Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WFH is dead and buried. Right to WFH bill is pointless

11012141516

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,276 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    That all comes down to management again and poor hiring. If you hire people who are unprofessional, they will take the p1ss. If the employees are not delivering and the boss is unaware that these people are taking the p1ss by not working for hours a day then that is poor management.

    I have worked in IT roles for about 20 years. Most of it in the office. People taking off to go to the dentist, doctor or hospital appointment happened when people worked in the office. Some parents would outright call out sick if their child was sick. I don't believe things are worse now than they were before but I have to admit, I haven't worked with many people younger than me so maybe that plays a part.

    From what I see online, younger people who have been even more f*cked over by our society and left outcast by the economy that my generation have a different view than previous generations when it comes to work but again, that is not a problem of work from home. I don't think it even a mark against younger people who prioritise their personal lives…it is a change brought upon by a systemic issue caused by mismanagement by companies and governments.

    These companies reap what they sow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Be a slam dunk in the WRC .

    “Meta said that the staff that are made redundant will be replaced by new hires meaning there will be no overall reduction in headcount.

    Any vaguely competent adjudicator would see that for what it was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,842 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    People are misunderstanding what Meta are going to do, i worked in one of the large tech co's coming up on 11 years ago now in a FP&A role, we regularly produced graphs on performance across sales teams and the bottom quartile were generally subject to performance improvement plans ( being managed out effectively) if they were there 2 or 3 quarters in a row.

    As most people who have managed a PIP process know, 90% of the time they are a waste of time, poor performers are poor performers in the main. Meta are going to accelerate this, so instead of giving someone leeway on 2 quarters of poor performance maybe its only 1, or the PIP process will be shortened. They will be cognisant of the legalities here and will work within them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    Companies can and do sack people if there is not enough work there for them. Companies are there to make money, to make a return on their investment. You cannot expect a company to pay people to do nothing

    In the case of the U S government, Federal staff there are being recalled to office because Covid is over and as Trump said, people working from home were playing tennis and golf and only working 10 % of the time.

    Too many Federal employees abused wfh, they knew they could not be sacked, the writing is on the wall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Are you actually just a bot that's now stuck spouting the Trump line about playing tennis and golf?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    Nobody here wfh in this country - or the usa I guess - is ever going to stick up their hand and say they ever played sport while supposed to be wfh, never mind only worked 10% of the time. But we know those people exist. Why would'nt some people doss, especially if and when their colleagues do it to some extent and they cannot be sacked?

    If you have toddlers / kids at home, and you are wfh, would YOU pay for childcare?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,675 ✭✭✭riddles


    anyone who finishes with Meta and is looking for a new role this year will be challenged in a big way on attitude and aptitude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,675 ✭✭✭riddles


    I would agree pips are ineffective for the most part - hugely time intensive and a real negative drain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,116 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    And where that exists, thats ok. But people who arent contracted to WFH cant really complain about not being able to WFH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    People working in fairly flexible work places have been doing things during work hours long before wfh become so prevalent and once you are getting your work done it’s not an issue whatsoever. I might do things while work from home that take me away from the desk but no more (and often less) than I do when in the office and that’s common really across the board from what I see. I actually think a “once I’m seen in the office” type mentality has crept in where people don’t feel they need to work as hard..

    Well they can because the world has changed since Covid and at least some wfh is expected from most whose role is suitable for it. There is a major divide also in pre and post Covid contacts as remote/hybrid contracts weren’t really a thing so people starting jobs now are at an advantage. It’s hard to take after 2 years pretty much fully remote and 2 more years of hybrid to be told you must be in 5 days, people have planned their lives around the fact they have this - hence I refused to go in 5 days.

    I would not take another job that did not have the wfh days or ideally fully remote contractually protected after my experience over the last year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,391 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I did 2 days PW WFH before Covid - worked very well . Good work/life balance. Maybe that’s what we have to reset to - work/life balance - some break from commuting but not a total break- some break from the isolation of home working but not the downsides. Collaboration but not presentism - pendulum is moving back too far in my view- we need to preserve what’s good of both ways of working



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Let’s leave the US out of this thread as it’s irrelevant no matter what you’re fearless leader may say.

    Do we know that people are going out and playing sport regularly while working? Can you provide any evidence for this?

    You do realise that a lot of people have targets to reach? Proper performance metrics that can be evaluated. My own laptop locks itself after 5 mins of inactivity, it’s very easy for management to see when I’m not at my desk at home.

    Again, when you provide actual evidence for your claims (that’s not Trump, Irish sources) I will respond to your queries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    Ìf you are not at your computer for more than 5 or 10 minutes you can be answering queries on the phone etc, even if your boss cares because he or she can be at the same dossing crack. There have been cases in the public service of employees in the office stating at a blank computer screen for hours, with the computer not even turned on. And teachers just sitting there not teaching.

    Not surprised Trump said Federal workers wfh only worked 10% of the time. There are even clever ways of having activity carried out on your computer even when you are not near it.

    Have any Federal employees been fired for having 4 hours, never mind 5 minutes inactivity on their computer?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    Another positive attribute of Trump is that he has not YET retaliated for Taoiseach Harris calling Trump " an awful ghoul " or something like that.

    Or for President Higgins who behaved appallingly also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Companies can, and do.

    Yes, yes they do.

