Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1249250252254255715

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,394 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Seems to be a lot of confusion especially with the raids. Saying they are targeting illegal immigrants with criminal convictions and when asked how many had a criminal conviction (it was about 50%) they say they were all criminals as they entered illegally.

    I always thought you needed to be convicted in a court of law to have a criminal record.

    Trump even says they will be detained indefinitely because they don't trust their home country to keep them. So it's not just about other countries not accepting them back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Right wing reactionary movements nearly require a bunch of left wing activists in order to justify their existence. It was true in 20s and 30s Germany where Nazis often clashed with Communists.

    The faces have changed, as has some of the terminology, but we're seeing the same playbook nearly one hundred years later. This is going to get fairly worse before it gets better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,033 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    "Right wing reactionary movements nearly require a bunch of left wing activists in order to justify their existence."

    What we are seeing now is right wing extremists making sh1t up in order to excuse what they are doing. They don't need any action whatsoever from the left as a justification.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,033 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Poster - can we not do Guantanamo?

    Headshot - Sure, why not give them a 5 star hotel!

    Can you see how ridiculous that sounds?

    You are calling the ECHR outdated? Since when were basic human dignities outdated?

    Which one of these are outdated?

    Right to life.

    Prohibition of torture.

    Prohibition of slavery.

    Right to liberty.

    Right to a fair trial.

    No punishment without law.

    Respect for private life.

    Freedom of thought.

    You see immigrants as the problem, when if you were in their shoes (or lack of) you would try and leave to go to somewhere better.

    The problem isn't with poor people trying to have a better life, the problem is those that have extraordinary wealth and influence not being content and wanting more.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭uptherebels


    Guantanamo is apparently because trump doesn't trust countries to keep the "criminals" that get sent back locked up. So they will send them to Cuba to make sure they can't try and return to the US.

    "Some of them are so bad we don't even trust the countries to hold them, because we don't want them coming back," he said of migrants. "So we're going to send them to Guantanamo... it's a tough place to get out."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,327 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Yes. The govt. here obviously should not antagonise them, and try and keep relations good (e.g. personally thought passing an "Occupied Territories Bill" was a bad idea long before Trump's election, but mainly for other reasons than it might anger the US govt.).

    However if his admin. come after us, toadying at cost of our principles or relationships with others us not going to help us, I believe.

    In that event, standing up to him with the EU (and maybe the UK, who knows) is a better bet. He is a bully.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,238 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    "The concentration camps labeling get thrown around far to easy."

    Definition of a concentration camp:

    "a place in which large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labour or to await mass execution."

    Sounds pretty accurate to me. There doesn't have to be gas chambers there for it to be a concentration camp. People will die.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,638 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    All true, but shame that the CDC can't publish any updates to the doctors in the areas in question about it. That is entirely due to the new admin. Imagine if it spreads to remote locations where doctors get a patient with the symptoms, said doctors having never seen the disease and don't dtrt immediately. Likewise for measles, polio, mumps - all rare in adults, all (save polio) making comebacks.

    The CDC does lots of stuff the average person isn't aware of. Now, that's stopped whilst they purge DEI-supporting employees from their ranks. Time is passing, illnesses are being spread. Making America Ill again.

    I don't know what the story was in Ireland back in the day with polio, but I'm old enough to have known a fair few polio survivors in the US when I was a child. You don't want this disease nor do you want anyone you know to have it. The prospect of it returning should terrify everyone. If RFKjr is confirmed, expect bad things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,638 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Slowly getting through that first presser. Had to skip over the 'arrest porn' early part, have gotten to the gleeful announcement of criminal Andrew Breitbarts disinformation channel being given a seat in the press conference. What could possibly go wrong? Disinformation flowing from white house pressers, with the goal of getting them to die out I think.

    Utter debacle so far, with the press sec reciting here memorized lines. Hopefully the gloves come off soon with the media in the room.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,326 ✭✭✭Field east


    I assume that , because Trump is referring to them as criminals, that they have been put before a Judge/ court and FOUND GUILTY of their crimes and therefor have been given a jail sentence. So the argument that they are a danger to society does not stand.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    I dont know if its a low for Trump but that truly was a horrible message he put out on his Truth Social about that awful crash last night.

