Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

WFH is dead and buried. Right to WFH bill is pointless

11011121315

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,727 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    So what you're saying is its doesn't matter hard you work. Its about who you know. :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    I agree meeting people in person is more effective in building up relationships with people you work with and overall is better for people's mental health. However their is no need to be in an office 5 days a week to allow people to build up relationships with their colleagues. This can easily be achieve through a Hybrid solution e.g 3 day in office, 2 at home. This also takes pressure off people with young families and greater work life balance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,224 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    If I go to get tea in my kitchen, the chances of it turning into a 20 minute post mortem into last night's The Apprentice is zero.

    On the other hand, if you get tea in the office kitchen, the chances of you sitting on the couch and watching Netflix for an hour is zero, so should we all go back to the office?

    Most people in the office don't spend 20 minutes talking about the Apprentice, just like most WFHers don't watch Netflix during the day. Trying to make coherent arguments based on outliers is pointless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,727 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I love the argument he office is better for taking to people in person. Except they then complain about people talking to each other. Can't build a relationship without talking to each other.

    Can't have it both ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,343 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    Tell that to the four people in my office who all did a meeting via Teams from their desks the other day. Regular occurrence across all departments, including my own.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    The problem for companies is that the outliers force companies into getting everyone back into the office. You lock the lazy worker to a desk there is a better chance of them working that if they are at home where they are watching Netflixs or whatever. The companies forcing RTO really need to look at their HR departments and ask the question "How can we motivate these people to work from anywhere?" It is really a question of motivation. Companies will spin the collaboration & culture piece all they want but it won't solve the lazy worker coasting along. How can they motivate these people? Promotion opportunities probably won't work as these workers are happy to tip along on current salary but maybe fear of being cut may motivate these people allied with proper metrics to review their productivity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,727 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    That's a bit like saying if you have to fire the outliers you have to fire everyone..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    You don't need to fire everyone but you do need to address the outliers and tackle the root cause. Managers may not like having the difficult conversations with the poor performers but why punish everyone for the sake of a few. It's a bit like the teacher giving out to the whole class for being bold rather that tackling the trouble maker that is causing all the trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,727 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    That was my point.

    It's not the outliers causing everyone to be brought back. It's the management using it as a feeble excuse to bring everyone back. It's feeble because they aren't tackling the outliers. But also they don't need to give any reason at all.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    I do that when I am in the office. Sometimes on calls I need to check things and it is easier to that at my desk with multiple monitors and a proper keyboard and mouse.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭TerrieBootson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭TerrieBootson


    Former Former Former said

    "Most people in the office don't spend 20 minutes talking about the Apprentice, just like most WFHers don't watch Netflix during the day. Trying to make coherent arguments based on outliers is pointless"

    Trouble with this argument is that you don't know "most people" any more than I do. Anyone I know, myself included, pisses about when working from home. My worst sin is pottering about on boards, but others I know are doing jigsaws, grocery shopping or just watching the soaps. Yes work gets done, but not efficiently



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,606 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Yes work gets done, but not efficiently

    My experience in the office is usually the opposite. There are so many distractions.

    Some places I've worked seemed to have people whose job it was to distract people from working.

    What this discussion has shown is that everyone is different and there is no one size fits all solution.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    To quote your previous post…

    Trouble with this argument is that you don't know "most people" any more than I do

    I would argue that anyone who can piss about as much as you suggest, and still get their work done, must be uber efficient!



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    People piss about plenty in the office too. I remember years ago prior to Covid when boards was in its prime, boards went down for a while during normal working hours. The running joke was that productivity in the country must have skyrocketed for those few hours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,343 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    As I said in another thread, I don't have the luxury of pissing about, whether I'm at home or in the office, my job is incredibly busy. The value in WFH for me was in cutting out the 2.5 hours of dead commuting time. Close the laptop at the end of the day and I could immediately start the dinner/throw on a wash/take the dogs out while it's still bright outside. We've been back in the office 5 days for a while now and the impact on my quality of life is almost impossible to describe. Especially over the winter, when I pretty much didn't see daylight during my free time from Monday to Friday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53 ✭✭eoo1


    My company is ending Hybrid and WFH shortly. In my view it appears to be the case that they wish to shed employees, without redundancies, which may negatively affect the stockprice. Any employee that has left my company over the last 18 months, has not been replaced. This has in turn affected morale, with a substantial increase in workload for those remaining. Personally I haven't struggled with the increased workload, and hybrid has been the primary reason.

    It may also be the case that senior and middle management feel their roles are threatened, and they need bums on seats to justify their existence.

    Due to hybrid I didn't mind doing addtional hours, but with that ending, I've informed my manager I will be looking to leave the company, and will decrease the addtional hours I do. The commute will now make me less inclined to do any time above my contracted hours. For collabration, the bulk of my work is from the UK, so I will be sitting in an office in Dublin talking to people on teams in the UK, of course when I raised this, I couldn't get a justifiable answer.

