Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1380381383385386751

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    until it starts to affect maga people financially, can't see anything changing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,046 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Trump doesn't get replaced by anyone. Vance is a stuffed shirt who may be a good instrument for the Project 2025 people but is never going to command respect of the MAGA faithful. MAGA will follow the blueprint that many cults of personality do that, when the leader passes away, someone with close familial ties will take over as leader - or not even leader, maybe steward would be more apt - and give speeches in between two gargantuan red banners that stretch from the roof to the floor and Donald's stern gaze emblazoned upon them.

    What's maddening about the Democrats is that it's almost as if there is a hope among their party elite that they'll get back in just based on how crazy Trump and MAGA are. That only barely worked last time. It probably won't work this time, and even if it did, they'd do absolutely nothing about MAGA or the socio-economic forces that drive it, and it would come back at them even more vengefully.

    It's like the Democratic party still don't understand what MAGA is and what they are with respect to it. MAGA is an insurgent reactionary movement done in a way only America can where it's not really led by the ordinary people, but by a gaggle of canny billionaires. The Democratic party and the rump of sane Republicans are the existing establishment. Existing establishments don't tend to do well in this scenario, historically speaking.

    We can scoff at the cult like mindset of MAGA and look down our noses at the so-called Christian Nationalism of leading supporters, but they have a unity and determination that seems irresistible when you contrast it with the rainbow of different interests and lukewarm secularism that powers the Democrats. The Democratic party is going to have to fundamentally break itself down and rebuild itself in order to make itself a force that can truly address MAGA, but that work should have been done ten years ago. Time, now, is a little bit short…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,681 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    …Unprecedented sackings of top military chiefs and senior military lawyers.

    In an unprecedented purge of the military’s senior leadership Friday night, President Donald Trump fired the top US general just moments before his defense secretary fired the chief of the US Navy and the vice chief of the Air Force.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/21/politics/trump-fires-top-us-general-cq-brown/index.html

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,046 ✭✭✭✭briany


    He's currently in the process of sacking every single US military head who might have the idea of moving against him. By the time he's finished, there's more chance of them moving to arrest Hillary Clinton.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,810 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    just following Putins orders



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,382 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    That's actually a good point. He's only in the job a few weeks, but is already filling the military top brass with Trump / MAGA flunkies (perhaps he's quite alert to the dangers of a military coup further down the line).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Before the election Trump and co vigorously denied that they had anything to do with Project 25, and DJT said he hadn't even read it (the last bit is probably the only truth he has ever spoken 😁),

    Yet we seem to have Executive Orders which implement a lot of Project 25 and some of P25's authors have been appointed to executive positions. So no, the poor deluded fools who voted did not know what they were getting. The should have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,810 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    you don’t need a military coup, all you needed was enough GOP senators to vote against Trumps crazy nominees but they all voted in favour because Musk threatened they would be primiared if they didn’t



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,082 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    What odds would you have given me in 2016, that in 9 years time, two Republican proxies would be doing Nazi salutes to the applause of their supporters?

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,544 ✭✭✭techdiver


    I'm not usually one for conspiracy theories but I could well believe this one and it would explain a lot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,256 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Same and the source being a Russian spy wouldn't inspire confidence but it'll be interesting to see if the story develops any further.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,129 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    A simple google of Trump and Russias relationship will bring up tonnes of evidence going back decades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    I suppose the world was never going to stay the same forever. We have had essentially boring politics since 1945. That was a long time of settled history in the grand scheme of things. Maybe the Trump/Putin axis might be the galvanising event that Europe needed. Although the threat of disinformation and propaganda could prevent that too. And democracy gets eroded off the face of earth completely in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,544 ✭✭✭techdiver


    As much as I absolutely hate Trump, I've learned a long time ago not to take Internet "evidence" as truth. Both sides can be guilty of embellishment (although the right are way worse at it).

    Unfortunately we now live in a world where it is becoming impossible to discern truth from misinformation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,129 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    There is massive and credible evidence of Russian money been invested in Trumps businesses through the years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,544 ✭✭✭techdiver


    That sort of copper fastens my second point. In the past something like that would easily sink a candidate, but unfortunately now, with the **** show the Internet and social media has made of obfuscating the truth, we are left where we are now. It is scandalous that "truth" has become tribal. It's impossible to fight against that type of brain washed ideology.

    I actually believe that a large percentage of Republicans hate Trump but are afraid to "come out of the closet" due to threats. If there were braver men in the ranks they would surely have tried to bury him with the above evidence. As regards the Democrats, I have defended them because they are without doubt being judged to a different level than maga, but they do appear to be incompetent at building a coherent message and putting out decent personalities to become the poster boys of the movement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,386 ✭✭✭Raichų


    surely it’s apparent to event the most backwards hick gobshite over beyond he’s making moves to try subvert the two term rule and be the next Putin (ie president for life)

    I am **** myself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,055 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    It has developed further - there are now two former KGB officers making the same claim - the original Yuri Shvets, and now an ex very senior KGB officer from Kazakhstan, one Alnur Mussayev.

