Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1122912301232123412351849

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Why do you waste so much time to write such utter stutter .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,437 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Trying to keep up with the thread the last couple of days, and there is too much doom and gloom here I think.
    New Zealand are always going to be a top quality team, being within a score up to the last 10 minutes and conceding a try to stretch it beyond a score isn’t the worst performance ever.

    Our defensive tenacity was impressive throughout, and we didn’t give them many opportunities for a line break, considering McKenzie, Jordan and Telea were all kept quiet that says a lot. Jordan only scored an overlap on the line, possibly the one time they out-manoeuvred our defence.

    The biggest annoyance is the lineout, followed by knock-ons, and lastly conceding ruck penalties. Against NZ there will always be a few ruck turnovers/penalties so I wouldn’t focus on that, the knock-ons are surprising but a slight adjustment could fix that, the real problem is the inconsistency at the lineout.

    We simply cannot make up the difference elsewhere if we can’t be sure of our own lineout ball, it’s too much of a momentum killer, we aren’t going to make line-breaks or 50-22 kicks that often to make up for losing attacking lineouts especially.

    I think the best approach now would be to freshen up the starting 15 with 2 or 3 changes, and to tweak the game-plan to try to have fewer knock-ons, and of course spend the week figuring out how to improve our lineout success.

    To finish on a positive, Hansen got minutes into him, had a few moments, nice dinky kick to touch, almost regathered one chip kick through the middle, linked up well and tried to get off his wing.

    I thought O’Mahony looked very physical when he came on, I’d start him the next night.

    Also, shout out to Gibson-Park, thought he was very good defensively.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We can't simultaneously have a lack of depth and lose guys like kleyn and frisch to countries with insane depth. Especially Kleyn.

    Or, do we have hyper specifically amazing lock and centre depth? Two of those countries on that list with great depth are also way more willing to capture cap than us. We don't act like a team worried about depth. If we were worried, anyone good enough to play for england, SA, NZ or France would be capped by us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,073 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Interestingly, we have so much depth at lock that we're playing our best one in the back row. Kleyn would be somewhere in the mix with the other four or five guys vying for a place in the wider squad, so I guess he would add depth in the strictest sense of the word.

    Yes, centre is so well stocked that Frisch wouldn't have been anywhere near the squad. We left Henshaw and McCloskey out of the 23 completely and they're twice the players Frisch is.

    If ireland somehow let slip some IQ props or half-backs, come back to me.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So, we play 4/5 locks and that's amazing depth.

    Possibly that's the problem. Most teams thinking about depth would play more than 4/5 guys over a number of years. You'd expect 8/9. How do you get depth without building it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,073 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    We are building depth, we're just not building it with the players you want to be picked.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Then what the hell are you talking about us not having depth?

    We pick more narrowly than countries that supposedly have more depth than us to the point that we DON'T pick players selected by those teams.

    The evidence is we don't pick narrowly because of depth. The evidence is pick narrowly because we want to pick narrowly. That's fine but we don't get to cry poor (depth wise) the minute we lose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,060 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Our lack of depth is a choice by Farrell to have the smallest squads and training camps of any Tier 1 nation, and allowing perfectly good players to declare for other countries.

    Having 'emerging Ireland' nonsense tours instead of blooding players in a full bore international training camp

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,563 ✭✭✭✭phog


    No idea why we're talking about losing IQ players, we left an Irish outhalf with international caps off to France. I think he might well have played in our first win over The All Blacks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,073 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    What I said was "we'll never have the same depth as our main rivals", and that isn't a particularly contentious statement.

    Where things went wrong is that you picked one decent-ish and one bang-average player, in the positions where we have the most depth and a good supply of young players, as evidence that we're not doing enough.

    If you'd said we should have rewarded Murphy's early season form and picked him ahead of Murray, I'd say fine, fair point. If you'd said Frawley is never a test-level 10 and Prendergast should have benched, I'd have wholeheartedly agreed with you. If you'd said Healy is way too old and we should just chuck Boyle (or indeed anyone else in) and see what happens, result be damned, I'd have seen your point. If you'd said Lowe/VDF/Aki won't make the next RWC and should be moved on, I'd also have seen your point, even if I wouldn't have made wholesale changes.

    But you didn't, you just defaulted to Kleyn and Frisch, one of whom is a) 31 and b) no improvement over what we have and the other of whom wouldn't get anywhere near the squad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭redmca2


    I can never understand why we sub Gibson Park in every game .... he was immense in defence tonight, our best player IMO.

    He surely had enough gas to do 80 minutes and Murray isn't going to be a game changer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Thats a ridiculous under estimation of Frisch, its no coincidence that Munsters defence has capitulated again without him, its the third time its happened. Once when he left with emerging Ireland, once when he got injured and now again when he left for France. Outside of that he's now made two French squads in a row, which is an outrageous achievement considering their depth. It also misses that we are stacked at 12 and Frisch spent two years playing 13 for Munster. He was quite clearly the second best 13 in the country for those two years and couldn't even make a training squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    When you have to keep twisting the truth that's a perfect time to step and back and accept you're talking nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,073 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    If Carbery was so badly treated, maybe that’s why Munster sacked Rowntree?



