Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1853854856858859909

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,620 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Easy solution - relax LTI limits to 5x income, 6x with exemption!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    would make zero difference besides pushing prices higher. The issue is that even if we built 60k houses a year I don’t believe it will resolve the housing problem because the only thing capping immigration at the moment is the difficulty in finding accommodation… increase in housing will more than likely lead to increased immigration swallowing up the increase in supply of housing. And this is where the problem exists imo. We need immigration to fill jobs and keep Country running but the increase in population increases rents and house prices and makes housing crisis worse.

    Easy answer would be to stop immigration till we have enough houses but that just moves the problem elsewhere (hospitals, transport etc unable to fill critical roles….. large multinational unable to fill key roles and start looking to relocate etc.). The million dollar question is how do you overcome this?

    Obvious answer is build enough houses but that requires the need for more immigration (builders etc) who need somewhere to live. So you either put incentives in place to attract builders (free accommodation, specific tax credits etc) and fast track building or you prioritise critical roles (builders, doctors, nurses etc.) and restrict immigration where possible.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    That's effectively already happening for FTBs buying new builds under 500k thanks to the First Home Scheme.

    Soon to be applied to second hand homes as well.

    And then no doubt applied to limits of 550k, 600k etc etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,620 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Tongue in cheek - relaxing LTI rules is a terrible idea. When the central bank did it a few years back from 3.5 to 4.5x income all it did was make prices jump, no benefit to supply.

    Throwing more money at the demand side of the equation will never fix anything



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    It's what the public wanted. The 3.5 LTI rule was very unpopular to those who didn't understand Economics.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,302 ✭✭✭Blut2


    All immigration is not the same, the idea that the state has to be either letting everyone in or nobody in has been an attack line used by those on the left for years. "If you want to reduce immigration then where will we get our nurses?!?" etc. Not saying that you're saying this mind you - but the media does, repeatedly. When in reality it would be totally possible to restrict some immigration, while letting other immigration continue (or even increase). And thats what most people want to do.

    ie increase the numbers of doctors/nurses/qualified construction workers/people filling expert and high tax paying 80k+ p.a. jobs given work permits. But reduce the work permits issued to anyone else significantly. And reduce the number of asylum seekers accepted significantly.

    Thats a policy thats easily/practically achievable pretty much over night, would be wildly popular with 90% of the electorate, and would make an immediate impact on the housing market. It would be possible to reduce yearly arrivals by 40-50k. Thats a huge number of people no longer requiring housing.

    Maybe if II or the rural INDs are part of our next government we might get some policy moving in this direction, I guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,580 ✭✭✭Roberto_gas


    20-25% rise next year in pockets and good quality homes. Avg 10-15%..drivers


    - interest rates falling

    -supply low

    -rents still high

    If they introduce HTB to old builds it will fire up second hand market further



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I agree with most of what you are saying but the question is what restrictions do you impose and what will be the knock on impacts….e.g.

    you could reduce foreign students overnight but then funding needs to be increased to universities.

    You could reduce immigration to high skilled paid roles but if that creates shortages of staff then companies will look to different jurisdictions to do the work or we end up with shortages in things like car mechanics, trades people etc. where do you draw the line and how often is updated.

    I fully agree it’s not an all or nothing which is the default argument as you say. But I don’t believe housing can be fixed without taking this dynamic into consideration…say for example we double housing output but at the same time immigration doubles then we are no better off than we are today.

    What amazes me is that it’s not discussed as much as hap or htb, as even all the housing forecasts have it as a key driver of future housing needs and as a nation we can surely discuss it without defaulting to an extreme left or an extreme right view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,302 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Reduce asylum seeker numbers by approx 90% by copying Denmark's policies - thats a roughly 25,000 yearly reduction of the least productive, and most expensive numbers arriving. We're spending €1bn a year housing asylum seekers at present, and close to another €1bn a year on other supports.

    The entire higher education budget at the moment is €2.5bn. An extra €500mn (saved from the above) would allow for a big cut in foreign student numbers with the income just replaced with higher funding from the government. Student:teacher ratios would also improve at our 3rd level institutions with this too, which is a big (and growing for years) problem. And capacity in student housing for Irish students, which is also a very big (and growing) problem. Reducing the number of international student visas by 50% would be 5000-10000 new arrivals a year cut.

    Eliminate non-EU work permits for the lowest 25% of pay / skill roles (with exceptions for emergency/care workers) and thats another approx 10,000 new arrivals a year eliminated (they're running at about 40k a year at the moment). At present the minimum salary for a work visa is only €34k a year - how is it acceptable to be bringing people into the country on a work permit at that low level of income / expertise during a housing crisis? (again with exceptions for emergency/care workers)

    Combined thats 40,000+ humans fewer a year arriving in Ireland, requiring housing - with very little cost to the overall economy. That figure over five or ten years of the housing crisis adds up massively. And I'm sure there are other tweaks to be made that would help too, they're just the ones I've heard of.

    I agree it is very strange how our runaway population growth gets very little coverage in all the very lengthy discussion of the housing crisis, though. Its the number one factor propelling it now, and is starting to get discussed in forums like this, but its never discussed in the media or by politicians still. I'd suspect because too many people are still afraid of being called racist for even mentioning the obvious - that its not reasonable or sustainable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,215 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    A combination of those things is required imo. A more focused approach to immigration away towards what is needed by Ireland as a country rather than merely the needs of employers. Employers' requirements should be considered but should not be the sole basis of immigration.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,215 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    "I agree it is very strange how our runaway population growth gets very little coverage in all the very lengthy discussion of the housing crisis, though. Its the number one factor propelling it now, and is starting to get discussed in forums like this, but its never discussed in the media or by politicians still. I'd suspect because too many people are still afraid of being called racist for even mentioning the obvious - that its not reasonable or sustainable."

