Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Premier League Thread 2024-25

1284285287289290364

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,024 ✭✭✭✭Mushy


    I'll always use that year to prove why the CL winners aren't the best team in Europe. It's a cup competition, you don't play every top tier team so how can you claim to be the best? Can use it for every year too and normally would at least be thereabouts, but then you get years where it can't be debated



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    But nobody ever plays every top tier team in a season

    Liverpool have definitely won the European Cup with an easier run than they had that season. AC Milan, with Ancelotti, were stacked as a squad. So were Juventus who "won" Serie A that season by 8 points ahead of Milan but couldn't lay a glove on that Liverpool side in the quarter final. Mourinho's Chelsea were hugely dominant too, not yet at their peak but not far off either and was during their 80-something home undefeated phase.

    Even that Leverkusen squad was dangerous with Berbatov, they had beaten Bayern 5-1 and Real Madrid 3-0 that season yet again they never really looked like knocking Liverpool out and conceded 6 to them over the 2 legs.

    I agree that they weren't the best team in Europe that season just because of winning the big one, but they didn't accidentally end up in the final by beating nobody's

    You can talk about luck when it comes to losing at half time and needing to score 3 goals in the 2nd half to avoid going out without conceding....but people forget that Liverpool did that TWICE in the CL campaign, it wasn't a one off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,024 ✭✭✭✭Mushy


    Well yeah that was my point. Any winner any season can struggle to claim to claim be the best in Europe, yeah they'll normally be there or thereabouts. But that was one of the seasons where I wouldn't class the winners amongst the best in Europe as they were way off domestically. Any team can overachieve in a cup comp, prime example being Wigan in 2013 (domestic cups obviously not with weighting of CL as there are domestic leagues, otherwise I'd claim Plymouth are better than Liverpool).

    It's not that the winners aren't deserving either, have to play who you're drawn against, just I dislike the misnomer of CL winners = best team in Europe



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    I don't think any Liverpool fan actually claims that Liverpool were the best or even amongst the best 4 or 5 teams in Europe in 2005, but, they managed to beat 2 of the favourites along the way- Juve and Milan. It's not called the miracle of Istanbul for nothing! Massive underdogs in the final against an outstanding Milan team that went 3 goals up, Liverpool were on the verge of humiiliation, but, somehow managed to turn it around. Milan were the better team on the night, yet lost. Ironically in 2007, Liverpool were a much better team, probaly the better team on the night, Milan not as strong, yet Milan won.

    Even though Madrid have dominated the champions league in the last decade, were they really the best team in Europe each time they won it, I wouldn't necessarily agree, were they better than City last season or even in 2022? It's a cup competition, so the best team doesn't necessarily win it each year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    Hope it's not too off topic but does anyone else feel Gyökeres will prove to be a disappointment for whoever pays 85+ million for him. Scoring in the Portuguese league is one thing but a top league is very different. Darwin Nunez hit 26 goals in 28 games for Benfica and as a Liverpool fan he's been very disappointing. In fact go back and look at the previous top scorers in Portugal, nobody really outstanding on the list.

    Mehdi Taremi won it twice and he's done nothing at Inter Milan this season, Goncalves won it and would anyone say he's world class. Other recent winners like Seferovic, Carlos Vinicus and Pizzi. I think he's a big risk personality, I really don't think he's a great bet for 25 goals in the Premier League or La Liga etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    It’s beginning to get annoying the way injuries are getting dismissed as a reasons for a team under performing by the likes of Roy Keane when discussing arsenal this season.


    Pep lamented city’s injuries this season when giving his thoughts in the defeat to liverpool so it’s not just teams that have a questionable psychological makeup that moan about injuries.

