Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland vs England - 6N 2025 match thread

12526272931

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,523 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I guess you’ll have to forgive me for interpreting “He actually didn’t do very much” and “I think anyone naming Crowley in their team of the week is bit off their rocker” as disparaging.

    Whatever about anything else, his first touch absolutely was an outstanding clearance kick. It was one of the best clearance kicks of the game. And I’d go as far as saying that every one of Crowley’s kicks from hand were better than all 3 of Prendergast’s kicks in the opening 10 minutes.

    And again, this is an area where, supposedly, Prendergast has the upper hand.

    More broadly, what you’re essentially doing is admitting there was a change of approach, admitting it worked well, but still judging Crowley as if there wasn’t one.

    There was a very clear and concerted effort across the team to target England’s back 3 with kick pressure that was obviously pre-ordained, as soon as Marcus Smith was in the backfield. It’s very clear and obvious watching it back; not just Crowley, but I’m willing to bet all of Lowe, Keenan and Hansen upped their kick frequency during that period too.

    That’s not happening by accident. You’ve literally admitted yourself that general phase play probably wasn’t what we were trying to do, but you’re still judging Crowley as if it were.

    And I think that’s, at best, a mistake, and at worst, wilfully misleading.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭niallm77


    I don't think Sam played better than Crowley, likewise I don't think Crowley played better than Sam.

    I thought both made some really positive contributions in the game and both made some poor mistakes/decisions. But given the amount of times an out half touches the ball there is likely to be mistakes. The really great out halves make fewer mistakes. Sam even referenced post match one pass he made which straight away he knew it was a wrong decision. It's a steep learning curve for him.

    The biggest positive for me with Sam was the penalty from 40 odd metres. Having misses two conversions, one of them quite poorly, he didn't hesitate to put his hand up almost making the decision for Doris. On the back of the previous 55 or so minutes where Ireland had been quite wasteful, and with momentum turning since Conan and Sheehan entered the game coupled with England big players tiring, it was a chance to put Ireland ahead.

    The ball going between the posts was the moment where Ireland won the game. The following 20 minutes was to decide by how much because the entire momentum of the game was with Ireland now and England were gassed, clueless and rudderless. And their bench was fairly poor by comparison.

    Crowley came into a very different game compared to the previous 59 minute's and instead of trying to put his own stamp on the game he just carried on with the momentum of the game which was fully with Ireland. And that's a compliment, not a criticism. It was exactly the right thing to do. Our forwards were getting gainline success, quick ruck ball and England were not getting their defensive alignment right which we exploited with two brilliantly worked tries.

    Impact from the bench is A key part of the game nowadays and it's something we haven't always had. Sheehan, Conan, Crowley, Henshaw brought a real impact.

    Henderson and Clarkson didn't stand out in open play but Ireland remained very good at set piece so they brought positive impact.

    The most notable contribution the England bench made was CunninghamSouth giving away a daft penalty for hitting Keenan in the air.

    If this is how both of our 10s go, and improve steadily over the next 2.5 years we will be going to the RWC in 2027 with two very good options at 10 with very little between them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭darkened_scrum


    Not really. Can you tell us, specifically, what he did so well?



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,029 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,711 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,486 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You quoted a post which asked a question only.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,486 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You never heard of an opinion?

    I call 6 average, 7 good, 8 very good, 9 excellent and 10 out of this world.

    5 is below average, 4 is not good, 3 is poor, 2 is awful and 1 is horrendous beyond belief.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,154 ✭✭✭Bogwoppit


    I call bananas apples.



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,868 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    And 0 out of 10 must be dying on the pitch at the starting whistle?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I also don't really understand the argument that JC was much better given his involvements on the field

    Who was better depends on how you weight each player's positives and negatives, which is all a matter of perspective I suppose.

    And this is the problem - we don't know what the Farrell/Easterby perspective is.

    We can assume there's something that Crowley hasn't been doing well enough, and we can also guess that they think that Prendergast can do it better, but without knowing what that might be, it's all speculation.

    My point is, Prendergast might have ticked all the boxes that Easterby wanted on Saturday, and the missed goal kicks or getting bumped by Lawrence are shrugged off as something that will resolve. Or maybe they wanted to see if he has the nerve and the scuffed kick is a red flag that he's not ready.

