Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Create a European Defence Force and Disband NATO in a few years

  • 12-02-2025 06:34PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭


    It's time to finance an EU or European Defence Force and then Disband NATO.

    Ireland should also get off the fence when we are clearly no longer neutral.

    Our own defense force is in the gutter and I don't think out fishermen can hold off Russian navy ships for much longer.

    The US will also noticed longer bail out NATO.



«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,118 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    There is no need for an "EU army" or "European Defence Force". Every country in Europe should have adequately funded defence forces from their own national budgets that are interoperable as part of NATO. The US is invaluable on defence so why would European countries leave NATO?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    US won't be supporting NATO much longer. They don't need to.

    And if wait for the inevitable then it will be too late.

    Post edited by Soc_Alt on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,748 ✭✭✭yagan


    The first Trump term was was the warning. Eastern Europeans that were once the staunchest of NATO members now have more reason for a better alternative.

    But in reality the drift started after with the Iraq war. NATO countries went to a members defense after 9/11, but the carryover to Iraq was military adventurism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Randycove


    what’s the difference between a European defence force and NATO without the US?

    sounds like the same thing to me?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,697 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    No to all. NATO without the US still makes sense. What would be the point in leaving and then setting up an identical organisation but without the pre-existing expertise?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,118 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    It may be Trump saying it and acting on it but America's complaints have been legitimate for decades when it comes to the defence culture of European countries.

    America paid for and provided huge defence before the fall of the Berlin Wall and after it.

    What did European nations do especially after 1991?

    They directed more and more of the 'peace dividend' in to bloated welfare states and away from defence.

    Fine, the only problem is that that 'peace dividend' was underwritten by the USA and their willingness to maintain defence expenditure in Europe which they did. Instead of European countries investing in their own defence expenditure down the years they collectively slashed expenditure.

    So the USA has for decades subsidised Europe's lack of willingness to invest in it's defence.

    It's a very hard argument to win to say there is something incorrect or unfair about the USA's attitude on this.

    It would have come to a head eventually but maybe it's better for Europe to have a reality check now.

    People will be annoyed just because it's Trump saying it but on this they are not wrong and it's in Europe's interests to invest considerably more heavily in defence (all countries, neutral or not).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Randycove


    I think that people underestimate the enormity of the US military machine. I remember reading somewhere that the most powerful airforce in the world is the US air force. The second is the US navy and the third is the US Marine Corp. that is an order of magnitude that Europe could not even consider matching.

    There are 49 active aircraft carriers globally, 20 of them are operated by the US.

    Simply saying that we should cut out the US isn’t just cutting off your nose to spite your face, it is cutting off you entire body.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭highpitcheric


    Upheaval is just how it goes.

    Through history this or that political entity grows, peaks, declines. And now we see the downward trajectory of what was the brief "pax americana" (a bit of a grandiose term but whatever).

    Now all through the media we see various dramatic efforts for sales and clicks by the use of red scares and europe panics headlines.

    Theyre all based on a 1980s understanding, boomers reliving the threat of soviets to a divided and dependent Europe.

    I however have rarel felt so optimistic about Europes approaching course.

    I see forces finally resolving, albeit it in the most tragic ways. These things were set to happen, and will bring about a solidified empowered EU.

    Tbc

    Bailey had a borderline personality" based on "narcissism, psycho-rigidity, violence, impulsiveness, egocentricity with an intolerance to frustration and a great need for recognition".

    • Psychiatrist Jean Michel Masson and psychologist Katy Lorenzo-Regreny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Randycove


    so **** Ukraine, if Russia wants it they can have it, is what you are saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Soc_Alt




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    Because its Canada making it NATO when the US pulls the plug and the US has the Largest influence and spending in NATO

    So in all areas it will no longer be NATO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    Trump now setting up meeting with Putin and the EU stamping the feet to be involved in negotiation's

    Again shows NATO is nothing without the US.

    To me, Poland should lead the way is driving a European Defence Force implementation based their experience of modernisation their Army



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,697 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Of course it will. It'll just be a lot weaker for losing its most important member state.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,102 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    You make it sound like the US got nothing from that deal. By providing the security umbrella they were able to sell far more of their **** to Europe.

    They also kept a hold of the political direction in Europe



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,697 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The US built the postwar world. Everything about it is as per their design. They clipped the wings of British an French imperialists, fomented the breakup of colonial empries and designed and built the postwar institutions like the IMF, the UN, the World Bank, the WTO, etc. It's like McDonald's wailing about the cost of printing receipts.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭highpitcheric


    So lets start with the most evident realities.

    Russias relations with Ukraine are done for a few generations. Ukrainians rightly hate Russia now, and will for decades. Russia has pushed this vast resource rich country and its brilliant people towards the EU.

    Who will get the land? Still in play. Who has Ukraines heart. Easy, the EU. Donald just ensured that. While EU takes millions of our Ukrainian neighbors in the US wants to take their homeland as a pay off for earlier promises. America first baby.

