Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1854855857859860909

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,302 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Median house price in Cork is €380k as of mid-2024. Median house price in Galway is €390k at same.

    Very far from "extremely cheap by international standards".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    If the second line is true (and it may well be), I think it's just evidence that prices of property have gone nuclear all over the West. Mass immigration and war-time levels of money printing are, I'm sure, completely unrelated to this…

    Just one more piece of the s**t-sandwich that older generations have passed on to us to deal with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    My thoughts on this.

    "HOUSEHOLDS ARE SPENDING almost as much of their incomes on mortgage repayments as they were in the latter stages of the Celtic Tiger, according to new economic analysis...

    ... On average, households spent 33% of their disposable income on mortgage repayments between July and October this year. It’s the highest share of spending on mortgages that Ireland has seen since 2007 and early 2008."

    This is interesting as this would be close to the limit of what bank's would be willing to offer retail customers in terms of DSR (mortgage payment/net income). This metric doesn't imply that people are about to start defaulting on their mortgage though unless there is a dramatic shift in the economy (which would lead to defaults regardless), but it could possibly have an affect on the demand side for house purchases if people can no longer meet the minimum DSR criteria in future applications. Though this could also mean that people downsize their expectations relative to their salary. That said, there seems to be no shortage of state/institutional demand.

    However, we seem to be entering a period where interest rates should be dropping so this should ease the pressure on DSRs for retail customers.

    "For example, for a household with a net income of €40,000, spending 33% of disposable income on mortgages repayments would equate to €13,010 per year or €1,100 per month. For a household with a net income of €65,000, it would be €21,450 per year or €1,787.50 per month."

    This is assuming that DSRs are flat across incomes. Unlikely.

    "The immediate outlook isn’t great for prospective homeowners either, with the number of homes completed in the first six months of this year lower than in the same period of 2023 (although the completion rate picked up after that)…

    Seasonal patterns typically show an increase in house completions in the final three months of the year – but it’s unlikely that home completions will exceed 33,000 by the end of this month. As a result, the ESRI is maintaining its forecast that just over 33,000 units will be completed in 2024.

    That is well short of the 52,000 homes needed per year to address the supply issue, according to the Central Bank..."

    Yes, this and net migration will keep house prices elevated. This is the most important point here.

    "The report estimates that house prices are overvalued in the region of 8% to 10%, which means that householders are particularly vulnerable to a “painful correction” of prices like that which was seen between 2007 and 2012."

    The peak to trough fall between 2007 and 2012 was around 50% and this was due to a Ponzi like housing market backed by a poorly regulated credit bubble. This is simply not the environment we find ourselves in now.

    Post edited by Rooks on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,302 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Yeah, interest rates dropping + net migration approaching 100k p.a. still + housing supply still in the low 30s = not a hope of prices dropping.

    Its a very simple equation at this stage, unfortunately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    Another rate cut. That ESRI paper needs revising. 😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 314 ✭✭Montys return


    What will be interesting to see the proportion sold to individual households as it was only about 30% of new builds last year so the figure of 30k-40k houses built in the short term won't really dampen pent up demand for homebuyers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭SummerK


    Families now taking on Celtic Tiger-level debts to buy home, ESRI report warns | Irish Independent

    I know a small number of people who have taken over 35% or more debt to their income ratio, because they desperately wanted to buy house. They're happy now because the property prices have further gone up and had they waited, they may not have been able to buy today is what some of them told me. Sad state of affairs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    big question is what % of income were they paying on rent…cause I suspect a lot of people will be paying more than 35% if they are lucky enough to find somewhere. (Especially if it’s a new build)

    According to ESRI report today property overvalued by 10%. That doesn’t mean prices will drop by 10% with the demand that is out there and the shortage of properties. Probably the best that could be hoped for is a slow down in price increases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    There is a canary in the coalmine that died a long time ago; rents being far more than mortgages. This is completely wrong and can only be effected in an inefficient (ie highly interventionalist) market. It springs to mind “free money” as often the rent on a property covers the mortgage and then some…there is no such thing as a free lunch; it is the taxpayer that is subsidising homeowners in Ireland and one’s belief in the corporate tax boon goes parallel with one’s belief in the property market; sky’s the limit essentially.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Last time I looked anyone coming to Dublin will have to budget circa €2500/mth which means no change from a €45k salary. I've long given up even trying to comprehend what this means.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,883 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The state is entering the hotel business

    20241215_002719.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    link dumping again…..

    what is your opinion on it and how does it link to this property thread or would it be better suited in some political thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    How is the tax payer subsidising homeowners, bar HTB or first home scheme?

    The tax payer is subsidising renters, through HAP and other social housing benefits, but it is not paying people's mortgages for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,883 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A rather significant milestone

    Citywest is the holding point before dispersal across the country, it's purchase represents the pernamancy of the issue. There appears to be no attempt to implement manageable quotas

    State has multiple vacant properties, inaction on converting them to some form of use displays complete incompetence in any form of housing provision.

