Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1186187189191192716

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,848 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Well elected officials jobs is to plan things for how a state works.

    Well if failure of planning is lazy then just blaming climate change as a whole is even lazier as it isn't going away any time soon so they're going to have to do some proper planning to deal with it.

    The Dutch have been able to keep out the water despite 25% of it it being below sea level and the rest of it being pancake flat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Sweet lord, another case of knowing enough to think you’re right, but not enough to know how completely wrong you are.

    Hire people for the job? Who is going to make it rain? Or lower the temp?

    You’re spewing off blameful nonsense.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,633 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Which they did by creating a sensible social system of pillars to accommodate their cultural differences and by electing practical people to get things done. Not a valid comparison to America where a convicted felon can be head of state instead of going to prison.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,639 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    And the Saudis don't have problems with flooding, either. So what?

    So your solution is what, dictatorship? Moving people out of flood plains or fire areas forcibly? And, global warming IS to blame for the higher frequency and intensity of the fire seasons. Trouble is, there's all those people looking for somewhere to live.

    FWIW, the Netherlands has been settled for far longer than California has and has a long history of trying to cope with flooding. California's big population uptake started in around 1849, and the fire problems intensified in the last generation or so. So, it's silly to compare the Netherlands to California's situation with wildfires.

    Also, fwiw, Canada is having huge wildfire problems too, the media (outside of Canada) isn't covering them as much. Not as dramatic, as the areas that burn aren't heavily populated. A different side of that pesky population problem. Low population is one thing saving Ireland from being a complete disaster, too, plus all the free money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,639 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    It's this thread - send people out to rake the forests!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,706 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    When you're born into a monetocracy, which is what America really is, one's lack of merit doesn't mean all that much.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,633 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It's pretty obvious when one can see how Trump gets away with things that would land a working class man on death row in some cases. I want to hold Kermit to account for his MAGA nonsense.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,639 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    America's never been a meritocracy. Moneytocracy sounds better. Then again, there aren't any meritocracys anywhere (Ireland? England? France? Nope.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,616 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Calm down.

    Have you ever heard of Forest management ?

    Controlled burnings, thinning out forests ???

    The reason California hasn't conducted more of these controlled burnings comes down to existing environmental laws in the U.S. that have posed bureaucratic obstacles to prescribed fires. It often takes years for proposals to go through reviews before any controlled burning can actually take place.

    Wildfires have long been a part of California’s ecosystem, and will continue to be so. 

    The key question for living with wildfire is how humans manage the risks, and its clear to see than Newsom and Co are not doing a good job of managing the risks.

    The acreage burned is increasing even as the number of wildfires has decreased, thats not necessarily the result of climate change alone.

    Instead of removing dead and diseased trees and undergrowth, the state, following environmentalist restrictions, has allowed that natural fuel to build up, creating the conditions for explosive wildfires.

    Land use restrictions have also forced development nearer forests, worsening the damage and loss of life.

    I do more than most for the environment but environmental policies also need to be practical and use more common sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,639 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    In many ways, the conclusion of this case perfectly symbolises the utter toothlessness of the legal prosecutions against Trump these last couple of years.

    They only increased his popularity/notoriety.

    Those who instigated the proceedings have all been knocked down pretty comprehensively.

    The cases got mired in the kind of procedural molasses that is only really available to the very rich and powerful.

    Trump has won, and made a fool out of everyone who's acted against him these last couple of years. I don't say that in a sense that I like it - I certainly don't think his impending presidency is a good development for the USA or the world, where the best case scenario is that his various acolytes get locked into infighting that minimises the amount of damage done, but the funny thing is that people are going to continue to call Trump stupid, this being the man who has won the U.S presidency on two non-consecutive occasions against people who would be traditionally considered more qualified.

    Ignorant? Maybe, yes. But stupid ? Oh, no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,616 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Bragg wins ?

    How do you make that out ?

    Trump was out of the running for the Presidency until Bragg brought that case. He made a martyr out of Trump and brought in huge funds for Trumps campaign.

    Bragg lost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,639 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Ehh? You think Bragg bringing the case helped? Now, that's a different take, I guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,048 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Trump was never out of the running. As soon as McCarthy bowed the knee to him at Mar-a-lago rather than the GOP kicking him to touch he was the front runner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,396 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Since when is a US District Attorney's achieved rated against whether someone gets into office or not?

    Bragg brought a case against him and got a conviction, how is that not a win for him?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Suckler


    The complete lack of understanding of the situation (wilful or otherwise) is staggering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,048 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    The judge has just said that anyone else would receive jail time but the POTUS is to be treated differently.

    Americans just voted to remove 'all men are created equal' from their constitution.

    The real issue is now that the line has been crossed, where does it stop? Senators surely. Congressman must be. Governors? Sheriffs? School board committee members if they did the act while in office?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It was never in their hands, really. The most the party could have done would have been to vote to convict Trump at his Senate trial, at which point Trump would have taken his revenge by getting his followers to vote each and every one of them out of office.

    The party had no-one to replace Trump, anyway, which would have been the first requirement to kick him into touch. Ron DeSantis turned out to be a weak joke of a candidate with zero charisma or interpersonal skills. Nikki Haley stood there and smiled impotently as Trump referred to her as 'Bird-Brain'. His rivals for the nomination were utterly pathetic and ineffectual. It was only ever going to be Trump's mantle to take on again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    These fires have nothing to do with the temperature. It's not hot. At least one person has been arrested for arson and I'm sure there will be more. The way fires were springing up unrelated to each other was completely unnatural, also they seemed to be weirdly concentrated in wealthy areas. The national guard has been deployed to stop looters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    the president of the united states of america is now,officially,a convicted felon….wheres batman when you need him?