    Conversely, Crowley might have looked great to us but if he didn't do whatever it is that has been lacking, then maybe he didn't help his case at all and he's no closer to winning the jersey back than he was on Friday.

    Edit: that's very convoluted, so let me illustrate.

    Back in 2017, we were desperately short on wingers. Craig Gilroy had always been a peripheral figure despite scoring bags of tries for Ulster, but he eventually earned a bench spot against Italy in the 6N. He came on and scored a hat-trick in half an hour, everyone thought this was it, the jersey is his now, what more can he do etc

    However, he also missed some soft tackles. His ability to scorch rubbish defences was never in question, it was his own defence and work ethic that was the problem, and he never played for Ireland again, I don't think he was ever even called into another squad. Fans posting on the net got it completely wrong because they misread what he needed to do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    I don't see Itoje as an England (or Lions) captain. Poor with BO'K & petulant. Captain Genge for me.

    Itoje's general game of hanging around behind the breakdown is being negated by the new protections afforded scrum halves & he isn't adapting. Being last to arrive at a breakdown in order to lenghten the ruck so his 9 can box kick before jogging to the next breakdown is not that laudable. His game is not what it was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    0 = being locked into the dressing room by your own team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,786 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    your right, i agree Hodnett should start at 7 alright .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,180 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Excellent article by Murray Kinsella on the Irish kicking strategy v England.

    I was particularly impressed with JGP kicking and the hangtime he was getting.

    Some interesting stats.

    Untitled Image

    Gibson-Park gets more than four seconds of hangtime on his box kick, a good measure of success as it allows chasers to either get into the air to contest for the ball or be in position to land hits like Hansen’s in this case.

    ———————

    Ireland scrum-half Gibson-Park had the highest average box kick hangtime [4.3 seconds] of anyone on the opening weekend of the Six Nations.

    Gibson-Park recorded the top three highest box kick hangtimes of the weekend, with five of his total six box kicks in the top 10 for hangtime. 

    Untitled Image

    The booming effort above is probably a little shallower than Gibson-Park intended but the sheer hangtime allows Lowe to bat the ball back for Ireland to spring onto the attack against an English defence that has to quickly organise itself after retreating.

    And even when it appeared that Gibson-Park had box kicked too long, things worked out well given the height on his kicks.

    I also loved the way Ireland embraced the grubber kicks as a way to attack.

    Untitled Image

    https://www.the42.ie/ireland-england-kicking-4367009-Feb2025/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,214 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    He threw a daft intercept and was very lucky that the ball grazed Itoje's arm as he made a tackle on Bealham and it was called back for a knockon. The pass he threw was incredibly dangerous (Ryle even said it live) and he was lucky to get away with it

    He also missed some pretty glaring gaps where he could have ran in under the posts.
    like this one below

    image.png


    Sam Prendergast played ok, he was grand, exactly at the level that you'd expect an inexperienced young professional starting out his career. He might improve and he could be a very important player for Ireland in the future. But he is not good enough yet, and it is not guaranteed that he will be either (despite so many people declaring out of nowhere that SP has a higher ceiling than Crowley to justify playing him now when he's not ready yet)

    We've seen this before, how many out halves have been declared the next big thing by pundits over the past few years? Harry Byrne, Ross Byrne, Ciaran Frawley and Charlie Tector have all been declared with full confidence to be the next Irish out half for the coming generation. One by one, they have failed to meet the hype and were replaced by the next guy off the academy conveyor belt. Sam Prendergast is that guy today, but what has he actually done so far to justify the hype?

    He has had a couple of good moments, and some very bad moments, and he has been lucky in some other moments (Still think he should have gotten a red card against Australia).

    His play style relies on being behind a strong dominant pack. This week, Ireland played against a small English pack, we were not losing collisions, Prendergast was not really put under any real pressure and was able to stand back and take his time most of the time. He has been ropey under pressure, as ROG said this morning, he looked a little spooked. If he plays like this against France when Meafou, Moafana, Alldritt flying at him, will we see him standing even further back and kicking the ball away even more?

