Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

15165175195215221309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭The Big Easy


    I'm splitting my comment because they are separate ideas.

    What if we are talking about bias here though, very few on this thread like to engage with line of reasoning which is their right.

    Very early on, Amorim mentioned clothes and how a player dresses and conducts their life. This was a mistake and should never have been mentioned. He tried to gloss over it and say just because he doesn't like something it wouldn't affect his selection criteria, but he vocalised it.

    There is also the wider political climate. Again this is another point very few on this thread like either. MR is one of the very few footballer activists in history. He was campaigning against a Tory government to extend the hot meals initiative.

    The club have been taken over by a Tory supporting, Brexit supporting, billionaire who is lobbying a Labour government for funding to create a Wembley of the North while at the same time cutting jobs, benefits and pay of the ordinary working class North. How do the politics of MR and SJR mix, what do they think of each other and their political goals?

    These are just ideas, thoughts on a slow Thursday morning, so don't lock me up and cart me off to the Conspiracy Forum.

    The best outcome for all now is that Marcus gets a move to a top European club and gets back to scoring goals and hopefully enjoying his football for the first time in a long time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,940 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I think there is a large element of Rashford being fed up with the club - the lack of direction/progress over the entirety of his career, the lies many players have been told with respect to the plans and where the club will be.

    As mentioned by @The Big Easy United have been rubbish for years, the best part of Rashford's career - and I believe he has effectively been lied to according to hints and nods from various 'ITKs' around United - such as Kane being a target before he went to Bayern, and we spunked 70m on Hojlund. Similar promises to players over the years, that have similarly been broken.

    Where I find that reasoning (my own reasoning) breaks in my own head is that the final straw occurs after Ineos come in and appoint Amorim whose style (to my own head) should be near pefect to get the best out of Rashford. Amorim even said the other day that we are missing a player with Rashfords attributes (but he won't pick him til he changes).

    I could understand Rashford giving up last summer when we kept EtH far more so than November/December - where I feel Amorim really represents a change of approach for the club and a brighter future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    I honestly think Rashford is burned out, Olé overplayed him while he carried injuries and his body hasn't recovered, he has lost that extra yard of pace he had and its probably weighing down on him.

    Hopefully the change of scenery helps him mentally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Caustic


    If Rashford somehow has the power to influence people to essentially get a manager sacked by not giving their all and all because he has been asked to rain hard and improve himself off the pitch in terms of attitude our lifestyle or whatver it may be its absolutely imperative he is gotten out of the club why would anyone want such a disruptive person at the club?

    Also on you Radcliffe point, if Rashford performed to the level his pay suggests he should or even at decent hard working premier league level there would be no talk of him moving on, whatever he is doing off the pitch in terms charity work, Radcliffe would be more then happy to use him to achieve his goal which is to get united back towards the top, you are glossing over the very simple, obvious answer. Rashford is paid a crazy amount of money, he has been terrible (not bad, not average) in 3/4 of his last seasons, and by the looks of it doesn't train hard enough, why would any owner want a player like this at the club eating up a large paychek.

    And yes rashford is entitled to his pay, but so is an owner who might want to move on an expensive underperforming assest



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Caustic


    Then how did he have his good season, if his body is wrecked? And why does it only effect him when he has to run back and not forward :D



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭GolfPar


    The Clubs he thinks he should be playing for don't seem to want him so I'm not sure how this is going to play out in the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,940 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    As you say, there are elements that people don't like to discuss as possible mitigations for Rashford - and I have been made out to be a moron for even mentioning them. But for me, while i think those elements are there with Marcus, I wouldn't imagine that they are specifically issues with SJR or Amorim and Marcus.

    I do think the club in general has shown a poor ability to protect its players from outside attacks
    I think Ole saying marcus needs to concentrate on his football when the government were telling him to shut up about hungry kids was good. I disliked that, a lot, from Ole.
    I think the general access the Glazers allowed UWS given their relentless attacks on Rashford and Maguire in particular - especially after both players (apparently) and Bruno and other raised UWS as a specific toxic issue.}
    There is also apparently ill feeling from Sancho and Rashford with regards to how United acted after the WC abuse vs how Arsenal rallied around Saka.

    But I don't think that the issues with Rashford right now with Amorim or Untied itself stem from his choice of clothes or politics. I think how the media treat him in general leans on that a lot, but I don't think its an inhouse issue.

    I think the Belfast trip and the night out (apparently) before the Everton game are two huge issues that Rashford himself caused - and lied about (apparently) on both occassions. Now, I think WHY Rashford does these things could be an interesting discussion of a persons mentality and what can contribute to it, but the end result would remain the same.

    I think the Everton night out was the catalyst for where we are now - but I also think it can't be the only thing, becuase that could be punished and moved on from. So I reckon there are probably any number of other aspects at play here, but Marcus himself is in control of solving it. It could turn out solving it involes being a 'good boy' with all the dog whistling that implies, but I personally don't think that is the case - and i would be appauled if it was.

