Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

16376386406426431308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭Nalz




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭thefa


    Yeah, I hope it’s repeatable on a regular basis. My fear is that it was just the situation the game was in that led to chances like that, ie. loads of room to counter a team with 70% possession trying to chase the game. Positive signs overall though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    We seen a bit of it against Sociedad as well. Too early to be getting excited but some encouragement imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,970 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Difficult to say…. there could also be a coaching component involved .

    At a lot of the Utd corners he gets involved in wrestling matches with opponent markers which doesn't allow him to attack the ball. If I was his coach I would tell him to concentrate on the ball and not love ins with the opposing centre half often ending up on the ground.

    Also he seems very 'heavy' on the ground ie no 'spring' prone to falling .

    Confidence is undoubtedly a big component in his lack of goals. for his own sake and the teams hope he regain that .

    However there needs to be a change of strategy from the coaching staff for him regain confidence, going on with the current

    performance is in my opinion guaranteed to fail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    He did seem to find it easier to score in Europe in that first season though. But for a 20/21 to score 10 PL goals in his first season, there's something to build on.

    Too many excuses this year to be making a judgement on him imo. He may just be that little bit too slow for the PL, but we should probably judge him once he has players around him who are creating decent chances for him... and another striker to take the pressure off him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Will be interestinig to see how we set up vs La Real on Thrusday.

    With Yoro injured and Dorgu not suspended I would guess Mazraoui moves into the back line and Dorgu and Dalot play WB. MDL and Maguire or Heaven the other CBs.

    the other 5 is a big question imo.

    I'd go with Ugarte, Casemiro, Bruno, Garnahco, Zirkzee. tbh its really just down to Hojlund or Casemiro imo - and I would go with Casemiro and move Bruno closer to goal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    I'm looking forward to Thursday now. Lucky enough to be going and hoping for another special European night at OT. Team I'd go with is

    Onana

    Maz MDL Heaven

    Dalot Bruno Ugarte Dorgu

    Zirkzee Garna

    Hojlund

    I think Brunos best performance have come from deep this season and I like the dynamic of having our 4 best attackers on the pitch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,224 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Is Yoro out?

    Amorim said after the game that he was a maybe, although he wasn't very specific on the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    My worry is that the attacks would break down with Hojlund up top rather than Zirkzee, and we'd actually be better off with one less attacker on the pitch as we would be more likely to maintain the ball and pressure.

    I also thiink Casemiro beside Ugarte could be interesting as Casemiro is a decent goal threat from deep - and a very good player in the air in both boxes, which could be needed with the defensive injuries we are possibly dealing with.

    But I do see you're from 5 selection being more likely than what I suggest/would like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    Fully agree on Cas being a threat and a help from set pieces. While he's been good recently I thought he faded badly yesterday, which is understandable so I'm not having a go. I'd be looking at Cas being the like for like replacement for Ugarte after 70ish mins. Collyer likely not being fit enough to start either also makes Hojlund the fave to start.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭The Big Easy


    He has to show something over the remainder of the season though.

    Much like RA and the team in general, you need to be seeing something. At the moment Rasmus is showing next to nothing currently. He may well end up another Forlan and prove himself topclass after leaving United. He wouldn't be the first guy who just couldn't cut it under the pressure of the badge.

    And let's face it the pressure of the badge has never been heavier in history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Agreed he needs to start showing something more for the rest of the season. He has been getting more chances of late so he needs to do better.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,762 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    Martial would offer more than Rasmus. That is how bad he has been. He is playing 4 and 5 out of 10 (at best) in every game. He is also jogging about the place putting nobody under real pressure.

    Zirkzee has found a way to function as he has upped his game and started playing himself into form. He is a good example of how to show something even when things are tough.

    With Hojlund it feels like he has stopped doing basics well. If he got back to trying to play, execute basics well then he would offer something. He looks lost right now.

    It is only his second season so I don't want to be thinking his problems are permanent. We have seen other similar strikers like Solanke struggle for consistency before firing on a more regular basis as they got older, more experienced.

    He has certainly suffered in part because he was put in as the main man before he was ready. It is typical United to do that when he doesn't have the senior players around him to take some of the load.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Can't see Ugarte starting myself. One thing we've seen from Amorim is that he's fairly cautious with bringing guys back from injury. Even though this is a huge game, I don't see him starting Thursday if he wasn't fit for some minutes yesterday. He didn't seem overly optimistic that Ugarte would be back in the post match press conference.

    I think it'll be Bruno and Casemiro in the two. If there was to be a change to that, I think it would be more likely to see Collyer in beside Casemiro to push Bruno further up (I wouldn't do that but I think it's more likely than seeing Ugarte start).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    IMO he wasn't selected yesterday to be cautious that he could play vs La Real. But of course we will see in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Ah ok, if he has been rested then I would be thinking along your lines, Ugarte and Casemiro together, Bruno and Garnacho with Zirkzee up top.

    That gives more "options" from the bench. Bruno can drop deep in the second half if/when Casemiro tires. Or Collyer in for Casemiro if we're not having to chase the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,970 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Only thing Id disagree with there is your rating… 2-3 out of 10 at best would be my rating.

    And as you pointed out..whats this "jogging about the place" for. Jogging up to the opponent in the hope you won't get there is what it looks like?

    He has to finish the season stronger….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,224 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    The way Rasmus is playing, a striker is becoming our number 1 priority rather than just one of a number of issues.

