Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Irish politics discussion thread

1215216218220221295

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The statistics are clear and factual, argue with them.

    No matter how people feel about taxation, workers up to 125% of the average income in Ireland are among the lowest taxed in the EU. Go above that, and it quickly changes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,489 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Tax credits, which not everywhere has, make a huge difference to the amount of tax paid versus the headline rates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,286 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The focus on the marginal rate to the exclusion of everything else is not useful.

    Most people will only be paying the higher rate on a small part of their income (if they pay it at all)

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,286 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,504 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Any evidence at all to back up these absurd statements?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Social Democrats reject any alliance with Labour to go into government.

    It's pretty obvious that the Social Democrats are a fringe protest party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,521 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Or playing a canny game having watched Labour and the Greens mess up in previous coalitions. At the end of the day here we are talking about politics and the art of doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    There's a place for protest parties in our Dail of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,521 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You reckon it's all over Hotmail? FF FG for ever more? Very pessimistic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The art of politics is getting your policies implemented. It is not about keeping your bums on seats, it is not about shouting and roaring from the opposition benches, it is about going into government and getting things done. We already knew there were two useless parties in the Dail - PBP and SF - who are afraid of government, but seeing the SDs join them is disappointing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,521 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think the SocDems are taking a leaf form the Shinners book. Do not go into a government with FF FG because they will hang you out to dry no matter what you do.
    Play the long game. bring their vote share down until they cannot control who governs.
    FF FG hung the party you vote for out to dry, directly challenging them during the campaign and you still trenchantly defend them. Curious to say the least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,578 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I don't see this as the soc dems skipping out. The fact is, ff+FG is too close to the majority to allow the soc dems (or Labour) use the numbers they have to be effective. Ff+FG will know that if a third party threatens to walk they can let them and go get some independents.

    If FF + FG were at like 78-80 then labour or Soc Dems would have had great leverage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,143 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    That's a very facile way of looking at things, Blanch. Get one watered down policy implemented and condemn your party to decimation by being the usual government mudguard versus continuing to build support and be able to implement substantially more in future would be another way of looking at it.

    By your reckoning, absolutely everyone should be willing to sacrifice pretty much their entire morals for a wink and a smile from the government party/parties.

    Your constant hard on for criticising SF at all times is blinding you to the fact that Opposition is an important part of holding our government to account.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That isn't what I said. I looked back recently at the Greens manifesto from 2020, and it is actually surprising how much they got done. Go back further to the Progressive Democrats and you realise that the income tax system hasn't changed much from when they were in power. Leaving a legacy is more important to me than just being in government.

    Take your favourite, Sinn Fein. If they got into power, had a successful border poll, and then faded into nothing, wouldn't most of those who voted for them be happy?

    The purpose of opposition is to provide an alternative. In that, Sinn Fein have failed. I look forward with more optimism to seeing Labour and the Social Democrats provide that opposition.

    I look at the PBP, they have been declining slightly for the last few elections as the diehard hard-left realise they aren't getting anything done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You may be right, and in fact, since the misleading post I replied to, I have seen a more nuanced approach from the SDs. They are not willing to negotiate as a left alliance with FG/FF but are willing to negotiate as a stand-alone party. I take back my post classifying them in with the no-hopers from SF and PBP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,143 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Now Blanch, you're perfectly aware I'm not a SF voter. I've consistently been very critical of them. While I favour Unification, as that isn't within the power of the Irish government to grant, it would be pretty idiotic to expect it from a SF government. I wouldn't vote for a party who activitely opposed Unification, but broadly speaking it would not be a huge consideration for me when ranking candidates to vote/transfer to.

    Certainly one could look at the Greens manifesto and acknowledge the handful of tidbits they achieved and be grateful for that. One could just as easily hypothesise on what they could've potentially achieved if they continued to grow and joined government an election cycle or two later with substantially higher representation.

    The purpose of the Opposition is absolutely not just to sit in waiting to form a future government. A strong Opposition is absolutely essential for holding government parties accountable in the current Dail session. The asking of Leader's Questions and bringing forward of Private Members Bills are an important part of our system of government.

