Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1146114621464146614671675

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭HanShotFirst


    Do you work for the irfu or something?

    From yesterdays “Why do we need to learn from selections?”

    Now its an odd idea “That there is nothing to be gained by playing him…”

    And Italy are “very decent”. Seriously?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,291 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I think they might be looking at Gavin as a 13 with long term planning. Connacht have played him there on his two starts this year. We’re very light there beyond Ringrose. Pity Hume didn’t kick on/have better luck with injury.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,506 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    You didn’t read the post you quoted.

    I was clearly specifically talking about the suggestion that there’s no point starting Crowley this weekend. There very much is a point.

    I would have liked to have seen him get more time during the 6N. I just don’t see the need to repeat that in every single post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,527 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Osborne can also play 13 in fairness. There's a lot of potential coming through in the centres



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,506 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Do you work for the irfu or something?

    That is hilarious and so original, so fresh.

    From yesterdays “Why do we need to learn from selections?”

    Now its an odd idea “That there is nothing to be gained by playing him…”

    Why do you see that as a contradiction? We know Crowley is good enough to play against Italy, but he’ll benefit from starting another test.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,291 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I think he can play 13 in the same way Henshaw could in the past but probably lacks a bit of acceleration to be a real line breaking threat there. I’m sure we’ll see him there at times, but 12 looks like his best position to me. In fairness he’s been very good at 15 too, we see more of his aerial game and kicking game from there and he hits the line well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭HanShotFirst


    Why is that question not original? You have been asked before? Hilarious!

    Sorry now but you are saying some mad stuff to rationalise selection. Hence the Qs.
    Im going to say that nobody but nobody is saying Crowley is not good enough to play Italy.

    I’m also going to say nobody (excluding the very few crazies I’ve encountered here) is saying Prendergast is not good enough to play Italy.
    And again Italy are “very decent”??

    I’ll tell you this much. If Ireland were going for the Grand Slam Crowley would not be starting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,759 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    BOD said before selection that Crowley should get the nod against Italy. He also said Prendergast's game need a good bit of tightening up. That's an honest assessment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭HanShotFirst


    Let me guess. He said that after the loss to France?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,192 ✭✭✭almostover


    I did read the post. And yes Crowley should start vs. Italy. We agree there. The point I was challenging is that Crowley is a young OH that needs gametime for development. He's young, yes, but he's also proven his worth. He's not just some new kid on the block who should be given token game time vs. Italy in a dead rubber fixture.

    As another poster pointed out, he'd likely be benching this weekend had we beaten France.

    Post edited by almostover on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 766 ✭✭✭Dual wheels


    Crowley should take the Leicester offer and never look back, he can set himself up for life after rugby which will be in a few short years, he’s better off doing that rather than playing second fiddle to prendergast for Ireland and operating in a poor Munster team



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭thamus doku


    To me it is bizarre how Crowley has been treated. There must be something more to this , there has to be. It literally makes no sense.
    I am going to guess it comes down to money.
    I would not be surprised there has been contract issues since last summer, Crowley wants his value and the IRFU wanted to pay less than half of that. So the IRFU have decided to make an example of Crowley.

    It would explain the way Farrell has spoke of Crowley, how Crowley is being treated - they have dropped him and they have taken his lions chances away - and why prendergast was pushed forward so quickly and why sexton is involved in the squad.

    Anyone else have an ideas on what’s going on.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,429 ✭✭✭ersatz


    IRFU spending money on Sexton to save money on Crowley, ffs.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,556 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Ireland 44 - 25 Italy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭HanShotFirst




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,192 ✭✭✭almostover


    That's a bit of a leap. But I also think Sexton should have been nowhere near this squad. A clean break was needed there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,808 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Oh definitely, our forwards were particularly poor v France, almost like they were disinterested or out of sync or something but we came out second best everywhere really



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,749 ✭✭✭JanuarySnowstor


    It does seem there's something more going on with the Jack Crowley debacle. Prendergast was shoved forward in record pace. Perhaps we'll never know the truth...

    All I do know is Sexton added nothing and should be got rid. He's always had a deep hatred for Munster, spurred on by Ronan O Gara!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,506 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    We’re just looking at things differently

    You’re looking at this game as token game time against rubbish opposition and he deserves better.

    You could equally look at it as an opportunity to start a test with JGP which he hasn’t done very often, or to play behind a pack that should be well on top and give him a chance to really play, which he hasn’t experienced very often either.

    He’s achieved a lot but there’s also a lot he hasn’t done and - whether people want to accept this or not - it’s been clear for a while that the Irish coaches want to see something more from him. He’ll be absolutely delighted to get a shot to get going on it, because otherwise the next proper test match is November.

    I agree Prendergast would be starting if we were chasing the GS.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,977 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    No there's not. Irish coaching team just think Sam is a better fit, currently, for how they want to play. It's not a conspiracy. There is no great hidden secrets. This is tinfoil hat nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,969 ✭✭✭Packrat


    "A chance to really play"

    In a dead rubber???

    Hes "really played" plenty behind the Irish pack last year.

    A 6 nations and URC winning 10

    If the Irish coaches wanted to see more of him they'd have played him. They didn't. They wanted SP.

    Now they want to save face and rescue the mess they created themselves.

    Nobody's buying their BS.

    Nor is Crowley I'd imagine.

    Post edited by Packrat on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,749 ✭✭✭JanuarySnowstor


    A better fit? There having their worst 6 nations in years. At least admit they got it wrong! Crowley is a proven winner, as others have said a 6N and URC.

    Sam has a lot to learn and unfortunately for Ireland fans the mgmt seem to think several poor performances is grand. Even the media are along for the ride!

    But the Munster fans will call it out because its bully boy tactics. How else do you explain Prendergast getting 80 mins against France when his performance was woeful. I tell you why, because Easterby and Sextons ego were put ahead of the good of this team



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭thamus doku


    that was not meant.
    I meant sexton was needed to help prendergast make the leap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭roverjoyce


    Compare the England Bench to Ireland

    Pollock getting a chance and learning and developing whereas Ireland have POM

    In the props division England have brought through Fin Baxter where as Ireland have stuck with Healy

    That is a damming indictment of Easterby and Farrell



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,527 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Clearly you have an incredibly short memory if you think this is their worst 6Ns in years. Likely 4 wins out of 5 ffs

    Post edited by AbusesToilets on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,429 ✭✭✭ersatz


    They actually made a tv show about the ROG/Sexton love affair in France.

    I think the 'more going on' with Crowley is that Farrell doesn't really trust him. He's dropped him whenever there's been a viable alternative and obvs decided to promote SP faster than he has with anyone else, though it reminds me a little of Keenan who was older but dropped into the 6N in 2021 in what was his first real season as a Leinster starter (1 appearance in the 2 previous seasons) and never looked back. I still feel like Crowley has a big future for Ireland but while lots of us feel like SP has a lot to learn, Farrell feels that way about Crowley. He hasn't been cast aide in the way the Byrnes or Frawley have been so clearly he is part of the plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,505 ✭✭✭50HX


    Keenan was starting for club prior to 6N's, he had a good consecutive run of pro14 games including the semi & final

    He then played a quarter final of CC.

    It was looking v likely that he would remain a starter for Leinster post his 6nations debut.

    I agree with you that Farrell doesn't see Crowley as the 1st choice 10, that's his call to make



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,260 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,977 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Nonsense. Ireland have lost one game to a strong French team.

    Crowley was unlikely to get a run at 10 when he was selected as a utility back in a 6/2 split.

    This juvenile sniping is really tiresome. I can't believe grown adults are persisting with it.



Advertisement
Advertisement