Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Council Waiting List

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    Yes it is a nice starting salary, im delighted with my promotion. Just have to pass probation now! 2 years at HEO level got me here. Im proud of myself. Ive turned my life around.

    Agree, i didnt mean to argue. Sorry for hijacking the thread. I can only comment on my lived experience with Fingal. Ill stop now! Thanks for the intervention

    Post edited by Skweefie on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,575 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Earning 80k, and getting a social house, when there are families earning 30k and not. Hang your head in shame if it's true. (But I don't believe it for a minute.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Also still on the HAP scheme too apparently whilst sending proof of income yearly. They won't be in the council house on HAP much longer if anything they say is true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭xyz13


    Sending this to FCC.

    Let's see how many single parents on 80k will move into "their forever home" in April 2025.

    www.concertarchives.org/novblues



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    I was in abject poverty and I was deemed as having a housing need. This was when my son was born. I had just left an abusive partner with my 6 week old baby. I found a landlord that accepted rent allowance at the time. That scheme means you can only work 20 hours per week or you lose single parent allowance. I worked as a care assistant to make ends meet. When the HAP scheme was introduced, I went on that instead. This is a scheme where you can work full time and submit your earnings on a yearly basis and the rent is calculated on that basis. Yes, it would have been better if I was allocated accommodation at that time when I was in poverty. As I clawed myself out of the mess I was in, i liaised with the council about my salary and incremental increases. I was scared as even if I stayed at the Executive Officer level, I would be over the threshold in a matter of a few years. They advised me, in writing, that I will not and cannot be penalised for going over the income threshold ss I had been assessed and deemed as having a housing need. What would you prefer? That I stay home and scratch myself? Or try to make things better for me and my son. I have worked my ass off to get us sorted. I have 13 years left before I retire. Tell me how can I save for a deposit and get a mortgage when I haven't even received my first pay check at this salary? You can be wound up by someones personal circumstances if you want and you can send whatever you want wherever you want. I have done nothing wrong. You all appear to be angry just because you dont understand the system. Thats not on me and I couldn't care less about your judgement and misinformed views. Be angry with the people in power that have created this ridiculously volatile housing market, not those of us that are trying our best.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,575 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    On an 80k salary, you CAN afford private sector rental. Social housing assistance is for those who CANNOT afford it.

    If you get to a point of being retired, and unable to afford private sector rental, then you will qualify for social housing again. Right now, you don't - though it sounds like you've somehow worked things to get the council to grandfather previous rules for you. I wouldn't be so confident about that delivering your your forevva-house though, there's a lot that can happen between now and April.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭Luna84
    Mentally Insane User


    Jesus that person getting a free house and also on HAP years while earning a senior management job while there is families homeless. If all that is true what they say then the system needs an overhaul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,928 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Oh but wait, they only got promoted 17 days ago!

    So most likely if they did get an offer of a place, they weren't assessed on their new €80k income, and I doubt they're going to go running to FCC to tell them about it now.

    How fortuitous. 😏



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    Lads, ring fingal. Ask them if this happens. It is written into legislation. I really am not doing anything wrong. They have my payslips. This is all above board. While I understand it may be hard to grasp, that is the system. Ive literally sent all payslips and my new rent amount for my long term let has been confirmed in writing based on my personal circumstances. Im not gaining an asset or a 'free house', im gaining long term affordable housing. My rent contributions are higher than other recipients based on my level of income. Your anger at me is misplaced. Im doing everything I'm supposed to do. They will literally tell you over phone or through email that an individual who has a housing need will not and cannot be removed from the allocation list just because it took them 13 years to get their allocation sorted. There are plenty of people in social housing that are above the income threshold. There are plenty that are not. But me trying to get things better so I can afford a holiday now for the first time in 20 years is a strange thing to get wound up by. I have done nothing wrong. You can contact fingal and ask them.

