Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deposit return scheme (recycling) - Part 2

19798100102103132

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Nobody also mentioned as election issue what they done with roads yet 9 out of 10 people who are driving are pretty pi$$ed about sparsely used cycling highways they put up everywhere. To say that bottle magic part was small because you did not hear complaints in the media is what you wish to be true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,919 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    DRS was an issue but a small one.

    If it was a big one it would have at least come to notice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,814 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    If not DRS, what did turn voters off the Greens? Posters here are somehow quantifying it's effect as small but i would think that voters would be turned off by Green policies that they implemented in the last dail, one of which DRS, and policies they hoped to implement in the next one if they had got in. I think that any policies that cost voters time or money would cause dislike for the Greens.

    The GPs if they want to return as an effective party will have consider how schemes like DRS have damaged their party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Their vote share in polls cratered a long time before DRS came in. And realistically, people who voted Green are not going to be too surprised by Green-style actions - the people who blame them for DRS never voted for them to begin with.

    Going in to Government with FF/FG when a lot of their voters didn't want them to would be issue 1. Various massive missteps in office like the sealing the Mother & Baby Homes papers would also put off general centre-left/left voters from voting for them.

    Last time they got more seats than expected due to SF surpluses. There weren't any this time, as SFs vote declined and they ran vastly more candidates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,178 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Was over in the U.K. on the ferry last week, so on the way home stopped into Asda in Holyhead and stocked up on cans of Coke and the little Fruit Shoots the young lad loves…

    Each can/bottle will still be recycled, just in my own green bin, just as they were before, while the State loses out on the VAT…

    I'd often be up North or close to the border (only live 55 minutes away), so will always just buy up there now and recycle as normal. (still have some cans in teh fridge from my last trip up).

    So that's what this scheme has resulted in…. me buying certain products in another country to avoid having to hoard empty/sticky cans/bottles in my kitchen…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,919 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    There's no harm in getting a bargain when you can.

    I used to use that ASDA before Brexit and MUP.

    Last week I got my usual top up at the pre-fab duty free shop on the pierhead.

    72 33cl cans of Heineken for £30.

    It's 5%, brewed in Finland and a lovely beer.

    I'll put the cans in the bottle bank bin and the cardboard cases in the green bin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,178 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    anytime I ever did drink Heineken, I could only ever drink the real (5%) version that’s available literally anywhere in the world…

    The Irish (4.3%) version is heartburn inducing pi$$ wa$$er



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,919 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I like the 5% but the 4.3% doesn't bother me.

    Maybe I'm not drinking enough 🙂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Nobody who voted Green in 2020 changed their mind in 2024 because of DRS.

    Plenty of people who have never voted for the Greens have moaned and groaned about DRS since it came in and said they wouldn't vote for the party they never voted for before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,095 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Without going into personal details, I can categorically tell you that you are wrong there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    Wow. Now Re-Turn fanatics won't concede that it cost the Greens 1 vote. Not even 1. That's mind blowing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    So someone who voted for a bland European Green party stopped doing so because of a bland European Green initiative?

    I'm not sure they knew what they were voting for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,814 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Well i think they would know what they were voting for after dealing with the time and effort involved in recycling through the DRS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    Maybe it was when they figured out it wasnt Europe that decided to introduce a half baked DRS on top of bin collections we already pay for.

    Or that it wasnt Europe that decided to force customers into shops to get their money back to pander to retailers. Gombeen decisions like that might have had an impact on votes.

    Post edited by jj880 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,392 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Maybe they didn't really. Especially beyond first preference votes.

    But a lot of people who voted for this "bland European Green party" stopped doing so, both first preference voters and transfer voters.

    So it is plausible to suggest the manner of the DRS scheme here and the issues in its rollout had a negative impact on GP votes, among other factors.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    My post didn't reference Europe as in the EU; it referenced the fact that the Greens are generic bland European style Green party; and they implemented exactly what you'd expect from that.

    If someone actually voted for them in 2020 and changed their mind due to DRS; they didn't understand what they were voting for in 2020. They got precisely what they voted for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    Well I think its fair to have assumed you meant Europe as in the EU here:

    bland European Green initiative

    I'd be interested to see Ossian's election promises from 2020.

    I dont think we're going to agree that if someone voted for the Greens in 2020 and wasnt impressed with Re-Turn it's the voter's fault for not knowing or being able to predict what the Greens are about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    No, to assume I meant the EU required completely misreading or misinterpreting the post.

