Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1131313141316131813191948

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,798 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Perhaps there is no counter protest because Israel is very unpopular at the moment for killing so many innocent women and kids in Gaza for the last year. I don't think hamas or the current Israel government, both lead by war criminals have much support in ireland outside of a deluded few.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    Do you want to comment on the murder of 40,000+ women and children ?

    Thought not , so keep your fake outrage to yourself ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,938 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    There's no counter protest because you could fit the Israel supporters in a phone box (back when we had phone boxes to fit them in).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,542 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    if there was a counter protest, would you have gone? And if there wasn't a counter protest, did you consider organising one?

    Perhaps there was no counter protest because no one could be bothered or there's simply no-one who could justify protesting in support of genocide and war crimes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Is that the 4 "civilian" "israeli girls" who were "abducted"?

    Some might see them as prisoners of war.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Go on, humour me. Tell us your definition of "holocaust".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,098 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Hamas made a very stupid decision on October 7th 2023. Their leaders must have known what it would lead to.

    Maybe Trump is right? What is the alternative? A conflict our great, great grandchildren will still be witnessing.

    Maybe it is time to end it once and for all.

    It gets to that point where it just can't go on and something decisive needs to happen or it will never end.

    I'm not saying I support resettlement BTW.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    Yep I think that what enemy soldiers are called.Once they are POW its a war crime to kill them. Often used in prisoner swaps along frontlines



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,938 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    For somebody not supporting resettlement you're doing a very good impression of it. The Trump idea is a clear notion of ethnic cleansing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    And has been pointed out to you before, Herschel Grynszpan must have known what his assassination of German diplomat Ernst vom Rath would lead to, and yet people still have the opinion that Kristallnacht was a bad thing the Germans did.

    Ukrainian soldiers know what will happen to them vis-a-vis torture or summary executions if the Russians capture them. Yet strangely, people have this mad idea that that doesn't make said torture or execution right and proper.

    A woman down the road here is always going around with black eyes. But it's perfectly acceptable because she knows what not having the dinner ready in time would lead to.

    Perhaps it might be a case that "knowing" a reaction doesn't fully excuse that reaction?



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭political analyst


    You know fine well I was referring to the men who had formed a crowd behind a line of Hamas gunmen and were taking pictures of the hostages with their smartphones. Stop being disingenuous!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    If you write to them, they'll give you the full details regarding how the survey was carried out, they say. An online, self-chosen cohort. I'm not going to write to them but I pretty much am sure that it is not a representative sample. Nevertheless, even at that, Q.20 is telling - and this was back in June 2024:

     20. 
    How strongly do you approve or disapprove of the way President Biden is handling the Israel-Hamas war?
     	 	 
    Approve strongly	  13%	 
    Approve somewhat	  35%
    Disapprove somewhat	  20%	 
    Disapprove strongly	  23%	 
    Not sure	           9%	 
    No answer	          <1%	 
     	 	 
    Approve - 48%
    Disapprove - 43%
    Not sure - 9%
    No answer - <1% 
    

    Of course, some of the 43% who disapproved might have wanted him to give Israel more bombs, as the question is ambiguous. But on balance I'd guess a lot of them disapproved of Biden's genocidal tendencies.

    Many of the other questions are ambiguous too.

    Then again, given that the source is hardly neutral, the ambiguity is probably intentional.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme


    No, instead you're saying you support genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    According to the statistics available, less than 2% of the US population is jewish. Yet Biden's cabinet had 10 jews out of 28 members. That's about 36%. Whether you support it or not, it is wildly disproportionate at more than 18 times their percentage in the wider US population.

    When you consider that they are also known zionists, which are a subset of US jews, it was even less representative again. I'd have been wondering the same if 10 members of his cabinet were Mormons or Muslims, and so would everyone else, and it would have been openly discussed.

    Let's look at it in an Irish context: could you imagine an Irish government where 36% of the government ministers were Church of Ireland? It would be viewed as completely unrepresentative, and people would be wondering how it happened. It would be a cause for comment, without a priori criticising any specific individual's abilities.

    So no, I am not anti-jewish. I am strongly anti-zionist, and a great many wonderful jews worldwide are too, I have already mentioned Chomsky, Finkelstein, Blumental, Naomi Klein etc.

    Finally, Irish jews already have a state. It's the same one that Irish catholics and Irish protestants have: it's called Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,098 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    I support an end to the conflict. Any option that can bring an end to it and not cost lives is on the table. Some will prefer one option to another option. Trump's put forward his idea.

    What's your idea?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Comments like Blanch's demonstrate clearly how little they now about this country. Wouldn't you wonder how they managed to go through 14 years of schooling here and not know that Ireland's (26 cos) population dropped year after year from 1845 to around 1960.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,154 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    You support the end of a conflict by giving the aggressor everything they want - removal of Palestinians from Gaza so that Israel can annex it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Maybe Trump is right? What is the alternative?