    Two amounts to a large plume of smoke, in my eyes.

    Everyone should remember that Musk was in secret regular contact with Putrid for two years and consider that the first thing he does with every government agency he targets is demand immediate unfettered computer access.

    Good thing the US security services are now run by a cleaning lady, in this hour of most dire need. All the most competent people in the administration being fired while unbelievably incompetent people are being appointed to head every major agency. It's actually surreal.

    Remember the Trojan Horse? It's possible the US is now completely and utterly f*cked.

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,740 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    It is still a conspiracy theory, but Putin has organised most of America into a faithful cult, isolated the US from South America - the least important - with Gulf of America and Panama Canal guff, from Canada with take over threats and tariffs, and from Europe with Greenland and Ukraine, and a whole lot of the third world by removing support. No-one will rush to their aid and Putin can quietly continue with the take-over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,382 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I would be optimistic enough from the European viewpoint. The EU is much more powerful than Russia, but may need to ramp up defence spending to fend off any threat from them.

    The major change in the world order (and it is indeed a huge change) is that the US is no longer a friend or ally of anyone in the West and is now cosying up to Russia and even China instead.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,046 ✭✭✭✭briany


    A big part of Putin's plan to vanquish his enemies is to stoke tensions within the relevant countries, but he's not a magician and cannot necessarily create tensions out of thin air. So, to the point of Putin organising most of America into a cult (I would argue it's less than that but enough to be where we are), he only seized upon what was already happening in the states. MAGA is really borne out of the Tea Party movement that sprung up as a reaction to Obama's election and a kind of fear that American conservatism would go the way of the dodo, so the party went for a strategy of maximum fear and intransigence. Then, like in many a science fiction opening, the experiment broke out of its containment field and attacked its creators, and has been creating mayhem ever since. And it was gift for Putin.

    Putin doesn't have as many tentacles as sometimes portrayed, but it benefits him greatly to create the image of an ever-present threat. The Art of War might have a line about it, something like, "When you're far away, make your enemy think you're near…"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,799 ✭✭✭threeball


    Wars America have lost

    American Algerian war

    War of 1812

    Korean War

    Vietnam

    Bay of Pigs

    War on Drugs

    War in Afghanistan

    War on Terror

    Cold War (claimed victory in 1989, actually won by the Russians in 2025)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,386 ✭✭✭Raichų


    americas response:

    No we didn’t

    No we didn’t

    No we didn’t

    No we didn’t

    No we didn’t

    Tactical withdrawal

    It’s the cartels fault

    It’s the terroists fault

    It’s probably Obama’s fault but definitely Joe Biden’s fault



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,664 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    if it'd been a male governor, this wouldn't have happened. Kinziger pointed out what a coward Trump is, but bullying women is his thing (say Hi, Ivana).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,839 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Reuters reporting that the US is threatening to cut off Ukraines access to starlink if it doesn’t sign the minerals deal. Land of the free hey



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I think Ukraine should ask for any international bidders for the mineral rights, specifically from China!

    And to think people thought Trump would be good for Ukraine when they decided to vote for him. Idiots.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,916 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The notion that he is truly interested in keeping men out of women's sport because he sees the men as likely sexual predators is doubtful if one chooses to look at his track record where protection of women from men is looked at. As for looking at the White House website, who do you think gets to approve the contents of the website?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    I know it goes against everything in the military rulebook and I'm also aware that militaries are rarely locations of leftwing or even centrist views (unless that is part of the ideology of the state) , especially in the domestic context,but it seems strange that even a right-leaning American military could ,in a few years, come to regard the increased closeness of this administration to a power that is in the direct lineage of an adversary that most of their fathers spent their lives opposing, with such equanimity and conversely, begin to regard with hostility states that were the allies of the US in the time of their grandfathers and were allies until recently. I know that there is no rule that one state has to be either an eternal ally or enemy of another, but many American military families in all branches of the armed forces must have had deceased or even still living family that worked with Britain and Canada in the Second World War. Its hard to believe that all top brass will memory hole this tradition and history because MAGA wants to make nice with Russia.

    Post edited by ilkhanid on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,386 ✭✭✭Raichų


    they’re taken the piss. Funny how it was all done to give Ukrainians access to the web to keep in communication and up to date etc as well as of course giving the military access to the internet which is vital.

    Now being used by Musk and Trump as an attempt to strong arm them into doing what he says. He’s a pathetic joke of a person not to mention as a disgrace as a president.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,046 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Worth noting that the US used to oppose Russia because Russia's ideology at the time was left-wing. It was also authoritarian, but the main sticking point is that it was very left-wing. Aversion to left-wing politics is maybe the US's most consistent value and, if anything, has increased in the time of Trump.

    Now that Russia is a right-wing capitalist oligarchy which seeks to eliminate social liberalism, the US right wing can't get enough of the place and its leader.

    So, in short, the US right-wing didn't change. Russia did.



Advertisement