Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Munster Team Talk Thread - Beirne After Reading

19419429449469471047

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    But it cannot be a one way street. Simply moving guys from leinster at academy level where they then may face a drop off in coaching standards might hinder their progress.

    Simply just moving guys, or signing NIQs isn't a long term solution. Not every signings like slimani will work that way. The word out of leinster is that he is very good with the younger players and there is potentially a coaching role for him in the offing once he does retire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭oppiuy


    I think its 12 counties in Leinster with a population pull of about 2.9 Million. 6 counties in Connaught and Munster. Connaught cant be more than 600-700K and Munster must be 1.5 million. So they are never going to have a stream of Talent to match Leinster apart from the odd golden generation maybe every 20 years.

    Uncompetitive provinces wont do anything to enhance the game or attract new eyes. It would be interesting to get the season ticket sales for each province for the last few years to see how thats trending



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Making the provinces stronger and more competitive can ONLY be done by improving the output of their own academies. Siphoning talent from other provinces can only be secondary because you’re never going to get the best of their talent, only the guys who need to move for game time. That’s not a sustainable model. The IRFU are already very active in moving players around but any idea of forcible distribution of talent via some sort of draft isn’t viable. And we’re never going back to the days of six or seven NIQs at a province.

    Fixing the academy output is a long-term job that will take years to see any results, that’s just the nature of it, but it’s the only sustainable solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,054 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I never see much criticism of the executive leadership group at Munster around here. The current CEO is a sports marketing guy w a background in other sports. Sponsorship and business vision is vital to the health of a team but for me it’s the wrong skill set for the top guy, Munster need a root and beach vision to produce players and a winning team, that should be priority number one. The fish rite from the head, and the model is failing currently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    How fortunate us supporters of other provincial teams are to have Leinster fans always at the ready to tell us how things stand and let us know what we're doing wrong. So gracious of them. However, might I suggest they address their own issues first, such as their complete inability to win silverware despite having more natural advantages than the majority of the clubs on the planet.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭oppiuy


    Telling us all to produce our own players isn't the answer, if its as easy as that, please, tell us all the magic formula. At the same time that doesn't absolve Munster from their lack of development and pathways over the last decade or so. That's on us and looks like it has been addressed but nowhere near producing the Players in the positions needed, which also seems to be a country wide problem



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,587 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    TThe Biggest issue with producing players is longer than a decade ago. It's players born early 90s which was the issue and it g0t better initially with players born in 94/95/96 with jack o donoghue etc and progressed from there. Munster have to be fair over past decade put in the structures and pathways to develop players. It simply takes time to show at top level and is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    if its as easy as that, please, tell us all the magic formula

    No one said it was easy. It will be very difficult. But it's still the only solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    This argument needs to die. In the last 10 years Leinster have 1 European Cup and 4 URC trophies. There is no guarantee of winning in Europe when teams like Toulouse or LaRochelle exist. Or previously Saracens/Toulon.
    Munster have 1 URC trophy in the same period. Mostly due to Leinster fielding a weakened side.
    Apparently Leinster will be a complete failure again this season if they don’t win the double as if Toulouse are not also stacked.

    The reason Leinster supporters are interested in the discussion of how to improve Munster and the other provinces is that a lot of the time the solutions involve making Leinster poorer to make the others richer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭oppiuy


    Its the ideal solution alright but if you cant produce the very high end players for the pool at your disposal what next. I dont have the answers but id like to hear what plans the IRFU have in place because with the 4, the game will fade backwards in many areas. We need the kids of today to grow, and sustain interest. You can already see what Limericks emergence in the GAA has done to crowds for attendances. We certainly have to sustainably build for the future but we also have to worry about the here & now.

    Interpro games should be nail biters and not the turgid or onesided affairs of the last number of years with the odd cracker thrown in



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Remind me, how many trophies they've won since South African teams joined the league? The truth is that Leinster have massively underperformed these past three years by not winning the URC given their squad, their finances and their player pathway system. To be blunt, they've failed.

    Consequently, it seems fairly bloody obvious that supporters of other provinces aren't going to take too kindly to being told how to change their circumstances by fans of a team that have had to go out and buy a couple of World Cup winners and a former French international to try and finally win something despite half their squad being capped for Ireland.

