Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

15775785805825831309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Mazraoui, De Ligt. They're the rejects of Bayern, why did we think buying them was going to drive the club on?

    Not that they've been any worse than what we have, but they've hardly massively improved things either. It's absolutely shocking that Bayern consider them less useful than Eric Dyer who at 31 is four years older than Mazraoui and 6 years older than De Ligt. Dier isn't going to suddenly become world class, nor is he anywhere near it, yet was considered by Bayern to be a better bet to keep hold of.

    I don't think they're bad players, but they're definitely not top players. I mean, De Ligt couldn't hack it at Juventus or Bayern, why did we think he'd be good enough for United? Mazraoui was cheap so it was probably worth it, but if he was any way useful Bayern would have kept him.

    We shouldn't be targeting players that are considered not good enough to be a back up player at a top club. Mazroui made 38 appearances in two seasons for Bayern before he was shown the door. De Ligt did slightly better at Bayern but was still shown the down after two seasons, moved on after three with Juventus.

    Not to be picking on the lads, but the point is, why are the club aiming for players other top clubs see as simply not good enough? Where's our vision? Where's our ruthlessness? Decent players, but that's it, decent. What type of effort was the club at with their transfers?

    The only possible reason I can see why the club signed them is purely for Ten Hag, because logically looking at their careers to date, they were never going to be the type of player that would drive the team into top 4, and they're hardly kids either so 10 years down the line was hardly the vision for them.

    Ugarte may end up in that column as well, PSG wouldn't have got rid of him if he was the type of quality in midfield they need. But I'd give him a big pass as he's probably been our most consistent performer this season and at 23 is relatively young so should improve.

    INEOS really sh!t the bed when they didn't fire Ten Hag after the cup final and gave him a €200m war chest to waste. You could have had 7/8 solid premier league players for that money.

    I don't know what transfers they're planning for Amorim in the summer, but I seriously hope it isn't a few rejects of some big clubs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,977 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Excellent post,I see is somewhat similar, The kind of players that Liverpool have are not at Man U.

    They cannot seem to be able to handle an 'all action' muscular in your face kind of team and dig out a result like Liverpool can do.

    Tempo is way too slow and laboured.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,302 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    It's also a reason why we are so bad at home imo. We get ripped apart in the wide spaces of OT.

    As a first signing, Dorgu might point to that being addressed, hopefully.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Just look at Forest or Bournmouth.

    I don't think the players they have a particularly more talented - but they are far HARDER. They run harder, they hit harder - they get to things quicker. Pep alluded to this too - physicality has become almost the primary requirement of a player in the PL.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭crusd


    Its a complete dismantling and rebuild. There is no money. Until all the fat contracts are off the books the rebuild cannot even start as it sets the baseline wages for any perspective signings. Bruno needs to be sold too while he still has value as he is the type of player you need to build around and he is already 30. If we can find someone to pay 40m for him we should bite their hand off.

    So until United are no longer paying the salaries of Casemiro, Rashford, Fernandes, Antony, Mount, Sancho, Eriksen, Lindleof and Shaw nothing is going to happen to start the rebuild. Probably one of Hjolund or Zirksee need to move on too, but they are not outrageously expensive and one of them can stay as backup. Only then when there is room can we start from the bottom up. If at least 5 of them have not left the club this summer the best we can expect is a similar season next year as we wont be able to sign the players necessary. If we were somehow able to move on all of them we would still have a tough season but may see light that could start to bare fruit from 27 onwards.

    A 25 man Amorin squad for next year for his system would need to look something like this:

    GK: New First Choice, One of Onana or Bayindir, Best of young keepers

    CB: DeLigt, Yoro, New LCB, Martinez, Maguire, Mazraoui

    LWB: Dorgu, Amass

    RWB: New RWB, Dalot

    CM: Ugarte, New CM, Mainoo, Collyer, Kone

    AM/10: Diallo, Garnaho, New AM, New AM

    CF: New First choice No. 9, Obi Martin, Hjolund or Zirksee

    If that does not happen at a minimum we are going nowhere. Be lucky to get half of it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,977 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Exactly! And they can stay on their feet in the tackle and in heading duels….Hojlund please note.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Are you being hyperbolic when you say until none of those players are being paid?