    Injuries are an extremely big factor in a teams performance so dismissing them is kinda dumb.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,712 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Definitely a worry alright… though he is on another level to pretty much all of them. They're all pretty much 1-in-2 strikers over there careers in Portugal, with the odd hot streak, while Gyökeres is nearly at a goal a game. Nunez is the exception - still close to 1 in 2, but that was with one brilliant season and one poor one so skews it a bit. Gyökeres consistency is pretty remarkable. Will always be doubt until he does it at a higher level, but he seems a safer choice than any of the others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    He's definitely a very good player but personally I'd say Oshimen and even Jonathan David are a safer bet. I've heard Arsenal fans say Sesko is too unproven and has potential but Arsenal needs proven quality right now. I'm not sure how proven Gyökeres really is. Would Sesko not hit 25 goals playing in Portugal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    Thing about Gyökeres is that he played in England for a lot longer than he's been in Portugal. So it's not like there's not already a sample size, albeit his appearances were mostly just in the Championship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,853 ✭✭✭DJIMI TRARORE


    Does that red for Gordon rule him out of the league cup final



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,619 ✭✭✭jacool




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,720 ✭✭✭Talisman


    That straight red card for violent conduct is a three match ban, so as it stands he'll miss the league game away to West Ham (March 10th), the Carabao Cup Final (March 16th) and the following league game against Brentford (April 2nd). In effect he gets a month off because the next game he'll be available for is Leicester on April 7th.

    England used to have a policy that while a player was serving a domestic suspension they wouldn't receive a call up for the national team. It will be interesting to see if Tuchel takes that approach.

    Newcastle could decide to appeal, in which case Gordon would be available until the independent panel reviews the referee's report and the video footage. If they deem the appeal to have been frivolous, i.e. the ban is upheld and there was no valid reason for the appeal other than to have the player available for additional games before the suspension, then an addition game would be added to the ban.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Milan Ultras boycotted the first 15 mins of tonights game against Lazio. Arsenal, United, Spurs and Chelsea fans ought to do the same and hold their teams accountable for poor performances. Standards have never been lower in the PL.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭FreshG


    Aston Villa are 10th and are able to sign a player who has won multiple CLs and have nearly 300 Real Madrid appearances to their name, and not when their washed up either.

    Brighton Brentford Fulham Crystal Palace etc are full of Internationals, and have some of the best recruitment around.

    Wolves are 17th and will have 2 if not 3 players in the Brazil squad for the next International break.

    Teams like Man Utd & Spurs are low in the table for a reason. 11 of the 'other 14' have increased their standards massively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,619 ✭✭✭jacool


    How Do You Solve A Problem Like Cunha?

    image-a648381fe49b4-f368.png

    Its 3 from 4 now, but in reality 2 from 3, as the relegation battle enters the last months. Wolves, are surely "too good to go down", but their "hero to zero" merchant Mattheus Cunha is trying to make a competition of it. Luckily for the Old Gold, Ipswich somehow conspired to lose at home to Southampton, otherwise the gap would be a mere 2 points. 

    Ironically, Southampton are one of the three games that Cunha is guaranteed to miss, with that game sandwiched between ties against Everton and West Ham United. It will be interesting to see if the ban gets extended or not, and I wonder will it matter that they are talking about the Millwall keeper getting his ban extended to 5 games at the same time? Dunno if the FA would compare the two incidents and see the Cunha one as a "lesser" offence?

    Were the ban extended then the next game is away to Ipswich!

    Long term I don't know what Wolves do - clearly sell, but how many clubs would be prepared to buy into the full "package"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    What have those teams you mention won? Success= Trophies.

    They are all midtable teams. Wolves having 3 Brazil players in their squad probably says more about how poor Brazil are at the moment than Wolves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,712 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I’m not sure that what they’ve won has anything to do with anything? The whole point IS that those mentioned are midtable teams. The middling sides by definition are not trophy winners - but in any given era they can be better, or worse. Right now they’re quite good. The depth of the league is actually strong enough that the strongest teams don’t get too many walkovers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭FreshG


    Success is not trophies.

