Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Luas Finglas

1272830323335

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,638 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Sure, but then Munich has a Metro population of 6 million! That is the population of the whole of Ireland.

    So you do need to adjust for the difference in size. We probably should build DU eventually, but by comparison we have 1/2 DART lines, 2 tram lines and 0 Metros. So we have a long way to go before we get to that point IMO.

    I'd look to Amsterdam and Copenhagen as examples as they are closer in population. Though worth noting that Copenhagen had a tram network, but got rid of it in the past and as a result are almost as reliant on city buses as we are with a similar sized bus fleet, while Amsterdam has just 1/10th the number of buses. They regret getting rid of the trams and are considering building some tram lines. For me this is the prove that trams are a competitor for buses, not Metro/DART.

    To be honest, I think we are pretty lucky with the heavy rail network we have, I think it can make a great basis for a solid commuter network. Lines going North and South of the city and two to the West, that is pretty good for a city our size. I think we just need to make better use of them like we plan with DART+



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,099 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    I don’t think Copenhagen is anywhere near as reliant on buses as Dublin is.

    They have a suburban train network and two metro lines which are excellent.

    Buses feed in to them and bikes aren’t an issue on the suburban trains any time.

    Sitting on a bus for an hour in the Copenhagen area is an absolutely rarity unlike here.

    But it’s definitely a city worth contrasting Dublin with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,434 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Munich built that first central tunnel when it wasn't much bigger than the size that Dublin is today: the S-Bahn was a major driver of the city's metropolitan area growth from the 1970s onward… But you shouldn't think I was saying Munich is a good equivalent to Dublin: it's geographically a completly different beast, located in the middle of a plain with hinterland all around, and located on a major crossroads in Central Europe (a role it took over after Prague ended up behind the Iron Curtain, but which is gradually reverting back to the Czech city).

    But my point on DU was that, as planned, it is not going to provide a classic "S-Bahn" core line as seen across Europe. Ironically, the Phoenix Park Tunnel fills this role better, connecting the mainlime stations, although the change at Heuston/Heuston West is a pain in the arse. I'm in two minds about whether the DU route should be replaced by a Metro: there are positives and negatives to both choices.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,638 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Oh, absolutely, I wasn't suggesting otherwise. Obviously Copenhagen is well ahead of us with with 7 S-Tog (DART) lines and 4 Metro lines.

    The point more was that like ourselves, Copenhagen has over 1,000 buses in it's city bus fleet. Whilst Amsterdam has just 160! The difference between those two cities is Amsterdams tram network that largely takes the place of buses. Both cities have similar heavy rail and Metro network.

    The overall point is trams largely replace buses, not heavy rail which is what was be suggested earlier.

    I do feel we are at the max capacity of our bus routes (or near to it) and need to seriously think of converting most of the core corridors to Luas.

    @KrisW1001 Yes, I totally agree, I'm also in two minds about the EAST - West corridor and if it should be DART or Metro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The metro area population of Munich is nowhere near 6 million. That figure has been bandied about here before and it's just wrong. It comes from the attached pdf (linked as the source in wikipedia) and in the very same file it says that the so called metro region around Munich is the size of Belgium! Given that, you can indeed claim that the metro region around Dublin encompasses most of the populated parts of the island including Belfast. Obviously that would be nonsense and not what any of us would consider to be the metropolitan region around a city. Dublin and Munich pre-Stammstrecke (Interconnector) are extremely similar, both in terms of existing infrastructure and population. Munich built it all around the Stammstrecke.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20190620162344/https%3A//www.metropolregion-muenchen.eu/uploads/pics/EMM_Poster_Daten_und_Fakten.pdf



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The huge benefit of an east-west heavy rail option over metro is that you get a massive multiplier effect on the existing infrastructure. You multiply its value enormously and can add huge capacity because you are no longer terminating at Heuston or Connolly. You are also bring people into the core city centre quickly. That's why several cities have built Interconnectors that connect their disparate heavy rail lines, of one sort or another.

    Should we build more Luas, absolutely. Should we build a Luas that pretty much parallels a heavy rail route rather than diverting those funds to an Interconnector, no, not in my opinion. Everyone can choose their poison though. I always thought we we making a huge mistake by stalling on the Interconnector and the exact route to me was immaterial as long as it allowed through-running and there was decent interchange between the two branches of the planned X. Tara, Pearse, whatever. The fact the northern line is looking like it will be quad tracked adds a further reason to connect it to the Kildare route witha direct tunnel under the city centre. There could be a 3 minute headway at peak times which would be hard to saturate, even with dozens of perpendicular feeder buses into the two lines. Remember when the DART originally opened the DART Feeder buses were an integral part of the system. They should be once again but you need the capacity to be pushing bus loads of people into the DART network.