    BUT i appreciate your point and post, and topic of discussion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    That was Luke Shaw bombing down the left ;) 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,374 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    The level of postulation to make excuses for MR has now surpassed that afforded to World Cup Winner Paul Pogba.

    I really don't fuckin get it. Like we've been watching him, live, in colour, for years, his efforts or lack thereof are there for everyone to see and have been, it's not a bad spell.

    There is a reason that NO club is in for him, even when it's clear he'd be available for a cut price. The Saudis and a half arsed loan enquiry from Milan is the height of it yet people retain some notion that he'll end up at a top club. Not a hope. The best he can hope for is similar to Sancho and that some club take a punt on him in the summer on a season long loan.

    People moan about the acceptance of poor standards at the club then cry foul when these poor standards are dealt with accordingly.

    Do any of you honestly think Fergie would have put up with him for this long? There's yer answer tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,940 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I think Rashford under a Fergie United for his career is a different person and player.

    I think environment can influence people.

    And I'll leave it at that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭fatherted1969


    Real crossroads in Rashfords career now, no club of any worth in for him and a manager who's determined to make and example of him. Should have been done years ago, hopefully the manager doesn't bend on this.

    I can remember Klopp deciding that Benteke wasn't for him when he took charge, not similar circumstances just Benteke playing style didn't fit in with his vision. I'd love to see Rashford enjoying his football, I just don't see that happening at Utd and maybe any club at this point. The difference in his demeanour through the years is stark



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,374 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Oh i think you are 100% right there tbh, but my point was SAF's intolerance to anything but 100% from players, both on and off field was well known, accepted by players and applauded by fans. Now we have a situation that a player that had the potential to go down as a club legend has completely dirtied his bib due to obvious onfield lack of effort / application, seemingly training field lack of effort / application and possibly social life issues is having excuse after excuse made for him by a group of fans.

    The only difference I see between MR now and say PP during his last spell is the fact MR is a local boy that has spent his life at the club and PP wasn't. The obvious indifference to their onfield lives with United is identical imo.

    How many times have we said over the last 4 or 5 years that we'd all love to see MR reach his potential, be the player he can be and blah blah blah? That ship has sailed. He is 28 this year, its 100% on his own head now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    The "100% in training" thing is being strangely misunderstood if you ask me. It would never have been about players sprinting further and faster than everybody else, as people seem to imply. And so its not really a factor that not everybody else is working harder than Rashford at all times.

    Its about attitude, and in that squad it has always been about attitude.

    I have trained with lads that on their worst day were fitter and faster than me on my best day. But they were also moany pricks who stood at the back rolling their eyes when the manager couldn't see them, who whispered complaints in corners and who generally just dragged the **** mood down.

    I have no doubt there are certain drills that Rashford probably beats a lot of players in. And I also have no doubt that he is at training with a huge chip on his shoulder, being passive aggressive about pretending to be cheerful towards Amorim while making it very clear to the other players that he "doesn't deserve this" or some other such crap.

    That sort of toxic behaviour kills offices never mind high performance sports teams and Amorim is dead right to want it cut the **** out of the squad.

    Its easy fixed for Rashford. Go to Amorim, apologise and have a clear the air talk, cut out the transparent moodiness, go to training with a genuine desire to be part of the team, wait a short while until the chance comes and then take it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I would bet that there's more to the Rashford story than meets the eye and imo it's difficult to speculate about it because there's too much information that isn't available to us.

    It's clear we want rid and when INEOS want rid of a player, they're more prepared to employ dark arts. Don't play the player, make life uncomfortable for them in the media, brief against them etc. It's a change from the passiveness of the Glazers/Woodward/Arnold that saw players like Martial take the club for a ride for the best part of a decade.

    I believe Rashford is a fairly solid pro. Not perfect by any means but looks after himself about as much as most other PL players. I don't see him carrying extra weight or being unfit etc. I think he's shown he's fundamentally of a good character too, on and off the field. The major issue with him is his form has huge variances. He has a high ceiling but a low floor. When he's off form you get 3 and 4/10 performances rather than 5 or 6/10. It's that and his body language comes across as shockingly bad to the point it regularly becomes a taking point and negatively affects the mood of the entire club. I think INEOS feels enough is enough because of those reasons and the training stuff is most likely exaggerated to hasten his exit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,143 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I have no doubt there are certain drills that Rashford probably beats a lot of players in. And I also have no doubt that he is at training with a huge chip on his shoulder, being passive aggressive about pretending to be cheerful towards Amorim while making it very clear to the other players that he "doesn't deserve this" or some other such crap.

    You have no doubt? Are you regularly at Carrington watching them train?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 968 ✭✭✭jayo44


    Imagine a fan making an excuse for a player being fed up who is earning 300k a week. Seriously like?

    How many of you in your current job would say ahh fek it I'm gonna go to Belfast on the lash tonight even tho I know I have to be in work in the morning?