    I read about the judgements against them at the WRC quite regularly.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    There have been cases in the public service of employees in the office stating at a blank computer screen for hours, with the computer not even turned on. And teachers just sitting there not teaching.

    Provide a source for these claims.

    Not surprised Trump said Federal workers wfh only worked 10% of the time.

    Again, Trump projecting. He literally spent 1/3 of his last presidency at his own properties, not counting a round of golf once every 5 days on average.

    There are even clever ways of having activity carried out on your computer even when you are not near it.

    Ah, now we're getting there. You sound familiar with these…

    Have any Federal employees been fired for having 4 hours, never mind 5 minutes inactivity on their computer?

    How would we know? This is a thread on an Irish website, about WFH in Ireland, not US federal employees. Stick to the topic. Stop lying. And provide sources.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭no.8


    Yes i have noticed that. It's not irrelevant, it's a cultural mindset... and I'm guilty of this too. No matter where you go, there's a societal pressure to conform to the norm and it's clear as day here (there's no reason an average 10-12 year old couldn't look after themselves for a few hours). Having said, it's not all good and opens up other issues…e.g. control of internet access etc. I digress, but the point is that some parents can achieve this while others couldn't until their child turns 18 or is turfed out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    If you told the average 10 or 12 year old to work from home all day long, and perhaps look after the toddler in the house as well, and perhaps do a few chores like hanging out the washing, how much work do you think would get done?

    Why would their parents be much different, most of the time, if working for an employer where you could not get sacked?

    Trump hit the nail on the head.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭no.8


    I'm sorry but you've completely missed my point. I was referring to older children being self-sufficent while their parents or guardians WFH / work on-site. For a few hours that is. Nothing to do with toddlers...thats a different story.

    Children become sick, and WFH or not, parents need to look after no.1, but most are pragmatic and cover the hours in the evening or swap shifts...or take a day off.

    Looking after a toddler in a regular basis while trying to work a full-time role is not Ideal, at all. Many single parents with no family support are in a bind though, so maybe additional support from companies would go a long way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    So you want taxpayers now to pay for creches for the toddlers and kids of those Federal employees wfh, so those federal employees do not have to look after them at home while wfh? Would'nt it be fairer just for everyone to go back to the office as Trump ordered. No golf, no tennis, no double jobbing?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,675 ✭✭✭riddles


    if you argue strongly you can do your job fully remotely - it’s then circled as a job that can be done in a low cost country if you work in a multinational. Also, for the civil service here if it can function on one day a week in the office why not drop it to four days a week work week fire them all and hire people in low cost countries and free up the buildings for the free housing for all comers the governments currently working on.

    It was generally accepted that you can’t work and care for children working remotely - unless you are just looking after children.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭eastie17


    wouldn’t it be fairer if you stopped continually dragging this off topic with your completely irrelevant references to the US government



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    What **** Federal employees?! This is Ireland. Not the 51st state. Do you just not understand this?! We don't have Federal employees (except for the few dozen working in US Immigration at Dublin Airport, and the American Embassy, both of which are technically US soil).

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    "Ah we are different " sez you. Productivity of Irish civil servants is not like productivity of USA federal employees.

    I remember one other time people said "ah we are different" was during the celtic tiger. We partied, and told ourselves we would have a soft landing. We were different. How did that work out?

    Covid is over. The party is over. Get back to work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    We’re all still waiting for your sources or evidence for these claims.

    If you don’t have any that aren’t “Trump said” that’s fine just admit to it.

    This thread is purely about the “Right to WFH Bill in Ireland”, time to leave the US out of it, other threads available to you to spout your pro-Trump rhetoric.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    I shouldn’t be engaging but keeping your “opinion” in mind how do you square the circle with companies who have decided it’s not worth keeping the office as wfh is working just fine? The company my wife works for closed a significant number of their offices world wide including in Ireland and moved everyone in those offices to fully remote. They saw no need for the office as business is flying and spending money on empty offices was a total waste. Aside from the vast majoring staff being very happy with this my wife as said it’s made hiring for her team much simpler as they can hire people anywhere in Ireland and there is no getting approval for remote anymore as everyone is.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Haven’t read the whole thread so apologies if it’s already been covered but a Q for people who don’t have children who work with lots of people who work from home.

    Do you end up having to pick up slack for people with children who are working from home and have kids in the house with them?

    And secondly, many times I’ve been for lunch with friends where we are in a restaurant and they are ‘working from home’ ie. checking their phone every 30 mins. Is there a junior member staff in an office somewhere picking up slack for them?

    I know these things vary but are these common scenarios?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Do you end up having to pick up slack for people with children who are working from home and have kids in the house with them?

    No.

    In fact, we have less people calling in at the last minute to take the day off or having to leave work because they get a call from the creche - because they have better options that allow them to manage their work / life balance.

    Despite what those who like to dwell under bridges think, it is possible to have children in the house, and still work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    This thread has nothing to do with the Celtic tiger, or US federal employees. Stay on topic, or feck off back under your bridge.

    I worked all through Covid, you muppet. I'm still working. At the start of Covid, it was 100% in the office, because it was necessary, despite me being immuno-compromised. I've being WFH and WFO from mid-Covid, to date, and my productivity is greater than when I was in the office full-time. Including continuing to work when I did get Covid, because y'know what - you can do that when there's blended working. You can't if you can only work in the office. Same goes if you have any infectious disease.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



Advertisement