    Anyway I think I have gone off topic enough here in this Finglas Luas thread, a project I support as it offers the people of Finglas a quick connection to the heavy rail network at Broombridge and runs largely on its own dedicated alignment. It's a perfect application of Luas to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 transfer90


    https://www.dublinlive.ie/news/dublin-news/finglas-luas-one-step-closer-30364457?int_source=nba



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 transfer90


    The Finglas Luas line is one step closer as a railway order application has been submitted to An Bord Pleanala.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    Would I be right in thinking that the biggest technical challenge is the bridge over Tolka Valley Park?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,141 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    That and how Broombridge is getting reconfigured to allow the luas to cross the railway are, I believe, the biggest two.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,805 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Website for the RO is given as

    www.luasfinglasro.ie

    Site does not, yet, exist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 305 ✭✭Thunder87


    I'd say the bridge over the rail line and canal while doing a 90 degree turn and gaining significant height over a short distance will be a much bigger challenge

    The Tolka is barely more than a stream where they're presumably crossing it

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/4Hef5bkt58Khc2GL6?g_st=ac



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    Yeah I hadn't considered it going over the rail line. That'll be interesting to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    If metrolink happens, what are its expected hours of operation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Depends on whether they want to flatten the track, thereby needing a longer fetch over the valley.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    Yeah im surprised they are not just running it over the existing Quaternion bridge…that section seems like its being way over engineered and i wouldn't be surpirsed if the cost of that alone runs into the hundreds of millions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,434 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    That bridge is barely 6 metres wide between the walls, and it skews slightly, further reducing the usable width: there's only one traffic lane there now, plus a footpath.. even if you gave it over completely to Luas, you could not get two trams side by side across it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,608 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    That video was really useful, thanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭OisinCooke


    The amount of grassed-over tracks on the route - nearly its entirety is amazing! Flyover looks amazing and really helpful to see it all visualised

    Post edited by OisinCooke on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,099 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Really does look the business.

    Have often stood at Broombridge station and stop trying to visualise the trams getting over the far side of the canal!!

    It’s actually looks a lot easier than I imagined.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 755 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Thanks for the link.

    I said it at the time of planning, but the distance to the first stop (1.3km to St Helena's) is very long, especially given the plans to redevelop the industrial estate. The gap feels even longer when you see it on video.

    For comparison, the distance between stops in the Docklands is 400-500m and about 500-600m in the Carrickmines area.

    Hopefully a future stop can be added near the park once the redevelopment of the area really kicks off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 305 ✭✭Thunder87


    Same, I used to walk along the canal there fairly regularly and often wondered how they'd manage it, but looking at that its surprisingly boring and simple.

    In fact looking at the whole video just leaves me wondering where the huge cost is coming from, the majority of it is across green space with very little disruption or complication



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,364 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Looks good. The one missed opportunity I feel, and I said it years ago during the consultations, is not bridging over the Finglas bypass at the end of Mellows Park, where the roundabout is now. Not having to cross such a busy road at grade would be a good help.

    The P&R is visible but vehicle access/egress not shown. Doesn't look very convenient for users getting to/from the station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Only possible location far enough from Broombridge would be just inside the park, that wasn't getting through planning now, but could be added later if locals demand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    Yeah, fully agree. A Luas stop in the park is probably not going to happen, but would be useful for people who live along Tolka Valley Road, even down at Scribblestown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,817 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    What are the planned disruptions for Broombridge Luas and the Inter City rail-line during construction?
    I'd guess it would be minimal enough for the Luas (perhaps the current end-point might have to be moved 30 metres eastwards when they start adding the new track?). But the bridge over the canal&rail looks like something that would need the rail-line to be closed for a period of time.

    Or perhaps they've thought of that and it gets constructed off-site and then 'slotted in' (highly technical phrase that) over a long weekend?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,801 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Haven't looked at it, but if it's not a bridge that they lower into place over night, I'll eat my hat, and anyone else's hat for that matter.

    Basically, zero disruption for the mainline rail is my expectation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 305 ✭✭Thunder87


    That's usually what's done for things like that, get all the prep work done first then just throw a huge amount of workers and machinery at it to get the disruptive part done over a short period.

    Something like this, albeit a bit more complicated with being curved and having the canal and existing bridge to deal with, but I'd guess it could be built pre-cast and lifted into place



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Large amount of at grade junctions... also could they not put cycle tracks along the length of it ?



Advertisement