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    "You are him…the one they call the "Baba Yaga"…

    yo! donnie vonshitzinpants..you sir are the skidmark on the jocks of humanity!!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    I’m well aware of what forest management is, and that is a literal bandaid solution to the larger issue, which is a changing climate where fires are more frequent and also larger now.

    You’re also talking about enormous sizes of land, and humans just don’t have the capability to manage that, that is where things like rain come into play.

    I see it first hand here in Canada. What is lost on most is the sheer scale of the areas we are talking about here, there just isn’t the capacity is manage it properly and with climate change, it just gets worse.

    I’m also not sure you wrote half of that post, the rouge “n” link in your second last paragraph is a bit suspicious there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,616 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    I understand the case beter than most.

    Bragg took the case primarily to undermine Trump's chances in the 2024 election by tarring him as a convicted felon, something the Democrats emphasised while vainly trying to turn voters against him.

    Bragg was undeterred by the fact that his predecessor, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., had decided against charging Trump with state crimes after concluding that none of the options were legally viable.
    Bragg was determined to get Trump one way or another, after all he ran on a campaign of Get Trump.

    He pursued a dubious legal theory that aimed to punish Trump for conduct that was not inherently criminal.

    Trump portrayed the case as politically motivated, which reinforced his general complaint that the Democrats were manipulating the law to prevent his election. 

    What did Bragg achieve?

    His daft case against Trump undermined the rule of law and public confidence in the criminal justice system while lending credence to Trump's insistence that all of his legal troubles could be explained by partisan animosity.

    Bragg lost, Trump won.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Ah right, so all the scientists, governments etc are totally wrong, and the lack of rain from last year didn’t play a part, right?

    You’re into conspiracy territory here with the “weirdly concentrated” garbage, sort yourself out there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,848 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Why would the Saudis have much problem with flooding (it's in the desert), it's irrelevant to them.

    You have particular environmental challenges associated with California.The people leading that state should be experts in how to deal with those issues and be very focussed on how to deal with them.There are particular environmental challenges with the Netherlands and they appear to be experts with dealing with these challenges.That is why the comparison is relevant.

    I find it bizarre that they ever thought it was good policy to have so many houses built in brushland and right in the middle of it there isn;t any relevant buffer zone around the houses, it's not good policy yet they allowed it to occur over the decades.

    Lets be honest some people don't like the failures of the officials in California being pointed out because the democrats have essentially been running that state for most of the last 30 years and they can't blame the republicans for the shitshow.If the republicans were in charge of the state we know it'd be all "republicans are rubbish" etc etc on here, they're to blame with a lot that is wrong with America but in this instance it's hard to blame them as they haven't much power in California so the failings of the democrats are ignored.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,230 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    image.png

    The fires of course, are connected to hot dry conditions. The land is dry because it hasn't rained there in years, and it gets hot when there is a fire there (or an ember from a fire further away lands there)

    Controlled burns are difficult to do when theres a multi year drought. How exactly do you do a controlled burn of a forest when a single spark carried by the wind can set off a fire outside of the expected control area?

    The wildfires happen when the conditions are extremely dry so that any fire that starts, regardless of the cause, burns out of control.

    Blaming Arson is just yet another right wing distraction from the real problem, which is climate change.

    The 50 billion dollars in damages this one fire is going to cost would have been a lot better spent on bulding public transport, renewable energy infrastructure, and migrating from fossil fuels 30 years ago when we should have been investing in these changes, instead, now its just going to be devastating natural disasters every year forever, getting worse the longer we continue to allow oligarchs to block action on climate change because it harms their own private wealth interests.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,033 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Stupid?

    Absolutely. I can give you plenty of well known examples. He is profoundly stupid.

    His success at politics isn't proof of his intelligence - it is proof of the average American's lack of it.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,048 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    So you assert that all the charges were made up to politically damage a person they had already beaten in the previous election? Although your previous point is that he was done and dusted after 2020, they decided that the only way to beat him was to make up crimes and try to plant evidence on him.

    The justice system is so corrupt in the US that despite all the GOP senators, congressmen, judges etc, this was simply allowed to happen and only for Trump's grit and determination against this corruption has he been able to clear his name.

    But wait. What about all the other cases? Tax fraud, hush money payments, stealing classified documents, 100's of millions in defamation rulings? Are they all part of the same plot of were these all taken separately but using the same corruption levers?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,790 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Presumably you'd be happy if Trump was completely exonerated because of the corrupt prosecutor, corrupt judge and corrupt jury?

    I guess if that were to happen, there'd be a lot of convicted felons across the US filing appeals for miscarriages of justice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,639 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Remind me, what party was Schwarzenegger from when he was governor? And, hmm, Pete Wilson? Ronald Reagan? The overcrowding took off in California post-WWII, and the laissez-faire attitude about development, around the same time, likewise the endless problems with water rights.

    The comparison to the Netherlands is irrelevant insofar as it's completely different issues and the Netherlands has been dealing with them for centuries; California (or anywhere in the US for that matter), not so much.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    so he’s still a convicted felon and rapist right?



Advertisement