    Why on earth is he trying to assign blame to people so soon?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,326 ✭✭✭Field east


    And , by the same measure, nobody forced the Irish illegals to have to go to the US either!,,,,,,,!!!,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,033 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Why is this face eating leopard eating *my* face?

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,653 ✭✭✭secman


    Because the man is a grade A , xxick, has zero class, a notorious liar, there are literally thousands of examples of this carry on by this "man". How anyone falls for anything he says is totally beyond me, if he told me it was raining outside, I would have to check to see if it was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,033 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Because that's what he does. He uses tragedy to make political gain.

    I regret to say he has always been that way.

    He is brutally immoral and completely without any empathy for anyone else.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    Because that's how he works. Fuck stuff up, then find someone to blame. Get everyone (the mouth-breathers that support him) saying "why didn't the pilots do something?", instead of asking "how did this happen?".

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,252 ✭✭✭crusd


    Widescale Tariffs and protectionist policies always undermine innovation and ultimately constrain a countries ability to grow. US succeeded in a free trade environment because they promoted a culture of innovation and risk. In a protectionist world this goes. You already see it in AI, where the US companies took a sledge hammer to a nut approach and gained an early advantage in the field. Then through restrictions on chip exports attempted to cut China and others off. So Chinese companies, using Chinese knowledge that would previously have emigrated to the US to create a better and cheaper solution While the American companies are still investing in sledge hammers. Wide scape tariffs will just super charge that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭McFly85


    No sympathy, you know had this man’s wife not been caught but it was a friends or coworkers he’d be cheering it on as Trump taking care of business.

    There will be thousands of these stories no doubt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,326 ✭✭✭Field east


    do the crime on US soil and SERVE your time on US soil - simple as. And if Trump succeeds in keeping all potential illegals out then the numbers of illegals in jail will dwindle over time



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,252 ✭✭✭crusd


    I am sure they put lots of concentration into that camp idea



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,252 ✭✭✭crusd


    Concentration camps did not start as extermination camps, they were just places to put the people the regime identified as being the scapegoats for the reason the masses felt left behind. It is 100% a relevant comparison.

    And then you see ideas like clearing out Gaza - explicit ethnic cleansing of an area of those deemed undesirable and yet you still have people claiming comparisons to previous fascist regimes are inaccurate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Anyone scoffing at the idea of this being a concentration camp needs to ask themselves why they think Trump picked somewhere outside of US soil when there are an abundance of facilities for detainment within the country.

    Guantanamo offers no constitutional protection of rights and isn’t monitored by independent agencies. Anyone sent there will be in for a horrific time, and for no other reason then being a foreigner living and working in the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,210 ✭✭✭Economics101


    A low for Trump? Don't worry, it won't be long before he hits a new, lower, low.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,836 ✭✭✭Nermal


    We already had those rights under our Constitution. Signing up to the ECHR did nothing other than offer up a lever to globalists to force open our borders through the courts. We should repudiate it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭McFly85


    There aren’t specifics, just that Trump says it’s for high-priority undocumented immigrants, what that actually means though is anyone’s guess.

    It shouldn’t matter though - there are already methods to deal with immigrants that have committed crimes through deportation and incarceration. Creating a facility outside the US for immigrants is hugely alarming, normalising the idea that it’s remotely acceptable to treat humans so poorly should never be tolerated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭tarvis


    • quite apart from the fact that Cuba and Cubans are under continuous economic SANCTiONS from the USA, the cancellation of which are routinely voted down in the United Nations by the US and Israel.
      Keep a country and its population out of the economic cycle while feeling free to set up prison camps on its territory - ???
    Post edited by tarvis on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,291 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Only a very small part of the ECHR is concerned with the rights of migrants or refugees. The vast bulk of it is devoted to protecting the human rights of every citizen already living in the country (which of course is why far right authoritarian types want rid of it).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,855 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    It was easy to forget how many WTF moments we had when he was in power the last time, it seems this time around may be even worse than we thought.

    Vote against Trump?

    Go to jail



Advertisement