    Eriksen, Lindelof, Sancho are certain to be gone. I think it is highly likely Casemiro and Rashford are gone. I think Antony goes on loan again at worst.

    But I don't see Shaw, Mount or Bruno going anywhere.

    But at that, I don't understand why a rebuild can't be started with the first 6 out the door in the summer? Thats like 70m off our wage bill or something insane like that - plus some profit generation from Rashford.

    But we cant start the rebuild cause Bruno is still there?

    As for the signings, I'd predict 5.

    LCB, RWB, CM, 10, ST.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,337 ✭✭✭cosatron


    the signing's of Yoro, Kone, Obi Martin and Heaven would point towards that direction, big strong athletic players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,226 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Agreed, I think we'll definitely see 5 or 6 in.

    We all know the finances are tight but Sancho will be sold for £25m (confirmed), Rashford will probably go out for around £40m assuming he has a Rashford style purple patch for the next few months. If Antony continues banging in goals and racking up MOTM awards then surely Betis will be itching to keep him, or one of the more wealthy Spanish sides will want him. That should easily be another £30+. By fair means or foul we need to offload Casemiro.

    The homegrown aspect of Rashford's sale is huge in itself, plus the fact that we spent relatively little in January and we're dropping a "bad season" off the PSR levels so we're surely going to be able to spend a decent amount in the summer. I don't think that will mean splashing out on £100m players, nor should it. But we should be able to bring in maybe 1 x £50m+ and 4 or 5 more around the £30m level. Berrada, Wilcox et al need to earn their money now and bring in the right type of players for sensible money.

    And the fans need to appreciate that the players who come in the summer are not going to win us the league. They need to stablise us and push for top 6. Some will say that it's a disgrace for United to be targetting top 6 but tough sh*t. That's where we are now and all the hissy fits in the world about top 4 isn't going to make it any more realistic. Stability first, progression second.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I reckon a likely target batch could be:
    LCB - Huijsein
    RWB - Quenda
    CM - Hackney
    10 - Cunha (?)
    St - Delap (which I'd worry about but i think Osimhen and Gyokeres will be too expensive.

    And I reckon that set of 5 would come in at under half the wages of the players we'd be getting rid of.

    We wouldn't be the finished artile by any stretch, but we'd have a far better profile fit across the starting 11 and some depth. Might add a couple of Kone/Heaven/Leon type signings.

    As you say, not aiming for ht elegaue with that group - but I could see Yoro, Huijsen, Quenda, Dorgu, Cunha, Delap, Ugarte, Hackney, Mainoo being key players in a top SQUAD. With hopes for the likes of Kone, Leon, Obi - as well as Fletcher, Igbagimov, Scanlon having some promise.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭crusd


    The reality of the situation is that until we are back in Champions league and the debt situation where it is, we can only afford signings on <100k per week with possibly an odd exception. And if the high earners are still on our books, including players who are on loan, our baseline for first teamers is at 150k plus. So until we clear nearly all the overpaid underperformers off the books completely we are looking at at best unproven 30m players like Dorgu, rather than going for players we know can make a positive impact straight away. And ilke what I see of Dorgu and think he will work out, but this type of player is at best a 50/50 for a team who has CL notions.

    The only other option is to accelerate some of the youth players though but this could come with a lot of pain and actually harm the long term prospects of some undoubted talent that is there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    People don't like hearing it because of what's happened over the past decade and they want results now, but this rebuild/reset or whatever you want to term it is a years long job not something to be done over 20 or 25 games. When you look at Dorgu, Chido, Heaven, these guys haven't been signed for this season. They are being signed for next season and the season after. This is going to be a gradual process and it is going to be painful but you have to take short term pain to ensure long term success.

