Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1488489491493494735

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,061 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    And *that's* the problem right there!

    Always the victim.

    Never, ever any introspection.

    Never once thinking that perhaps you are in the wrong.

    You see, that's the kind of thinking that leads to this kind of blind devotion to a cause

    Screenshot_20250314-082206.png

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    more than half of US oil imports come from Canada and most of its fertiliser



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    trillions were wiped out from those rich peoples assets in last month

    And the bottom keeps falling out

    Even if they pay zero taxes in US for decades it won’t recover those loses

    Which btw makes his argument of wanting to cut debt a lie, as lower taxes just increase debt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,342 ✭✭✭Field east


    ’HATE’ is a VERY EXPLOSIVE word. If anyone has even a modicum of Christianity - or equivalent in the other religions- in them that word would not be in their vocabulary. Imagine just hating , as a principal, a country , a culture , a sect, a religion, an individual, etc, etc, etc,etc just because they are DIFFERENT



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,240 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    And US refineries are tooled up to process the shale oil from Canada, they can't just inport more crude from Saudi to replace it

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,732 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    You are not wrong, and conversely, while I have based my views on Trump directly on what he has said, rather than what other people have said about what he says, it has got to the stage where I can't stand to hear his voice.

    Instead of just reacting to comments, why not give us some more proactive thoughts on what impresses you so much about him, why you feel he deserves to be taken seriously.

    Can you explain why almost all the western leaders have recently spoken out against him - from a starting point of the US being accepted and respected as the leader of the free world up to the last 9 years or so?

    Explain to us the justification for attacking Canada - and Mexico, though Canada seems much more harmless and had a very positive relationship with the US up to a couple of months ago. He seems to have given up on the Panama Canal, unless there is secret work going on that we are not hearing about, but why Canada?

    He seems to suggest its an aesthetic thing, he doesn't feel the line across the continent is very pleasing. Is that a reason for attacking? He does give the impression that Canada and Greenland should be handed over just because he wants them. Or Russia wants them, its hard to know. It is hard to deny that he is trashing the economy, he argues that things will be a bit difficult for a while, is there an economist you can quote (not one of his stooges cabinet, they say what they are told to say) who would support this 'slight dip, then vast wealth' approach?

    Why would he want Canada? As a state (or more reasonably, several states) it would tend to the left and only help the Democrats, assuming it was given equal and proper rights, which is what he seems to be offering. Surely he is not lying about his intentions?

    His base argument seems to be 'the rest of the world has been treating us very badly, they have taken advantage of us'. It is not a point that I have heard much discussion of, either support from his followers or rebuttal from those who criticise him. Is it justified? In terms of trade he argues that other countries will not import low quality US goods; why should they? Produce goods that people want and they will buy them.

    To people outside his cult he comes over as a whinging, self-centred, uneducated, irrational brat. I would love to hear your arguments that can actually be discussed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,342 ✭✭✭Field east


    A typical Trump strategy ie flood the zone to confuse , obstrufacate , deflect from other things , eg and also to fly a number of ‘kites’ and see what gets legs, what sticks , What gets a reaction , etc and he takes it from there . If the government/population react very favourably towards Trumps utterances on the matter of Greenland then he will ‘follow up ‘ on it. BUT if he gets a TOTAL REJECTION from all in Greenland then he might drop the idea of doing anything - even though he might keep on ‘rabbiting’ about it.

    Tc,etc, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,654 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    But you said they think Private Eye, a satirical paper, is trash. So, have they read it or not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,728 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I think anything like the above would be completely lost on Trump's fans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,342 ✭✭✭Field east


    Two further points STRUCK me about Trumps behaviour which have not been really highlighted ie

    (1) tThe Russian invasion of Ukr was MORE than sufficient - and it of a very serious nature internationally- to fully occupy the Western allies/NATO re trying to address it /solve it. Up until to the end on Biden’s tenure , and including the VAST MAJORTziY of Americans , the US was very ‘anti Putin/ anti Russia’. So why did Trump ‘MUDDY THE WATERS’ with his anti Ukr V Z comments, demanding payment for arms promised /delivered and for double the price of their value, demanding a contract be signed for rear earth mining, delay delivery of arms via congress in 2023, the whole Tarriff issue, 99%+ damage to US allies re the relationship, etc, etc, etc,etc.

    Imagine ALLThe deflection that the above must have caused and all the ENERGY that could have been otherwise expended towards the war. Could he not have held on until LATER?

    (2) the way he has gone about ‘ draining the swamp’, getting rid of apparent corruption, saving money and suchlike in MIND BOGGLING x 10 . All other nations would leave the framework/ structure in place but get an analysis done of how each situation can be improved and consider the recommendations accordingly or some approach along those lines



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,654 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    So, it was Madge Taylor's bf who fed the question about Rosie O'Donnell moving to Ireland at the Oval Office presser the other day. Seems he's a regular when a distraction is needed or a program started (viz. Zelensky):

    https://www.rte.ie/news/us/2025/0313/1501966-rosie-odonnell/

    "Conservative journalist Brian Green…"

    Pity the RTE didn't point out his relationship with MTG. Seems he 'works' for some septic volcano called "Real America Voice."