    It's probably easy enough to calculate how many points Onana has cost us this season, based on his errors. But although it's harder to calculate, how many losses would have been draws or draws would have been wins if we had a striker averaging a goal every 2-3 games?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 819 ✭✭✭ngunners


    Yep, but that's my point. He is being criticised for his poor performances so why isn't Hojlund held to the same standard?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    You've people saying Hojlund shouldn't play again this season, that he needs to be replaced, that he is rubbish.

    What standard are you looking for?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 819 ✭✭✭ngunners


    Maybe I am being harsh and I did consider that he held back to protect the draw but if you watch the clip he doesn't really hold back his position either, just jogs aimlessly.

    I agree his workrate is usually impeccable, but in this instance I feel like there was more of a mental issue (fear of failure holding him back).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Think it’s unfair to Martial to be put in same breath as Rasmus at this point.

    Martial took a bad rap because he looked lazy stylistically, suffered injuries and badly faded towards the end to the point he stopped trying (recency bias).

    Martial was uniteds best player for stretches under LVG. He is in a different stratosphere than Hojlund as a player. His link up play when he was fit would utterly transform this United team.

    If Hojlund leaves this summer, he will go down as one of our worst ever signings (he’s a worse signing than Antony). His 24/25 season might be the worst individual season in United history for a player to consistently start.

    To be fair he is being fairly universally slated at this stage. Get the odd defender still (always get those) but he’s trending on twitter pretty much every game we play with all sorts of mental stats and criticism bandied about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    A striker (/forward who can score) should have been our number one priority last summer. The writing was on the wall for this season for me back then. The hope that Zirkzee would contribute or bring more goals from others wasn't enough, a proper goalscorer was needed. And that was so obvious from our goals returns for the previous 2 seasons tbh... and so obvious because we were relying on a 21 year old as our only proper striker.

    What's fairly easy to calculate is the average goals for and against for the teams between 4th and 10th in the PL... Somewhere where we should be expecting at a minimum.

    We've conceded 40 goals this season, the average from 4th-10th is 38.4.… we're not in 14th due to our defensive record / Onana blunders included.

    We've scored 34 goals this season, the average from 4th-10th is 46.7. Lack of goals is why we are in 14th.

    In a round about way of answering your question... If we added a player who scored once every 3 games, we would have 10 extra goals and those 10 extra goals would have us up at about 6th or 7th imo.

    Above may be an overly simplistic way of looking at it, but it's not a complex problem... Goals win (or draw) games.

    There should be no doubt that a striker is number 1 priority... Players who can add to our goals tally should be priority number 2 & 3 as well imo.

    There was a back-and-forth about Garnacho being one of our main attacking threats vs him not scoring in 22 games. The problem is that both are true, he is one of our main attacking threats at times... And he hasn't scored in 22 games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    The plan last summer was (imo) for Zirkzee to facilatate Rashford, Garnacho and Bruno to hit their top numbers - in a 4231 system.

    Obviously we got it wrong.

    But if Zirkzee had got 8-10 or goals while Garnacho hit similar, Rashford 15/20 and Bruno 15/20 (which all players couldm arguably be said to have the potential to have done so) we'd look far better for goals, and position.

    Obviously NONE of that worked out.

    And with the change of formation, Zirkzee can't do what he was invisioned to do imo.

    We now need the striker to be doing 15/20 goals, and the two AMs doing 10/15, the 8 doing about 8/10 and the WBs chipping in 10 between them.

    And we only have Bruno who is capable of doing what is neede there in terms of goals.

    IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,224 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Thanks for doing the math I was too lazy to do.

    Yes that was my point. Add 10 goals to the season via a half decent striker and we're chasing top 6. That also lightens the doom & gloom (which will greatly disappoint some) by demonstrating that we're not quite as bad or as hopeless as we look if a single good signing would elevate us to a top 6 challenging side next year. So make that 3 decent good signings and we should be in relatively decent shape. Still a long way from title challenging, but good enough to stop being a laughing stock and start challenging for Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,224 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    I don't see how Hojlund can be classed as worse than Antony.

    Antony - £81m - 96 games - 12 goals - 3 assists

    Hojlund - £64m - 68 games - 22 goals - 3 assists

    So Hojlund cost less, has nearly twice the goals and the same number of assists in 28 less games. More goals may be expected as he's a striker, but Antony's lack of assists was horrendous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭Robson99


    Nothing against Zirkzee, but what on earth was the thinking behind signing him in the summer… neither an out and out striker nor a 10 either no matter what system you play. Surely there was a better option even short term to be back up to Hojlund



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    facilitator player (like Firminho) to create spaces an opportunites for the attacking players around him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I don’t think goals and assists are the only way to value a player especially when you consider Hojlund is an out and out 9.

    Antony is actually quite effective in defensive structures.

    Goals and assists also do not quantify just how detrimental Hojlund is to the teams ability to retain possession and build up play.

    They are both clearly horrendous signings but Hojlund has been worse for me. Certainly his 24/25 season is significantly worse than anything Antony ever produced. His first season was probably better than Antony marginally.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    I actually think Zirkzee is more suited to Amorim's system than the 4231. He was never going to play 10 (with Bruno there) and I think he's better as one of the two 10s in Amorim's system than he would have been wide left / drifting in under ETH's.

    One hopeful signing was never going to be enough in my eyes but that's in the past now. I just hope we seriously prioritise players who can add goals to the team this summer.

    A striker, a 10 who scores, and an attacking RWB would be my priority targets.



Advertisement