    Munster, Ulster and Connacht have gone from being competitive in Europe and the league to being also rans with the latter two not far off Welsh regional sides and Munster soon to join them. At the same time the IRFU is doing everything in their power to ensure the favoured child finally stops languishing in mediocrity and actually manages to win something. The gap is only getting bigger and yet we are told to put up and shut up. So yeah, you'll forgive us if we don't look too fondly on the status quo and get a bit pissed off when smug mouthpieces come in and offer advice when their team's only recent claim to fame is winning the interprovincial shield, an achievement akin to battering cripples.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭mun1


    so we’re back to the old “its your own fault you’re poor, and you’re not getting any of “my” money #teamofthem. 😂

    Seriously though,

    No one is saying Munster should not be looking for their own solutions and yes Toulouse and most french team have bigger budgets, but the do play way more matches then us.

    If we can get transparency from the IRFU on how much money is spent on each province, including CC players, then it would become clearer of the disadvantage other provinces have compared to leinster .

    Now obviously the IRFU aren’t in a position to give equal amounts to all provinces , so it becomes a fine balancing act.

    At least the new “upto” 30% of CC are funded by each province thus rebalancing the only somewhat (bit dubious about the upto figure).

    IMO it’s not that the Toulouse of this world are significantly better than they were during the early 00’s , it’s the Irish provinces that are a bit weaker , including the team leinster from 2009-2014. That’s why leinster and all the provinces need the outside injection of talent , just like Toulouse La Rochelle etc to compete at the highest level.

    No one begrudges leinster their “own money “ from the schools development system and bumper gates (which is a great achievement for any organisation)

    But id guess the overall leinster revenue and income is significantly more than the other provinces when you add in , IRFU , sponsors, gate money, and their outgoings for players is less than other provinces due to the CC situation upto now.

    Would the Leinster net “profit” be double that of Connacht for instance. ?

    That would justify the expense of Barrett and Snyman.

    Should leinster be penalized for generating the extra income ? Absolutely not, but when they also have extra funding available from the CC scenario obtained from the IRFU , then the ethos of #teamofus and team ireland must come into it, no ?

    Pro sport is all about money and if you have more than your opposition , you can be successful. The balancing act for the IRFU is above all they need a performing mens senior side to generate income. They get this by carefully managing the players they have by keeping them in the provinces and paying a reasonable amount of money for their services.

    If they don't pay the rate for the top players then they will go elsewhere and that could weaken the Irish team and that hits the bottom line.

    I think the club game will surpass the international game and the money will follow. This will drive different dynamic in the game , much like soccer or golf or NFL or NBA etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,926 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,667 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Making the provinces stronger and more competitive can ONLY be done by improving the output of their own academies.

    This just isn’t true. Yes, it’s the primary, most fundamental way.

    But NIQ’s are a way too. Nobody will convince me that Munster wouldn’t have been significantly improved with an NIQ prop instead of Abrahams.

    That’s not even asking for more NIQ’s. That’s just asking for NIQ’s in the position that coaches think they’re most necessary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Munster absolutely would be improved with an NIQ prop, I’d have given them two if I was in charge.

    But they’re here for two or three years, so unless you have the native guys coming behind, then it’s not fixing the problem, it’s kicking the can down the road. The overall solution remains the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭oppiuy


    Not if what's coming behind isn't the required standard. It can't be a case of produce or flounder. We have to remain competitive



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,667 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Let’s assume they do produce someone behind him in 2-3 years.

    There will still be NIQ’s in the squad. Munster will always need to supplement. Leinster need to supplement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    but the alternative is constant importation of NIQ players, which we know IRFU won’t allow.

    BTW - before I’m accused of seeking attention or voyeurism or some other fetish - I think hard and fast rules like “no NIQ props” are stupid and ultimately unworkable, but the reality is that all the provinces have to operate under the IRFU system of prioritisation of the national team. That’s the inescapable reality of the situation and wishing it away isn’t very constructive.

    As you’ve pointed out, some fans will simply lose interest as a result. Many posters here have already either lost interest in or actively dislike the national team precisely because they see IRFU policies as holding their province back.

    There’s a balance to be struck, I personally don’t think IRFU have it right but I see what they’re trying to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Yes, there will still be NIQs. I absolutely never said there would be no NIQs so I’m utterly confused as to what your point is.

    Won’t Connacht and Ulster also need to supplement? Why did you only mention Leinster ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    For the record I want Munster to be only a slightly bit less successful than Leinster. My parents are both from Munster and support Munster as is my wife.
    And I don’t agree with the NIQ prop ban as it is too blunt. If Snymans contract is as has been reported that he cannot start in front of Ryan/McCarthy than a similar clause could be in a props contract that they can only play 50 minutes max in Europe etc. But one NIQ prop wouldn’t solve Munsters issues, you’re not going to be allowed a full NIQ front row.
    And yes the central contracts are currently massively in favour of Leinster. But that is a product of Leinster developing the best players. It wasn’t always the case. How would you suggest we change the central contract offer to reward Irish players and help keep them in Ireland without also handicapping Leinster? Maybe a bonus based in making squads/23s. That way more players get a piece of the pie. Although injured players than get penalised. It’s a tough one.
    Finally, Leinster sold out the aviva/croke park how many times last year? Should they not be allowed spend that money on marquee players? It’s not like the other provinces have not had World Cup winners in their squad in the last also. Munster still have one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,667 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The point is, what’s the problem if it has to remain an NIQ in the front row?