    It is not my fault there is not more affordable options for people. Ask youself if you want people to be kept at the bottom wrung of society for the rest of their lives. I'm proud of myself for securing mine and my sons future. It has finally fallen into place for me after working my ass off for it. I am not worried about this conversation or anything I have said because it is all the truth. Be angry with the system. Not someone who has made a valid and great change in their life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    Thy are well aware of my upcoming change in circumstances. I told them. They have my payslips at my current salary which is point 2 on the HEO scale. Im doing nothing sly or anything of the sort. They advised to resubmit my payslips for a further rent assessment like I have been doing since 2017. Every year they get my payslips. Any change in circumstances i notify them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,928 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Quite simply, people can, and are removed from the housing lists regularly, and as late as at the allocation stage, for going over the income thresholds. I've already posted some relevant links, and there have been other threads here about it, from people who were removed for being over the threshold.

    This thread is not actually about you.

    It's about the fact that you challenged correct advice given by another poster above, and countered it with "the OP has no need to worry about going over the income thresholds, once they're on the list they can't be taken of."

    Again, quite simply, that is incorrect. They can. Here is a screen shot from Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council which also states eligiblity may change on re-assessment.

    image.png

    Also, have a read of this:

    https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2023-11-09/96/

    image.png
    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,260 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Other posters here clearly know the rules in detail, but from a layman's view...

    If the income limit is 41k and perhaps 42k with a single child exemption, its quite doable to earn less than 3.5k a month on a new 80k salary, once previous 12 months income is assessed and still (i assume) remain within the FCC income limits for social housing?

    How do pension contributions factor into the eligibility for housing?

    Regardless of housing eligibility, Congratulations to the poster for working hard to get to the job level they are now at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    I took your point and I said that maybe different councils do things differently. I said that me being on the HAP scheme might be different too. I had said the information was incorrect because I'm currently living it. I have not and will not be removed because of my income increases. I was always in communication with them. Ill have a read over some of the legislation today and see if I can find how and why I have been allowed to do this.

    I am sorry for hijacking the thread. I'm sorry I said anything as I didnt want to winde anyone up. I was sharing my lived experience. Fingal told me it was written into legislation so I will find what they are referencing and post accordingly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,755 ✭✭✭✭billyhead




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,570 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    What an offensive comment! Why Sould you hang your head in shame? You support two different people, paying vastly different prices for the same property and it's the working one, getting robbed on taxes and rent etc... its total discrimination and stay under that threshold op... in our fantastically " progressive " country, you lose half your income over 44,000 any way! Well done on the job and don't go getting robbed on rent, when they are housing non workers, for free, at our expense...

    The government makes the rules, they have a huge amount being robbed on housing, and others getting it for next to nothing. Dont mind these hypocrites who would also do, what suits them best... martyrs for the vulture funds and outrageous prices etc..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    Thanks to both of you. I felt a little judged and attacked for trying to fix our life. The main thing OP should do is talk to the council. There are options.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,928 ✭✭✭Ezeoul




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    You do have to understand that there are rules in place that do say you shouldn't be getting council housing. Now there is some discretion that an individual civil service may override the rules. That does not mean that another civil servant will review the information and accept your application. They have the power to do that. Many people will believe that is the correct application of the rules given your current financial situation.

    I do see your point that if they housed you at the start they would not take the property away but that is not what happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    I am just off the phone with Fingal to clarify things.

    I was on the social housing list and then applied for HAP. When I was sanctioned to receive HAP I was removed from the housing list and added to a 'transfer' list as my housing needs had been met. At that point, I was advised of the choice based lettings scheme. This is where properties are advertised and you can express an interest. If you are longest on the transfer list of those that express an interest, you are offered the property. I read over my paperwork this morning too and in 2017, I was advised of this change. I didnt remember being told about the movement between lists. I knew I hadn't done anything wrong and I hope that clears up any confusion. Im sorry for that.