    One other thing I noticed following the match. There was a lot of criticism of Bundee Aki in this thread. I thought Aki had a really good game, he made some crucial try saving tackles, he scored that try beating 3 defenders when any other player would have been pushed into touch in that situation, he hit rucks hard and when Henshaw came on to replace him, I don't think he added much that Aki wasn't already doing.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    despite so many people declaring out of nowhere that SP has a higher ceiling than Crowley to justify playing him now when he's not ready yet

    This is a strange perspective. Firstly, the guy has gone from fourth choice to first at Leinster in the space of eight months and from zero test caps to (apparently) first choice for Ireland in less than four months. So saying he has a high ceiling is hardly out of nowhere.

    But "to justify playing him" is even more odd. There's no justification required, the coaches are already picking him. It's explaining what is already happening.

    And maybe that's what is so upsetting for people, it's not blue-tinted internet hype that can be dismissed, it's actually playing out in reality.

    Harry Byrne, Ross Byrne, Ciaran Frawley and Charlie Tector have all been declared with full confidence to be the next Irish out half for the coming generation. 

    Pretty sure no one ever said anything remotely like that about Tector, and the majority of Leinster fans have been saying all along that Frawley is a decent player but no OH. I'd say Harry Byrne is the only one who was ever really "hyped".



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,528 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He threw a daft intercept and was very lucky that the ball grazed Itoje's arm as he made a tackle on Bealham and it was called back for a knockon. The pass he threw was incredibly dangerous (Ryle even said it live) and he was lucky to get away with it

    He also missed some pretty glaring gaps where he could have ran in under the posts.

    like this one below

    I mean, I know. I literally referenced both these things in my post. The intercept was daft, but advantage was called before he threw it so I assume he knew this.

    The English pack made a mess of our breakdown in that game and were very aggressive in defence. A number of moves broke down because of this. But those moves often broke down after SP created space by running to and passing on the line (and got clattered for his efforts multiple times). I simply don't agree with this narrative that he stands deep - he is not Ross Byrne (who, incidentally, I don't think anyone ever claimed would be the flyhalf for the next generation)

    I don't think Henshaw added anything when he came on either and would much rather Osborne in the 23 jersey. Or potentially even the 12.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,523 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You’ve a habit of misquoting people, FFF. This:

    So saying he has a high ceiling is hardly out of nowhere.

    Isn’t the same as this:

    declaring out of nowhere that SP has a higher ceiling

    Now, by all means, debate whether he has a higher ceiling or not. But let’s not misrepresent what was said. There’s a subtle, but important, difference.

    As for this:

    And maybe that's what is so upsetting for people, it's not blue-tinted internet hype that can be dismissed, it's actually playing out in reality.

    What’s “upsetting” people is, plainly, they think it’s the wrong decision. There’s a perfectly credible argument for that. I would argue even moreso after Saturday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,214 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    When people question why Healy is still being selected it's acceptable to think the coaches might have made the wrong call.

    But when people question why Prendergast is selected, the fact that the coaches selected him means by definition it must be the right call (for some posters).

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    You’ve a habit of misquoting people, FFF

    But let’s not misrepresent what was said.

    I didn't (mis)quote him nor did I misrepresent him, I paraphrased him to remove the needless and invidious comparison between two good IRISH players. We can still talk about a player's ceiling without being negative about another. Or maybe we can't, did I miss a memo?

    There’s a subtle, but important, difference.

    I didn't think it was that subtle, but I guess you missed the point so I'll take than on board for the future. Noted.

    What’s “upsetting” people is, plainly, they think it’s the wrong decision.

    Well, yeah, obviously.

    It's funny that the more "wrong decisions" we make, the more successful we get.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,711 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    I have to challenge you taking thoughts from people's heads and posting it as an argument. I for one haven't thought that the coaches made the wrong call on Healy, I assumed that they thought he was the better alternative. They may revisit that after Saturday, but that's their job.

    Similarly with Prendergast. Saturday was always going to be a tough match, first one of the tournament and a must win because of the way the fixtures play out and that being at home is the best chance of beating England. There were other good reasons for picking him to start. Not least for the fact that if it went very poorly, they could spring a more experienced player from the bench. But they left him out for almost 60 minutes.