    Success is meeting and achieving a clubs objectives. Ipswich won't be judged against winning a trophy this season, likewise Wolves or Crystal Palace and Brentford and so on. Chelsea don't care about winning a league cup trophy, we want to play CL football, that's what success is for Chelsea this season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Middlesbrough won a League cup in 2004, Portsmouth won an FA Cup in 2008, Birmingham won a League Cup in 2011 and got relegated, Swansea won a League Cup in 2013, Wigan won an FA Cup in 2013 and got relegated, let's not forget Leicester won the league in 2016 and an FA Cup in 2021 and West Ham won the Confrence League in 2023.

    That is success for lower/midtable clubs not finishing in European places or top half. Fans should expecting more from their club. Leicester fans were protesting their owners there recently and rightly so they've seen their team win the league and an FA Cup and rightfully expect higher standards than what they've been producing.

    You can say the standards have never been higher but yet the same teams will end up winning the trophies at the end of the season. Liverpool will win the league and most likely win the league cup and City will most likely win the FA Cup. If Chelsea win the Confrence League they'll have had a better season than Arsenal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,712 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Again, the point has nothing to do with winning trophies. The fact that so many of the teams that DO NOT win trophies are now good enough to cause the biggest sides trouble is what makes for a league with strong depth. The biggest teams at any given time will always win most of the trophies, and selecting the small handful of exceptions from a 20 year period only enhances that. (on that subject though, it might be worth noting that only 1 of the 8 quarter finalists in this years FA Cup is a 'big team').

    Some of the traditional superpowers are in transitional phases, and most of the rest have stepped up a level. It's great!

    (as for the Leicester point… their owners money comes from duty free shopping. That industry's collapse during covid destroyed them. they just don't have money to invest anymore. Add in the tragic death of the family patriarch at one of their games, and their relative stagnation is fairly understandable)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭FreshG


    You're just listing out clubs, from outside the 'big 6', that have won a trophy in the last 25 years. Without actually saying anything.

    How clubs played in the cups 25 years ago isn't relevant to the current standard of league. They could have got a favourable draw etc. For example, Wigan (PL) played teams in League 1, Non-League, Championship, PL and the Championship again before playing Man City in the Final.

    Leicester fans are protesting the current state of the team in a relegation battle. It's not because they are not winning the bloody Premier League or the FA Cup in this current season. Success for them is staying up, in their first year of being in the actual league. You don't get promoted and automatically think that you can win the league the next season. Their team fell off a cliff because they bought average players and the other clubs around them bought well. The other clubs raising their standards and Leicester fell backwards. The other clubs like Fulham, Palace, Brighton, Brentford etc, all with terrific recruitment and managerial appointments. They are protesting because their club are not maintaining the status quo with these clubs, not because they are not winning the cups and league. If you think it's because of that, you're deluded.

    Aston Villa had a terrific CL campaign and beat Bayern Munich amongst other teams. Are doing poorly in the PL, are in 10th position because there is no easy games anymore, apart from those 3 teams at the bottom. Villa can't handle the extra workload because the 'lesser teams' can turn them over now in that 3rd game in a week. The days of just rocking up away to a mid-table side away from home and beating a hungover Robbie Savage team is long gone.

    That is the big thing now. No more easy games you can win by just showing up. The standards have increased massively, especially in positions 7 to 15. West Ham won a European trophy, while finishing bottom half in the league.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I'm saying that clubs outside the "big 6" can win trophies and should be aiming to. Favourable draw or not Wigan still had to beat those teams to win the FA Cup. Yeah Leicester City fans are protesting but I don't see Southampton, Ipswich or Wolves fans protesting.

    So you're saying that Fulham, Brentford and Brighton have all had terrific recruitment but yet have failed to win anything so it isn't terrific recruitment unless you're definition of terrific recruitment brings you midtable mediocrity. Fulham managed to make a Europa League final in 2010 and no one was calling their recruitment terrific then.

    There never were any easy games in the Prem unless it's against some sh1t promoted team like Sheffield United last season, Southampton this season or 07/08 Derby. Was always tough going away to the likes of Stoke, Birmingham, Blackburn or Bolton. Probably easier now than before when the lesser teams used to have rubbish pitches and knock lumps out of passing sides. Now every ground has the same standard pitch and every team is playing some variation of tiki taka or counter pressing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    If your starting point is in a lower league never having played top flight before then solid midtable of the Premier league can absolutely be the result of terrific recruitment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭FreshG


    It's funny that you mention Bolton when one of the primary drivers of their success in the 00s was their use of the revolutionary ProZone predictive data analysis. They gained a massive advantage because of this, because they had an outlier.