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    So? In 1970 800 million were waving around Mao's Little Red Book in China. In the US 2024 elections 85 million Americans didn't vote at all, a figure larger than for either Trump or Harris. For me that's the more worrying stat.

    As for media orgs, you seem to have forgotten about Fox, which couldn't be any more "Mainstream Media" if it tried. Never mind Newsmax, Epoch Times, Washington Examiner, The Daily Wire, One America News, etc, and that's before we get to the plethora of the online "Alternative News media" which is chock full of MAGA/Right. It's likely Trump would have gotten fewer votes without the likes of Joe Rogan sticking his oar in and backing Trump, Vance and his party, along with wheeling out people like Musk to add to a long list of the US Right, politicians and assorted conspiracy nutters hoofing ivermectin(that appears to cure everything but idiocy). The aforementioned Musk bought Twitter which heavily platformed Trump and MAGA and the Right with an army of bots and useful idiots to help.

    Ohmigod I don't know why there are so many of them! And so forth, but if you think Trumpism doesn't have massive support from media and business vested interests, who got front row seats when he was sworn in, I may have some magic beans to sell you. Though I suspect you've already bought them elsewhere.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,732 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Your caps lock keeps sticking, maybe a bit of keyboard cleaning?

    Also its rare earth, I know Trump said 'rear earth' and other people have repeated it, but there is no point in perpetuating his error.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Actually most anyone with a semblance of a brain who wants to gauge how things work and how people think will seek out opposing views to theirs. If anything to counter them and learn from it. Those of any political stripe who don't deliberately live in an echo chamber where their secondhand views are reinforced.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,732 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/13/tech/taiwan-tsmc-us-investment-reactions-intl-hnk/index.html?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc

    Hong Kong/TaipeiCNN — 

    It was a surprise ceremony at the White House presided over by President Donald Trump to unveil a $100 billion investment from what he called the world’s most powerful company, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

    Taiwan relies on US military and political support. Under the Taiwan Relations Act, the US is legally obligated to provide Taiwan with the means to defend itself against a possible attack by China.

    But Trump’s recent rhetoric has cast uncertainty over the future of US-Taiwan relations. He has repeatedly accused Taiwan of “stealing” the US semiconductor industry, a claim that is widely disputed, while saying outright that Taiwan should pay the US for “protection.”

    Could one of the Trump supporters please explain to us why Trump should not be considered a mob-boss? Or maybe having a white cat to sit on his lap and be stroked might be appropriate?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,750 ✭✭✭yagan


    His fuel is adoration, essentially a cult leader.

    You can't reason with a Trump supporter as Trump is their truth and their light.

    He takes the reelection as a coronation and his next great struggle will be securing dynastic presidential succession, like what Taiwan had and North Korea still is.

    Post edited by yagan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Canaibh


    But this thread, for example, is an echo chamber. I'm with you on seeking out opposing points of view, but not from trash such as the outlets I mentioned.

    Why is trust in the media in the US at an all time low? Across the board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,841 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Canaibh


    I don't vote either. I removed my name from the Register of Electors a few years ago. I see nothing wrong with not voting.

    I didn't forget about Fox et al. One of the great things about the US, apart from the amazing First Amendment, is that there is lots of opposition there. Here on the other hand there is no opposition of any sort. The radio stations, newspapers, RTÉ, the political parties, the judges, etc, are all identical.

    He doesn't have massive support. The only reason they were there when he was being sworn in was to curry favour with him. I suggest you use those magic beans yourself if you think Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerbeg and Sundar Pichai voted for Trump and are staunch Republicans.

    And last year a study showed that 89% of the coverage on Trump on CBS, NBC and ABC, all of whom are identical, was "entirely hostile": https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/3125746/unprecedented-positive-media-for-harris-89-negative-for-trump/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,617 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Trump is disliked in most of the western world. It's not because of the media, it's because we're all perfectly capable of seeing how he behaves. You're unlikely to find Irish fans of Trump for good reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Canaibh


    I don't know whether they've read it or not. I doubt it, but I can't say for sure. The point I'm making is that one doesn't need to read or watch something to know that it's trash. For example, I've never watched Love Island but I know it's trash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Canaibh


    But Ireland has no opposition, so all most people ever hear or read is the same things NYT, CNN et al write and say about Trump.

    By the way, just to be clear, I'm not hugely fond of Trump either, but I do like the GOP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,617 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Do you think none of us have watched a Trump speech? Or one of his press conferences? He is perfectly capable of showing himself up as a hateful lunatic. In terms of the impact of his actions, they're not being misreported on even though you'll claim they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Canaibh


    Hate is a perfectly normal human emotion. I hate lots of people and see nothing wrong with hating people as long as you don't let it consume you. And you don't think the people who work at NYT, CNN et al hate Trump and his supporters? I'm certain they do. But, to be clear, I don't hate any religion, culture, or sect.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    But this thread, for example, is an echo chamber. I'm with you on seeking out opposing points of view, but not from trash such as the outlets I mentioned.