    TL:DR, I'm happy with whatever they decide to do, they're the coaches and know their plans/players best.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,528 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'd have zero issue if Crowley was selected and I don't think Easterby picking a player is some catch all response to criticisms or calls for another player. I just don't think a lot of the commentary on Prendergast is that accurate or fair and I think narratives about him being pushed by media etc are quite silly. Coaches in both Leinster and Ireland have seen enough to elevate him very quickly, as they did with Crowley beforehand, and I think "he just isn't ready" is a poor argument. He had a reasonably decent first cap in the 6N in a high pressure environment where he improved after a ropey opening 15 mins. That doesn't say "not ready" to me.

    Also, a lot of the discussion glosses over that Crowley has had a pretty inconsistent season overall. I don't think one game is enough to change that, though I wouldn't be shocked if he started against Wales and gave himself a shot of the start against France.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,486 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Your point seems to be that a person cannot have different opinions on totally different questions? Hmmm.

    I think everyone has long acknowledged that Healy is there because of the lack of any viable alternative. Getting 7 minutes off the bench is testament to Porter's engine but also to the way Healy is seen by the coaches. Throwing in someone, anyone, and seeing what happens is a big leap for any coach (but tbh I think we're at that point).

    None of that applies to the OH question. We didn't have to throw in Prendergast, he's there for nothing but positive reasons.

    All that said, absolutely no one said that being selected "means by definition it must be the right call", (help, help, I've been misrepresented!) but it does very definitely draw a distinction between internet fan hype and reality on the ground.

    Edit: I've said this multiple times over the last two weeks but I'd be very happy to see Crowley start on Sunday, I can go either way on this call. Just before anyone jumps to the wrong conclusion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Good article by Gerry Thornley in the Irish Times, basically highlighting that even though the first half performance had errors the effort put in had the desired result with england a spent force in the second half. I think it would be easy to dismiss Prendergast performance and I'd have no issue with him starting against the Scots. As a neutral the I think he may just pip crowley in the next few years but having said that I think both are going to be a level below Sexton.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,857 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    His play style relies on being behind a strong dominant pack. This week, Ireland played against a small English pack, we were not losing collisions, Prendergast was not really put under any real pressure and was able to stand back and take his time most of the time. He has been ropey under pressure, as ROG said this morning, he looked a little spooked. If he plays like this against France when Meafou, Moafana, Alldritt flying at him, will we see him standing even further back and kicking the ball away even more?

    Just on this point, Prendergast wasn't playing behind a dominant pack for most of the match, quite the opposite. I think part of what has put him ahead of Crowley (for this game at least) is his superior passing game. Our attacking approach was to generate multiple phases to allow us get on the outside of the English defense. Prendergast's passing was crucial to this. He generated multiple line breaks, both for himself and others.

    Crowley was able to benefit from the team being on top of England physically when he came on, and as Podge alluded to,I could see this being a deliberate choice by the coaches to take advantage of his best traits.

    One other thing I noticed following the match. There was a lot of criticism of Bundee Aki in this thread. I thought Aki had a really good game, he made some crucial try saving tackles, he scored that try beating 3 defenders when any other player would have been pushed into touch in that situation, he hit rucks hard and when Henshaw came on to replace him, I don't think he added much that Aki wasn't already doing.

    I thought it was one of the poorest games I've seen from both of them in a long time. Aki looked like Ross Bryne when Smith ghosted by him in the first half, and barely featured outside of his try. He didn't get much change in his carries, but we were using him a lot in phase ball to give pull back passes to Prendergast sweeping across. Henshaw was poor alright, that missed tackle very unlike him. I'm all on in on giving Osborne a start at 12 for Scotland. He's just so damned good, although his defense needs work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,523 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    but [selection] does very definitely draw a distinction between internet fan hype and reality on the ground.

    What a load of rubbish.

    It’s not “internet fan hype” to suggest Crowley should start over Prendergast.

    The guy played every minute in a 6 Nations last season, ffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,837 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    What a load of rubbish.

    tut tut

    It’s not “internet fan hype” to suggest Crowley should start over Prendergast.

    To be very clear. I mean, it was clear, but just to make even clearer.

    My reference to internet fan hype was in relation to the other poster's comments about the Byrnes and Tector.

    The guy played every minute in a 6 Nations last season, ffs.

    The post you're losing your sh1t over literally contains the words "I'd be very happy to see Crowley start on Sunday". What part of that are you reading as undermining his credentials?

    I also said "in case anyone jumps to the wrong conclusion", guess that was five seconds of my life wasted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,711 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler




Advertisement