Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

15845855875895901308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    but then we ONLY have Garncacho and Bruno for the 10.
    It is simply unrealistic to think they can both start, never mind finish, every game - so Zirkzee as a 10 option has to be used.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭Dano650


    Would you want Amorim gone if we lose 3 of them games?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,736 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    How so? He's actually a very intelligent presser and his link up play is better than the other options right now.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    His out of possession positioning/play is poor - and creates a problem tracking the oppisition fullback and winger between the deeper CM and the WB - which was an issue we saw at the weekend vs Spurs.

    It is possibly something he can work and improve, but his blocking/pressing/tracking of the fullback (so the CM can concentrate on the oppo CM) would be a concern.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    If we lose against Everton, Ipswich and Leicester, we'll be in real relegation trouble. I don't see us getting anything off Arsenal to be honest.

    That being said, I see us beating Ipswich and Leicester, so that's relegation pretty much out of the picture (if not mathematically).

    Mad to think that's what we're looking at. Even crazier to think that depending on results, we could finish the weekend in 12th or 16th and the table wouldn't look so bad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Three of the games are against Everton, Leicester and Ipswich, the relegation threatened teams.

    Lose 3 games and West Ham will likely go above, so United will be in 16th. Potentially 17th, if Wolves win 3 of their games, and Wolves play Bournemouth, Fulham, Everton and Southampton in their next 4.

    Lose 3 of the next 4 games and people will simply have to admit that this is completely broken.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    If we lose all 3 to Everton, Ipswich and Leicester even I one of Amorims biggest defenders would start to think it's not working and honestly it could happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,819 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    It's a real difficult one to answer. I think he probably would get the bullet but would I want to see that probably not yet but I do think he needs to be more pragmatic or he will be on the scrapheap



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I don't think we will lose all of the upcoming games but my test will be 'are we still playing like a 15th place side?'. We need to start looking like a 7th-10th place team soon, at the very least. That would still be dire but a tangible improvement on what we've been served up so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭Dano650


    Personally I wouldn't sack him. No chance of us getting relegated. I think the 3 teams that came up will go straight back down. Give him the summer transfer window and see if he can get the players in he wants. Its not his fault that previous managers wasted money on shite and some of these players can't adapt to his playing style because they aren't good enough



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Mitch pretty much covered it. Amorim mentioned the changes he needed to make out of possession due to having Zirkzee at 10.

    My overall point would be that it would be beneficial to minimize these changes (stick to Rasmus or Hojlund at 9, together with stopping the WB and midfield changes) until we can nail down a certain way of play both in and out of possession. I think we need that foundation in place, before progressing to other variables.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    So you would be ok with him losing 8/9 of the remaining 13 matches and carrying on into next season?

    If so, I think you completely underestimate the effect that would have on the club. Our league season is over and we won't get relegated, but imo the continuation of the current form will have intangible but terminal consequences for Amorim. What I mean by that is the difference in finishing 15th and 10th are minimal in terms of sporting achievement for a club like United. Once you finish outside the European places and avoid relegation, it doesn't really matter. But there are effects you can't measure like erosion of confidence of the hierarchy in the manager, erosion of fan confidence in the manger and the football hierarchy (I'm talking about INEOS), erosion of player confidence in the manager (he will have to work with most of them next season) etc. Utd as a brand is also getting damaged by the sustained doom and it'll take a lot longer to recover if we go through another 3 months of this humiliation.

    Basically, I think when things get that bad for a sustained period of time it will create numerous negative situations and it would be far more straightforward to just hire a new manager. I don't think it's as easy as suggested that we can say 'sod that, complete free hit this season as long as we don't get relegated and we start with a clean slate this pre season'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭Dano650


    We are not going to lose 8/9 of the remaining 13 matches. Anyway who do you think should come in to replace him that will make a difference? Because if he did get the sack whoever comes in and replaces him won't make a difference. I would give him next season no problem. Get the players in who he wants in the summer who can play to his system and if things don't improve by Christmas then yes he has to go



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Decent (but depressing) podcast by the Athletic FC from yesterday. Lots of areas covered from Amorim to the Varane interview, to the structures in place at the club. So many discussion points to talk about in relation to our woes... It's hard to know where to start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    Well he's lost 8 out of 14 already and I've seen zero improvement in performance.

    I don't know who they might get to replace him, it's a mess. Tuchel would have been the obvious solution if he was still available. I'm pretty confident that performances and results would not be anywhere near as bad if we had a manager of that ilk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,342 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan



    Since the turn of the year they have played 10. Won 5. drew 2 and lost 3.
    It's shite form but it's not losing 9 from 13 bad just yet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Its getting into March and absolutely nobody is even confident of beating Ipswich and Leicester, two sides adrift at the bottom of the table.

    This team finished 8th last season and won the FA cup, added 200m worth of players in the summer and let go a ton of deadweight.

