Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland's Refugee Policy cont. Please read OP before posting

17677798182142

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Denmark got their policies wrong, paddy won't be doing that- next 1000 to a field in athlone, ta.

    Deliveroo will increase their prices n lure people from more essential work - I've literally heard it all now. All one can do is laugh!

    Uptake of employment, marvelous how many can pay their way? Also unemployment stats for Africans here per the census are dreadful, 40% Nigerians unemployed other countries worse again- not dreadful for the refugee industry and it's shills naturally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Yes it's ridiculous to suggest a profitable business would up it's wages in light of staff shortages. Aside from that I think you're vastly over-estimating the amount of IPAs working for Deliveroo.

    I think the stats you're referring to are out of date and precede changes made in the right to work for IPAs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    ”Like it or not (and it seems to upset some people very much) there does seem to be quite a high uptake of employment amongst asylum seeking people in Ireland, so any demands they put on services or emergency accommodation would still have to be met.”

    What are you basing that on?

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/social-affairs/2024/08/28/hiqa-80-of-mosney-centre-residents-have-refugee-status-but-are-unable-to-move-out/

    Looks to me like the vast majority of them are still wholly dependent on the state even after securing right to remain etc?
    If there’s such high uptake of employment amongst them as you suggest surely a good deal of them ought be capable of supporting themselves?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    That article is behind a paywall so I can't read it.

    Not being able to move out might be related to not being able to find or afford accommodation, as opposed to not working.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Regardless of the circumstances of their inability to move out, the bottom line is that the vast majority of them remain totally dependent on the state

    Their inability to support themselves doesn’t really jive with your assertions that they’re generally good workers that will be a boon to the state.

    Adding tens of thousands of additional dependents to the housing list appears to me to be nothing more than an enormous drain on resources no?

    Do you understand the concept of opportunity cost? We’re spending into the billions of euro on all of this accommodation and other costs - that money could be spent instead on more schools, hospitals, public infrastructure, granting free public transport to all etc…y’know, things that actually IMPROVE our country and benefit the people of our country.

    Instead we’re pissing it away to allow these people to tread water for another year until they can go on the housing list and cost us more money. It’s senseless waste.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    The point I'm making is that a lot of low paid workers are dependent on the state.

    I think the idea that emergency accommodation costs for IPAs would simply disappear in their absence is a fallacy. Other low paid workers would be required to fill their positions, who themselves would require emergency accommodation of some sort.

    Personally I think there might be scope for attempting to reduce the numbers working in certain low paid jobs, but I think it should be attempted on a smaller scale and in a very deliberate manner so as not to disrupt essential services. I don't think it's anywhere near as straightforward as saying we don't give work-permits for certain roles. Typically, having lower entry requirements, it's relatively easy for people to move between low paid roles and we have to protect jobs which are essential or positively impact the economy in other ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭NattyO


    What would the country do without deliveroo eh?

    Well, we'll find out in a couple of years, when the likes of Manna drone deliveries put them out of business…….

    I suppose all the IPA's will then magically become highly trained drone pilots!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Nobodies saying the costs would disappear, but tens of thousands of fewer dependents would go a hell of a ways to reducing the enormous costs

    Just because we already have dependent low paid workers here doesn’t mean we have unlimited capacity for every other one in the world. Far, far from it.

    It’s the same line of reasoning as people that say “sure there are Irish people abusing the system here too so who cares if extra people come in and do the same” - yeah of course there are, but that doesn’t mean we should let everyone else abuse the system, it means we should deal with the abusers and reform the system, not become permissive of abuse from everyone.

    Basically, yeah we’ve our own dependents already - adding tens of thousands to that burden (and that’s only 1 year in this “new normal”) makes it a lot worse. Allowing it to continue is just digging a deeper and deeper hole for ourselves - there are literally billions of people out there, we will never ever be able to get on top of this. Let’s face reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Quite a few people seem to think that costs would disappear from what I read on this thread.

    I'm not so sure there'd be as many less dependents as you think either.

    Do you think low paid workers who rely on state support are 'abusing the system'? I don't mean to put words in your mouth but that's the impression I get.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    Are there certain posters on a commission every time they mention Deliveroo?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 891 ✭✭✭Juran


    How comes other countries eg. Australia, UAE, Qatar, can bring in lowskilled workers via legal issused visa's -- health care assistants, cleaners, porters, kitchen workers, etc.. Lots of countries operate this way, why can't Ireland ?

    Note; I am not saying I agree with the treatment of low paid workers in certain ME countries, I am referring only to their visa/ work permit process.

    Post edited by Juran on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    We do bring in people through these systems and also people from the EU can come work here where ever they like.

    They still need somewhere to live. Given our housing shortages that's going to cost the state one way or another.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,800 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Other groups as you put it are Irish and legal workers from abroad unless you prefer it spent on asylum seekers. Those workers who come from the EU and non EU on work permits are still bound not to be a burden on the state .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,438 ✭✭✭halkar


    There is a big difference between permit holders and asylum seekers. People get their work permit, come to state and start working. From day one they have to provide for themselves. They don't cost anything to state.