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    i swear to god its the constant arguing from both sides at the same time.

    The deepest depth rugby country in the world can't pick someone we ignored for years as good enough to be in their world cup winning 23, and that guy be 'bang average' and not worth even a training camp spot for us for years.

    How many other players do we have that are 'bang average' that other countries with 'better depth' would pick if they could?

    Pick one. You can't argue we have bad depth and also bang average or decentish irish players are good enough for countries with better depth than us.

    These are completely incompatible concepts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,563 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Yes, make this provincial, I'm reporting it too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    I think the issue with Ireland's bench is simply down to selection. While we may have moved on as a rugby nation in most aspects I still think there's an element where we are stuck in the past in regards to how we assemble our bench, while other nations pick their bench to make impact and change a game it feels like we selection a bench just to steady the ship and close games out i.e play it safe…in some aspects that works but in many, particularly at this level, it just doesnt.

    I guarantee you if you gave France, SA, NZL our squad they would have selected a completely different bench to the one we did…and that's the big issue that needs addressing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Would agree here, Frisch was a great player. Super defence and always looking to offload out of the tackle (sometimes a bit too much but I reckon that was the instruction). He had one slight dip in form one of his seasons but I'd agree, mad he couldn't make a training squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    Every few years the team needs to be freshened up to stop it becoming too stale and predictable - and we look to have reached that point again in the cycle. Not a complete rebuild because we don't and indeed can't do that, but a notable change where four or five of our 23 are moved on and younger or better players are brought in. The worry is that we'll make the mistake we usually make, which is to try to flog every last yard out of a few players that are past it.

    So in terms of the older players it would be thank you and goodbye from me to Henderson, O'Mahony and Murray at a minimum. None of the three play in positions where we don't have replacements in place to go. Thanks for the memories lads but it's time.

    In terms of the not so old players Frawley needs to be returned to his ICE role as well, he has no place in the first 23. Give Prendergast his head now and let him learn on the job this autumn, better to give the minutes to the player who will likely be good enough soon than the one that we know will realistically never be. Also I know we've got a hooker injury crisis at the moment and needs must, but longer term there needs to be a discussion about Kelleher as well. He can't throw the lineout with any consistency and he's made of glass. Hooker is a position of sufficient strength that we can realistically see him being shifted down the order assuming that selection decisions are made based on performances on the field.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,563 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Even with the bench we had, brining players on to try turn the game around with about 10 mins left isn't going to work.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,073 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Report away, but Carbery was a provincially contracted player who was a distant second choice with no meaningful role at that province, then he left. You raised this topic, btw.

    If that was a bad miss, then who else would we look to for answers if not the Munster coach?

    I’m genuinely not sure what the point was here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,563 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Was Farrell picking him for Ireland at the time?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Frisch was never our second best 13 - either Aki or Henshaw were. McCloskey is a better player and he was drifting in and out of squads - perhaps if there had been a bigger injury issue at centre Frisch would have made it but there wasn't.

    Neither our depth at centre or lock was the reason we struggled on Friday. It is clearly in the front row we are struggling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭typhoony


    I still think this is a valid post as I think a good number of players from this list won't be around in 2027



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,073 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    to be very clear here, my OP that so exercised people says

    ”our lack of depth is a major issue “

    And

    “mis-steps from Farrell”

    The issue is that Kleyn and especially Frisch are really bad examples of this.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    MOD: I don't want to see any more policing of when people were last on the forum or whether they are GAA fans etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    I think you're getting a bit het up Ulsteru20s.

    Why is it not ok to not rate a player highly. I also don't think Klines inclusion or exclusion is of any importance to this team. He's about the same standard as Henderson for me and I would be happy enough to say thanks and good luck to Henderson now as well.

    I know many won't agree with that but this is a rugby chat forum, there will never be consensus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Where did we get the notion that France have all the answers anyway?

    They’ve massively underperformed to a far larger extent than we have. They have more depth than any country in world rugby and they’ve won one 6N in the past 14 years ffs.

    People posting “France would have picked different players than us” - so what exactly?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,073 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    if it makes any difference, it was Frisch I was describing as “bang average”, and before people freak out, I mean in the test-level context



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    Completely agree with this post.

    Lots to moan about in terms of older players being moved on but frisch and Kline are not the answers imo to any of the questions we need to ask ourselves.

    For what it's worth, id like to see a changing of the guard.

    Pom, Henderson and Healy should go back and play for provinces and if they are the form players let them come back into contention.

    Murray and Bundi are also getting on a bit but I would argue that their provincial form has merited inclusion at present.

    It's a little unfortunate that Ahern and Baird have had Injuries and haven't hit top gear afterwards but izzi looks like he wouldnt let us down.



Advertisement
Advertisement