    I'm not saying I support resettlement BTW.

    I can't get my head around these two contradictory comments in one posts.

    Mind you, this poster has constantly provided support for Israel's actions, so my opinion is that the word "not" was written in error.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,860 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Mod warning:

    @deirdremf good evening

    You start getting a bit uncivil in your last few posts. I would advise you to stop it and post in a more civil manner to avoid a forum ban.

    Thank you.

    Upcoming gigs and events: David Byrne, VNV Nation, Lord Of The Lost, Dry Cleaning, The Shawshank Redemption, These Charming Men, Sasha Velour, Disorder Festival, The Cure, Garbage, Olafur Arnalds, Cabaret Voltaire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    I believe the definition of genocide includes forced displacement of a population. In other words you are, in your mealy-mouthed way, supporting genocide.

    Have you thought this through? If this was to happen the next target would be the Palestinians in the West Bank. Following on from that would come the Palestinians of Jerusalem and Northern Palestine.

    This is 7 million people - and believe you me, this will not provide Israel with security so they will find an excuse to continue their expansion. We have all seen the Yahoo's maps of the Middle East, they are not a secret.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme


    A peaceful two state solution. Would you be in favour of "cleaning out" Israel and moving all Israelis somewhere else? Maybe America can take them.

    Post edited by Augme on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,098 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    I didnt say I supported it, I said that's Trump's suggestion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    moving all Israelis somewhere else

    Maybe not all of them - just those who have immigrated without going through official Palestinian channels. 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Maybe Trump is right? What is the alternative?

    These words of yours, although formulated as questions, seem to suggest otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    You know what would be an idea, some form of attempt to correct the lopsided mistakes of the past.

    1. Britain to come forward and recognise they fucked things up by signing the Balfour Declaration and ignoring the people of Mandatory Palestine, which is the root cause of the problem.

    2. The UN to admit they got it wrong in ignoring their own charter on the right to self-determination for the Arabs, that their partition plan was totally unfair and all it did was solidify the problems created by the British.

    3. Some attempt to redress the balance since then, the creation of a Palestinian State, the removal of all settlements and the return of all occupied territories to Palestine.

    4. All this on the condition that Hamas/Hezbollah(or any other terrorist organisation) are disbanded and that any further attempts to attack Israel will see the end of the deal and Israel to be given full control of the entire Palestinian area.

    This will never happen because it would mean some actual recognition that the Arabs were screwed over and Israel will never take a step back with regards territory, and as always the US backs whatever Israel does. I



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,938 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Things are looking grim over the next 4 years -

    "Trump’s new administration has promised “unwavering support” for Israel, and key positions have been taken by hardline supporters of its expansion. His ambassador to the UN said in confirmation hearings that she considered Israel had a “biblical right” to the West Bank, which Israel occupied in 1967 but most of the world recognises as the heart of a future Palestinian state."

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/26/trump-resumes-sending-2000-pound-bombs-to-israel-undoing-biden-pause



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 858 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    Mod note:

    Post deleted

    @sheepysheep

    please have a look at the forum charter and new rules in the main page of the forum, where it specifically mentions not to bring up a poster's history from other threads.

    Thank you.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Even the ICJ ruled that the case before them is plausible.

    Plausible. Needs investigation. It's not up to random civilians in random countries to decide. You are not the arbitrators.

    Never mind giving different examples of what you consider war crimes. As I said already, every side in a conflict are guilty of war crimes, every single one. Unfortunately.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 858 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    Firstly, you didn't answer my question as to why Ireland has become so involved in this war as compared to other countries, or why the interest in this conflict above all others.

    Why is Ireland, and not other countries, involved in a diplomatic spat with Israel? Why can our President not keep his mouth shut on the issue?

    The bottom line is, if you're relentlessly talking about the subject, you're drawn to it for some reason. Pretending that antisemitism isn't the motivating factor for a large segment of the irish poulation is just silly.

    Secondly, to say that an accusation that Ireland is indeed a racist country is not outrageous at all. We're a deeply racist country as many immigrants will testify.

    Anglophobia is racism, and there's a huge section of the Irish nation that freely embraces that. Could they not be antisemitic too?

    You don't need Jews in Ireland to be antisemitic. You just need to look at the online commetry and see the amount of virulent anti jew posts and Posters.

    You have to go very far to find evidence of this racism in our country. Pretending that the glorious irish nation couldn't possibly be antisemitic is rubbish.

    Racism has long been a feature of Irish society

    Irish network against racism

    As the experience of Travellers and other minorities attests. The evidence from minorities' direct experience logged with the iReport.ie system shows that racism is an ongoing and everyday experience for all minorities in multiple dimensions of life.

    racism-is-rampant-in-ireland-across-all-sectors-and-levels/

    https://www.irishtimes.com/special-reports/2023/10/13/racism-is-rampant-in-ireland-across-all-sectors-and-levels/



Advertisement
Advertisement