    Despite all the complaints we won't be relegated. INEOS are imo doing an ok job so far. This summer will be the biggest test so far of their ownership. If we are waiting until August to make our second signing of the summer then I'll start proclaiming them a failure etc.

    I can accept not winning the league. It's incredibly difficult. What gets me is players that show no desire and little effort. I'll take a team that isn't quite good enough but works hard and runs themselves into the ground for the privilege of playing for Manchester United over a team of star names on huge wages



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Ashbourne hoop


    SAid it before but the keeper is terrible. Can't do the basics right. Constantly parries shots back into play. DeGea needed to be moved on but this guy is not an upgrade in any way, shape or form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Just on the formation. Why can't Amorim change formation?

    Most managers switch things around all the time. Managers regularly change from 442, 343, 433 to whatever else within games depending on what's happening.

    I can understand wanting to set out your stall and demand players meet the standard and the way you want to play, but does that mean you have to inflexible and stuck to one way of playing? Most top managers can adjust, change formation, alter tactics throughout games, never mind over a few months or over a season.

    Amorim doesn't strike me as a fool, so switching things around shouldn't be a problem for him?

    Because there's a lot of times now the players looked more confused and disjointed than under Ten Hag.

    Trying to instil a new culture is going to be a seriously hard task, and maybe forcing players to do what you want is his way of doing it, but the longer the poor performances and results keep happening, the more that inflexibility and inability will begin to look like incapability.

    Granted they're not the best players, not the most physical and not the greatest attitude, but he's supposed to be a top manager and he's there long enough to have been able to improve the basics and basic plan, yet we're not seeing it, in fact bar the odd second half surge in games, we're actually worse.

    I just have this awful feeling that this is Ten Hag last year mark II, and that we're going to spend massive money in the summer but the level of performance remains the same before he's fired before Christmas.

    I don't know why, but I can't shake that feeling. Maybe it's the constant bad results and negativity, but I just can't shake this horrible feeling the second half of last season is happening all over again, but with worse results.

    The club needs something on the field bar the odd result, it needs a lift. If that means Amorim sucking it up a bit and changing formation to get a run of results, and more importantly good performances, then it's something he should consider. Especially as he's starting to look more broken-hearted after games himself, he won't be pulling us out of a funk if he's deep in one himself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Revenues are 600m+ (650+ projected for this season, so 600m without europe next season doesn't seem outlandish.)
    Player wages are ~190m - and will drop signficantly as a starting point (with players to be signed to be added to the new 'base' - our player wages could realistically drop to 160/170 while improving the squad considerably.
    Interest on the Leveraged debt is 25m.
    We have (apparently) reduced staffing costs by ~45m
    A large part of the other annual debt was the revolving crediit facility which has APPRENTLY been replaced with the money that INEOS invested.

    I just disagree with your outlook. But you could be right, none of us KNOW how tight things are or what the budget will be. I think it will be far better than you do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭crusd


    This is all monopoly money. The club has a cash flow problem, so even with a relaxed PSR environment, the club dont have cash flow for massive spending. And they have a large amount of delayed transfer fees coming due. And they have a large tranche of debt that needs refinancing and the books need to improve to get any ways reasonable terms. I dont think people understand how dire the financial situation is at the club.

    Also, in the current environment 30m players are punts with no guarantee they will impact first team performance immediately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,226 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Sadly this is probably true.

    All the fuss over Onana coming in was his ability with the ball at his feet. But every time I watched footage of him the thing that stood out was his tendency to block the ball into dangerous positions. There's no use producing a worldie of a save only for it to result in a tap in.

    His positioning is questionable, he rarely claims crosses, he has plenty of howlers in him, but it was always the failure to clear danger with his blocks that concerned me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Ashbourne hoop




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,267 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    I think in an ideal world we put the romance around Martinez behind us and move him on. He's a liability and injury prone.

    There's no legs in midfield at all. Mainoo and Ugarte are not athletes.

    This could get ugly before the end of the season and I have no idea how the summary could go.