    I be happy if government handed out work permits and welcome packs at the airports, ports, train stations and send them their merry way rather than going in the black hole of asylum process and providing for years with little or no chance of deporting anyone. No asylum process, no food, no accommodation, no money. Believe me most of them will not last few months and leave. Once human traffickers find out this Ireland will be at buttom of the list in their catalogues and then we can work on helping genuine refugees either on shore or off shore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    ”Do you think low paid workers who rely on state support are 'abusing the system'? I don't mean to put words in your mouth but that's the impression I get”

    No I do not, they are as entitled to state support as anyone else

    However, if that same person travelled to another country in which they’ve never paid a cent of taxes and claimed asylum under false pretences and availed of that country’s state supports then yes that would be abusing the system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,800 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    You seem to have the opinion that low paid workers require emergency accommodation They would be EU and Irish who manage without much state support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    The private housing market is at full capacity.

    Pretty much for every additional person that enters somebody must leave.

    The person leaving will be entitled to emergency accommodation or homeless support.

    As it is it seems a small number of low paid workers are living on the streets. I'm not sure it's feasible, or right, to think that this would increase and allow the state to be relatively off the hook.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭Rosahane


    Our overly generous social welfare system is a big pull factor.

    Other than medical supports our unemployment benefits should be based on paid PRSI contributions and pay related. This should reduce significantly over time to encourage recipients to seek work.

    Basic social welfare should be just enough on which to live - maybe half the current rates.There should also be a household cap which would include carers allowances and any other household payments.

    Same with disability benefits which should be generous to those with genuine disabilities and levels and grants based on the degree of disability. Many of what are considered disabilities do not preclude working.

    The minimum wage should be a living wage, zero hour contracts should be outlawed.

    … lots more opportunities out there as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,438 ✭✭✭halkar


    It will be easier for Irish to leave the state, come back after destroying their documents and claim asylum in their own country. Why bother working their @ss off and still can't afford accommodation while others will be getting 400k houses.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    This is exactly why the Government needs to restrict the numbers of Student visas, limit benefits, step up deportations… there's no where to house any new comers in this country, that's a basic fact…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,680 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    The mental gymnastics of the first part. Are you suggesting that because they didn’t go to a journalist as soon as the tweets were posted that their concerns aren’t valid? And how do you know they didn’t anyway. There is no time limit on being aghast by the actions of a politician btw



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭NattyO


    To be fair, the poster has come a long way in a very short time - from he never said that, it's a far right lie to OK, he said it, but it wasn't in the papers for ages so it doesn't matter - that's progress.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    It's possible these 'whistleblowers' went to the journalist some time before the story appeared in Gript.ru.

    But why didn't the Sunday Times print it then? Did they not take it seriously?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    It's still a far-right lie.

    O Gorman didn't issue tweets invite people here or promise them anything. A commitment to end direct-provision, (which itself was part of the program for Government), together with a white paper full of warnings and limitations on what a replacement might look does not constitute a promise.

    Nothing will change those facts.

    If you want further proof of this simply look at the reaction of Refugee NGO's at the time, basically describing the whole thing as a wishy-washy nothing burger.

    https://www.hotpress.com/opinion/minister-roderic-ogorman-published-government-white-paper-on-ending-direct-provision-22843612



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭NattyO


    You can describe it as a lie as many times as you wish, his own department and his own government colleagues admitted the truth of it, and it caused a measurable increase in asylum seekers coming here for the free houses Roderic promised them (and who can blame them?).

    The fact that you are trying to minimise the reaction of those who raised concerns, and the childish name-calling of a media outlet that dared to publish the valid criticism of darling Roderic makes it clear you know the truth, but want it covered up, like so many others uncomfortable truths about our insane asylum policy.

    By the way, you need to give Roderic the heads-up that he didn't say these things, because he doesn't seem to know it - here he is repeating them in a newspaper (hopefully the indo isn't too "Russian" for you):

    Asylum-seekers will get keys to their own homes and will be able to work - policy to end Direct Provision revealed

    “The accommodation will be own-door for families, and provide the privacy and independence so many were not afforded over the past two decades,” Mr O’Gorman said.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/asylum-seekers-will-get-keys-to-their-own-homes-and-will-be-able-to-work-policy-to-end-direct-provision-revealed/40133273.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭enricoh


    The just eat lads will be paying our pensions, as soon as deliveroo hikes it's rates them lads will too- sorted!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,219 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Wonder why the SDs, Labour and PBP weren't at the debate last night?

    If they weren't invited one would imagine they would be screaming blue murder about being left out but not a peep out of them.

    Surely the reason couldn't be that immigration is a topic where they are just happy to sit it out and debate housing and health instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I'll deal with the rest of your points when I have the time.

    But first when you make a claim that 'his own department' are putting the increase in asylum seekers down to these tweets, what's your basis for this?

    And who are the government colleagues who believe this?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,680 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    inaccurate. He did not say the tweets were misrepresented by the far right. Here is the exchange about the tweets

    Sandra: the one you tweeted inviting everybody in 8 different languages

    ROG: no I’ve never invited anybody, that’s a piece of far right rumour

    Sandra: you didn’t send that?

    ROG: no tweet like that was sent

    Sandra: somebody hacked your twitter?

    ROG: no one hacked. There wasn’t any such tweets

    Sandra: so that was a red herring, that never happened? You did not invite in eight different languages?

    ROG; nope that never happened

    Sandra: so why have you not defended that?

    ROG: I have, I have said it every time that it has been brought up to me on the media, on television, in the dail

    Sandra: and have you looked into where it came from, I mean that’s serious, that’s a huge part of why people are totally against you at the moment

    ROG: yeah I’m aware

    Sandra: the children, the tusla files, the abused children

    ROG: now which files?


    nowhere does he say his tweets were misrepresented. He made it sound like the tweets never existed at all



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement