Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1489490492494495735

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭McFly85


    This thread isn’t an echo chamber. You’re free to defend Trump in here and explain why you think he’s done something well, but you’ll be challenged on it, and any fabrications will be called out, and obviously repeating lies will get you booted.

    The idea that any post, no matter how untrue it is, should be considered valid to avoid being an echo chamber is ridiculous. If you have views you should be prepared to have them challenged.

    If you want to see a real echo chamber online, visit the conservative subreddit. Only flared users allowed to post, any challenges to information voted down and bans handed out. A funny position to take for people who like to be known as free speech absolutists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,654 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "The Washington Examiner? Well colour me shocked. And any studies done on Fox, Newsmax et al content wouldn't show a heavy "entirely hostile" bias against Biden/Harris? Of 

    course

     they would. That's my point. US media is incredibly, nay scarily partisan and captured. They may as well be the official PR companies of the two parties. And because of that now toxic environment whatever actually independent media exists will be seen as Fake News© by one side, or both."

    Wise observations from @Wibbs

    Thanks to the killing of the Fairness doctrine under the GOP administration of Reagan the Evangelical. US has really changed since then and not for the better. Add in Citizens United when Obama was POTUS, and accelerate with pitiable education and the booming population. Trump is what America's become, like every President.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,417 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    'We might attempt to try and annex some of your sovereign territory over the coming year but in the meantime, got any eggs?'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    Also, Private eye is not just a satirical paper. It does some of the best investigative journalism around.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,260 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    @Wibbs Personally I'd make it a legal requirement for all those of voting age to vote.

    The candidates who will benefit from forcing people into a voting booth who don't really want to be there, will be the shoutiest of shouty populists.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Best presidential start of term ever

    President Musk and First Dog Trump wiped out 5 trillion of assets



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,061 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    The power of marketing.

    Do you recall the guy who was quoted here, saying he voted for Trump because of his "business acumen".

    F**king laughable stuff.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,542 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Look, you have to have business acumen to do that much damage.

    Biden couldn't even wipe 5 trillion off in value if he tried.

    You can't put a value on socking it to the libs / having a real man in charge…

    Am I doing this right?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,728 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    No. I don't agree with this and it's a very US POV.

    Right now, there is nobody in this country that I can vote for. I can't throw my X on Labour. I've never voted for Sinn Fein. I absolutely despise Fine Gael and their smug politics/politicians, Fianna Fail have scuppered the country twice in my lifetime and have always been chancers, I'm not that enamoured with the Social Democrats who seem to be somewhat at sea in the grand scheme of things and the "others" leave me cold. There were also no indies that caught my eye.

    However, if someone is a citizen of the state and paying taxes etc, then they absolutely have a right to voice their opinion on how the country is being run by those with their hands on the levers of power, regardless if they voted or not.

    It's understandable that people get angered by someone who just cannot be arsed to get out and vote because it's the most important democratic right that people possess. But sometimes the case is that a person just can't see anyone that they can, in all consciousness, vote for.

    In addition, I'd actually prefer if people who aren't informed on what they're voting for stay the fu*k out of the polling booth. There's too many clowns voting for and against people/issues that they don't have the first clue about and it leads to catastrophic results. Hello Brexit/Hello Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,523 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Anyone with quarter a brain and a gram a decency can see how dangerous and divisive and utterly reckless Trump and his backers are. Not voting doesn't change this

    Gerry Hutch got 1000s a votes by people in this country. Voters are a huge problem in places!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭Slideways


    the scaremongering about compulsive voting is just that.

    Here in Australia we have CV, there’s very little in the lunatic fringe getting in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,728 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I didn't mention anything on "scaremongering about compulsive voting".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Tarriffs are simply more tax's they increase the cost of goods for consumers .I think musk is his his own world he wants to cut federal agencys and sack as many people as possible .people servants protect the environment and protect consumer rights they work in national parks and pay pensions or provide medical services to people in low income .western countrys allow people to retire and provide basic services and pensions which are paid for by the tax's those people paid when they were working .They also collect taxes and regulate company's to ensure real competition.

    If the federal government is erased the quality of life will fall even for middle class people

    It makes no sense to privatise federal agencys eg you can't make a profit running social security or Medicare Medicaid or running national parks or providing emergency services in natural disasters



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭thereiver


    People voted for trump because the democrats have lost touch with working class voters and are seen as soft on crime and immigration .alot if people won't vote for a black female president anyway for obvious reasons

    Post edited by thereiver on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,732 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    I'm not sure why it is a US point of view, they seem more interested in stopping people from voting than obliging them to. Unless they are Republicans. I don't agree with forced voting either, it would encourage protest and uninformed votes that had no relationship to the government of the country. While I agree generally with your analysis of Irish political parties, its going well off topic for this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,728 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    People voted for Trump based on a multitude of reasons. Most of them entirely ignorant of who and what he is and represents.

    Frankly, I would have preferred if those people had stayed on their couch. The US would probably look quite different today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,728 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I'm not sure why it is a US point of view

    I have, generally, only heard the idea that people who haven't voted should remain voiceless from Americans. I fundamentally disagree with that idea no matter where it's expressed.

    I don't agree with forced voting either

    I, literally, said nothing about "forced voting".

    While I agree generally with your analysis of Irish political parties, its going well off topic for this thread.

    That I do agree with. 😄



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,240 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    What do you like about the GOP?

    The fact that they want to subject every child in america to random genital inspections?

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,150 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    It would scratch him. Animals tend to recognise people who like them. There's a good reason there's no cat-or dog-in Trump's WH. The bald eagle didn't take to him either. Animals are no fools.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,260 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Our argument in this article is restricted to majoritarian electoral systems, with the US serving as our primary case study. Although one might expect to find similar effects of CV in systems with proportional representation, the details of electoral competition under PR are sufficiently distinct to be outside the scope of our current article and of the formal models discussed here.

    So not really of any use here

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,150 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    And heavily partisan feedback keeps the media that way. MAGA readers expect MAGA media to hew to the Trump line and will punish any deviation from that course. That why any right-wing media that have any pretensions to objectivity are in a quandary. If they dare to contradict some Trumpist statement or voice disagreement over any policy, they lose readers and are liable to face the wrath of the God Emperor. Having an impeccable rightist record won't save you. Recent WST doubts earned them condemnation as 'globalists'. To hardcore MAGA any deviation from orthodoxy (which could means March's orthodoxy or This weeks orthodoxy or Saturday's) could have one condemned as 'leftists' . NoT too different from Stalin's USSR….without the mass murder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,814 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    I would rate The Monk’s business acumen much more bigly than I do The Donald’s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    IMG_5736.jpeg

    Unfortunate use of words there Donnie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭uptherebels




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Canaibh


    When almost everyone agrees with each other on everything and just echo what the other person says. This thread is almost 100% anti-Trump in which posters with identical opinions thank each others posts.

    Mod Edit: Warning issued for commenting on other posters rather than the thread topic

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Canaibh


    But if you go to a restaurant and don't like anything on the menu would you eat there anyway? Why on earth would I vote for people who have turned my country into a total kip? I would however vote for the GOP if I lived in the US.

    I don't believe there's such a thing as 'centrist'. The centrist agrees with the leftist on pretty much everything. He's just a different shade of left.

    But the US is far more left than right. Most of the universities, if not all, are left-wing. Most of the media is left-wing. A lot of the right-wing outlets you mentioned are small ones. It's really only Fox that's a big player like NYT, Washington Post, etc. And Fox is more populist than right wing, in my opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Canaibh


    But they're pretty much identical. That's the point I'm making. On anything that matters, I mean.



Advertisement