    And now we aren't sure we can beat Ipswich or Leicester. This ain't right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I'm just talking about the PL here. Amorim has 8 defeats in 14 for us. 3 defeats from 6 since the turn of the year. And tbh, there's a reasonable argument to exclude the Liverpool game as that has proven to be a total anomaly. That would be 3 defeats from the last 5 and one of the wins was a late turnaround v the bottom side in the league in what was otherwise a horrific performance. The Fulham win wasn't deserved either if we're honest. We would surely be expected to lose at least 6/7 of our remaining PL games based on current performance.

    Losing 8/9 of our remaining PL games would probably be close to 'worst case' scenario but unfortunately it is plausible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭Dano650


    Do you ever think that some of these players are just not good enough and maybe it's not the managers fault. Some of these players have thrown several managers under the bus and are still there.Its a pity we can't sack players for underperforming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Mitch put up some detailed posts about why and how each player may have been expected to adapt to the new system and why it was believed that it could work.

    It begged the question, if the player profiles did lend themselves to the system, why is it then that every, single, one of the players is now underperforming?

    One player struggling, normal. Two players struggling, fine. Five players struggling, ok. But all the players? Every one of them?

    Again, Ten Hag had this squad performing as a top 8 side and winning trophies, so why are they now a 15th place side with nobody playing well at all and at this point worried about Ipswich?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    If Ipswich & Leicester were to pick up another 4 points or so across their three games in the same period, and Utd are within 5 points of the relegation zone with nine games left, and in absolute freefall, I think Ratcliffe would have to bring in someone to avoid his money going down the drain of the Championship



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,736 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    That wasn't the issue at all IMO. Dalot was dropping too deep and Mazraoui didn't push up or cover across when he should have. Bruno kept vacating midfield to cover but Dalot and Maz should have sorted that between them. They actually did this in the second half and it worked much better. There were multiple occasions in that first half where Dalot and Maz were practically marking each other. That should never happen and allowed Son to be completely free when the ball was crossed in for their goal.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I will never understand people thinking it would be ok to drop into the championship.

    The club is broke, it needs every penny it can get and that means every place it climbs in the PL matters. I think it is about 20m difference in prize money between 8th and 15th, so that is 20m that will be missed right there due to this poor performance.

    Just being in the PL gives about 100m, how can they rebuild without that?

    Being outside the PL basically means a guarantee of no European football the following year, so good luck budgeting or selling sponsorship based on that.

    This whole idea of writing off the season is very shortsighted, every single one of those league places matters right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,515 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    The poster you are replying to hasn't suggested it would be ok to drop into the championship though?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    If Amorim was to be sacked, I wonder would he take Berrada and/or Wilcox with him - not as employees obvioulsy but if we ended up sacking him cause of relegation form after 4 months, it would speak terribly to both the decisions of Berrada and Wilcox, as well (and more importantly) the faith the could or would be put in them from that point. Or would it hasten an appointment of a sporting director and remove some of the football authority from Berrada and Wilcox (ie. you don't pick the manager).

    I don't think he will be sacked, I think the club have a plan for the summer to support him and get him the profiles needed as I think there is a long term plan and this season is 'just' a horrible bump. But obvioulsy there is a fear that even with the right players we don't gain the performance consistency needed.

    I do think that whatever players we buy in the summer will be better long term buys as well though - I think we will be versatile, flexable players with speed and strength - so i don't think we will be in a place where we'd be starting from scratch again if things don't pick up significantly next season, and if Amorim looks like he's guiding us to midtable next season I'd consider him to be under big pressure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Fair enough..
    I do/did think Zirkzee looked much more effective and integral in the last 15 when we looked a lot better. But we just couldn't execute well enough in the final third



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭Dano650


    So what do you think should happen?Sack Amorim and bring in another manager and still have the same **** going forward. Look the club is in a bad state from top to bottom due to bad decisions by the owners and poor players purchased by previous managers. Sacking Amorim isn't going to change things.We need to stick with him and back him in the summer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    Stick with him even if he loses there of the next four games, and shows no willingness or ability to adapt? That would be crazy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    Any failing manager in history can point to flaws/issues in his squad to explain underperformance. I think we've to be careful not to give him a complete pass based on the real squad issues he has. He deserves leeway for the challenges that exist but not a get out of jail free card that absolves him of all responsibility.

    It's obvious that there's deep issues with the environment at Utd and that's evident in the performances of players like Rashford and Antony the second they get out the door. While the causes of that can't be laid at Amorim's door, he is supposed to be part of the solution in changing that and I've so far seen zero evidence of him having any sort of positive impact. Given how charismatic he is in front of the media, I'm shocked that it looks like he hasn't been able to improve the environment at the club so far. There's no positive energy coming out of he and his team as a unit. It's all crap.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,168 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    all that can be true, it still doesn't make Amorim the right man for the job. At some point he has to show he has the ability to turn things around, how long do we wait for that?

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



Advertisement