Cold Case Review of Sophie Tuscan du Plantier murder to proceed. **Threadbans lifted - see OP**

All too easily shot down- and that’s been the problem for the last nearly 30 years now - just on one of those pieces of so called evidence - “did he know her?”- not one person is 100% certain they even met once no less “knew her”- not one person.
And that makes it just all so unbelievable that he would march up to her door at stupid o clock looking for sex- it’s not even a feicing theory it’s so bad - it’s just balderdash 😀

I quoted a case in America previously on this thread where a loner man was found guilty of multiple murders of women over a period of time and states - he singled them out from a distance and murdered each one in a similar fashion - so it’s possible this murder could have happened that way- but it’s so bloody unlikely it was Bailey that did it in that way - unless he was a serial murderer- but that would then need the assistance of the UK police

He was so horny, he marched across the countryside in total darkness and murdered someone with a giant rock, leaving no trace of physical evidence.

But apparently his libido dropped massively after that night and he never did it again.

Is that the theory?

He said he murdered Sophie on a number of occasions. He lied about his whereabouts on the night of the murder. His whereabouts can't be backed up by anyone for a number of hours on the night. He gained new injuries on the night of the murder. He burnt a number of items behind his house soon after the murder. He had a history of being extremely physically abusive and sexually inappropriate to women. He stated a believable motive for the murder.

For the reasons above and others, Bailey has been the leading suspect in this case and it looks like the cold case team also see him as the leading suspect. But for some reason you think you know better?

You ignored this part of my post:

He said he murdered Sophie on a number of occasions. He lied about his whereabouts on the night of the murder. His whereabouts can't be backed up by anyone for a number of hours on the night. He gained new injuries on the night of the murder. He burnt a number of items behind his house soon after the murder. He had a history of being extremely physically abusive and sexually inappropriate to women. He stated a believable motive for the murder.

Maybe I am mistaken then but from what I read in the Irish Times, they were unable to get a proper sample off the gate or rocks - or at least a proper sample for the technology used for analyzing the samples at the time. Their DNA testing was inconclusive as a result but they were hoping to reanalyze again with more advanced technology as part of the latest investigation.

Bailey claimed there was DNA found that was not his or Sophie's but that was not stated by the investigators or confirmed, it was just stated by Bailey. All of that to say, it does not suggest the DNA evidence definitively said it was not Bailey just that it could not be used at the time to identify anyone. There was physical evidence but none that could be used to identify any culprit at the time.

What is definitively true - the Gardaí made an absolute shite of the investigation and of preserving the crime scene. The state pathologist also had a lot to answer for.

Ok, so no evidence for Bailey. Agreed.

Yes, never said there was DNA evidence but also not daft enough to suggest Bailey definitely did not murder her just due to an absence of conviction by the Irish justice system that fluffed the investigation. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out he had nothing to do with it but also wouldn't be surprised if it turns out, he was the murderer.

1. He said he murdered her and the people he told thought he was fully serious.
2. He lied about his whereabouts, we know this because he changed his story.
3. He has no alibi, that's far from a silly statement, far, far from it.
4. The mad turkey and the dangerous Christmas tree sounds like a fairytale. You believe in Christmas fairytales?
5. He burnt items that a forensic expert noted included items of clothing soon after the murder. Why did he lie about the fire if it was nothing?
6. He battered his partner a few months before a woman was battered to death a few kilometres down the road.

You're trying to minimise all of the above but you're failing miserably. As we saw in the McGregor case recently, the DPP are not infallible. The cold case team are assessing everything, they have looked at Alfie Lyons, they have looked at all the other conspiracy theories and it looks like they have come to the conclusion that it most likely was Bailey who committed the murder. Maybe you should send them a link to this thread and tell them to keep up.