    I would agree with the above. The problem is that too many influential people with connections benefit from the crisis as it stands so there isn't the political will to change things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,252 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Accross Europe 4LTI is common, it 5LTI by some banks in the UK

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks




  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Across Europe mortgage arrears are uncommon compared to Ireland, and even more so in the UK.

    Across Europe repossessions are common compared to Ireland, and even more so in the UK.

    If Irish banks cannot enforce mortgage contracts, it is reasonable to expect that LTIs should be lower here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    I'll repeat my above post here and include the post I was responding to. I've also bolded the important point of that post.

    "relaxing LTI rules is a terrible idea. When the central bank did it a few years back from 3.5 to 4.5x income all it did was make prices jump, no benefit to supply.

    Throwing more money at the demand side of the equation will never fix anything"

    "It's what the public wanted. The 3.5 LTI rule was very unpopular to those who didn't understand Economics."

    I hope that's clearer now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    The silence on immigration is indeed strange. It's obvious that the housing crisis is a direct result of immigration, but this only began to be discussed openly in recent years, when it became too large to ignore. The question of why this happened is one to consider alright.

    I think it's a combination of social pressure, apathy and greed. Humans are a very consensus-driven species, so when something is considered outside the realm of discussion, few will talk about it for fear of social consequences. This is not unfounded, for labeled as a "racist" in this day and age can have severe repercussions.

    Regarding apathy, if someone is comfortable in the life, they probably won't look far beyond it. If one has a mortgage-free house in a nice part of the country and plenty of money, life is quite good here, and there are PLENTY of distractions. This allows a person to indulge in what I would call "luxury beliefs", and given that being against immigration is seen as being low-class, these people are very unlikely to ask too many questions.

    Lastly, we have greed. How many people are making a fortune off the immigration crisis? I have an uncle who is letting a house too god knows how many foreigners, and that's just the lower end of the scale. How many business owners are using cheap immigrant labour? How many landlords are renting property to the state to house "refugees"?

    Unfortunately, a problem cannot be ignored in order to make it go away. Until recently, the enormous costs of mass immigration were paid mostly by lower-class people, which is why they were the first to complain. However, it's now spreading. My mom's family are very much upper middle class (Dublin 4), but my cousins are nearly all unable to buy a home anywhere near their parents. I myself had to move to Wexford to get a decent house, and I'm aware that being able to buy anything at all makes me a lucky one.

    Anyways…bit of a rant, but it's coffee break, and what better way to pass it than to ponder the death of Western civilization.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 314 ✭✭Montys return


    Is it buying a house in Wexford that has heralded the death of Western Civilization?

    The straw that broke the camel's back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Indeed. I can barely keep the orcs out of the garden….

    More seriously that is not what I said. Please don't use strawmans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Price rises next year are definitely on the cards unless there is a big economic shock.

    HTB to be extended to 2nd hand homes

    ECB interest rates to fall dramatically given the state of the German and French economies

    A healthy domestic economy

    FDI doesn't seem to be slowing down anytime soon.

    10%+ growth could be on the cards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭Zenify


    Lots of people keep mentioning help to buy for second hand homes being introduced. I can't find anything about this. Has this been confirmed or are people making stuff up?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 305 ✭✭Brasso


    It's nothing definite yet but there has been some talk of extending the First home scheme (rather than help to buy) to 2nd hand homes. I think it was also suggested that HtB could be extended to €40k max, up from €30k. But I'm not sure if there's any tak of bringing the HtB to 2nd hand homes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    was mentioned in the elections….Just idea at this stage and hopefully will stay that way



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,507 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2024/1205/1484914-number-of-landlords-in-ireland-up-5-7-rtb-figures-show/

    Article on RTE yesterday evening stating a 5.7% increase in the number of landlords from Sept 2023 to Sept 2024, an increase of roughly 6,000 to 104,327.

    It does also state that also that landlords issued almost 4,000 notices of termination.

    This data seems to show that landlords are not leaving in their droves as has often been mentioned throughout this and other threads.

    The RTB director stated that "Some landlords in the Dublin area are reappearing regionally and moving their investment."

    Seems that rent caps are making them re-evaluate their investment and see better opportunities in certain regional areas where these are less stringent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Hopefully, but one way or the other, they'll be firing up the funny-money press and flooding it into the market. This is inflationary in nature, and the people making the decisions know that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I suspect the reason why landlords are not selling up in droves is because the type who were typically exiting the market are now all gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    is that an increase in no of registered properties with RTB……if so it might just be a case of landlords being put under pressure to register so tax credit can be claimed by renter and not be an actual increase….very hard to know



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    Could be the replacement of single landlords with institutional landlords, the latter of which would tend to do things by the book?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    “The UK statistics agency defines properties costing more than five years of income as “unaffordable”.

    The above is a line from an article in the FT today that said only the top 10% could afford to buy a property in England  with less than five years of household income in the year to March 2023.

    If we were to apply this matrix to the Irish market what % would we be looking at?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 641 ✭✭✭J_1980


    most of ireland would be affordable (except Dublin) to couples.

    Non-Dublin Irish property is extremely cheap by international standards.



Advertisement