Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

13132343637393

Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I simply can’t put value on one life over another. Of course I love my family and friends more than strangers. That’s what drives our success as a species and I won’t apologise for it to anyone.

    But do I believe an Irish person is worth more(I.e. a higher value) than a Somalian. Absolutely not.

    Let me ask you this. What is an Irish person to you? Someone with Irish citizenship or someone with genetic heritage?


    if it’s genetic heritage, how pure does it need to be? Does their value decrease the less native they are l?

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,150 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    i find most irish people probably don't value other irish people that much either. someone saying they value irish over immigrants probably hate many kinds of irish people - greens, wokes, D4 types, bleeding heart liberals, cyclists, junkies, HAP recipients, rugby types, people from the inner city, and there are quite a lot of these people. so i'd take this valuing your tribe thing with a pinch of salt. i try and hate everyone as equally as i can.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Exactly. People who "grade" other people based on nationality tend to have a massive distrust and dislike of people in general whether they be from Spain or the next Parish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,754 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    This is what makes us a soft mark country.

    It should be Ireland first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,019 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    That poster is looking for an explanation of what is meant by "Ireland First" or what they think defines someone as "Irish"?

    Can you explain what you mean? Do they need to have red hair and freckles? Can a mixed race individual be deemed as Irish? How about a family who have lived here for multiple generations but were once originally from Germany?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    The problem is the supporters of the whole situation think that just by the virtue of someone having a different nationality, religion or skin colour they add to the society. No other factors are considered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    You have that backwards, the people who have an irrational fear of people from different countries believe the default position of these people are they are a negative on society.

    Fortunately these would be a very small minority evidenced by the latest general election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Well currently, and although through no fault of their own, they are having a negative impact on society. In the form of unsustainable mass immigration impacting the already stretched services in the country, from housing to schools to prisons and everything in between.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭Zico !


    Not impressed by where this is heading law and order seems to be broken



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 794 ✭✭✭Phat Cat


    What an incredible waste of tax payers money



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,901 ✭✭✭dabbler2004


    @Boggles

    Fortunately these would be a very small minority evidenced by the latest general election.

    You're suggesting that because it's another FF/FG government that the public are happy with immigration. I think it's more to do with lack of an alternative party who would take a more pragmatic approach to immigration than a big thumbs up for the current lot.

    Using your logic that would mean we're all happy with long hospital waiting lists, a large increase in the cost of living with stagnant wages and so on.

    So to get back on topic of immigration not politics it's most simply a case of logistics. Having increasing amounts of people arriving here is putting pressure on existing resources and a sinkhole of money being thrown at it is causing other areas to lose out in funding.

    That's just common sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Huh?

    Over a third of our construction workers are immigrants.

    Over 40% of our doctors.

    Without immigrants we would be proper fecked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Having increasing amounts of people arriving here is putting pressure on existing resources

    The people arriving here are positively impacting resources.

    See above.

    You're suggesting that because it's another FF/FG government that the public are happy with immigration

    They are certainly happy about FF/FG, we are entering our 2nd 100 years of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Net immigration of almost 80k, mar23-mar24. Many of those you quoted already live here and have done so for years. But that is not to say, that the continued population growth is sustainable. We can keep welcoming the world but we have to acknowledge it is putting huge strain on the country and it's services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Ah that good old “Criticism of current immigration policies means you are entirely against all immigration in any form” strawman

    I’d love to see a counter of how many times someone’s tried that particular facile, bad faith old chestnut on in related threads. Don’t think it’s ever worked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    In other news we can add the Labour Party to the list of things that are now “Far Right” compared with us

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/feb/11/uk-home-office-citizenship-refugees-dangerous-journey



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,901 ✭✭✭dabbler2004


    What percentage of those construction workers and doctors are asylum seekers/ economic migrants?

    Or are you trying to mix up people who came here through official channels and work visas with those who arrive here from (and I'll be generous) conflict zones.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You are refuting this post by making a claim they never made and declaring they are creating a strawman.

    Satire right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    The poster spoke about unsustainable mass immigration putting pressure on services to which Boggles replied speaking about doctors and stating “without immigration we would be proper fecked”…as if the poster they were replying to had in any way intimated that all immigration should be ended full stop. Like I said, a facile strawman argument that has been attempted umpteen times in similar threads.

    It’s a bad faith attempt at making it into a black and white all or nothing issue devoid of any nuance. People mostly see right through it thankfully.

    Try again



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The poster pointed out two sectors which would have shortages. Healthcare and construction which rely heavily on immigrant workers.

    You then crafted the strawman argument of

    “Criticism of current immigration policies means you are entirely against all immigration in any form

    And accused the other poster of doing so which is why I assumed satire!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    No they deliberately choose two essential sectors both of which are literally on the critical skills visa and not representative of the unsustainable migration policies the poster was criticising.
    It’s a cheap (and transparent) attempt to muddy the waters and act is if that’s what the poster they’re replying to is calling for.

    Not to mention their blanket statement “We would be proper fecked without immigration” again, as if the poster had said anything to the effect that there should be no more immigration whatsoever henceforth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 247 ✭✭minimary


    deleted

    Post edited by minimary on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭briangriffin


    Immigrants here do not include those 250k who have been granted citizenship since the naughties. Those statistics are only meaningful if immigrants by definition those born abroad and who moved here are categorised and recorded by country of birth. Unfortunately some countries have high unemployment rates from the 2016 census so we decided those racist statistics couldn't be updated in the 2022 census. I wonder what NGO lobbied for that. Citizenship skews every metric recorded now with market participation and unemployment. 2024 had 30k Citizenships with net migration of over 70k in 2024 there will be more citizenships in 3 to 5 years time. In fact we have one of the largest demographic changes of any country in Europe in the past generation with nearly 1/4 of the population here now born abroad. Considering in the 1990s 3% were born abroad that's a fairly seismic shift in one generation.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    You quote statistics without any context. But I want at a source for that 1/4.

    Why have the demographics changed so much? What drove them? Why was the % so low in the first place?


    It wasn’t a “great replacement”, I can tell you that.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 ✭✭star61


    The hospitals are creaking now. Eventually they will collapse. We cannot out build this population growth. Not houses, not Schools, not hospitals and not nursing homes. We are all going to have to get used to more basic services. Standards have dropped and they will continue to do so as time goes on . It’s long been the case that we are not training Irish medical students. It really is shocking what’s going on in universities and hospitals. All this to “grow the economy “ . It’s all just about the money.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    we need people to build the houses, we need nurses, teachers and doctors because ours are leaving.

    Unless we put up a fence and don’t allow anyone to leave we need immigrants

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    Our nurses, doctors are leaving because they can get better conditions elsewhere. This is a problem of our own doing. That’s why I have to laugh when people say that healthcare would collapse without immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    You imagined a strawman and then invented your own.

    World Class.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The thread is about immigration, the OPs post was about immigration.

    Another imagined strawman.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    As I just explained with examples they are positive on the "strains" of a country.

    Just like Irish people going to Canada or Australia, both countries have "strains" but the Irish help alleviate these.

    This isn't very hard to understand to be honest.



Advertisement