    Are the outlets I mentioned equally "trash"? Just want to judge the consistency here, as I suspect the definition of trash is closely associated with how one's own already formed opinions are reflected and reinforced, or not.

    Why is trust in the media in the US at an all time low? Across the board.

    Several reasons: America was always Red or Blue to some degree, but it's become remarkably partisan of late and lines ever more sharply drawn. Both sides have their own vested interests and those vested interests have access even direct control of American mass media. Advertising another driver as the marketplace became more partisan and with massive competition from the interwebs and social media, crazy of any type gets attention, clicks and advertising cash and moral panic really rings the greasy tills. Complex nuanced questions that require complex nuanced answers that don't fit in a 10 second soundbite or on the peak of a baseball cap doesn't.

    Even something mundane as the switch from PC's to phones to access the online world has made a huge difference. To get online 20 odd years ago required at least a semblance of knowledge and online conversations tended towards both the longform and linear where opposing ideas couldn't be so easily ignored. Now any shaved ape with a thumb, doesn't even need to be opposing, can mash their phone screen and get their point across, but with a character limit and the readers can like with zero effort. Hell bots can do both. More, it's far more easy for people to get into an echo chamber even if they don't want to be as the "algorithm" tweaks their timelines and what they see, which in turn makes them easier to sell to, or manipulate. Add in ever decreasing attention spans and this is where we are.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,732 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Do you feel you (ie, you and everyone else) have a right to a political opinion if you do not vote? Voting is a social obligation, you can't withdraw from it and expect other people to take your opinions seriously, or even accept that you can express opinions at all. Note, I am not saying you can't have opinions, that is up to you, but if you are not going to follow through your opinions by voting then you should keep them to yourself.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I don't vote either. I removed my name from the Register of Electors a few years ago. I see nothing wrong with not voting.

    This is where we would differ(and I suspect a few would differ from me). Personally I'd make it a legal requirement for all those of voting age to vote. Too many people in too many nations across too many years have fought and died for that right.

    Though being somewhere to the right of Attila the Hun in a few areas I'd also add a basic civics test into the mix to winnow out the chaff.

    I didn't forget about Fox et al. One of the great things about the US, apart from the amazing First Amendment, is that there is lots of opposition there. Here on the other hand there is no opposition of any sort. The radio stations, newspapers, RTÉ, the political parties, the judges, etc, are all identical.

    They're not and there is opposition. It's just not the heavily slanted either/or that's present in American politics. Most European nations are similar. They tend to be centrist and tend to end up in power sharing coalitions. That's quite different to the US bipolar setup and system where the chances of a third option ever emerging are very very slim. Any movement or person even vaguely politically innovative has zero hope of widespread support at the state or national level has to try to water down any innovation and shoehorn themselves into one or other party, if they even get through the door in the first place and aren't dismissed as a "Commie" or "Fascist". And if they can get the many millions from backers required to run a campaign.

    He doesn't have massive support. The only reason they were there when he was being sworn in was to curry favour with him. I suggest you use those magic beans yourself if you think Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerbeg and Sundar Pichai voted for Trump and are staunch Republicans.

    What they are is staunch vested interests, who will hitch their wagon to whatever comes down the road that will help them make more bank. If that be "50 genders on Facebook"(Yay Democrats!) to ever more crystallise their marketing and political data, or more tax cuts, gov contracts and much less legal responsibility for content(Yay MAGA!).

    And last year a study showed that 89% of the coverage on Trump on CBS, NBC and ABC, all of whom are identical, was "entirely hostile": https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/3125746/unprecedented-positive-media-for-harris-89-negative-for-trump/

    The Washington Examiner? Well colour me shocked. And any studies done on Fox, Newsmax et al content wouldn't show a heavy "entirely hostile" bias against Biden/Harris? Of course they would. That's my point. US media is incredibly, nay scarily partisan and captured. They may as well be the official PR companies of the two parties. And because of that now toxic environment whatever actually independent media exists will be seen as Fake News© by one side, or both.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,343 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Two party system and media has led to a hugely polarised and divided nation. The US is practically two different countries at this point - the Red states / MAGA half and the Blue states.

    That was absolutely fine when there was a level of courtesy and mutual respect between the two sides, but it was never designed to be able to cope with the emergence of demagogues like Trump and Musk taking over the Republican half, effectively getting rid of it and replacing it with something very different and radical. Those two don't even claim to be unifiers or to be trying to bring the country together.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,415 ✭✭✭arctictree


    What do you mean 'Ireland has no opposition'? Every day we hear Sinn Fein, PBP etc argue against Government policies and they are given ample airtime. You should really visit a country where there is no actual opposition and see how dissent is tolerated.



Advertisement