    As for the less productive employees, they will be no different in the office than WFH imo, what I see is they are more likely to distract the more productive employees, either by pointless chit chat, or requesting help. We have a few of them in my place. It's easy to say a manager should simply correct behaviours, but anyone that has managed knows how difficult it can be to correct these behaviours, there is many steps to follow, to avoid falling foul of employment laws in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,967 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Re: long commutes and after work childcare arrangements, not only does the RTO brigade not care about any of that but I'm convinced that that some ENJOY seeing others struggle. Plenty of sadists, psychopaths, narcissists and deeply insecure people in workplaces. Seeing other people having to do a pointless commute is lifefuel for those in power that live 5 minutes from the office.

    They don't want happy employees because if an employee is happy, they must be "getting away with something". Senior people want to look out the window of their office and smugly see their BMW parked in its designated spot - while the plebs who've just driven 80 km scramble to get their Corollas and Golfs parked before the place fills up. Also, if you are in a senior role, you're likely an office politician and office politics require people in the office. No point having a brass nameplate on your office door if none of the plebs can see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    Yes, I think companies are using RTO to reduce headcount but the poor performer is less likely to leave that the strong performer leaving companies in a worst off situation. The strong performer will be less daunted by a move to another company and will be more adaptable and get up to speed quicker. The productivity of the poor performer may improve slightly with working in the office but the loss of the strong performer who may be critical to the business will have much higher impact overall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,569 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    One presumes you do the 'extra' hours at home so that you can do less in the office, you are still only doing your mandated hours for the week unless you are a very unusual civil servant.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's not against any rules :) Once I do my "mandated" hours I am not obliged to do any more.

    And since the pandemic, during which I did literally 1000s of extra hours - for free, (as did many of my colleagues to keep things running as we adapted overnight to WFH) - and for which we got no recognition and now seems to be completely forgotten - I no longer kill myself.

    Enjoy your evening! Its bright enough to still go for a walk!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,569 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Never said it was but the post reads like you put on extra work at home when it's not really the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 640 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    Exactly, the office is very distracting - even doing things away from your desk at home like putting on wash, doing a school run are less of a distraction as they don’t really break your train of thought in the same way especially if is another technical discussion or ends up in you doing more work. There is also far more of a tendency to take longer breaks in the office.

    I start work approx an hour later on office days and typically take longer breaks as we “grab a coffee” most mornings that ends up being a 30min round trip - this is a 5mins at home to pop down to the kitchen. I do no more or less non-work internet browsing in the office and my phone screen time tends to be higher on office days then when I’m at home (I use my phone fairly minimal for work).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    I think companies see the coffee breaks in the office where you are chatting to colleagues i.e building up relationships, work friendships as a benefit to the company where if you are taking a break while a home doing a school run or some house tasks as no benefit to the company. Generally company morale events are outside of office hours where you are spending time building relationships, friendship etc similar to time spend on coffee breaks in the office. Of course there is no need to be doing this 5 days a week which is why Hybrid solutions work best.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 13,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


    A company in Cork certainly attempting to kill off wfh here, employee had been working remotely since 2018. It doesn't say if her contract specified remote working or not.

    Remote worker told to relocate from Monaghan to Cork



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,606 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    From the article:

    Ms Douglas had given an address in Emyvale, Co Monaghan, in her complaint form and said she had never worked for the company at its main office in Little Island, Co Cork, in the years since she joined in October 2018. She said her original job site was Dr Steevens’ Hospital in Dublin before her role was made entirely remote during the Covid-19 pandemic.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 13,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


    Ah yes, I had forgotten about the Dr Steeven's Hospital stint so remote due to Covid restrictions. Still, sending her back toher original office location would have made more sense than expecting an employee to up sticks and move to the other end of the country within a few weeks. Unless forcing her out was the objective.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    Very unfair on this employee and at a minimum she should have been offered redundancy from the outset. It says her originally place of work was in Dublin prior to Covid. It does highlight that there is no real protection for workers with regard to remote working. Jobs are being advertised as Hybrid but company policies can change with short notice and full RTO can be enforced. e.g I leave my current job to go to a company offering hybrid and they change their policy in a few months. Unless it is specially called out in a contract the worker has no protection.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 13,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


     It does highlight that there is no real protection for workers with regard to remote working

    Any job I have had, had a clause in the contract about work location being subject to change and I've quoted the clause from my current work from home contract below as an example. It is much more problematic for people like the employee in that case being expected to commute Monaghan to Cork or to move house. While it is almost certainly within the company's rights to do that, it was done in a very unfair manner, lacking in common sense unless as I said earlier, pushing her out was the actual objective.

    Excerpt from my contract

    Work Location
    You will initially be located at your home address with attendance off-site as required.
    However, the Company reserves the right to locate you at any location within the Company, in which event, you will be given reasonable notice. Any such change to place of work will not constitute a breach of this agreement or give rise to any entitlement to payment to the employee for disturbance or otherwise.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There are companies pulling that stunt to try and get rid of employees. I'd say that is what is going on here.

    Not the first case of this we've seen. There was a case in the High Court about it recently, if I recall correctly.

    (eta) Link to case which was settled "confidentially".



Advertisement