    If you vote for someone without knowing what they intend to do, yeah, that's your fault. But I also don't believe that 99% of the "I didn't vote Green this time because of DRS!" claimants ever voted Green in their entire lives.

    You can't be shocked when a Green party does Green things. I didn't vote for them as consider them awful neoliberal twats, but plenty of people did in 2020.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    https://www.greenparty.ie/sites/default/files/2022-03/GREEN_PARTY_TOWARDS_2030-WEB-VERSION.pdf

    "We propose the immediate implementation of our Waste Reduction Bill to reduce the use of single use plastics and provide a nationwide deposit and return scheme for beverage containers."

    This is what the Greens promised in 2020. That is what they delivered.

    I originally said that "Nobody who voted Green in 2020 changed their mind in 2024 because of DRS."

    I should have said that "Nobody who voted Green in 2020 changed their mind in 2024 because of DRS, unless they were too stupid to know what they were voting for in 2020" but I didn't want to point the last bit out. Unfortunately, it seems that some wanted to point it out for themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,392 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    And in 2020:

    Did they propose a botched rollout with confusion about what was and wasn't in scope, people being charged deposits on ineligible items?

    Did they propose a scheme with unreliable machines?

    Did they propose a scheme with retailers giving them a huge exemption size, far larger than in the countries that were continually pointed to as examples of a working scheme?

    Did they propose a scheme where deposits could only be returned in stores?

    Why propose a scheme without RVMs are council depots? Why no bulk machines?

    Were they "too stupid" (your words) to know that all of that would needlessly **** off people on the fence about DRS or who might be generally disposed to it?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    I dont see how the rabbit hole of "did people know what they were voting for in 2020" changes the original point here which was Re-Turn cost the Greens votes in THIS election. You think the Greens care that maybe voters "werent up to speed on what the Greens are really about" in 2020. Theyre all out except for 1.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,547 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    Exactly. I live a few doors down from a small shop and a coffee shop. My front garden frequently has rubbish thrown into it through our hedge. Cans, bottles, coffee cups, crisp packets etc. There has been no reduction in the amount of plastic bottles and cans entering into my garden from litterers since the introduction of this scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Its not a rabbit hole to point out that anyone who stopped voting for the Greens due to DRS didn't know what they were voting for.

    But also, more likely, doesn't actually exist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    You could also argue it's the Green's fault for not keeping voters happy or predicting how they would respond to Re-Turn.

    Is it reasonable to expect Green voters in 2020 to predict how anti-customer and anti-shop staff Ireland's implementation of a DRS would turn out to be?

    Maybe Ossian's next interview will be:

    Interviewer: "So Ossian what do you think cost you and your party seats?"

    Ossian: "People who voted for us last time were too thick to predict what we'd do after the last election. It's their fault. Not ours"

    While frantically waving 3 disposable vapes about in each hand.

    Interviewer: "Err… ok".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    https://www.rte.ie/news/2024/1121/1482275-marine-litter/

    "Coastwatch Ireland co-ordinator for Wexford Mick Berry said that awareness campaigns and community clean-up efforts over the past decade have brought about a decline in marine litter but "since February 2024, the newly introduced deposit/return system on plastic drinks, bottles and cans has really made a difference".

    "Now most bottles found on the shore are either old with a pre-tethered cap, or milk bottles," he said.

    However, the survey found that plastic cutlery, straws and expanded polystyrene containers banned under EU and Irish law since July 2021 remain a problem."

    When you introduce a financial incentive, litter reduces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The desperation to blame DRS for the Greens losing votes, is only matched by the desperation to blame DRS for price increases. Not a shred of evidence for either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,919 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    That's disappointing.

    Some people have such a sense of entitlement that they think it's ok to buy a drink whenever they want one and litter the container.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,392 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    All those lost Green votes a mystery.

    Not a shred of evidence of explanation as to where they went. Nothing to do with DRS. Not one vote, no sir.

    Maybe the ballots got lost.

    As for price increases, is it "only matched by the desperation" (your words) to misrepresent the CPI as being applicable to the type of increases that could be associated with DRS especially in relation to size and price of multipacks, withdrawal of items from the market etc
    Or did you forget you haven't provided a shred of evidence for its applicability either?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    No mystery to me. I predicted it. A consequence of serving in government. A repeated pattern.



Advertisement