    Next lets have a look at Putin and Lukashenko. Both in their 70s.Their peoples having lived under their failing dictatorships. Theres no politicking natures course. Both have 2 decades max left at the extreme. Realistically both will be at least out of power in 10 years.

    Leaving the door open for reform. The EU being the central power on the continent. The only game in town.

    TBC

    Bailey had a borderline personality" based on "narcissism, psycho-rigidity, violence, impulsiveness, egocentricity with an intolerance to frustration and a great need for recognition".

    • Psychiatrist Jean Michel Masson and psychologist Katy Lorenzo-Regreny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭highpitcheric


    Next up. UK.

    UK cannot continue without economically aligning with a trade block. Today the terrible truth is dawning on the brexiters. America first means just that. Cut throat US centric neocapitalism with a dose of untrustworthiness and unpredictability on top. Theres no uk-us trade deal coming, not under starmer, not under America first.

    A humiliating crawl back to Europe is the only option.

    Whos next in the neighborhood. N.Africa, mid-east. Israel and the Muslim world havent been so opposed in decades. With Israel being extremely dependent on EU trade. Surrounded otherwise.

    The Muslim world being in no state for Ottoman style ventures any time this century.

    Bailey had a borderline personality" based on "narcissism, psycho-rigidity, violence, impulsiveness, egocentricity with an intolerance to frustration and a great need for recognition".

    • Psychiatrist Jean Michel Masson and psychologist Katy Lorenzo-Regreny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭highpitcheric


    Russia next. In shīte order. A 3 year 3 day operation. A 1c rouble. Locking up butter in the shops. Productivity is no longer on consumables, the economy propped up by war production, you cant eat rifles.

    Brain drain, working age men dead, injured, deployed. Oil infrastructure getting destroyed.

    tbc.

    Bailey had a borderline personality" based on "narcissism, psycho-rigidity, violence, impulsiveness, egocentricity with an intolerance to frustration and a great need for recognition".

    • Psychiatrist Jean Michel Masson and psychologist Katy Lorenzo-Regreny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,478 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I wouldn't worry about America. The Orange One is about to get very tied up in domestic policy and constitutional crises across the three branches of government.

    And after he gets slapped down by the Arabs over his daft Gaza notions, and all of Europe gives him a flea in his ear over even thinking of selling out Ukraine, he will withdraw from foreign policy scraps and return to plastic straws and renaming stuff that isn't his to rename.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Randycove


    and if Russia doesn’t want Ukraine joining the eu? What will the eu do about it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭political analyst


    There's no evidence that the US will quit NATO. Hegseth is doing what was done during Obama's presidency - the pivot to Asia. If China goes to war against the Western powers then so will Russia. So the US would still be on the same side as the the European members of NATO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭highpitcheric


    The process takes some time anyway.

    In the meantime begin reforms and "totally not eu related" agreements.

    Ukraine and EU can wait, Russia is on a downward trajectory.

    Bailey had a borderline personality" based on "narcissism, psycho-rigidity, violence, impulsiveness, egocentricity with an intolerance to frustration and a great need for recognition".

    • Psychiatrist Jean Michel Masson and psychologist Katy Lorenzo-Regreny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭tarvis




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭political analyst




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭tarvis


    And now Trump and Putin appear to be on the same page ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,102 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Indeed, the US doesn't see Russia as a strategic threat to itself whereas it does for China. It doesn't have the capacity to both focus on China and Europe and given the formers strategic priority, it's telling Europe that it's on its own

    It also clearly places a lot lower value on its alliances with Europe as Europe has been slow to back the US in its engagements.

    The US also doesn't see Europe as a hegemon, certainly not in the same league as itself or China. There's definitely been continental drift in the last 10-15 years.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,697 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The EU is a hegemon. It's just too chaotic and disorganised to speak and act as one. The US is a construct of 50 semi-autonomous entities that speak as one internationally. The EU is a construct of 27 partners, each of which have their own culture, politics, agenda and, in many cases, a separate language. China is a little bit similar but it has a long history of centralized government and bureaucracy.

    Obama started the whole pivot to Asia thing. It's no surprise that Trump is continuing that though unless he is prepared to defend Taiwan, I don't see the point.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    So whats the issue with having an EU defence force instead of individual national Defence forces?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,780 ✭✭✭threeball


    Its not the same at all. It would involve sending US troops back home which would create a massive headache for Trump. Every base across Europe lost. No staging posts to run their wars in the middle east. The reality is we're stuck with Trump or a version of him for the foreseeable. We should be doing everything possible to weaken his position. Not buying arms from them creates further issues for him especially in the red states. Invest in Europe.

    The poles are completely at Trumps mercy having filled their boots with American gear that they have no control over the supply.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    Maybe, just maybe if certain EU countries (Germany, France, Spain, Italy in particular) would pay the 2.5%-3% agreed of their GDP into the NATO budget, as they are supposed to do, Trump wouldn't be threatening to pull the US out of NATO.

    The fucker said all this 8 years ago, and once again, certain EU nations are still dragging their heels on this.



Advertisement