Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1317318320322323431

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,457 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,047 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Is that UK ambassador going on a solo run with his urging Zelensky to get back behind Trump's plan, or is this an inkling of the consensus of other western leaders? Are they privately telling Zelensky to go back to Trump? Would be a hard pill to swallow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 803 ✭✭✭Cushtie


    Starmer just said he spoke to Trump last night, I think they are trying to salvage it.

    TBH I expected a bit more from the European Leaders summit today, the only reason I think they didn't commit to more, is the US plan in still in play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,047 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It's getting sadder by the day how much European leaders appear to be desperately clinging onto this idea that the US under Trump is still a reliable partner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    Starmer announces £1.6bn package for Ukraine for air missiles

    On top of the £2.2bn loan announced yesterday, Starmer now adds another £1.6bn in UK export finance allowing Ukraine “to buy more than 5,000 air defence missiles, which will be made in Belfast, creating jobs in our brilliant defence sector”.


    Belfast? Is there missile making facilities in Belfast?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,184 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Europe doesn't have any real choice here. The hard truth is that Europe needs America for credible defence capability because Europe ran down it's defences since the end of the Cold War. The US didn't and Europeans thought the US would continue to pick up the tab for some reason.

    It was always going to come to a bust up eventually.

    Obama in his second term also pleaded with Europe to do much more for our own defence and we just ignored him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,047 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Yeah, but you get the sense that if Europe can get some sort of flimsy word of reassurance, European leaders will think, "Whew, thank god for that, we don't have to do anything major now. Almost thought we were going to have to work on defending ourselves there for a sec."

    But it is in a sense understandable why Europe has lagged in this regard, because European leaders are all about consensus, and they've been unable to arrive at one on a common defence policy. This is where authoritarian governments are far more agile - they can order complete restructuring of an economy towards a war effort while an alliance of democratic countries is busy setting up meetings about formulating a proposal to discuss a pathway towards a five point plan that will lay the groundwork for future collaboration on a project that promises to establish the foundation of a multinational committee tasked with overseeing the design of the uniforms that a theoretical European defence force may wear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,130 ✭✭✭purplepanda


    Is he the first member of the British Labour Party to go full MAGA? That's what it initially looks like, if so he should be sacked immediately by Starmer.

    I wouldn't be surprised to see Tony Blair is now cosying up to Trump, that snake has been keeping very quiet lately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 951 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    European defense stocks a good bet at the moment



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,062 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    France - 300 nuclear warheads; The UK has 225; Both have the means to deliver them. Do the Orcs even have 525 targets worth the effort.

    The Orcs have 833 fighter jets. Weak Europe only has 1367, of which a good number are F-35s, which supposedly each worth multiple Orc flying targets.

    So, no, you are wrong on all counts. Europe is far from defenceless and certainly are fee to make choices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,824 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    the world is crying out for real, emphatic, decisive and well considered leadership…

    And we have Donald Trump as the US President. Slags off and threatens his allies, Europe & Canada….with sanctions / tariffs etc etc…

    He’s actually a head case and I’d say the only thing that will stop him seeking a constitutional amendment to bringing in a third term of office for sitting US presidents would be his age… he’ll be 82 when this term is up and I think that will make him the oldest sitting president in history. Certainly ‘modern’ history…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,457 ✭✭✭zv2


    This is just crazy-

    Edit: already posted…

    Post edited by zv2 on

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,148 ✭✭✭wassie


    Don't think that for a minute that because Trump is cutesy with Putin that Americans are too. They just don't really care for Ukraine.

    American society has had the best part of a century being told that the Russki's are the evil empire. That isnt easily undone in a few weeks…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,457 ✭✭✭zv2


    ….

    image.png

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,017 ✭✭✭jmreire




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,017 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, and having to pay storage and maintenance fees as well! It has gotten to the stage that you would pay good money to someone to take it away…and you would save money in the long term



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,701 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    dims.apnews.jpg

    Coalition Of The Willing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,309 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Where did I hear that term before?