    Barring ipa from the workforce is in itself a denying of a human right

    These and multiple other related points have a profound affect on property prices/rents



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    addressing-housing-construction-is-critical-for-the-new-v0-0qblpe63fm3e1.jpeg

    More of the same for the foreseeable, essentially.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,883 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Flush with money from taxpayers, yet simply incapable of providing infrastructure the country needs for both housing and industry

    No new large industry can be supplied with water in the greater Dublin area due to capacity constraints



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    IPA has a bigger impact on tourism than housing and is a EU wide issue. What are your other multiple points in relation to housing? Or is it just a post that belongs in the political forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,883 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Hotels as homes and homes become hotels

    Your around here long enough to know that Airbnb fills the gap of hotels full with IPA

    Tourism figures to ireland are up 8% annually in October 20024 compared to the previous year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,302 ✭✭✭Blut2


    20,000-30,000 IPA arrivals a year (as we're now predicted to get every year) has a massive impact on housing. The idea that it doesn't is just people deliberately ignoring the cold hard maths. Every additional human who arrives into this country has to be housed.

    Its the equivalent of 10,000+ housing units a year taken off the market, or almost a third of our entire yearly housing production being negated.

    Its also now costing Irish tax payers over €1bn a year, that could be better spent on housing in other ways.

    And its something that could be reduced by 90% almost overnight, if the decision was made to do so.

    So its something that definitely needs more awareness of, and rational talking about, when the housing crisis is the number one issue in the country right now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    A real black pill is that illegal aliens (which is what most "IPAs" are) make up only a fraction of the total immigration into the state. However the state has clearly shown that is actively wants this number to increase, for reasons I will not speculate on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭tigger123




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I would imagine that it's more to with supplying cheap unskilled labour and driving up rent-prices, but as I said, I don't to speculate. I don't think this is the place to discuss the Great Replacement, whether it exists or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Homeowners (not necessarily mortgage payers) are being subsidised by the tax payer in a few ways and it is utterly criminal from FF and FG to squander the gains of the last 10 years on such a narrow-minded policy which will almost certainly come and bite the country on the behind when US growth slows and with it Irish growth; belts will need to be tightened and people will be wondering where the heck is the shiny new infrastructure, the €200 per month creche and minimised doctor/hospital waiting lists in the health system.

    The FF and FG government has acted intentionally to raise house prices (which is not a secret, this has been a stated policy post-08 crash) and how can the government do this? A combination of policy and spending of tax income. Here are some of the ways the government subsidises homeowners by encouraging house prices up;

    • Policies to keep supply of properties low by, eg not reforming the planning system, not introducing policies to ramp up supply (in fact we have known for 10 years that landlords have been leaving in their droves), not discouraging mass purchases of housing estates and apartment blocks.
    • Policies to increase demand for rentals eg immigration has not been restricted at all even with no rentals available for 6+ years; in fact, employers and colleges have been continuously championed for bringing in new workers and students.
    • Spending to keep rents and house prices high including HAP, rental tax credit, H2B, shared equity scheme, giving money to local authorities and charities with mandates to buy up / rent what little supply is available, mortgage interest tax credit.

    By keeping rents high, this creates a yield on properties which of course increases their value and homeowners benefit from this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    This is a class example of why the impact of immigration on housing can’t be discussed. It’s not all extreme left or extreme right which is what most responses default to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,302 ✭✭✭Blut2


    In reality its just cold hard maths.

    If there was any other policy change that the state could introduce overnight, that would reduce spending by €1bn a year, while also simultaneously increasing the output of housing units by 10,000 units a year, can you imagine how much discussion there would be of it? How every major political party would be falling over themselves to call for it?

    But for some reason because doing exactly this involves reducing the number of asylum seekers accepted it gets very little media discussion. I would suspect because up until very recently anyone even suggesting we reduce the numbers accepted slightly was deemed a horrible racist, especially in more cosmopolitan media circles.

    The overton window is moving on the issue finally now at least, but slowly. It takes open discussion, based on statistics instead of emotion, to fully legitimise the issue and enage with it. The more people who talk about it, and look at the figures, the better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Those 3 points you raise are not subsidies to homeowners.

    Couple of things in response..

    Point 1. There is a planning reform act that will be implemented in the coming year. Judicial reviews by nimbys will be much harder to achieve.

    Point 2. If employers cannot house staff, employers will leave Ireland.

    So why would employers not house their foreign staff?

    Point 3. Govt has to spend on HAP because they dont have enough council properties.

    If you've a social housing list of 1000 families and only 100 council houses available, you need to pay market rents to house the other 900 families.

    Post edited by BlueSkyDreams on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I’m talking about the fact that the response is to label it some ‘conspiracy theory’. So automatically people default to tin hat, anti 4g, flat earthers and the topic isn’t discussed as a result. And it just goes into the bat **** crazy box.

    It needs to be discussed as you say with hard numbers and some middle ground found and not just extreme left or extreme right views.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Part of the issue is that you cant legislate for a number of inbound asylum seekers.

    It isnt legally possible to define a cap. Without a cap, you have to prepare for what you think may arrive and you had better work off the high estimate.

    Asylum immigration isnt a tap the govt can turn up or down.

    I do agree that there needs to be a better balance of control, but its very hard to control which way the wind shall blow.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,302 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Thats not accurate at all.

    In the real world a government can bring in concrete policy measures that absolutely reduce the number of inbound asylum seekers, by making the country less attractive to them.

    Denmark did exactly this back in 2016, and reduced the number of asylum seekers arriving from 21,000 a year to 1,500. A reduction of 90%+, while still remaining party to every international law and obligation that Ireland is.

    Denmark's asylum policy measures have been proven to work in the real world to dramatically reduce the numbers of asylum seekers that will arrive, and could be copied over night by the Irish state. The fact that we haven't done so is very much a choice made by our government.



Advertisement