    The reason I mentioned Leinster is obviously because if a team of their calibre have to supplement then Munster and the other provinces will obviously also have to.

    Perhaps I’m prickly on this subject FFF, but I remember being hammered on the Ireland thread for suggesting something as straightforward as a 10/3 split of Central Contract’s being untenable.

    It seems at times like there’s a cohort of posters who think Munster fans should have to pull Munster over hot coals before you can comment on NIQ’s, central contracts and the like. (And are all too willing to do it themselves. To be clear, not saying you here)

    Maybe Munster fans just want to be positive about the rugby team they support…. Especially when they come into the Munster thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,667 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ok, so you can see what the IRFU are trying to.

    Now can you see what Munster are trying to do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭exiledawaynothere


    Was it in March that RTE retired POM from international rugby on a live TV interview based on rumours?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    But to go back to Frannos initial question I think the internet helps the fringe views to get more attention.
    It is easy to look at Leinster and feel like the game is rigged. But they’re mostly a product of their own success. They’ve the best academy so they produce the best players who in turn get the most central contracts which makes Leinster more successful so they sell more tickets so they make more money so they can afford better NIQs etc.

    A lot of Munster supporters can look at that and feel aggrieved and want a more equitable system. But as has been discussed ad naseum it is difficult to come up with a scenario that doesn’t punish Leinster to improve the others.
    There is then the fringe views who see it as the IRFU purposefully sabotaging everybody else just so Leinster can succeed and Andy Farrell only wants to select them. Any critical thinking of this shows how outlandish it is. And to be fair I think the majority of the Munster supporters on boards are of the more level headed variety as compared to twitter/reddit/munsterfans.

    Also apologies if I come across as a holier than thou Leinster fan. I genuinely want Munster to do well but it really annoys me when fans don’t support an Irish province when they play a foreign team.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,651 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Mod: Folks could i respectfully suggest the general discussion on NIQs and investment and comparing provinces goes to a different thread. I know it's a grey area when discussing how Munster progress but I'm not sure constantly bringing up Leinster here is productive. As long as the discussion is focused specifically on munster it's fair game - for everyone not just munster fans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,660 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    not the place for this and I certainly don’t want to get drawn into this rubbish debate but I’m sceptical of that 80/20 split, I suspect some of that’s down to putting things on balance sheets that suits the narrative.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 35,073 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Mod Note

    Totally agree, not the place for this.

    I've deleted a few posts as Leinster seemed to be mentioned ALOT and there was already a Mod Note regarding same.

    If you want to talk Finances and how the IRFU distribute between provinces, splits, percentages ( and of course NIQ's) then kindly post elsewhere. This is the Munster thread and Leinster seems to be mentioned more here than in the Actual Leinster thread. A greater level of seperation in provincial threads is needed. Common threads are where the above discussions are welcomed.

    Any further post that go against the Mod Notes will be a Warning/Ban.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 234 ✭✭letsbefair


    Things are not as dire as some people are making out, injuries to top players have been huge factor, a dip in form for others and also new coach mid season. Things can turn around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,926 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I'm not overly concerned and but for a few odd reffing decisions we might well have got a point or two from our games v Leinster but the loss to Zebre was an expensive loss, especially when the likes of Edinburgh & Glasgow play them twice and could pick up 10 points.

    We can't afford another cock up like that again this season.

    The rumours of Lancaster coming seems far off the mark now unless he's playing his cards very close to his chest until closer to the end of their season.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭mun1


    onto next match v Saracens on 11th

    Hopefully have POM, Crowley, Murray, Barron, and maybe Loughman ? at least back for this one.

    Although thought Coughlan had a good game last week.

    Saracen’s have Bristol at home, then us away, then castre at home then Exeter away,

    they’re 2 from 2 in CC so they would expect to get 5 from castre game at home , which should give them top 2 in group, id say (hope) they will do a mix and match for our game.

    With very few options up front Id expect a team of Bluler, Scannell, Jager, Beirne, Ahern, POM, Hodnett, Coombes, Murray, Crowley, Daly, Scannell, Farrell, Nash, Haley

    With a bench of ryan, Barron, Archer, EOC , Kendellan, Gleeson, Coughlan, Burns.



Advertisement