    It didn't take long for every other club to take note, and increase their own standards to use this, or similar, technology. Thus increasing the standard of the entire league.

    You'd think as an Arsenal fan, you would be well aware of how one club can achieve over others by having some sort of revolutionary technology or methodology. Arsenal had it with dieticians and sport science under Wenger. They won a few leagues until every other club caught up, dragging the other clubs out of the 80s & 90s era when it came to food and fitness and drinking, and the league eventually became better as a whole. Every club started to use the same techniques.

    The league keeps evolving and increasing in standards across the board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    I have no interest in watching the tournament or paying attention to it, but I am curious about how the new Club World Cup works out for Chelsea and City

    It kicks off less than 3 weeks after the end of the season in America

    So season ends May 25th for City in the league, with Chelsea likely in the Europa Conference League Final on the 28th

    Then the international window is June 2nd to 10th (includes the Nations League Finals) and traditionally players would go on holidays after this window.

    But the Club World Cup starts June 14th and runs to July 13th so the clubs will be in Noeth America when all others will be on holiday and yet to start pre season tours

    I guess it's like a regular World Cup year for 2 clubs and they can use squad players if they're not that serious about winning it and then try to have a normal preseason with the rest of them with the 'World Cup' players returning late

    Seems like a massive headache and I'm not convinced that not qualifying for it is a bad thing. But let's see. I'm curious to see how strong they go with their squads, I'm sure FIFA would hate for the biggest clubs to field second string sides in their fancy new format tournament, and will be interesting to see if it affects them in the early part of next season - or if it boosts them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,989 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    There has been a lot of stupid things in football over the last while but this maybe tops the lot

    It doesn't fit in the calendar, simple as.

    It'll either be a glorified pre-season tournament or the teams taking part will have to massively rotate their squads for the first month of the season potentially putting a title challenge on the line.

    I know City have all the money etc.. but even they can't carry this.
    Pep himself surely needs some downtime



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    The Club World Cup will basically mean players for certain teams will have basically no time off potentially for years. Two Summers will be the Euros and WC and then this Club World Cup in other years. No wonder so many players are getting injured.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭8-10




    Well now we know what was supposedly said!

    https://www.thefa.com/news/2025/feb/14/everton-and-liverpool-charges-140225

    It was reported by the Referee that following the full-time whistle, he was approached by LFC’s Arne Slot (“AS”) who had entered the field of play to confront the Referee and the Match Officials team. Tensions were running high. It was alleged that AS’ manner was confrontational and aggressive. It was alleged that he initially used abusive words whilst shaking the Referee’s hand including that the Referee had “fúcking give them everything” and that AS hoped that the Referee “was proud of that performance.” The Referee thereafter confirms (having reviewed the video footage to clarify) that he was approached again by AS around one minute later. In this exchange, AS once again shook the Referee’s hand and said “if we don’t win the league, I’ll fúcking blame you.” It is then further alleged that AS turned to the Assistant Referee and shouted twice that it was “a fúcking disgrace.” As a result of AS’ conduct, he was shown a red card by the Referee.

    Additionally, Sipke Hulshoff (“SH”) is alleged to have entered the field of play following the full-time whistle to confront the Referee in an “extremely aggressive manner.” It is alleged that SH said the Referee was “fúcking shıt” and “gave them everything” and he was a “fúcking disgrace.” We are advised that the Referee attempts to remove himself from the situation to deal with the dismissals of CJ and AD, but SH continues to follow him and is eventually restrained by colleagues, but continues to shout “fúcking shıt.” SH was also shown a red card by the Referee and dismissed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    didn’t know **** had a fada,


    edit- but I can guess now why it’s there



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭8-10




Advertisement