would want to control the territory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,560 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    You’re saying the people who live in Greenland have no agency over who governs them? Is that a joke?

    Explain why it would be better if Denmark was paid off, why would it be?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭briany


    So, it's looking increasingly likely that Trump is looking to get the Ukraine war settled and will then begin the process of formalising relations with Russia and China, agreeing on global zones of control and create a new world order that is an authoritarian triumvirate, working hand in glove. Yalta 2.0

    The US will control the territories of South America and the more general west.

    Russia will control the territories of the former Soviet Union.

    China will control east Asia and the wider Pacific, excluding Hawaii.

    Seperate arrangements will probably be divised re: Africa.

    By control, I mean more that the powers will agree not to meddle outside of agreed zones of influence and let each other do as they please within their geographic allocations.

    Europe will be a collection of vassals. The powers will work in concert to undermine European cohesion so that they can not exert a major influence on the world stage. This will involve funding various anti-EU political groups and rescinding NATO protection.

    We're already seeing this take shape. The phrase for European leaders visiting the White House has been "don't pss off Trump". Be servile, be submissive. We're already praying that he just won't be too hard on us all.

    This is all going to get a fair bit worse before it gets better, so buckle up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,353 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Now let's substitute your statement for Northern Ireland or Wales, would that also be acceptable with the right pay off?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,014 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Just to be nice about it. No offence to Denmark but I would prefer the US governing Greenland in terms of western security. Denmark has no serious contribution to make in that regard.

    Another option is to pay off the locals after they vote for "independence" from Denmark. Offer all 57,000 a couple of million dollars each. It would be good value for the resources there.

    I suspect one way or another Greenland may be part of the USA before the end of the Trump term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,038 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    The best outcome, and probably most likely, would be that the US does nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Who Ate The Cat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,015 ✭✭✭JJayoo


    Greenland should join with the other Nordic countries, Norway have the unlimited wealth fund and expertise in oil production,Iceland are very handy at mining in extreme conditions, Sweden have that Muppet chef.

    What if Donald tries to relocate all the Palestinians to Greenland....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,560 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Let’s dissect this easily.

    Denmark is a member of NATO, so in terms of western security, it’s probably better placed than America, which is being relatively hostile towards other NATO allies. So that falls flat.

    Next, paying them off. Currently America is cutting costs, mainly to federal workers and veterans. But you think they’ll pay every citizen of Greenland money, like a bribe. So basically playing citizens of Greenland as fools, who would believe a word from Donald Trump right now? So that also falls flat.

    I suspect, going off what Greenland has just voted for, and the complete lack of trust and general operations of the Trump presidency, that we will see pigs fly before Greenland is under control of the USA.

    Your argument makes little to no sense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I'll say this - if the US invaded Greenland what would Denmark actually DO about it? They certainly would not be able to provide an effective military response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,825 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    How does a western country invading/annexing a western country help western security?

    Using your rational, I suspect Greenland would be the 49th state, right after Russia annexes Alaska (or Trump sells it back for $73mil, He said it was the greatest deal ever, 10x times what the US paid for it, 9x profit) and California becomes an independent country (some say it's really Canada's 11th Province - but still under the remit of the 27th member of the EU (Canada) after Hungry was ejected). There was an issue after Trump renamed the wine valley in California as Champagne, so the US could still have cheap Champagne (those damn tariffs on the EU), but president of California Newsom, renamed it back to Wine Country and France dropped their objection.

    But yeah Greenland may be part of the USA (I'd say SA, there's nothing united about it now) before the end of the Trump term (unless you mean if he goes with a monarchy and the Trump name rules for the next few decades?)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,560 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 97,264 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Trump invokes 18th century law to speed deportations, judge stalls it hours later

    It's like the UK all over again with the trying to undermine Checks and Balances by digging through old laws. ( cf. Henry VIII clauses, Statute of Proclamations 1539 )

    https://www.usa.gov/branches-of-government The Constitution of the United States divides the federal government into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. This ensures that no individual or group will have too much power.

    Mr Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: 'Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action.' Frequent attempts to break the checks and balances is a warning sign. They only need to get one big change once to undermine the system.

    The Onion had a quote about how the only reason for the second amendment / NRA to exist is to prevent a takeover of the country. And how they failed to do so,

    How many times does Trump need to be told something or can he keep getting away with being ignorant? Merkel had to tell Trump 11 times that Germany couldn't make separate deals with the US. Also that if the US wanted to sell more cars in Europe they should make better ones. And yes I mean ignorant in the sense of someone who refuses to understand.

    Trump is like Schrödinger's douchebag - makes offensive statements, and then decides whether he was joking based on the reaction. To the point that not even he knows when he is serious about what he says. ( unless it's him being petty over a personal slight )

    https://wtop.com/business-finance/2025/03/delete-is-one-of-their-favorite-terms-inside-doges-irs-takeover-ahead-of-tax-season/

    It began in mid-February when senior IRS staff were told DOGE would be visiting their offices. They were given just a 15-minute heads up that Gavin Kliger, a 25-year-old software engineer, was on his way.

    Within minutes of arriving, Kliger demanded access to the IRS’s “tax administration systems,” according to an IRS employee familiar with the situation.

    Reducing headcount in the IRS probably means less tax audits for the 1% and less tax rebate processing for Joe Public. They are also going after taxpayers who may not have settled status.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,829 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The US would rape Greenland for it's natural resources in record time and treat it like it does Puerto Rico and Guam in the mean time. As in ignore it and do nothing more than throw paper towels at it in the event of an emergency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,825 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Doesn't make a difference, do you really think NATO countries would trigger article 5 against the US? And if they did, you would have to look at the structure of NATO to see who actually directs the troops and responses. The supreme allied commander is a US Army General, so he'd have to direct a NATO response against…… the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,829 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The great peacemaker is currently breaking another campaign promise with several waves of air attacks at Houthis in Yemen.

    What promises does he have left to break?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭briany


    NATO is a paper agreement and the US's adherence to it under Trump would be close to nil. He already wanted to leave it in his last term.

    A for the rest of the countries. They'd probably give some speeches and little else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,560 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Of course it makes a difference, you think NATO countries would just sit idle and let it happen?

    The US would be acting against another NATO ally, so any form of decorum or process would be null and void.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,687 ✭✭✭threeball




Advertisement
Advertisement