    My comment was in response to your characterisation of SDs (I acknowledge I could have made this clearer), which I see you've acknowledged the ridiculousness of and walked back from, but the core point stands alone: if the SDs decided to strategically opt out of sacrificing themselves as a FF/FG mudguard, believing that their representation will continue to increase and allow them to eventually sit in government with a much stronger mandate, it would not make them, 'afraid' of sitting in government as you so put.

    It's also hard to understand precisely how you think SF should or could even try to form a government considering you also strongly opine that the only two realistic pathways do doing so have a mandate from their voters to not even consider coalescing with SF.

    As always, I remain eternally glad that SF remain out of government because I think they're economically incompetent and don't think that promising half the country whatever they want to hear as long as they vote for you sets up a solid basis for governance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,935 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I see the new Soc Dem TD Eoin Hayes has managed to dig a hole for himself. He had shares in a company that he used work for who have subsequently made a lot of money off of the Israeli Genocide in Gaza. Cue those shares rocketing up in value over the past year. Hayes sold his shares this summer, a month after he was elected as a councilor. The problem for him though is that he stated that he had sold them before that election. He has now issued a correction and an apology.

    As usual in politics, the damage isn't done by the initial incident but by the botched cover-up. It's probably lucky for him that this happens now at the very start of his Dail career rather than at some later date. No doubt this will thrown back at him come the next election by opponents on his left but that's a long time away now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,935 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Looks like the music stopped and Mattie didn't have a chair to sit on

    image.png

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,850 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    You'd imagine the Inds Group will take him in eventually. He certainly looks a better fit for that crew than Gogarty…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,578 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Ya, Gogarty in thst group is odd. He was on radio after election saying he'd be open to joining a grouping as long as those he joined were in favour of green agendas and such. And then he ends up with independent Ireland and the likes of the healy raes. Odd.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,850 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    A couple of more interventions like this by DHR

    Untitled Image

    could have Gogarty directing some more unparliamentary language against his own 'colleagues'

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,286 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    These 'technical groups' are the biggest load of nonsense ever.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,578 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    They're needed for speaking rights in the Dáil. It's a quirk from when the Dáil was mainly made up of parties only.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,850 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Presumably there'll be a rejigging of the technical groups if and when some of the Independents reach an agreement on supporting an FFG government, as I can't see the entire Regional Group being invited to the party, certainly not Aontu…

    I'm wondering did the Regional Group come together as a bloc with an eye to government formation, or were they just intended as a conventional technical group and Simon and Micheal took a look at them and decided

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,286 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Well maybe if you don't want to join a party you don't get the benefits of joining one.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,489 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    All Government supporting TDs would be expected to drop out, although they don't have to. Cabinet members cannot be in a TG; which is why O'Gorman hasn't joined one yet - he's still in the cabinet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,489 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They're also needed for parties with <5 TDs (formerly <7 - the 2002-7 TG had 6 Greens and 5 SF in it, rule then changed to 5)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,850 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I get that, was wondering what would become of the leftovers, who will presumably number at least the Aontu duo. Hard to see Carol Nolan getting selected either unless the rest of the Regionals insist; I'd imagine FFG would see her as at least as much potential trouble as her former colleague Peadar.

    I had assumed Mattie and two Healy Reas were automatic picks for this venture and were only being apparently left out because they didn't happen to be in the Regional Group but FF & FG might prefer the way things appear to be developing, less of an air of gombeenery about the whole enterprise. Maybe give ministerial positions to Harkin & Heneghan and they could put a vaguely 'progressive' gloss on the whole arrangement…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,099 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    I don't know what gave anyone the impression that the Healy-Raes were going to potentially support the government, never mind being the most likely candidates for it. They get their votes by couriering passport forms to Dublin and shaking hands at funerals, not by actually achieving anything.

    It'd be a risk for them to say they're going to do something in government, because they'd then be associated with any shortcomings in delivery (perceived or real).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    If there's a full term ahead, DHR will be 75 come next election. Could very well be his last term before he hands over to (presumably) his son Johnny or daughter Maura.



Advertisement
Advertisement