    I will go back to the OP question and advise them to talk to their local authority and see about availing of the HAP scheme so that they can alleviate the pressure of trying to escape poverty while not jeopardising their future stability. I have been where OP is and it is a scary and worrying place to be. I wouldn't wish it on anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,260 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    All true, but If the rules are that the max income is 42k net to stay on the housing list, then someone on 50k-55k over the last 12 months would still qualify for social housing.

    If the poster's salary goes above 60k from next month, I am not sure what happens.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    In other words you were wrong about what you were saying about the housing list. You are on a preferential renting list. OP should certainly talk to the council but they are in a very different situation to you and the threshold is certainly at play.

    It is a great credit to you getting to AP level as that is a lot of effort and the panel process can be very annoying



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    Yes, I was mistaken, hence the apology. I was worried about OP and their income threshold worry so I wanted to encourage them to explore options. I knew there were options but it seems my advice was ill informed. I was speaking from an emotional standpoint as the post hit close to home for me. Sorry for the 'that is incorrect information' statement to your original response. This is on me for not explaining my circumstances correctly.

    Thanks for the understanding and compliment on reaching AP level, it is not easy!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    I read back and at no point did you apologise till this post nor suggest looking at alternatives to the OP. You were pretty confident you were right about a housing list you weren't on.

    I understand you were being emotional but facts don't care and it is not an excuse. It was not that you explained your situation wrong, you actually didn't know and took offense to people making factual statements. You upset other people and weren't really helping the OP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    After I hsd clarified things with Fingal I said "im sorry for that" once I realised I was wrong. What else do you want? I had said previously that maybe because I was on the HAP scheme it was different. I had repeatedly said OP should check on options and liaise with his LA. I had said maybe there is different criteria for different LAs. I repeatedly said I was only going on my own lived experience. I responded to the housing policy and sdcc information saying that I took their point. I dont know what else I can say or do. I've addressed and owned up to where I was wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,575 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    If you income is just below the threshold, then you might consider (if possible) going to a four day week when you are getting close to the top of the list. Just to be sure.

    There are no guarantees about being offered a house. But you won't be put back to the bottom of the list: more likely to go down a few places in there are others with more need than you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭surrender monkey


    Hi Sweetie, now your comments make sense. Social housing assessments are conducted over the preceeding 52 week period. Your previous salary was most likely under the net income level of social housing support for your family size in your local authority area. If you had gotten the house a year later you would have been assessed on a full year of AP salary and would likely have been removed from the list. Although you say you have been receiving HAP so it varies from council to council.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,260 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    What about the assessment next year, if the poster is then over the income limit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭surrender monkey


    Deleted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭Skweefie


    I clarified where i was misinformed on the process in a later post. I had been moved off the social housing list as I was approved to go on to the HAP scheme. Once I availed of that scheme, the council deemed me as having my housing needs met. Then my income levels are assessed and my rent increased over time in line with my increased salary. In effect, the HAP scheme turned the private rented apartment into a council managed property with regard to rent. The upkeep and maintenance remained mine and the landlords responsibility.

    I was then put on a slower moving transfer list which resulted in my upcoming move.

    Once a person is in a council property or through one of the housing agencies, their rent is calculated based on income. They will not get removed from the property if their income exceeds the threshold. The rent incrrases accordingly. So once I get my new payslip, i will send it on to them and my contributions will increase.

    Sorry again for the confusion and emotional responses yesterday. I realise this is not that kind of platform so I should have gotten my ducks in a row before offering an opinion.

    OP should see if they are eligible for HAP as I was where they are a few years ago and it is scary, I couldn't have done this without HAP.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,575 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    The current deal is that they get to keep the house forever (so long as they pay the rent and don't engage in anti-social behaviour).

    In Fingal, it's 12% of the after tax income.

    Most councils have a maximum amount, but Fingal appear to only have a maximum for 2nd and subsequent adults in the house, not for the main earner.

    This may not be how you and I think things should be for highly paid people. But it's what the law is now.



Advertisement