    Aim for 10th and try win the Europa. FA Cup, ugh unfortunately means little in the finance modern world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    We did okay in those couple of games before his departure and could be in a better league position now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭DataDude


    The team has been screaming out for athleticism for ages now. Makes the signings of Ugarte, De Ligt and Zirkzee this summer all the more baffling.

    Yoro we haven’t seen much of. I thought he was athletic but then that game against Southampton where he got torched for pace on repeat made me wonder.

    You simply can’t play high press, dominating football when your back 3 is Maguire, De Ligt and Martinez. The midfield is similarly limited physically.

    If you watch Liverpool. So much of their dominance is facilitated by the fact Konate and VVD can be left 1 v1 in 60 yards of space against any striker in the league. It’s the base in which all of their aggression is built upon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭crusd


    Europa is massive because it means CL next year. Thing is there are at least 10 teams left in it that I would not be at all confident we could beat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,008 ✭✭✭AidoEirE


    A goal scorer is needed and should be top priority in the the summer. We created plenty of chances yesterday. If we had a human that could bury the chances the whole conversation would be different.

    This team cannot score, chances are there but the confidence is so low we just can't put it in the back of the net.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    Finishing 9th isn't solving any of these long term problems. Instilling a caretaker instead of Amorim to appease the players would have been the worst option. Honestly doing anything to appease these players is the last thing I'd suggest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,470 ✭✭✭✭Father Hernandez


    Too much is made of the formation - his tactics allow a huge amount of changes in game where it's really the 3 at the back that stays the same. Having 3 at the back is not having an impact on us being unable to stick the ball in the back of net.

    Same goes for the formation, we were shít as a 442, 433, anything else Ole or ETH have implemented. Suddenly changing to a 442 or whatever isn't going to change a thing.

    Amorim's formation doesn't impact Garnacho missing a sitter, Onana parrying the ball straight to Maddison or our players not having a clue what to do in the box.

    The major crux of the problem at United is the inability to stick the ball in the back of the net, compounded by a poor goalkeeper, a non existent centre mid and low confidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭crusd


    Its hard to believe how much Hjolund has regressed. When he came he was raw but had qualities to work on. There were times yesterday when he moved to the exact wrong place. If his goal was to hinder the attack he had a great game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Honestly, play whatever damn formation he wants, the problem is that this was a top eight, cup winning side that now can't get a good performance from any of its players.

    They are currently sitting in 15th and not one person here can honestly say that they see anything improving.

    We want Amorim to win races but he can't even get the damn car started.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,302 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Was just looking at it from a first signing for Amorim point of view. But yes, Yoro fits the bill as well… our other January pre-signing who I forgot about, Leon, does as well. I would be a slightly hesitant to mention the others until we see them become first team players.

    Heaven and Obi certainly look like they will fit the bill eventually. Kone is small and slight, I can't see that changing much but it'll be more about the athletisim with him, imo. How many of those 3 will become first team players though, 1/3 would be a very good return.

    Kukonki is the youth player that would mark a real change in direction. Just gone 17, already 6ft 5 and really athletic... But too soon to for him as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,008 ✭✭✭AidoEirE


    Problem with Hojlund is he still a young lad learning his trade and he is the leading line for UTD. He has no senior striker to be feeding off in training/games. A Rooney, Van Persie, even Igahlo would help the lad.

    Don't think we'd ever had this problem before. Always had a senior to help bed in the younger lads afaik.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,302 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Very small sample size to be basing that on though. Two games against Leicester, together with PAOK and Chelsea.

    Had a friend saying the same thing about possibly keeping Ruud on yesterday, just after he was saying that Casemiro can never play again… Casemiro started all 4 matches for Ruud was my response.

    We are in such a bad state overall that it's hard to pick out any decisions that may be proven good in the medium to long term.

    But on the base of it, I think it's nearly always better to be getting a long term manager in rather than a temporary one.

    Things have gotten worse under Amorim, but if he has accelerated a clear out, we might look back on it as a positive at some stage, hopefully.



Advertisement