    Like seriously if you can't have any kind of self control as a professional football then maybe it's the club that's fed up with him and his attitude because they are paying him 300k a week to turn up for work and perform?

    Are the club allowed to be fed up with him or is it just a him? It's his attitude and others like him that's the reason the club hasn't performed!

    I honestly couldn't give a toss if he never played football for the club again he has a poor me attitude and is up there with pogba, lingard and sanchez as some of the least likeable past players at the club.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    Good ol boards.ie pedantry 😂 It's just a saying, when anyone says "I have no doubt" to me I know it's more of a "I have a feeling" etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Yes, I am regularly at Carrington watching them train, you got me. Please don't tell Jim that he forgot about me when making the cuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    Brailsfords whole career (in cycling) has been based on among other things (!!!!) 'marginal gains' and a team ethos where the team was stronger than it's parts. Team Sky won the Tour year after year, often not necessarily having the best rider but had the best strategy and best team environment. Team GB won at the Olympics because they had state of the art aero bikes and equipment before other countries, in a sport of hundreds of a second.

    Ineos pulled Brailsford from cycling for this type of thing…you would have to assume, Amorim being their hire is on board with this. Anyone, not getting the maximum from what they have, good luck.

    Players like Rashford, who is quite clearly not getting a fraction of what he should out of his talent, certainly does not fit in with a culture of extracting every 0.1 of a percent out of yourself.

    There are no doubt valid reasons why he is the way he is but the long and the short of it is that culturally he does not fit with where United are heading, supposedly.

    Put all that alongside the wages and financials, he is not value for money and there will only be one outcome and for everyone's sake I hope it gets sorted before Tuesday… I can't take the press conferences about one player any more.

    People might argue that Hojlund or Zirkzee are not performing or scoring, but they are not a million miles off what they have previously shown (10ish goals a season) and are young, whereas Rashford has proven that he can score 30 goals in a season.

    It's like when you're coaching the kids, the number one thing is 'do your best'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,374 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Rashford has proven that he can score 30 goals in a season.

    He's done that once in 9 seasons

    Since MR started (in all comps)

    23/24 - G8 A5 43 appearances

    22/23 - G30 A9 56 appearances

    21/22 - G5 A2 32 appearances

    20/21 - G21 A13 57 appearances

    19/20 - G22 A9 44 appearances

    18/19 - G13 A7 47 appearances

    17/18 - G13 A8 52 appearances

    16/17 - G11 A5 53 appearances

    15/16 - G12 A2 31 appearances

    Total Goals - 135

    Total Assists - 57

    Total Games - 415

    Average Goals Per Game - .33 / 1 every 3 games

    Average Assists Per Game - .14 / 1 every 7 games

    And this lad is on £300,000 or thereabouts a week. Like I said in my last post, it absolutely boggles my mind how anyone can still defend him and make excuses for his consistently abject performances. I think its gone to the point that people got so entrenched in defending him for the last 18 months that at this point they think it would be somehow embarrassing to climb down from their position.🤷‍♀️



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    FB_IMG_1738252273737.jpg

    Nowhere near as much as we do on a match day!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    I don't think I was defending him in my post. I think he should be gone. And I think he will be gone on some sort of a loan deal a la Sancho. And whole point of the post was he 'can' score, whether he did it once or for 10 seasons, is irrelevant. He is not performing to the level he is capable of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,374 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,940 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Spurs with a big 60m bid for Tel accepted.

    No chance United are matching that - best we could do is a loan with an option and even that would probably require Rashford to be going out. I don't even think if we sold Garnacho that we would go out and buy Tel immediately with the money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,374 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    That level of pricing vs what he is a pre INEOS transfer tbh, no thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,940 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I'd love him at United but i would see him as a 40m player tops right now.

    i'd see 50m+ as an overpay right now but if he were to develop as people did/do expect him to his price won't be an issue in the future.

    If United could have got him on loan and a 50m option in the summer I would have jumped at it tbh - and maybe we still would be able to cause he might reject Spurs (he is apparently waiting to see if us or Arsenal come in for him). Spurs pushing the boat out could be doing what we did with Yoro - for the situation at a value your competition won't match.



  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've had a few responses I've thought of today, the strange comparisons to Pogba the main thing I'd have issue with. Will leave it with 2 questions.

    Can you point to the excuses being made for him because I'm not seeing any?

    Do you believe Rashford has never been good then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,940 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Screenshot_20250130_184901.jpg

    Eriksen and Bruno off hojlund... Full backs both sides.

    Hojlund the only player with even the attributes to stretch the play, and he probably won't.

    Horrific.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Man Utd: Bayindir, Mazraoui, De Ligt, Martinez, Dalot, Collyer, Mainoo, Malacia, Eriksen, Fernandes, Hojlund.

    Subs: Heaton, Onana, Lindelof, Maguire, Yoro, Casemiro, Ugarte, Amad, Garnacho, Zirkzee.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Death, taxes, Dalot and Bruno.



Advertisement