    Fact is US have been the main sponsor and main instigator of this whole sad adventure from the beginning to this very point. In the here and now and in a more practical sense they also provide all the logistics and intelligence. When it comes to crunch time Ukraine would have to surrender without US support within weeks or possibly days. In fact without all the external life support they couldnt even pay their public service wages or their pensions or anything really. Without external life support Ukraine looks like a zombie state both on the battlefield and off the battlefield.

    All that fantasising here over Telegrams about Russian donkeys and North Koreans and Ukrainian drone swarms doesnt change any of that.

    Do you think Zelensky gets his face slapped and is then being told to crawl back grovelling because US support isnt that important?

    When crunch time comes no one in that 'Coalition Of The Willing' will send their troops into Ukraine because a) body bags wont look good at home and b) WW3 anyone? It's all bluster and eagerness to spend another crazy debt package. Just this time it will be the war industry instead of the banks who's going to benefit from it. Never miss a good opportunity when it comes to raiding the public coffers.

    And after crunch time - when Ukraine finally steps away from their maximum demands and enters talks and maybe we'll have a cease fire - no one will get their troops in there either because Russia will simply not agree to anything that ends up having any NATO troops in the Ukraine. Regardless whether they're called 'peacekeepers' or not. This is what the whole thing is about after all. Russia is not going to say 'cool, let's have a cease fire and have French, UK and German troops enter Ukraine'. Like NATO through the backdoor. How do these people think this is even a remote possibility? Are they fuckin stupid? And if they're not they must obviously think we are.

    So the 'Coalition Of The Willing' can pony up a few more billion every month so the lights dont actually go out in Ukraine and they can send a few more missiles or whatnot and keep watching another hundred thousand people die. And they probably will because of their pigheaded stubbornness to accept defeat and because they extended themselves so badly in their rhetoric and actions they now have no way out without losing face.

    If they were smart at all they would use Trump as their way out. Bad cop and scapegoat all rolled into one. But I reckon they're not going to be smart. It sounds like they gonna double down and remain absolutely resistent to learn anything. Our glorious leaders.

    Post edited by CalamariFritti on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭Lirange


    re: an unconstitutional 3rd term

    I would never say never where Trump is concerned. However repealing an amendment means approving a new amendment to override it. This would mean 2/3 of both houses of congress. He couldn’t come anywhere near that requirement today as the Republican majorities in both the Senate & House are very slim. It would seem nigh on impossible for either party to achieve such majorities given the nature of the current division & polarisation in the US. The midterms (coming in 2026) typically see the opposing party of the sitting president make gains. On top of that he would also require 3/4ths of all state legislatures to see the amendment through. So only 13 state legislatures need to vote against the amendment to void it. I confess I didn’t know most of this until just now but your question may be do a shallow dive.

    I hope the Democrats & any opposition really aim much of their ordinance at Vance & Musk. I think one of them will attempt to carry the banner of Trumpism forward. The Republicans as a party have shown themselves to be spineless & shameless in their fealty to Trump. But I don’t have the sense that the party is full of Putinverstehers let alone admirers. Even among the isolationist faction in the party. If you look at Ukraine aid votes under Biden especially prior to Trump trying to scuttle the additional aid last year there was broad support. So it’s mainly driven by Trump & his retinue. This is why the fubsy veep & Musk need to be pilloried to the fullest extent with a view to when he’s out of frame.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭political analyst


    A Russian invasion of Poland would still cause a greater outcry in the US than it did in 1939, i.e. 24-hour cable news coverage. After all, Trump did more about the use of nerve gas by the Assad regime than Obama did - not to mention the assassination of Soleimani, of course. The pivot to Asia doesn't mean that Trump regards Putin as a friend. After all, Putin and Xi are practically joined at the hip - they're a bit like Bertie Ahern and Mary Harney in government together.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Here's a brilliant idea for the Democrats and Canada and the left-wing European countries: Stop tying yourselves in knots about identity politics and the International Criminal Court!

    Putin was already laughing at the West before Trump's first term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,062 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,062 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Untitled Image

    King Troll meets the Man



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭omega man




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,309 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,210 ✭✭✭amandstu


    That is what Vance was doing in the sofa.He was looking for his tie.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,701 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Can I ask what is happening with all the frozen Russian money, why is that not going to Ukraine?



Advertisement